Hidden Subliminals in Barbara Bush clip!

[thoth]

IN the movie Illuminati 2, Barbara Bush talks in a short interview about midway of the film. A friend of mine showed me if you slow it down and rewind it, you can see a 'man' fizzing in like static almost and what looks like another being superimposed over her. I was blown away! It is there for sure, and I suggest that some of you guys check into this. I couldn't slow it down myself, and it seems as if the google video of the movie was harder to show it than it was on youtube. This is a monumental find.

[midwich cuckoo]

Yes I noticed this too, but I thought it may have been a flaw in the copy I was watching on Google video. I paused it to get a good look but didn't recognise who it was.

[11kushna11]

Any chance of a screenshot chaps?

[thoth]

Any chance of a screenshot chaps?

I can't do it. My computer know how is nil. But my friend slowed it down for me. It is DEFINITELY a subliminal of somekind.

[midwich cuckoo]

You can see it for yourself in this clip here - Mind Contolled in the New World Order (http://youtube.com/watch?v=KF6Ee08TXaQ)

Pause it at 3:08

[fantana]

It could just be a bit of tape still on where they have tried to cut it as close to her talking as possible but that bit remained

If that doesnt make sense imagine you have 24 Frames

She is talking in Frame 23, but they cut it at Frame 22.


I dont know if that is what happened, but it is another suggestion to mind control antics. Like when you suggest to a woman, my place or the back of my car?

[thirdwave]

could this not be an editing fault, i cant see what it would be there for...

[11kushna11]

yep just seen it... I'm thinking it's just sloppy editing to be honest. I don't see another 'being' superimposed over Barbara (other than the fact that she looks like an alien anyway) I think it might just be the combination of the two pictures creating a gestalt effect. Pretty odd that it's in there, does anyone recognise the man?

[thoth]

Really? I am open, but it seems to me that this ain't no editing mistake. Its like a fuzz or something that came over her body while this 'person' and another 'thing' is superimposed over her body only, not the rest of the screen. Check it out again.

[thoth]

It happens again in the interview, at 2:53. And it almost sounds like she is saying something there when played backwards. It may just be me, but it sounds like she says,"Cut em by the throats!" Not to be an asshole, but are these mistakes also?

[thoth]

By the way, do you guys think that the company that produced this interview are not capable of using equipment and resources that are not faulty? If they have all of this funding, why not use top notch equipment? Why have any 'faults'? This seems way too sloppy to be a mistake. Its there because its supposed to be for some reason. There is definitely a being on her right side. See if you can pause it there. It is definitely not human!

[lenejento]

Yes, I see it clearly! :eek: It's a human man with dark hair, I had it on full screen, let it play past 3:08 (didn't see anything) then luckily youtube stops at exacly 3:08 if I pull it back, and there he is.

There is also some scribbeling at 2:53 but no man.

Would be cool if someone could recognise who he is.

I have no idea about filming and if this could be a sloppy mistake. Strange though that it appears at the very start of the two clips, and in the third on she just has a nasty expression on her face at the beginning.

It could just be a bit of tape still on where they have tried to cut it as close to her talking as possible but that bit remained

If that doesnt make sense imagine you have 24 Frames

She is talking in Frame 23, but they cut it at Frame 22.

Guess this could explain it, but very sloppy of them.

[yinjing]

why do I not have permission to make attachments??
Is that only for premier subscribers?
I did make a screen cap though, and it's clearly a man superimposed on bbush he even seem to have his arms in the same position. Maybe we can be lucky and find the original footage and see if there's anything there too.

[avatar]

why do I not have permission to make attachments??
Is that only for premier subscribers?
I did make a screen cap though,

Just host your capture and post it as a [img]

[avatar]

Looks like cross interference from another channel to me. If you look you can see its a newsreader and the horizontal lines from the other station.

[yinjing]

ok try this:

http://img105.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=15145_bbush_122_614lo.JPG

[avatar]

ok try this:

http://img105.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=15145_bbush_122_614lo.JPG

http://img105.imagevenue.com/aAfkjfp01fo1i-16978/loc614/15145_bbush_122_614lo.JPG

[thoth]

Looks like cross interference from another channel to me. If you look you can see its a newsreader and the horizontal lines from the other station.

But why and how? If this was a major network with great government funding, how can they make a cheesy mistake like this?

[thoth]

http://img105.imagevenue.com/aAfkjfp01fo1i-14571/loc614/15145_bbush_122_614lo.JPG

What the fuck is the thing towards the right of her head? And why does this happen only when she is using a mantra? Looks like a face, with a nose and eyes. It looks eerily like a tall grey.

[avatar]

But why and how? If this was a major network with great government funding, how can they make a cheesy mistake like this?

Its obviously not raw feed from the station but someone who as recorded it from the TV. Don't you ever get signal interference?

