View Full Version : CBS Prez warned about fake plane crashes in 2000
killtown
23-09-2008, 08:51 PM
More evidence supporting that TV fakery was used on 9/11:
CBS Is Divided Over the Use Of False Images In Broadcasts
Published: January 13, 2000
New York Times
[Andrew Heyward, the president of CBS News,] said that he understood the argument against the use of the technology -- which is widely employed in sports and some entertainment shows -- on news programs. The danger is "that it looks too real and therefore it's wrong or potentially wrong," he said. "I certainly agree it's potentially subject to abuse."
He noted that advances in computer-generated techniques had made things like missiles hitting Baghdad and airplanes crashing look so real that it was incumbent on networks to underscore that these were not real images.
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9A0DE7DF153AF930A25752C0A9669C8B 63
http://killtown.blogspot.com/2008/09/cbs-prez-warned-about-fake-plane.html
Be sure to also read:
- Media warned of TV fakery BEFORE 9/11 (http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=35534)
- Why They Didn't Use Planes To Hit The WTC (http://killtown.blogspot.com/2007/05/why-they-didnt-use-planes-to-hit-wtc.html)
More evidence supporting that TV fakery was used on 9/11
More? More??
You haven't provided ANY yet.
P.S. How many sites is it this month alone that have told you to go blow your fascist takeover control fantasy?
I count three so far that I know about.
But then we are only talking about this month.
Bit slow on getting the message, ain'tcha, champs?
Definitely interesting, and something I want to look into further.
killtown
24-09-2008, 03:26 AM
What's the odds that TV fakery is "disinfo," but the media warned us about it prior to 9/11? That would make an incredible coincidence.
ryans53
24-09-2008, 03:53 AM
Thanks for your work on TV Fakery Killtown; it's much appreciated.
Quick question: David Icke has said that part of the "globalist agenda" is to eventually break America, presumably to create a more centralized world government. From what you know of TV Fakery, would you say that the sorts of errors we see in the footage were likely "mistakes"? In other words, would the sort of expertise required to make the ghost plane crashes look as real and convincing as they did be likely to have made the kinds of errors you and others have found? Would it have been hard to have inserted images of plane parts bouncing off the building for example to protect against people like you and Ace exposing the footage as fake? Or are these errors relatively minor ones that could easily have been corrected at the time?
jalexander
24-09-2008, 07:05 AM
More? More??
You haven't provided ANY yet.
What would you consider to be evidence of TV Fakery then? Since a quote from the president of CBS News from 2000 isn't enough to even make you question your beliefs.
bryan
24-09-2008, 01:20 PM
More? More??
You haven't provided ANY yet.
Ace Baker provided conclusive proof on this very forum only three days ago. After reading his research only a serial coincidence theorist could believe the planes were real.
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=36557
P.S. How many sites is it this month alone that have told you to go blow your fascist takeover control fantasy?
Sounds more like it's the sites who are fascist.
mynameis
24-09-2008, 02:19 PM
Ace Baker provided conclusive proof on this very forum only three days ago. After reading his research only a serial coincidence theorist could believe the planes were real.
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=36557
Sounds more like it's the sites who are fascist.
Or it could be that Ace Baker much less aware than we thought...This isn't about serial coincidence it's about reality. Truth will set you free, right? This photograph which is snapped in reality along with every other witness is not serial coincidence it is reality.
http://davidicke.com/forum/showpost.php?p=521897&postcount=26
bendoon
24-09-2008, 02:24 PM
Thanks for your work on TV Fakery Killtown; it's much appreciated.
Quick question: David Icke has said that part of the "globalist agenda" is to eventually break America, presumably to create a more centralized world government. ?
Yes the agenda is to blame everything on those evil "capitalists" so that we will gladly embrace a Communist New World Order.
Only trouble is that most people don't realise that those "evil capitalists" aren't capitalists at all, but Marxists trying their best to smash Capitalism.
Understanding this basic idea is key to understanding the world.
Oh, and on the subject here is a CGI video of someone who is dead, most people who knew the guy would not know the video was fake.
Bob Monkhouse (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7lHBZmXP-o8)
What would you consider to be evidence of TV Fakery then? Since a quote from the president of CBS News from 2000 isn't enough to even make you question your beliefs.
Some evidence that stood up to critical examination would be nice, wouldn't it?
Rather than that which only appeals to the bewildered, the non-technical and the paranoid.
That'd be a good start.
