Who gets the most replies to his/her threads

[steevo]

Which member of the forum gets the most replies to his/her threads ?

I would like to know the answer to this question, so if any mods (or Sean) are reading it, could you possibily let me know by posting on here ? Not sure if you have that sort of info though.

The reason that I ask is because I am trying to work out the psychology behind it.

[boots]

Just of the top my head.

I would say steppewar, because his threads are just tabloid crap, and people cant help themselves but buy into it.:mad:

[tinmenace]

Which member of the forum gets the most replies to his/her threads ?

I would like to know the answer to this question, so if any mods (or Sean) are reading it, could you possibily let me know by posting on here ? Not sure if you have that sort of info though.

The reason that I ask is because I am trying to work out the psychology behind it.


All I know is that TinTin's amazing "news behind the news" thread has had over 1 million views! That's absolutely incredible. Well done TinTin!

I think the most posted thread is the photo thread.

Sorry I can't answer your original question... :D

[zero1]

Not me, that's for sure...

[steevo]

All I know is that TinTin's amazing "news behind the news" thread has had over 1 million views! That's absolutely incredible. Well done TinTin!

I think the most posted thread is the photo thread.

Sorry I can't answer your original question... :D







That thread (Tin Tins) should have a catergory of it's own! It's a one of a kind that one is :)

[boots]

Not me, that's for sure...

Just replying to you, so to boost your numbers;):D

[emanuel]

Not me, that's for sure...

That isn't neccessarily a bad thing.

[zero1]

That isn't neccessarily a bad thing.

I suppose not, but it hurts when the one's I'm most enthusiastic about are flops. And my attempted "humourous" one's are nearly always duds. I suck at thread making. :( Then again, a few threads I made out of boredom or curiosity turned out to be relative hits. So, I don't think there is a cohesive psychology to it from what I can see (directed that to Steevo too...). :)

[tinmenace]

I suppose not, but it hurts when the one's I'm most enthusiastic about are flops. And my attempted "humourous" one's are nearly always duds. I suck at thread making. :( Then again, a few threads I made out of boredom or curiosity turned out to be relative hits. So, I don't think there is a cohesive psychology to it from what I can see (directed that to Steevo too...). :)

At least you DO start your own threads. ;) I've had tons of flops. Who cares? :D

[steevo]

Just replying to you, so to boost your numbers;):D

:D I honestly didnt expect so many replies to this thread lol

[boots]

:D I honestly didnt expect so many replies to this thread lol

Ironic isn't:D

[zero1]

At least you DO start your own threads. ;) I've had tons of flops. Who cares? :D





That's the most positive attitude to have, for sure. :)

[limelady]

Which member of the forum gets the most replies to his/her threads ?

I would like to know the answer to this question, so if any mods (or Sean) are reading it, could you possibily let me know by posting on here ? Not sure if you have that sort of info though.

The reason that I ask is because I am trying to work out the psychology behind it.

Sadly, it would seem that threads started by steppewar (like the one where he tells us how proud he is to be sleeping in dirty sheets etc) seem to generate the most attention. :(

I'm all for having some fun and a few lighter threads to lift people's spirits - I have even started a few such threads myself - but I use the word "sadly" in this instance because the fact that members would rather discuss for days on end the merits of 'pissing in a pot' and how often one should change their socks and undies on an attention seeking thread designed to distract, says rather too much about how many people are still NOT prepared to dig deeply into themselves and contribute in more positive/constructive ways to some of the most urgent problems facing humanity at this crucial time in our history.

End of rant. :p

[disorder2k8]

Sadly, it would seem that threads started by steppewar (like the one where he tells us how proud he is to be sleeping in dirty sheets etc) seem to generate the most attention. :(

I'm all for having some fun and a few lighter threads to lift people's spirits - I have even started a few such threads myself - but I use the word "sadly" in this instance because the fact that members would rather discuss for days on end the merits of 'pissing in a pot' and how often one should change their socks and undies on an attention seeking thread designed to distract, says rather too much about how many people are still NOT prepared to dig deeply into themselves and contribute in more positive/constructive ways to some of the most urgent problems facing humanity at this crucial time in our history.

