PDA

View Full Version : From another Icke site...


truthsupplier
14-05-2007, 11:16 PM
http://f1.grp.yahoofs.com/v1/0M1IRklK-fBHtquraikNw3vYC288HS5sFnmdWvqeGgWfHJWbOjrFp9zwVO8 sJqAgRnCEzBPBDP7vDxi1yMfiR5CAAfkagdRXk0Y/%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%2 0%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20% 20%20%20%20%20%20Dealing%20with%20TROLLS

Totalitarians use misfits to disrupt free speech on the internet. Vladimir Lenin coined term "useful idiots" to describe those westerners who would assist in building the totalitarian agenda. The New World Order trains their "useful idiots" well. Personal attacks are their general technique. Watch what happens after this is posted. Useful idiots never get respect. They just get used. --Selwyn Duke With a small amount of checking, we often find that these government shills are convicted criminals, who mysteriously received incredibly large reductions in prison time. These government shills might even be sex offenders, who were not required to register for the National Sex Offenders list. This procedure will destroy the totalitarian's most effective method of disrupting free speech on the internet. Please pass this around. Permission to add this to web pages is granted.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FreedomOfSpeechNow/message/25 What is a Troll?

An Internet "troll" is a person who delights in sowing discord on the Internet. He tries to start arguments, and upsets people. Trolls see internet communications as convenient venues for their bizarre game. They are actually afflicted with a form a sadism; in that, they take joy in hurting people. A sadist gets sexual pleasure from causing pain. The troll is engaging in "cyber sex" for the sadist. Many trolls are bigots. Bigotry is a good cover for sadism. Trolls feel no sorrow whatsoever for the pain they inflict. Indeed, the greater the suffering they cause; the greater their joy. For the moment, the relative anonymity of the net allows trolls to flourish. Trolls are utterly impervious to criticism (constructive or otherwise). Arguing with a troll is like playing Russian roulette with a dead man. The troll's usual reaction to a response will be amazingly similar to the adolescent phrase: "I know you are, but what am I?" He will simply say "Whatever he says about me applies to him". This is like a little child who says: "I am rubber and you are glue. Whatever you say bounces off me, and sticks to you." When the trolls become very desperate for attention, they will resort to insulting the normal member; by name, AND IN THE SUBJECT LINE, OF THE MESSAGE. If there is a troll on this list, I ask him to now reveal himself by replying to this message by calling me a troll. Trolls are quite predictable. Within a few hours of the first time, that that this message was posted , one of the internet's most active trolls posted a message, with my name in the subject line, saying that I am the ultimate troll. After this message was first posted, many people asked if there was a web page; which gave a list of known trolls.

If you want the trolls to identify themselves, just post this message, and see who takes offence, and pops in to comment. It is safe to conclude that if one were to throw a rock into a pen full of pigs, and one of them squealed, that the one that squealed, would be the one that you had hit.

You cannot negotiate with trolls.
You cannot cause trolls to feel shame or compassion.
You cannot reason with trolls.
Trolls cannot be made to feel remorse.

You can say: "Why don't you take your silly bickering to the chat room, and stop filling up everyone's mail box with drivel?"

BUT THEY NEVER WILL.

The reason that the trolls refuse to take their silly bickering to the chat room is that then everyone would see how few people are interested in what they have to say, by the fact that NO ONE would go with them to the chat room. NO ONE, BUT THE TROLLS, WOULD BE THERE! ALSO; then they would not be filling up everyone's mail box, with drivel; which is their real goal. Trolls do not feel they are bound by the rules of courtesy or social responsibility. Perhaps this sounds inconceivable. You may think, "Surely there is something I can write that will change them." But a true troll can not be changed by mere words. The only way to deal with trolls is to limit your reaction to reminding others not to respond to trolls.