What happened to the image I posted? Its still hosted but this forum has locked it out.. mods?

[thoth]

Its obviously not raw feed from the station but someone who as recorded it from the TV. Don't you ever get signal interference?

What happened to the image I posted? Its still hosted but this forum has locked it out.. mods?

Okay, my wierd shitto-meter just went off. Where the hell are those pics, I just posted one myself?

[thoth]

http://img105.imagevenue.com/aAfkjfp01fo1i-19994/loc614/15145_bbush_122_614lo.JPG

lets see how long it lasts.

[thoth]

Don't you ever get signal interference?



No. Not since cable was invented. I have yet to have interference like this. Further it leaves me wondering because you only see it when you play it backwards. If its interference, why can't I see it when it plays forward? You don't even really notice it while shes talking and the clip is playing. Once again, if its interference, why can't the multi-billion dollar company get better equipment? Why tape over an old clip? Why the 'interference' at all? Notice that the 'interference' is only over her body! What kind of interference is that?

[tinmenace]

http://www.globalfailure.com/images/bush.jpg

[avatar]

Cable is not common outside US, Canada and Australia, most of the world uses wireless digital and satellite now. All of these are subject to cross-signals. I have cable and local power surges have that effect.

[tinmenace]

All the images from that video clip are VERY disturbing, in my opinion.

http://www.globalfailure.com/images/barbbushuglyashell.jpg

http://www.globalfailure.com/images/clintdope.jpg

http://www.globalfailure.com/images/whatarethoseeyes.jpg

http://www.globalfailure.com/images/sq.jpg

http://www.globalfailure.com/images/end.jpg




All of them, except for the last one perhaps, have uneven eyes. One eye is looking up and the other down.

[thoth]

Cable is not common outside US, Canada and Australia, most of the world uses wireless digital and satellite now. All of these are subject to cross-signals. I have cable and local power surges have that effect.

I am not sure if I have EVER seen anything like this before. But hey, who am I.

[tickles]

They remind me off that movie The Manchurian Candidate. The latest one.
Definitely controlled people there.

[yinjing]

what's wrong with bill clinton? He might be controlled, but he has something else to him. He look so drained. In a sleep depraved or drugged sort of way.

[domtak]

I've seen the Illuminati 2 film and the original film the clips of Barbara Bush come from (can't remember the name now - but it was about live satellite feeds).

The subliminal isn't in the original source footage and so has been added by the makers of the Illuminati 2 documentary.

Illuminati 2 is pure Hollywood in it's over the top drama and 'glitchy' editing techniques - so don't be surprised to see shit like that in there - it's been deliberately added to cause a bit of viral promotion and a kerfuffle.

Stick to the path!

;)

D

[truthcommission]

http://i4.tinypic.com/4lxdiqx.jpg

If you use your magic eye you can make out the head of a 'person' overlaying BB and 'his' tie is also clearly seen at 2:53.

Notice also the interference only seems to effect the area directly surrounding BB and not the entire screen.

All I can suggest is either a glitch in BB (big brother) technology or crack in the matrix revealing a 4th dimensional entity controlling BB?

The interview would have been prerecorded so there is little chance of satellite or cable interference of this nature.

[tinmenace]

They remind me off that movie The Manchurian Candidate. The latest one.
Definitely controlled people there.

Do you know that when the remake of that came out, with Denzel Washington and Meryl Streep (and other good actors too), Hillary supposedly was outraged because she thought that Meryl Streep had modeled the Eleanor Shaw character after her.

That's being a little bit sensitive if you ask me....

I think that hit a bit of a nerve with her because it's TRUE! She is Bill's controller, and she's every bit as corrupt, ambitious and evil as the character in the movie.


http://www.globalfailure.com/images/streep.jpg

http://www.globalfailure.com/images/senator-clinton2.jpg

[thoth]

I've seen the Illuminati 2 film and the original film the clips of Barbara Bush come from (can't remember the name now - but it was about live satellite feeds).

The subliminal isn't in the original source footage and so has been added by the makers of the Illuminati 2 documentary.

Illuminati 2 is pure Hollywood in it's over the top drama and 'glitchy' editing techniques - so don't be surprised to see shit like that in there - it's been deliberately added to cause a bit of viral promotion and a kerfuffle.

Stick to the path!

;)

D


I don't know if I would say all that, but there is a chance that the makers of Illuminati 2 put it there. This was one of my original thoughts about it when I first saw it. Why, I am not sure. But are we sure it isn't in the actual footage? I am not so sure.

[adramelech]

G-Man?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G-Man_(Half-Life)

:D

[tinmenace]

http://i4.tinypic.com/4lxdiqx.jpg

If you use your magic eye you can make out the head of a 'person' overlaying BB and 'his' tie is also clearly seen at 2:53.