End of rant. :p

Here Here

[anyuser]

Sadly, it would seem that threads started by steppewar (like the one where he tells us how proud he is to be sleeping in dirty sheets etc) seem to generate the most attention.

Yes, and the tintin's post I was going to say before, but most of Tintin's post are himself I think and steppewar seems to be asking for advice.

[drhemp]

Sadly, it would seem that threads started by steppewar (like the one where he tells us how proud he is to be sleeping in dirty sheets etc) seem to generate the most attention. :(

End of rant. :p

LOL - that made me feel ill when I read about his dirty disgusting minging sheets, filthy cooker and piss pot. It still makes me feel wrong just to reading the title of the thread in the main menu, these things ought not to be shared, they really shouldn't. I didn't want to say anything, for risk of being rude, but now the lovely Limelady has mentioned it, I'm glad to know it's not just me. Yuk!

Oddly enough, I've noticed that Baron often generates many replies, even though most people on here seem not to share his views.

[emanuel]

I suppose not, but it hurts when the one's I'm most enthusiastic about are flops. And my attempted "humourous" one's are nearly always duds. I suck at thread making. :( Then again, a few threads I made out of boredom or curiosity turned out to be relative hits. So, I don't think there is a cohesive psychology to it from what I can see (directed that to Steevo too...). :)

The thing is, people respond the most to the threads they a) understand and b) can relate to

If you start a thread about the same old crap that has circulated so many times that are relatively easy to understand then it takes no real effort to engage in that thread. If on the other hand you start a thread that is tricky to grasp or is contravercial then people are more reluctant to get involved because they generally only comment on things if they feel their opinion is strong enough.

[drhemp]

The thing is, people respond the most to the threads they a) understand and b) can relate to


I can't relate to dirty sheets or piss pots.

[steevo]

Sadly, it would seem that threads started by steppewar (like the one where he tells us how proud he is to be sleeping in dirty sheets etc) seem to generate the most attention. :(

I'm all for having some fun and a few lighter threads to lift people's spirits - I have even started a few such threads myself - but I use the word "sadly" in this instance because the fact that members would rather discuss for days on end the merits of 'pissing in a pot' and how often one should change their socks and undies on an attention seeking thread designed to distract, says rather too much about how many people are still NOT prepared to dig deeply into themselves and contribute in more positive/constructive ways to some of the most urgent problems facing humanity at this crucial time in our history.

End of rant. :p

lol Thanks for replying LL :)
I suspected that Steppewar would be right up there, as did a few others on this thread. I would love to see the stats. I realise that there are certain threads that become huge (such as the Maddie McCann thread) but I would like to see if there are particular members who generate the most replies to there threads, and I would like to see if there are any factors that influence it. Not sure if it's possible for you to provide stuff like this though.

[steevo]

Sadly, it would seem that threads started by steppewar (like the one where he tells us how proud he is to be sleeping in dirty sheets etc) seem to generate the most attention. :(

I'm all for having some fun and a few lighter threads to lift people's spirits - I have even started a few such threads myself - but I use the word "sadly" in this instance because the fact that members would rather discuss for days on end the merits of 'pissing in a pot' and how often one should change their socks and undies on an attention seeking thread designed to distract, says rather too much about how many people are still NOT prepared to dig deeply into themselves and contribute in more positive/constructive ways to some of the most urgent problems facing humanity at this crucial time in our history.



It saddens me too :( And I find myself shaking my head alot at the threads for the same reason that you have mentioned LL.

[darketernal]

Sadly, it would seem that threads started by steppewar (like the one where he tells us how proud he is to be sleeping in dirty sheets etc) seem to generate the most attention. :(

I'm all for having some fun and a few lighter threads to lift people's spirits - I have even started a few such threads myself - but I use the word "sadly" in this instance because the fact that members would rather discuss for days on end the merits of 'pissing in a pot' and how often one should change their socks and undies on an attention seeking thread designed to distract, says rather too much about how many people are still NOT prepared to dig deeply into themselves and contribute in more positive/constructive ways to some of the most urgent problems facing humanity at this crucial time in our history.

