View Full Version : Stoke Common, Burnham Beeches
Any one live near these sites, why are they owned by the City of London?
Seems odd.
titan
17-10-2008, 01:09 PM
Used for satanism allegedly
mike martin
17-10-2008, 01:49 PM
Well I found this, any help to you? Unless you prefer the satanic BS answer.:
13 November 2007
Stoke Common transfers to the City of London
Stoke Common in Buckinghamshire was officially transferred into the ownership and protection of the City of London Corporation on 31 October. The 220 acre site was previously owned and managed by South Bucks District Council.
Stoke Common is a Site of Special Scientific Interest and an important public open space for the local community. The transfer of the land to the City Corporation will ensure the ongoing expert management of the heathland and guarantee long-term financial support for the common. The City of London Corporation is also progressing work with the British Trust for Conservation Volunteers (BTCV) on the creation of a new ‘Friends of Stoke Common’ group.
A public ‘drop in’ event will be held in Fulmer Village Hall on Saturday 15 December, in the afternoon and evening, for local people to express their views and get involved with the future management of the Common. Further details on the event are available from the Burnham Beeches office on 01753 647 358.
The City of London Corporationowns and manages over 10,000 acres of open spaces in and around London, including Burnham Beeches. They are all protected as publicly accessible open space through the ‘City of London (Open Spaces) Act 1878’ which states that the City ‘shall hold and administer the open space in trust to allow the enjoyment by the public as an open space.’ Stoke Common is now dedicated under the provisions of this Act, thus securing the long term future of the common.
Andy Barnard, Superintendent of Burnham Beeches National Nature Reserve, said: “Building on the excellent work carried out by South Bucks District Council, we will ensure that Stoke Common continues to meet the needs of the local people who love and visit the site whilst ensuring that this important Site of Special Scientific Interest is protected.”
Ends
Notes for editors
About the City of London Corporation and its management of green spaces:
The City of London Corporation provides local government services for the financial and commercial heart of Britain, 'The Square Mile.' However its responsibilities extend far beyond the City boundaries; it provides and funds additional facilities for the benefit of the nation. This includes over 10,000 acres of public open space including such internationally renowned places as Burnham Beeches, Epping Forest and Hampstead Heath. Many of the City's Open Spaces are sites of Special Scientific Interest, National Nature Reserves or Special Areas of Conservation (the latter being a European designation that reflects international conservation importance.)
In the 1870's the City Of London was concerned that free access to the open countryside was being threatened by landowners wanting to enclose common land and by encroaching urban development. It therefore embarked on an ambitious programme to protect countryside in and around London. As a result, two Acts of Parliament were passed in 1878: The Epping Forest Act and the Open Spaces Act, which enabled the City to acquire threatened Open Spaces and protect them for the Nation 'in perpetuity'. So revolutionary was the work for the City in this respect that the Open Spaces Act was used by the National Trust as a template for their own Act of 1895. The City of London Corporation and the National Trust remain two of the very few organisations that can provide this 'ultimate' level of protection to the countryside in the UK.
I'm not sure what to believe, I have my doubts that the City of London Corporation would do something so altruistic when it is based on debt slavery.
Satanism, as crazy as it sounds, In the US they have Bohemian Grove where they do some messed up rituals over a weeks secret camp.
Is there an underground comopund there?A complete backup of the City Of London? A frriend of mine was a delivery driver for computer server equipment and visited an MOD address only to find a small unmarked meta door into a concrete shed, which was the access to an underground compound. This was at a different location, but they do exist.
agneau
17-10-2008, 02:35 PM
Oh good grief!
Tell me please, whilst I try and work out why we had to know that not only was your friend a delivery driver, but more accurately a a deliverer of server equipment, what colour is the sun on your planet?
(Mad as a box of frogs....)
Oh good grief!
Tell me please, whilst I try and work out why we had to know that not only was your friend a delivery driver, but more accurately a a deliverer of server equipment, what colour is the sun on your planet?
