View Full Version : 911 planes
lightgiver
29-10-2008, 10:30 PM
Can anyone name the plane?;)
http://img515.imageshack.us/img515/79/31485se1.jpg (http://img515.imageshack.us/my.php?image=31485se1.jpg)
mynameis
29-10-2008, 10:41 PM
Can anyone name the plane?;)
http://img515.imageshack.us/img515/79/31485se1.jpg (http://img515.imageshack.us/my.php?image=31485se1.jpg)
What do you think the FAA does for a living?
keystone
29-10-2008, 11:00 PM
Take your pick.
1. A Boeing 777
2. Banoyes
3. Penelope.
lightgiver
29-10-2008, 11:01 PM
Take your pick.
1. A Boeing 777
2. Banoyes
3. Penelope.
correct:) you could have come in a bit later:D i bet you had to search around;)
can you name the differences.:confused:
keystone
29-10-2008, 11:02 PM
correct:) you could have come in a bit later:DOoops! :o
i bet you had to search around;)Not really I tried to be clever and download the pic to zom in and see if I copuld read the reg number in order to put a real name to it. Too blurry so failed. That's what kept me. :)
lightgiver
29-10-2008, 11:04 PM
Ooops! :o
It was meant to be an observational exercise;)
can you name the differences?
keystone
29-10-2008, 11:06 PM
can you name the differences?:confused:
mynameis
29-10-2008, 11:07 PM
It was meant to be an observational exercise;)
can you name the differences?
Why? Are you a NWO agent or something? :rolleyes:
lightgiver
29-10-2008, 11:12 PM
Why? Are you a NWO agent or something? :rolleyes:
What as that got to do with being some type of agent:confused:i am trying to perceive peoples perceptions of the differences between certain types of boeing aircraft, seeing everyone is an expert:rolleyes:
Suspicious aren't we,maybe its a reflection of who you really are:confused::rolleyes:
keystone
29-10-2008, 11:16 PM
What as that got to do with being some type of agent:confused:i am trying to perceive peoples perceptions of the differences between certain types of boeing aircraft, seeing everyone is an expert:rolleyes:Oh I see - the differences betwen this and a 767 and a 757 yes? Do you really want the obvious physical detail that gives this away as a 777 without any further empirical study? The clue's in the tail end but I won't spoil other peoples fun for now.
lightgiver
29-10-2008, 11:16 PM
:confused:
You know what i mean,between a 757,767,777:D
also keystone does your avatar name come from some type of architecture:confused:;)
keystone
29-10-2008, 11:19 PM
You know what i mean,between a 757,767,777:DSee post 10 above.
also keystone does your avatar name come from some type of architecture:confused:;)Didn't you ask me this yesterday? I'm sure I answeerd but can't remember on which thread. I'll do a search later.
mynameis
29-10-2008, 11:21 PM
What as that got to do with being some type of agent:confused:i am trying to perceive peoples perceptions of the differences between certain types of boeing aircraft, seeing everyone is an expert:rolleyes:
Suspicious aren't we,maybe its a reflection of who you really are:confused::rolleyes:
I don't understand why would you want to perceive people's perceptions of differences, when you have refuted all the :rolleyes: people you claim are experts in the first place on these subjects without good reason?:D :confused:
lightgiver
29-10-2008, 11:22 PM
I don't understand why would you want to perceive people's perceptions of differences, when you have refuted all the :rolleyes: people you claim are experts in the first place on these subjects without good reason?:D :confused:
Twisting things again i see:rolleyes:
lightgiver
29-10-2008, 11:23 PM
See post 10 above.
Didn't you ask me this yesterday? I'm sure I answeerd but can't remember on which thread. I'll do a search later.
\the tail end any other differences?
also your avatar name:confused:
mynameis
29-10-2008, 11:24 PM
Twisting things again i see:rolleyes:
I don't twist, I point out the obvious. I'm blunt that way. It keeps me level.
lightgiver
29-10-2008, 11:30 PM
I don't twist, I point out the obvious. I'm blunt that way. It keeps me level.
Hold on a minute i have just started the thread and one of the 1st things or should i say 2nd thing you state is that i am nwo puppet,for asking people can they tell the difference between aeroplanes,you need to knock that chip of your shoulder mynameis.
17 posts in and the only people that reply are u2,and not very positive comments at that.
keystone
29-10-2008, 11:41 PM
\the tail end any other differences?Its a seriously big sucker for a twin jet compared with the other two The fuselage shape is quite different to a 757. Doors in different places. 6 wheel main u/c (if you could see it). Seriously large diameter turbofans. Did you know that a 777's tailplane has a greater surface area that a 737s wings?
also your avatar name:confused:Cripes it was 2 days ago. See here (http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showpost.php?p=588518&postcount=20) Sorry took a long time to find it.
mynameis
29-10-2008, 11:43 PM
Hold on a minute i have just started the thread and one of the 1st things or should i say 2nd thing you state is that i am nwo puppet,for asking people can they tell the difference between aeroplanes,you need to knock that chip of your shoulder sonny boy.
17 posts in and the only people that reply are u2,and not very positive comments at that.