End of rant. :p

Here Here


Disorder, myself and a few others were actually discussing this very thread abourt dirty sheets over voice chat the day it was started, and how amazing it was that it got past 20 pages in the first day, while many threads on more serious issues die a slow death...

[limelady]

lol Thanks for replying LL :)
I suspected that Steppewar would be right up there, as did a few others on this thread. I would love to see the stats. I realise that there are certain threads that become huge (such as the Maddie McCann thread) but I would like to see if there are particular members who generate the most replies to there threads, and I would like to see if there are any factors that influence it. Not sure if it's possible for you to provide stuff like this though.

Steevo I'm not sure if V-bulletin has a function that can generate those kind of statistics for you or not. If it does, I certainly don't have access to this function.

However, I will bowl this one along to Sean to see if we can get an answer for you. :)

[steevo]

Steevo I'm not sure if V-bulletin has a function that can generate those kind of statistics for you or not. If it does, I certainly don't have access to this function.

However, I will bowl this one along to Sean to see if we can get an answer for you. :)

Cheers luv! :)

[crowd control]

Who cares, there is a global fascist state coming, HELL IS ON IT'S WAY! and what you are concerned about is your threads popularity? Give your ego a break. Post this kinda stuff in the have a laugh section or something, that's what it's there for, too much important info on here for this sorta guff to be getting in the way, sorry if this sounds harsh, but come on!

peace.

[anoninnyc]

my vote would be for fantana.

[hw spartan]

Who cares, there is a global fascist state coming, HELL IS ON IT'S WAY! and what you are concerned about is your threads popularity? Give your ego a break. Post this kinda stuff in the have a laugh section or something, that's what it's there for, too much important info on here for this sorta guff to be getting in the way, sorry if this sounds harsh, but come on!

peace.

Exellent :)

[xpleet]

I find it really sad that most peoples' minds apparently wander around in threads like " I haven't changed my bed sheets for 2 years" when we have deaththreatening and future events all around us.

[crowd control]

I think there is space for lighthearted stuff, we'd be in a terrible place if we couldn't have a laugh and joke with each other on here, a spoonful of sugar help the medicine go down and all that, but there is a space for it. It's got it's very own section.

[tracker]

:D I honestly didnt expect so many replies to this thread lol

it is a good question stevo .

it can tell some one alot about others .
what they like
what threads they avoid
how they write

and more besides .
unique subject stevo , well done .:cool:

[size_of_light]

Threads where everyone can put their own personal spin on a common question or experience do well for obvious reasons, and the Pisspot thread is a good example, because we're all experts on personal hygene (or lack thereof).

More challenging threads are naturally going to attract less responses because there's less relevant information to contribute.

The problem isn't the number of responses, but the number of views.

If a challenging thread isn't continuously bumped by new responses it sinks without a trace, which is a shame because it means less people are exposed to the information.

There's no solution to the problem because even if management took on the massive extra workload of determining and sorting the more important threads from the junk, and made them 'temporary stickies' to get more views, you can imagine the uproar and complaints along the lines of 'how come his thread was stickied and mine wasn't?' etc. etc.

[monkfish]

Well it certainly aint any of mine:D
Havent,as yet,gained enough info to start a thread of any worth,but i'll get there.
I do enjoy reading everyone elses threads though,so keep em coming:)

[cafe beelzebub]

I would love to see the stats. I realise that there are certain threads that become huge (such as the Maddie McCann thread) but I would like to see if there are particular members who generate the most replies to there threads, and I would like to see if there are any factors that influence it.

What the hell for?

[size_of_light]

What the hell for?

To learn, and create more effective conduits to express his views.

[cafe beelzebub]

Who cares, there is a global fascist state coming, HELL IS ON IT'S WAY! and what you are concerned about is your threads popularity? Give your ego a break. Post this kinda stuff in the have a laugh section or something, that's what it's there for, too much important info on here for this sorta guff to be getting in the way, sorry if this sounds harsh, but come on!

peace.