(Mad as a box of frogs....)
WEll if he was delivering guns/ration packs, it would simply be an arms/food cache, likewise other stores or provisions.
The computer server equipment indicates there was a more active facility in which intellegence or computer based operations were being undertaken.
Would the MOD store new server equipment in underground stores? (looking at public sector budgets they probably do)
Cmon. It is more than likely that somewhere there is an infastructure for maintaining the operations of the City Of London in the event of an emergancy, fire, flood, riot or terrorist bomb.
Even a UPS hub has some pretty impressive emergency continuim facilities, independant power, massive fire proofing, impressive security. What do you think the bank of england has, a pad and pen by the phone to take messages?
banoyes
17-10-2008, 02:59 PM
Well I found this, any help to you? Unless you prefer the satanic BS answer.:
November 2007
Stoke Common transfers to the City of London
Stoke Common in Buckinghamshire was officially transferred into the ownership and protection of the City of London Corporation on 31 October. The 220 acre site was previously owned and managed by South Bucks District Council.
The City of London Corporationowns and manages over 10,000 acres of open spaces in and around London, including Burnham Beeches. They are all protected as publicly accessible open space through the ‘City of London (Open Spaces) Act 1878’ which states that the City ‘shall hold and administer the open space in trust to allow the enjoyment by the public as an open space.’ Stoke Common is now dedicated under the provisions of this Act, thus securing the long term future of the common.
Andy Barnard, Superintendent of Burnham Beeches National Nature Reserve, said: “Building on the excellent work carried out by South Bucks District Council, we will ensure that Stoke Common continues to meet the needs of the local people who love and visit the site whilst ensuring that this important Site of Special Scientific Interest is protected.”
Ends
Notes for editors
About the City of London Corporation and its management of green spaces:
The City of London Corporation provides local government services for the financial and commercial heart of Britain, 'The Square Mile.' However its responsibilities extend far beyond the City boundaries; it provides and funds additional facilities for the benefit of the nation. This includes over 10,000 acres of public open space including such internationally renowned places as Burnham Beeches, Epping Forest and Hampstead Heath. Many of the City's Open Spaces are sites of Special Scientific Interest, National Nature Reserves or Special Areas of Conservation (the latter being a European designation that reflects international conservation importance.)
In the 1870's the City Of London was concerned that free access to the open countryside was being threatened by landowners wanting to enclose common land and by encroaching urban development.
It therefore embarked on an ambitious programme to protect countryside in and around London. As a result, two Acts of Parliament were passed in 1878: The Epping Forest Act and the Open Spaces Act, which enabled the City to acquire threatened Open Spaces and protect them for the Nation 'in perpetuity'. So revolutionary was the work for the City in this respect that the Open Spaces Act was used by the National Trust as a template for their own Act of 1895.
The City of London Corporation and the National Trust remain two of the very few organisations that can provide this 'ultimate' level of protection to the countryside in the UK.
I find it excedingly odd that a Corporation involed with world finance has control over all this public land.
Makes me wonder how these "mandates" were acquired.
and why a money Corporation has such intrest
Seems to me that the stewardship of public land should be in a public institution
agneau
17-10-2008, 03:07 PM
Cmon. It is more than likely that somewhere there is an infastructure for maintaining the operations of the City Of London in the event of an emergancy, fire, flood, riot or terrorist bomb.
Even a UPS hub has some pretty impressive emergency continuim facilities, independant power, massive fire proofing, impressive security. What do you think the bank of england has, a pad and pen by the phone to take messages?
Agreed. That sounds like a sensible assumption.
Sorry, thought you were suggesting underground reptilian or satanism nonsense.
Agreed. That sounds like a sensible assumption.
Sorry, thought you were suggesting underground reptilian or satanism nonsense.