When you try to reason with a troll, he wins.
When you insult a troll, he wins.
When you scream at a troll, he wins.
The only thing that trolls cannot handle is being ignored.
Taking out the trash. There is a scenario; which repeats itself continuously on the internet egroups. A group; which was originally formed for a specific purpose, loses it moderator, and is taken over by trolls. The trolls bully the normal members, and drive many of them out, with insults and personal attacks. You could put the troll into your "blocked sender" list, but then you would not know what he is saying about you. If the normal members leave then they have turned the list OVER to the trolls. There is a simple solution: The list decides on one "Designated Driver for the garbage truck". The "garbage truck" is for hauling away the trash, from list trolls. All but ONE member, of the list, puts the troll into their "blocked sender" list. The "Designated Driver" for the garbage truck reads the troll's garbage, and notifies the list, or notifies any individual members PRIVATELY, of anything that might interest them. Then the rest of the list can operate at peace. No one is worried about what the troll in writing about them, AFTER they put him into the blocked sender list.. No one EVER responds to the troll's message. If you think that someone might have read the troll's insults and slander, then just make a general post, that does not mention the troll, but addresses his slander. This should NEVER be posted as a reply. Replying TO THE TROLL will cause those who have put him into their blocked sender list, to have to see his message. OF COURSE, the list trolls can create new ID's, that are not blocked, as long as they like, but that is fine. It only takes one click, with the mouse, to put the new ID in "blocked sender" also. The troll will get ONE POST PER ID. IF YOU REPORT THE TROLL, eventually he will lose each of those ID's. Trolls are a way of destroying freedom of speech. Read up on the invasive tactics for Information Warfare on the Internet visit:

http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~alb/misc/infowarDistraction.html

excerpt: Information techniques Distraction with irrelevant posts. What better example than the recent porn posts? Discussion is lost in the noise. (In this case, the posts may make the group "appealing" to a new audience, so a small silver lining is that new people can be informed about mind control.) Distraction by voluminous postings with no information by blowhards and empty name-callers. (Can be hard to distinguish from genuine blowhards.) People who wallow in the mud do not need to outdebate you; they only need to drag you down there with them. Kill files can help if your newsreader has them. Planting of provocateurs (and sleeper agents, etc.). These people will vary from the posters who suddenly show up one day under an alias attacking regular posters, to people who seem like regular posters themselves. They may work in teams, supporting each other and giving the illusion of popular support on the net. (Remember, net IDs are basically free, and one person can have many.) As cointelpro showed, there is little that is more poisonous to an organization than to have it tear itself apart from the inside with accusations of moles. (The CIA knows all about this from its own mole hunts.) Moles love to accuse others of being moles; then again, there are real moles. You have to judge for yourself who to listen to or what to believe. The reader will notice that no one is named in this discussion. If there is any person; who feels that this discussion accurately describes themselves, that person is invited to comment.

truthsupplier
14-05-2007, 11:21 PM
Thanks for the education, trading of important sites and the audience for my posting... it has been appreciated. To those who read and didn`t comment, I did not mean to warrant dismissal through being ignored and buried within the social calendar of the longtime "locals".

In my defense, I did try.

truthsupplier
14-05-2007, 11:32 PM
http://f1.grp.yahoofs.com/v1/0M1IRhgHG5lHtqurO3JNLEzRy_NqFcZAg9B6LhXfByFRrJ0Ckd h2v0vSSwrsREWoTkYfN0_x5ToIvCJaDCLMXSS0qMNKXj3rjSw/%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20Disinformer %27s%20Gambit%20
http://f1.grp.yahoofs.com/v1/0M1IRhgHG5lHtqurO3JNLEzRy_NqFcZAg9B6LhXfByFRrJ0Ckd h2v0vSSwrsREWoTkYfN0_x5ToIvCJaDCLMXSS0qMNKXj3rjSw/%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20Disinformer %27s%20Gambit%20