I agree

[steevo]

Who cares, there is a global fascist state coming, HELL IS ON IT'S WAY! and what you are concerned about is your threads popularity? Give your ego a break. Post this kinda stuff in the have a laugh section or something, that's what it's there for, too much important info on here for this sorta guff to be getting in the way, sorry if this sounds harsh, but come on!

peace.

I'm not concerned about my threads popularity.

While the PTB are plotting our downfall, we spend our days and nights discussing the personal hygiene of forum members (and other similar stuff). The mind boggles. I'm interested in the psychology behind THAT.

[clozaril]

i think it's something every one can chip in with (dirtysheets thread)

i think we don't want to come across as ignorant in some threads thats why we stay out plus people don't know about the ins and outs of the fractional reserve system, the leagalities of strawman/non-person and the magna carta back to front or obscure charachters from the 18th or 19th century.

the Z2 thread has generated a lot.

[checkmate]

What difference does it make. I too am amazed at some of the topic discussions with with world going down the tubes.

[father ted]

That isn't neccessarily a bad thing.

I second that!

Just because a thread is popular, doesn't allways mean you're getting good info (it can mean that).;)

[logic bomb]

I would like to know the answer to this question, so if any mods (or Sean) are reading it, could you possibily let me know by posting on here ? Not sure if you have that sort of info though.

I don't think there's an obvious function to hand that displays that type of data Steevo. Not that I know of anyway.

[raptorialis]

Who gets the most replies to his/her threads

Why the need to ask such a question?

Are you thinking of making a pyramid Steevo?

You know.... The most important thinkers and sayers at the top.

And the unimportant, silly arses and trolls at the bottom?

:eek:

http://www.moroney.com.au/SiteMedia/w3svc630/Uploads/Images/People%20Pyramid.gif

[mushroombot]

I'm not concerned about my threads popularity.

While the PTB are plotting our downfall, we spend our days and nights discussing the personal hygiene of forum members (and other similar stuff). The mind boggles. I'm interested in the psychology behind THAT.

My view is that forums are a bit of double edged sword. Since the community spirit has declined over the years due to the television and other technology distractions, the on line forum has become a way for people to scratch their community spirit itch (If that makes sense). The act of participation in forums goes some way towards diffusing any internal rage about the system. I suppose its a bit like going down the pup for a few drinks, sitting there having a rant and then getting back to clowning around. I'm sure that in most cases if people chose to sit around at the pub discussing serious things all the time, they would quickly become unpopular. I'm not saying that forum discussions are pointless in tackling the NWO as ideas do get spread around, but due to the public nature of the internet, its a bit like talking about the battle plan in front of the enemy. IMO real action can only take place when people come together as a community like we used to but we seem to be becoming more divided than ever through various media and government manipulation. Thats just my observation anyway.

[steevo]

Who gets the most replies to his/her threads

Why the need to ask such a question?

Are you thinking of making a pyramid Steevo?

You know.... The most important thinkers and sayers at the top.

And the unimportant, silly arses and trolls at the bottom?

:eek:

http://www.moroney.com.au/SiteMedia/w3svc630/Uploads/Images/People%20Pyramid.gif

No dont worry rap I'm not making a pyramid, I want to destroy the pyramids. I knew that YOU would worry about that because if there was a pyramid you obviously feel that you would belong at the bottom. No pyramids for me thanks.
On the contrary, it's YOU that wants us to follow leaders and therefore have a hierarchy (pyramid). YOU are always telling us in your posts that that truthers can NOT succeed in destroying the Illuminati UNLESS we have leaders.

[john white]

Quality not quantity Steevo that's what I say

(though with both of us over 4000 posts, I'd say we were gunning for both lol)

[raptorialis]

Your own signature Steevo quotes two leaders.

It is in the vacuum of "no leadership" that people perish.

You can see the power of leadership in the lifetime of Adult Hitler

If we face a force that is 1000 times greater in the future,

believe me -

People will need to learn about leadership again.