LOL, Surely reptilians would struggle underground being cold blooded.....Why am I even trying to use reason on this....
mike martin
17-10-2008, 03:15 PM
LOL, Surely reptilians would struggle underground being cold blooded.....Why am I even trying to use reason on this....
Nice one, made me laff out loud.
Mike
eastbeast
17-10-2008, 04:39 PM
LOL, Surely reptilians would struggle underground being cold blooded....
Ah they have heating.
barney_rubble
17-10-2008, 07:16 PM
LOL, Surely reptilians would struggle underground being cold blooded.....Why am I even trying to use reason on this....
Ah they have heating.
Or to reptilians wear sweaters (sorry jumpers)?
eastbeast
18-10-2008, 10:06 AM
Or to reptilians wear sweaters (sorry jumpers)?
I don't think they would, Barney, and for this reason. Reptiles shed their skin in order to grow, so to shed this skin they would need to undress, then they would get too cold to shed, and die.
I'm still going with my heating theory, but to be energy concious I think they have those infra red heaters that only heat body mass and not the air.
I don't think they would, Barney, and for this reason. Reptiles shed their skin in order to grow, so to shed this skin they would need to undress, then they would get too cold to shed, and die.
I'm still going with my heating theory, but to be energy concious I think they have those infra red heaters that only heat body mass and not the air.
Yep. Even the evil overloads of space and time are carbon concious.
keystone
18-10-2008, 11:52 AM
Yep. Even the evil overloads of space and time are carbon concious.Assuming , of course, that they are not a silicone based lifeform.
eastbeast
18-10-2008, 12:18 PM
Assuming , of course, that they are not a silicone based lifeform.
So if they were silicon based, could I use them to seal around my bath?
Dude! Sweet!
They would be self squeezing! Think of the work that would save, and self-delivering. No more trips to the DIY store to buy Dow Corning.
They would smell of Acetic acid if they were silicon based wouldn't they?
keystone
18-10-2008, 03:28 PM
So if they were silicon based, could I use them to seal around my bath?
Dude! Sweet!
They would be self squeezing! Think of the work that would save, and self-delivering. No more trips to the DIY store to buy Dow Corning.
They would smell of Acetic acid if they were silicon based wouldn't they?Yes I meant silicon not silicone. Point kinda lost now huh?
banoyes
18-10-2008, 04:09 PM
Typical Freemason disruption Look at the thread
look at who is doing it
just pitiful
seems clear -their purpose
mynameis
18-10-2008, 04:45 PM
Typical Freemason disruption Look at the thread
look at who is doing it
just pitiful
seems clear -their purpose
Then why are you so jocular about posting here? I'm sure posting about how they are disrupting the thread isn't really going to solve the problem and to me your intercessions sound like a whining overused siren.
keystone
18-10-2008, 05:01 PM
Typical Freemason disruption Look at the thread
look at who is doing it
just pitiful
seems clear -their purpose
and what is YOUR purpose unless (I like this) it's "sounding like a whining overused siren".
Assuming , of course, that they are not a silicone based lifeform.
I just thought they were worried about the environment. That or they are too tight to pay the carbon tax.
keystone
18-10-2008, 05:46 PM
I just thought they were worried about the environment. That or they are too tight to pay the carbon tax.:D
daniel1987
24-10-2008, 07:30 PM
I live in a small village called Stoke Poges, in Buckinghamshire, which is where Stoke Common is. Burnham Beeches is also very close to me, and I used to go there often in my childhood. I have tried to research this myself. Apparently, Burnham Beeches is "notorious" for Satanic rituals. I found a comment on the Internet by someone who made reference to such rituals taking place there. She said something along the lines of, "Go to Burnham Beeches at night, and you'll see what goes on there." I e-mailed her to try to get more information, but she never replied. Look at the City of London's arms: it has two dragons on it, so it comes back to the idea of the reptilian connection.