The whole agent thing was actually a joke, but I guess you can't tell it right off. If I offended you. I still have to laugh though, the government does collect survey information and data, actually, so if you're not an agent, you are being quite nonchalant about it? So. I apologize. Perhaps, this will show banoyes how manners are used?
keystone
29-10-2008, 11:43 PM
and the only people that reply are u2,and not very positive comments at that.If that's what you think then I'll bugger off elsewhere before I reveal just how sad I am concerning aeroplanes.
Oh and BTW I HATE flying in the 777 - particularly the RR Trent powered ones. There's a horrible high pitched whine in thecentre of the aircaft which puts my nerves right on edge.
lightgiver
29-10-2008, 11:53 PM
If that's what you think then I'll bugger off elsewhere before I reveal just how sad I am concerning aeroplanes.
Oh and BTW I HATE flying in the 777 - particularly the RR Trent powered ones. There's a horrible high pitched whine in thecentre of the aircaft which puts my nerves right on edge.
No do not bugger off,this is good info,you appear to know a lot about aircraft,why are you sad about aeroplanes:confused:no offence intended with my positive comments;)
Oh i get it,you are a plane spotter:confused::D
lightgiver
29-10-2008, 11:56 PM
The whole agent thing was actually a joke, but I guess you can't tell it right off. If I offended you. I still have to laugh though, the government does collect survey information and data, actually, so if you're not an agent, you are being quite nonchalant about it? So. I apologize. Perhaps, this will show banoyes how manners are used?
Sometimes with you mynameis one finds it hard to know whether you are joking or being serious,all my thread is directed at is how difficult for a amateur to differentiate from ground level the characteristics of aircraft,unless you know your stuff.
No need to apologize.
mynameis
30-10-2008, 12:00 AM
Sometimes with you mynameis one finds it hard to know whether you are joking or being serious,all my thread is directed at is how difficult for a amateur to differentiate from ground level the characteristics of aircraft,unless you know your stuff.
No need to apologize.
You aren't wrong to think that an amateur might have trouble differentiating the planes, or being told what the plane were by confirmation without looking at the other source materials. I think those witnesses are too far removed from the event to perhaps remember otherwise, but there's always a shot at asking them.
lightgiver
30-10-2008, 12:03 AM
You aren't wrong to think that an amateur might have trouble differentiating the planes, or being told what the plane were by confirmation without looking at the other source materials. I think those witnesses are too far removed from the event to perhaps remember otherwise, but there's always a shot at asking them.
yes,but we have been asking questions for 7 yrs and still no answers from where they should be coming from,i wonder why?
keystone
30-10-2008, 12:19 AM
yes,but we have been asking questions for 7 yrs and still no answers to where they should be coming from,i wonder why?You are right. One small matter I've always wondered about is why the two AA aircraft were declared deregistered in 2002 but it took until 2006 for UA to do the same.
lightgiver
30-10-2008, 12:21 AM
You are right. One small matter I've always wondered about is why the two AA aircraft were declared deregistered in 2002 but it took until 2006 for UA to do the same.
I have not heard of that one?have you any links:)
keystone
30-10-2008, 12:22 AM
I have not heard of that one?have you any links:)Not immediately to hand but I'll have a look.
OK here we go - much as I hate to acknowledge Syzmanski heres (http://www.rense.com/general68/911h.htm) one and another ( http://www.infowars.com/articles/sept11/very_strange_markings_on_911_aircraft_registration s.htm) from Infowars. It seems that my recollection of the dates may have been a little out of kilter but the question remains all the same. Note that Infowars directly quotes the FAA registration page.
lightgiver
30-10-2008, 12:26 AM
Not immediately to hand but I'll have a look.
Found some,1st page of google under de registration of American airlines.
http://www.rense.com/general68/911h.htm
looks interesting.;) cheers for the info.
According to BTS statistics, both 11 and 77 officially never took-off on 9/11. The meticulous data kept on every airliner taking-off at every airport in the country also showed no elapsed run-way time, wheels-off time and taxi-out time, not to mention several other categories left blank on 9/11 concerning the two flights.
Usually a normal procedure after an airliner is destroyed, why it took United more than four years to 'deregister' the airplanes and fill out the official FAA paperwork remains a mystery and never has been fully explained by the FAA, United or the government.
In fact, in stark contrast, a check of FAA records shows the two other American Airline flights, Flight 11 and 77, both were 'deregistered' and classified as 'destroyed' only months after 9/11 on Jan. 14, 2002.
and this just sums it all up.
"What a mess! This crime - the murder of approximately 3000 people, and the excuse for two wars and alarming attacks on civil liberties - and presumably more to come - is supposed to have been properly investigated and documented? Why should we be expected to believe who the hijackers were, when the spin doctors can't even do a credible fabrication job of a list of innocent victims?
helloperator
30-10-2008, 12:39 AM
You're a loose cannon lightgiver
lightgiver
30-10-2008, 12:41 AM
You're a loose cannon lightgiver
Ha ha,i cannot help it,question everything;) hope you are well:)
qasrose
30-10-2008, 04:14 AM
Take your pick.
1. A Boeing 777
2. Banoyes
3. Penelope.
I Select option number 2 please :cool:
lightgiver
30-10-2008, 04:21 AM
I Select option number 2 please :cool:
Now,now don't forget to put me on the list;) Banoyes does have some valid points.