No dont worry rap I'm not making a pyramid, I want to destroy the pyramids. I knew that YOU would worry about that because if there was a pyramid you obviously feel that you would belong at the bottom. No pyramids for me thanks.
On the contrary, it's YOU that wants us to follow leaders and therefore have a hierarchy (pyramid). YOU are always telling us in your posts that that truthers can NOT succeed in destroying the Illuminati UNLESS we have leaders.

[steevo]

Quality not quantity Steevo that's what I say



But alot of the biggest threads sidetrack us so that we never get anything done. Steppewar's threads and Baron's threads (and some others) in particular. Their threads PROVOKE for the sake of it. It keeps us busy and unable to progress. That's why this forum is in the state it's in now. It's a shame. I dont mind these threads being here but cant they be put at the bottom of the list somewhere so that the people who WANT these particualr threads can go looking for them ? Afterall those threads are NOT really about the stuff that David Icke talks about.

[steevo]

Your own signature Steevo quotes two leaders.

It is in the vacuum of "no leadership" that people perish.

You can see the power of leadership in the lifetime of Adult Hitler

If we face a force that is 1000 times greater in the future,

believe me -

People will need to learn about leadership again.

You tell me that you dont want a pyramid and then you say that we must have leaders ?

Gandhi showed that you can win by simply not co-operating with them. It's about knowing your SELF and your part in the oneness that we all are. I agree with what Gandhi said but I dont follow him (or anyone). The same goes for David Icke. You, Rap, keep blurting out "where is David Icke, he should be leading us" :cool:

[tracker]

Your own signature Steevo quotes two leaders.

It is in the vacuum of "no leadership" that people perish.

You can see the power of leadership in the lifetime of Adult Hitler

If we face a force that is 1000 times greater in the future,

believe me -

People will need to learn about leadership again.


on another thread you called some one a headless chicken for not wanting a leader .
you also say you have hacked the matrix to which all is an illusion .

now you seem to side with the matrix illusion by saying people need leaders .

im confused just a little bit .

are you bipolar ?

im not trolling you , its just that you seem to sway from one extreme to the other , a typical symptom of those cought up in the matrix . the matrix is bipolarity .:cool:

[boots]

You tell me that you dont want a pyramid and then you say that we must have leaders ?

Gandhi showed that you can win by simply not co-operating with them. It's about knowing your SELF and your part in the oneness that we all are. I agree with what Gandhi said but I dont follow him (or anyone). The same goes for David Icke. You, Rap, keep blurting out "where is David Icke, he should be leading us" :cool:

That's a good post steevo.

If David Icke was here on this forum then nothing would have a chance to grow we would all be following what he was expressing we wouldn't be learning anything by ourselves.

You can respect a man and honor him but you don't have to follow him like a disciple.

[ichi wa zen]

That thread (Tin Tins) should have a catergory of it's own! It's a one of a kind that one is :)

Weird world, i find that the most useless fearmongering topic i have ever witnessed on any conspiracy site.

Completely useless. Pure conspiracy gone nuts theories in there.

On topic: All the good insightful informative topics die. All the shit topics are revered and never seem to die.

Great forum lads.

[raptorialis]

yes, i see where you are coming from tracker. My own position does seem to sway between pure consciousness where everything is an illusion and love is the only truth - and a position where the beast on the lower plane must be fought using great leadership.

It is not a duality.

It is where i am experiencing both consciousness and then unconsciousness.

In the conscious mind, everything is an illusion save love. There is no fear, no conflict - only unconditional love.

In the unconscious mind all is war.

You can call it an alternation between the higher and lower mind.

So in one mind, i am totally disinterested and free of all attachments and in the other their is this call for great leadership.

