PDA

View Full Version : If this is "accepted rhetoric"...


truthsupplier
11-05-2007, 03:41 PM
http://www.dagnyscloset.com/content/view/409/33/

Dagny's Closet - We're in it Together - Leaked video of US troops in Iraq

I just want to share this here for people to be able to see what is happening right now in their world. I am personally absolutely tired of seeing the destructive force of the war in Iraq and the United States oligarchy / NWO in general. I hope that things get better soon, if these U.S. soldiers are acting like this, I don't see things getting any better in the near future. Real Christian ehtics exibited, huh? And you wonder where the sentiment "Why do they want us to leave" is a misstatement. This guy was not alone here...

truthsupplier
12-05-2007, 01:14 AM
No, this isn`t new, but I`ll bet you didn`t hear of it... Anyone else watch the TV show Jerico? Where do you think those nukes came from? Yep, desensitize and keep the smoke and mirrors in place... in this case (as with many others) ignorance of the populace is bliss. The show was manufactured after the theft... funny huh?

================================================== ===
Los Alamos Missing Plutonium for 150 Nuclear Bombs

http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/consumerawareness/a/missingpluto.htm

From Robert Longley,

Your Guide to U.S. Gov Info / Resources.

Watchdog groups claim 765 kilograms unaccounted for
Dateline: August 16, 2004

The beleaguered Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) is unable to
account for 765 kilograms of plutonium -- enough to make 150 nuclear
weapons -- according to a letter from nuclear watchdog groups to LANL
Director G. Peter Nanos.

According to the letter, "The Department of Energy (DOE) reported a
discharge to waste from LANL of 610 kilograms of plutonium; Los
Alamos indicates a figure of 1,375 kilograms . . . a discrepancy of
765 kilograms, the equivalent of 150 nuclear weapons. This is
unacceptable by any imaginable standards and constitutes a crucial
safety, environmental, and security issue."

The letter was sent by the Institute for Energy and Environmental
Research (IEER), Nuclear Watch of New Mexico and Concerned Citizens
for Nuclear Safety. Copies were simultaneously delivered to DOE
Secretary Spencer Abraham, New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson and
key members of the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives. Calling
the accounting discrepancy "huge," it continues, "If the LANL number
is anywhere close to correct, then there may be very serious
implications regarding the lack of due care in minimizing losses of
an extremely expensive, proliferation-sensitive, and dangerous
material. On the other hand, if the 1,375 kilograms that is now
booked as waste is not, in fact, in the waste, the security
implications are obvious."

Plutonium is both a core ingredient for modern nuclear weapons and a cancer-causing contaminant for humans.

The LANL plutonium accounting discrepancy was first noted in a 1996
DOE memorandum, which the letter signers posted on the internet. An
agency working group set up to address the issue at that time never
issued a report. "To the best of our knowledge, LANL has yet to
explain the large plutonium accounting discrepancy or address its
security implications," the signers stated.

"It is completely unacceptable for a discrepancy of 150 bombs worth
of plutonium to remain on the books eight years after it was first
discovered," the letter to Nanos concluded. "Since you have already
stood down LANL on other security and safety issues, we request that
you seize this moment and immediately appoint an independent task
force to investigate this issue until it is resolved."

All operations at Los Alamos were suspended on July 17 due to missing
computer data and a series of worker injuries.

(Yeah I posted this last year, just had not found this forum at that time)