http://www.civicheraldry.co.uk/london_city.JPG
daniel1987
24-10-2008, 07:33 PM
I live in a small village called Stoke Poges, in Buckinghamshire, which is where Stoke Common is. Burnham Beeches is also very close to me, and I used to go there often in my childhood. I have tried to research this myself. Apparently, Burnham Beeches is "notorious" for Satanic rituals. I found a comment on the Internet by someone who made reference to such rituals taking place there. She said something along the lines of, "Go to Burnham Beeches at night, and you'll see what goes on there." I e-mailed her to try to get more information, but she never replied. Look at the City of London's arms: it has two dragons on it, so it comes back to the idea of the reptilian connection.
http://www.civicheraldry.co.uk/london_city.JPG
barney_rubble
24-10-2008, 08:27 PM
I live in a small village called Stoke Poges, in Buckinghamshire, which is where Stoke Common is. Burnham Beeches is also very close to me, and I used to go there often in my childhood. I have tried to research this myself. Apparently, Burnham Beeches is "notorious" for Satanic rituals. I found a comment on the Internet by someone who made reference to such rituals taking place there. She said something along the lines of, "Go to Burnham Beeches at night, and you'll see what goes on there." I e-mailed her to try to get more information, but she never replied. Look at the City of London's arms: it has two dragons on it, so it comes back to the idea of the reptilian connection.
http://www.civicheraldry.co.uk/london_city.JPG
[my emphasis above]
Oh come on.
Crest and Coats of Arms have be arround for centuries and the symbols are on there to represent a trait or ideal of the family, town or organization that the crest/coat of arms is for. Pictures were used so to get the meaning accross quickly to both the literate in illiterate alike.
A simple search on coat of arms symbolism (or Heraldry) will tell you that:
Dragons represent "Valiant defender of treasure; valour and protection".
Using your logic all Canadians would not be reptilian but would be Feline(lion) or Unicornian based life forms.
http://www.heraldry.ca/images/canada_arms1994.gif
eastbeast
30-10-2008, 11:33 AM
Typical Freemason disruption Look at the thread
look at who is doing it
just pitiful
seems clear -their purpose
What have Cetations got to do with thread disruption?
We only use Goats in our ceremonies anyway. This is for obvious reasons, sweeping up a bit of fur is easier than mopping the floor and getting in a pump after the Porpoise or Dolphin has got over excited.
agneau
30-10-2008, 11:58 AM
Using your logic all Canadians would not be reptilian but would be Feline(lion) or Unicornian based life forms.
Maybe I was wrong about Canadians, then.
But now I'm very worried about the Welsh....
eastbeast
30-10-2008, 03:43 PM
Maybe I was wrong about Canadians, then.
But now I'm very worried about the Welsh....
Why worry about them? they are quite happy with the sha........Oh you mean the Welsh Dragon thing.......
I'm going to look at Heraldry in a whole new light from now on.......
elirien
30-10-2008, 04:31 PM
[my emphasis above]
Oh come on.
Crest and Coats of Arms have be arround for centuries and the symbols are on there to represent a trait or ideal of the family, town or organization that the crest/coat of arms is for. Pictures were used so to get the meaning accross quickly to both the literate in illiterate alike.
A simple search on coat of arms symbolism (or Heraldry) will tell you that:
Dragons represent "Valiant defender of treasure; valour and protection".
Using your logic all Canadians would not be reptilian but would be Feline(lion) or Unicornian based life forms.
http://www.heraldry.ca/images/canada_arms1994.gif
I am not sure on the reptilian connection but I would get pissed on this 'idol' if I were your average Joe christian or anyone else except DND players who have an affinity with dragons or a black metal vocalist who just loves to see reverse crosses.
I couldn't care less what it symbolizes. It looks brutal just on its own without all the imperial connotation. But then I do hate the idea of Monarchy. I think I'm not seeing eye to eye with your average "god save the queen" brit :)
How do you guys feel having a fantasy animal and a reverse cross on probably one of the largest corporations symbols?