Those i guess are my two answers right now, but perhaps one day there will only be one.
:)



on another thread you called some one a headless chicken for not wanting a leader .
you also say you have hacked the matrix to which all is an illusion .

now you seem to side with the matrix illusion by saying people need leaders .

im confused just a little bit .

are you bipolar ?

im not trolling you , its just that you seem to sway from one extreme to the other , a typical symptom of those cought up in the matrix . the matrix is bipolarity .:cool:

[john white]

But alot of the biggest threads sidetrack us so that we never get anything done. Steppewar's threads and Baron's threads (and some others) in particular. Their threads PROVOKE for the sake of it. It keeps us busy and unable to progress. That's why this forum is in the state it's in now. It's a shame. I dont mind these threads being here but cant they be put at the bottom of the list somewhere so that the people who WANT these particualr threads can go looking for them ? Afterall those threads are NOT really about the stuff that David Icke talks about.

I'd say a significant amount of the forum threads are either completely opposite to Icke's views or display alarming ignorance of them/subvert them

Regrettably, I feel the inability to discuss the newsletters (for non subscribers) does hold us back there, though I dont expect that to change

[raptorialis]

And the 30,000 strong rabble army were cut to pieces by the 5,000 strong roman legion who in perfect formation cut the bloody heart out of the uprising.

That's a good post steevo.

If David Icke was here on this forum then nothing would have a chance to grow we would all be following what he was expressing we wouldn't be learning anything by ourselves.

You can respect a man and honor him but you don't have to follow him like a disciple.

[steevo]

I'd say a significant amount of the forum threads are either completely opposite to Icke's views or display alarming ignorance of them/subvert them

Regrettably, I feel the inability to discuss the newsletters (for non subscribers) does hold us back there, though I dont expect that to change

I thought that you could discuss things that were in the letters (such as cognitive dissonance) but we are not allowed to quote the newsletters ?

[raptorialis]

You, Rap, keep blurting out "where is David Icke, he should be leading us"

I believe those with great knowledge that would seek to influence every man, woman and child on this planet - must be willing to stand up and take responsibility for their actions.

Stand up and take responsibility for your flock David Icke.

It is in your name that we have come here and come here every day.

It is against your name we must face the beast.

Thank you to alerting us of our plight.

Now lead us into battle

[steevo]

I believe those with great knowledge that would seek to influence every man, woman and child on this planet - must be willing to stand up and take responsibility for their actions.

Stand up and take responsibility for your flock David Icke.

It is in your name that we have come here and come here every day.

It is against your name we must face the beast.

Thank you to alerting us of our plight.

Now lead us into battle

Un-believable! :rolleyes:

[raptorialis]

Talk the Talk.

Walk the Walk.


Un-believable! :rolleyes:

[steevo]

Talk the Talk.

Walk the Walk.


Does David Icke have to do what YOU want him to do ?

[strt]

Un-believable! :rolleyes:

During shitty years,

Neredi u Beogradu 90-ih - YouTube

there was rare but distinct kind of people; I saw two or three of them in total; They would pick convenient bench or any other elevated position, stand up and yell 'charge!' to already mad crowd; We all easily recognized them and crowd would not listen - their job was to create blodshed and provoke people to do what they would not do usually.

Other tactic was to stand up and yell 'Where is {whatever leader} to guide!'. This was intent to makes us hate our leaders since we are 'left alone'. Could not work, same as it can not work here.

If you look at the video, you can determine if any NWO sanction can scare me now :D

Back on topic:

I was this close to open 'Madonna divorce' thread just for fun to see how many views/posts there would be :D

[steevo]

During shitty years,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VIduPnHjZXs&feature=related

there was rare but distinct kind of people; I saw two or three of them in total; They would pick convenient bench or any other elevated position, stand up and yell 'charge!' to already mad crowd; We all easily recognized them and crowd would not listen - their job was to create blodshed and provoke people to do what they would not do usually.

Other tactic was to stand up and yell 'Where is {whatever leader} to guide!'. This was intent to makes us hate our leaders since we are 'left alone'. Could not work, same as it can not work here.

If you look at the video, you can determine if any NWO sanction can scare me now :D

Back on topic:

I was this close to open 'Madonna divorce' thread just for fun to see how many views/posts there would be :D

I agree that they do use these tactics.

[raptorialis]

Yes, And your job is to fuel the imagery of the beast, influence and turn minds to your way of thinking and then position to run away.