Sounds more like it's the sites who are fascist.
Er, no.
You seem unaware of the Killtown's ongoing (if futile) agenda which is to eliminate or silence all opposition to make the world safe for his carefully cultivated brood of no planers, TV fakerists and general fantasists.
bryan
24-09-2008, 08:39 PM
Er, no.
You seem unaware of the Killtown's ongoing (if futile) agenda which is to eliminate or silence all opposition to make the world safe for his carefully cultivated brood of no planers, TV fakerists and general fantasists.
I'm aware of the (futile) attempts to allow only part of the truth to be told.
I'm aware of the (futile) attempts to allow only part of the truth to be told.
Back in the real world however, the Killtown Klan don't have any problems whatsoever 'telling their truth'.
Their problems come with trying to make their 'truth' (chuckle) withstand anything other than awed adoration.
Hence ze continuous attempts to make it proof against any criticism, by ze fascist means of silencing ze critics. Sieg Heil!
Which I'm sure you'll agree makes it no kind of truth at all.
jalexander
24-09-2008, 09:56 PM
Some evidence that stood up to critical examination would be nice, wouldn't it?
Rather than that which only appeals to the bewildered, the non-technical and the paranoid.
That'd be a good start.
Critical examination? By who?
I'm sure the CBS News president made those statements to appeal to the bewildered, the non-technical and the paranoid.
Way to answer a question without really answering it.
Critical examination? By who?
That'd be by those with the wherewithal to examine evidence rather than merely accept assertions.
I'm sure the CBS News president made those statements to appeal to the bewildered, the non-technical and the paranoid.
Have you actually read what Da Prez actually did say?
As opposed to what the Killtown wants you to infer?
Way to answer a question without really answering it.
On the other hand, way to consider an answer without understanding it or its implications.
jalexander
25-09-2008, 04:03 AM
That'd be by those with the wherewithal to examine evidence rather than merely accept assertions.
And those people would be who exactly? I have a feeling that whoever did, should they come to the conclusion that TV Fakery is correct you would just play this card again no matter who examined the evidence. :rolleyes:
acebaker
25-09-2008, 04:19 AM
For anyone following Killtown's research, please note that there are a number of false claims being promoted by him and others such as Fred BS Registration, PollenB, Webfairy, Ewing2001 (nico).
1. They claim there is a missing building in the Ghostplane footage. There isn't.
2. They claim 9/11 videos were animated in layers, that there are moving bridges and moving skylines. There aren't.
3. They claim various similar (but different) shots are actually the same, then point out contradictions.
Killtown has absolutely made a very persuasive and correct argument for why they did not and would not use real planes. Killtown has also steadfastly continued to promote this false material, and associate it together.
In my opinion, based on the evidence, and based on my experience with him, Killtown is intentionally associating the correct evidence for no planes with false evidence, for the sole purpose of confusing and discrediting the case in general.
-Ace Baker
mynameis
25-09-2008, 05:09 AM
In my opinion, based on the evidence, and based on my experience with him, Killtown is intentionally associating the correct evidence for no planes with false evidence, for the sole purpose of confusing and discrediting the case in general.
-Ace Baker
I think that the group in general has failed to associate itself with honesty and detracts from further 911 investigations. Falsehoods and misguidance are more rampant due to the lax of critical thinking and analysis skills that came with true education of liberal arts programs of the past. Moreover, those with lax of education are stuck using a square peg with the monotony of endlessly trying to insert it into a round hole.
And those people would be who exactly? I have a feeling that whoever did, should they come to the conclusion that TV Fakery is correct you would just play this card again no matter who examined the evidence. :rolleyes:
This, as the Pythons once said, is not an argument; it's just contradiction.
But maybe it's the best you've got.
bryan
28-09-2008, 12:07 AM
2. They claim 9/11 videos were animated in layers, that there are moving bridges and moving skylines. There aren't.
I must admit, when I first saw 'WTC on a Platter' I thought it was a smoking gun. But then I sat down with a map of New York, roughtly worked out the angles using the ratio of the sides of the buildings, and came to the conclusion it was an optical illusion. I wouldn't put that kind of stuff down to disinfo. I think maybe a few questionable videos were put out in the excitement of realizing TV footage was faked and wanting to spread the word.
On the other hand, I think now there's good, solid evidence, people should drop their differences and get behind that evidence. I haven't been following the bust-up between you guys, so I'm aware that this may be a naive suggestion.