Tactics of Disinformers A short time ago I posted some information on The Tactics of Disinformers. I was amazed to see how quickly the disinformers came out of the wood work to identify themselves. One disinformer actually created a fraudulent ID, specifically to impersonate me, as a response to this message. The use of this deceptive tactic shows everyone EXACTLY WHO the disinformer is. This fraudulent ID was created as a response to my explanation of The Tactics of Disinformers. This response was actually an excellent demonstration of one of the tactics; that was explained: THE GOLDEN RULE OF DISINFORMERS: Always accuse your adversary of whatever is true about yourself. Sometimes, if you simply post information on Disinformers; without naming anyone, the Disinformers will identify themselves, by taking offense, and popping in, to comment. Occasionally, even though you do not mention anyone's name, they will claim that what you have written is about them. Nothing could be more precise, in identifying exactly WHO are the disinformers, than the disinformers own reaction to this post. It is safe to conclude that if one were to throw a rock into a pen full of pigs, and one of them squealed, that the one that squealed, would be the one that you had hit. TRY POSTING THIS, ALL AROUND, and then watch what happens. See who it is that claims, that this "shoe fits". It is a good dog, who comes when he is called. Here is the message that makes the pigs squeal: The Disinformer's Gambit The Tactics of Disinformers In the game of chess there exists a term; which describes a maneuver, a stratagem, and a ploy; using different pieces working together, to accomplish a secret purpose. This is called a gambit. Those who hope to build totalitarian control over freedom loving people, also use many gambits. BUT, the chess player has the advantage of always knowing which pieces are on the other side. Those who would defend liberty have no such luxury. The most treacherous player in the gambit is the false patriot. The false patriot will present himself as a defender of liberty, BUT he will spend most of his time attacking the defenders of liberty, under numerous pretenses. The false patriot will attempt to re-direct attention in every direction EXCEPT at those, who are building tyranny. The false patriot will attempt to re-direct attention to an entire race, a religion, a large group with a few problems, or even against patriots. This is essentially the very old military strategy of the creation a "decoy to draw enemy fire." The ultimate success of this deception is to cause defenders of liberty to "fire" on non-combatants, or even to "fire" on their own friends, and allies. In addition, the false patriot will neutralize the efforts of the defenders of liberty. The false patriot, like every other player in the gambit, will neutralize the efforts of the defenders of liberty by: 1. Deceiving the defenders of liberty into supporting hoaxes. 2. Dividing the defenders of liberty into fighting each other by creating strife among patriots. 3. Deceiving the defenders of liberty into creating class struggle by promoting ethnic hatred. 4. Attempting to waste the time of patriots, by forcing them to respond to personal attacks, or endless debate about trivia. 5. Using multiple aliases to create the appearance that there is someone, who believes them to be credible. 6. ABOVE ALL: Accusing the most effective patriots of being false opposition. THE GOLDEN RULE OF DISINFORMERS: Always accuse your adversary of whatever is true about yourself. It is VERY simple. Those who spend their time fighting tyranny, are patriots. Those who spend their time fighting patriots are working for the advancement of tyranny. The false patriot will generally proclaim himself to be a religious zealot, but he will not adher to the principles of his proclaimed religion, in his own actions. He might even; incomprehensibly, be an ally of another player in the gambit; who is an admitted atheist, or a socialist. The false patriot; and those whom he deceives into promoting hoaxes, will reduce the credibility of all patriots. Those who have heard outlandishly ridiculous "conspiracy theories" will have a tendency to dismiss all "conspiracy theories" without serious examination. The admitted atheist, or socialist will supply the most fervent, and obvious, opposition to the defenders of liberty. This player, in the gambit, will make a strong frontal attack on everything that the defenders of liberty do. The admitted atheist, or socialist will implement the same goals; that are listed above. The admitted atheist, or socialist will play on the existence of outlandishly ridiculous "conspiracy theories" to encourage people to dismiss all "conspiracy theories" without serious examination. The admitted atheist, or socialist will infest patriotic, and religious, groups for no apparent reason. The main reasons are to disrupt, to get the group deleted, or to waste the time of patriots. Even though DISINFORMERS make it a practice of accusing the most effective patriots of being false opposition, you will notice that there are certain admitted government