What kind of crazymaking is that?

Is this a real war - or something you all just made up in your head?

If its real - then, if you care - you need to get real.

Don't live in safety and talk death.


During shitty years,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VIduPnHjZXs&feature=related

there was rare but distinct kind of people; I saw two or three of them in total; They would pick convenient bench or any other elevated position, stand up and yell 'charge!' to already mad crowd; We all easily recognized them and crowd would not listen - their job was to create blodshed and provoke people to do what they would not do usually.

Other tactic was to stand up and yell 'Where is {whatever leader} to guide!'. This was intent to makes us hate our leaders since we are 'left alone'. Could not work, same as it can not work here.

If you look at the video, you can determine if any NWO sanction can scare me now :D

Back on topic:

I was this close to open 'Madonna divorce' thread just for fun to see how many views/posts there would be :D

[emanuel]

That's a good post steevo.

If David Icke was here on this forum then nothing would have a chance to grow we would all be following what he was expressing we wouldn't be learning anything by ourselves.

You can respect a man and honor him but you don't have to follow him like a disciple.


How do you know he isn't? Just because they say so! He may well be, when he has a spare moment. He would of course not use his name so that he does not get swamped. I would be curious of my forum, I would test it out to see how people react, see if they react to me as a 'brand' or purely for the information I present. It would be interesting to see how many people would attack a fresh idea, while not knowing WHO actually posted it!!!

[size_of_light]

How do you know he isn't? Just because they say so! He may well be, when he has a spare moment. He would of course not use his name so that he does not get swamped. I would be curious of my forum, I would test it out to see how people react, see if they react to me as a 'brand' or purely for the information I present. It would be interesting to see how many people would attack a fresh idea, while not knowing WHO actually posted it!!!

Don't blow my cover, dude :eek:

[raptorialis]

I don't know what he is afraid of.

I mean, people do follow him , whatever they say.

He has been a big influence in peoples lives.

The people on this forum are probably his most loyal supporters.

It doesn't make any sense to me.

He should show himself on this forum - if for no other reason than people are also customers of his works.

In business, you always look after your customers.

[emanuel]

I don't know what he is afraid of.

I mean, people do follow him , whatever they say.

He has been a big influence in peoples lives.

The people on this forum are probably his most loyal supporters.

It doesn't make any sense to me.

He should show himself on this forum - if for no other reason than people are also customers of his works.

In business, you always look after your customers.

If this is business then it is no more relevant than politics

[americana]

Which member of the forum gets the most replies to his/her threads ?

I would like to know the answer to this question, so if any mods (or Sean) are reading it, could you possibily let me know by posting on here ? Not sure if you have that sort of info though.

The reason that I ask is because I am trying to work out the psychology behind it.


I respond to you because I associate you in my mind with Cary Grant.

If you were to change your avatar, I would be very disappointed.

I love old movies, and I am a huge fan of Alfred Hitchcock.

Your still from North by Northwest evokes an emotional response in me that is MORE THAN YOU.

You are asking a complex and interesting question.

[raptorialis]

This is the period of non-responsibility of non-accountability.

A man may cause 1 Million deaths in Iraq
A man may cause the disintegration of markets at the toss of a coin
A man may create sciences that could wipe out the whole of China in 8 hours
A man might create an atom bomb that annihilates Japan
A man might influence a generation to rise up against the Illuminati

SO WHY SHOULDN'T THESE PEOPLE STAND UP AND BE COUNTED.

WHERE ARE YOU DAVID?

I HOPE YOUR NOT HIDING WITH THAT USELESS FSA?

If this is business then it is no more relevant than politics

[steevo]

I respond to you because I associate you in my mind with Cary Grant.

If you were to change your avatar, I would be very disappointed.

I love old movies, and I am a huge fan of Alfred Hitchcock.

Your still from North by Northwest evokes an emotional response in me that is MORE THAN YOU.

You are asking a complex and interesting question.

That's a good enough reason as any I suppose :) Dont worry I have no plans of changing my avatar so you can keep replying to me if it tickles your fancy :D