apologists, who are never accused. This is because certain admitted government apologists are also players in the gambit. The admitted government apologist will attempt to portray the defenders of liberty as subversives, as unreliable, and as outlandishly mentally unstable. The admitted government apologist will play on the existence of outlandishly ridiculous "conspiracy theories" to encourage people to dismiss all "conspiracy theories" without serious examination. The admitted government apologist will use documents from the FBI, or other government sources, as his authority. Another player in the gambit, is the pretended neutral. The pretended neutral will take almost none of the above actions, but will work in the background, until a vital move is needed. The pretended neutral will occasionally "vouch" for the other players in the gambit. The pretended neutral may even be the moderator of a group. When the pretended neutral is the moderator of a group, he will take no action, as long as the other players in the gambit are "holding their own". If the other players in the gambit are NOT "holding their own", THEN he will intervene; perhaps even by banning the most effective defenders of liberty. The most effective defenders of liberty will be caught between all of these different players in the gambit. One dead "give away" is the fact that these different players in the gambit frequently are unable to conceal their support for one another; in spite of their alleged differences. The alleged religious zealot/patriot might be great friends with the admitted atheist/socialist. The false patriot; who is always accusing the most effective patriots of being false opposition, might be great friends with the admitted government apologist; whom he never accuses. The false patriot will even join the egroup that is run by the admitted government apologist, and will participate and support the admitted government apologist, in his own group. If you will study the tactics used by the FBI COINTELPRO program. THEN you will recognize FBI COINTELPRO immediately. Visit: http://bcn.boulder.co.us/environment/vail/ifanagentknocks.html Take note of the following paragraph: "The FBI COINTELPRO program was initiated in 1956. Its purpose, as described later by FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, was "to expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, or otherwise neutralize activities" of those individuals and organizations whose ideas or goals he opposed. Tactics included: falsely labeling individuals as informants; infiltrating groups with persons instructed to disrupt the group; sending anonymous or forged letters designed to promote strife between groups; initiating politically motivated IRS investigations; carrying out burglaries of offices and unlawful wiretaps; and disseminating to other government agencies and to the media unlawfully obtained derogatory information on individuals and groups." If you understand the meaning of the tactic "to expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, or otherwise neutralize activities" you will understand that the person who is most likely of being a Fed, is the one who involves patriots in activities that have no effect on those who are building tyranny, and activities that will destroy the credibility of the patriots. Those who are building tyranny would love to convince people that we are all a bunch of paranoid nuts, so that we will we unable to warn people about the building of tyranny. Those who are building tyranny would be more capable of convincing people that we are paranoid nuts, if they could convince a segment of the patriots to run around telling people that the clouds, and the street signs, are out to get us, or that we should ban water. If you understand the meaning of the tactic "infiltrating groups with persons instructed to disrupt the group; sending anonymous or forged letters designed to promote strife between groups" OR OF: "disseminating to other government agencies and to the media unlawfully obtained derogatory information on individuals and groups." THEN you will know that a campaign of personal attacks on the real patriots is a part of the FBI COINTELPRO program. If you understand the meaning of the tactic of falsely labeling individuals as informants THEN you will know that the person; who is most likely to be a fed, is the one who calls the real patriot a fed. It is a common tactic of FBI COINTELPRO to try to be THE FIRST ONE MAKE THE ACCUSATION. THE GOLDEN RULE OF DISINFORMERS: Always accuse your adversary of whatever is true about yourself.

Anders Lindman
15-05-2007, 12:04 AM
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FreedomOfSpeechNow/message/25 What is a Troll?

When you try to reason with a troll, he wins.


I don't think so. And are trolls always male? :D

anoninnyc
15-05-2007, 12:23 AM
yes, the best defense is to just ignore the trolls. there was one very cruel and evil troll that is still on this website, i just don't respond to his posts now and it does not upset me.

and anders, no i don't think trolls are always males. i would imagine it would be pretty evenly split.