Notice also the interference only seems to effect the area directly surrounding BB and not the entire screen.

All I can suggest is either a glitch in BB (big brother) technology or crack in the matrix revealing a 4th dimensional entity controlling BB?

The interview would have been prerecorded so there is little chance of satellite or cable interference of this nature.

It's very strange, and in this shot, he's just staring straight ahead. No expression at all....It may be just a superimposed glitch, a technical thing, but who is this guy?

http://www.globalfailure.com/images/bush.jpg

Does anyone recognize him? For a minute I thought he might look a little like Shepard Smith from Fox News.

http://www.globalfailure.com/images/shephard.jpg

[thoth]

I don't know who it is. I want to know more about why its there also.

[truthcommission]

I don't know who it is. I want to know more about why its there also.Years ago I used to perform television magick to see into the images created by the media. It was a form of ritual and divination that could also be used to pierce the veil of 3D reality and see what was behind appearances.

You can quite easily tweak your reality like you tune a TV to reveal the hidden layers of reality. Deep inside the TV Eye are hidden symbols, subliminal messages and meta themes that come from the collective unconscious. These meta themes are constantly revealing themselves to us either consciously or unconsciously through TV shows and movies.

http://i3.tinypic.com/4r8mhoi.gif

[tinmenace]

Hey TC, Long time no see... :)

[graflok]

It looks like both of the "shape-shift" frames are at the beginning
of a cut. I think they're just artifacts from something that was
recorded earlier on the same media. Like they recorded over
something and the first frame of the old recording was still there.

But, it's a creepy video anyway.:eek:

graflok

[tinmenace]

The video is very creepy. The eye thing bothers me a lot. Didn't David talk about things being stuck into the sides of mind controlled slaves' eyes? (Rockefellers, I think he mentioned specifically)

It just seems strange that their pupils are not level. Do you see it?

[graflok]

http://img183.imageshack.us/img183/7523/bbushls6.jpg

I didn't read that about sticking things into their eyes. Do you know where that is?

She does have that wide-eyed stare that is common with DID types (multiple personality)?


graflok

[tickles]

Tinmenace, In the Manchurian candidate i thought she also looked a lot like or was modeled after Hillary Clinton. No wonder Hillary Clinton freaked. It cut too close to home for her. ;)

[adramelech]

The video is very creepy. The eye thing bothers me a lot. Didn't David talk about things being stuck into the sides of mind controlled slaves' eyes? (Rockefellers, I think he mentioned specifically)

It just seems strange that their pupils are not level. Do you see it?

Man, I wish I could somehow retrieve the massive "left eye" thread from the old forum.

http://www.davidcogswell.com/HeadBlast/BushFace.html

"Looking at both sides of George W. Bush's face is scary.

There is a fascinating theory that says the human face, like the brain, is bi-polar. One side of your face, the theory goes, shows the side of your personality that you present to the world, the social construction. The other side reveals more about your inner, hidden, private self.

This has nothing to do with what psychiatrists now like to call "bipolar disorder," which is pretty much the same as what they used to call manic depressive psychosis. This is a different idea entirely which grows out of the fact that the brain is made up of two separate cerebral hemispheres connected by a band of fibers of nerve tissue called the corpus callosum.

In the early 20th Century doctors found they could stop epileptic seizures by cutting the connection between the hemispheres. The subjects could continue remarkably well with the main connection between the two hemispheres cut, but there were some strange side effects.

In one experiment a person with his cord cut was given a spatial mechanical problem to solve and was told to only use his right hand. The left hand, which represented the right brain, was more spatially intelligent. Experiments have tended to show that in general the right side of the brain (corresponding to the left side of the body) is the more creative, dreamier, side. The left brain (right body) is the more rational side, more adept at linear thinking.

In the experiment, the left hand actually kept trying to take the puzzle from the right hand and solve the problem. The subject could not stop the left hand from interfering until finally he sat on it.

From many varying experiments on the brain, the left brain-right brain theories were formulated. I saw a study once that described how one could analyze faces from the bipolar standpoint and get some interesting results.

If you look at Bush's face in this context, it is immediately striking how different the two sides look. If you block off one side or the other from your vision and only look at one half of the face, you see a very different face on one side from what is on the other.

On the right side of the picture above -- the socially constructed, outwardly directed side, we see the famous Bush smirk. It is a little chimp-like, a little mischievous. It's cocky and defiant, but more or less friendly about it.

On the left side of the face, the side that represents the unconscious, the deeper levels of the personality, the hidden, private side, there is no smirk. If you block off the left side of the picture and look only at the left side of his face, there is no trace of a smile. There is no warmth, none of the familiar, friendly fratboy we have come to know.

Instead on the left side of the face, you see a cold stare. A deep hollow stare that looks right through you. The end of the mouth turns down sharply, in stark contrast to the right side, on which his mouth turns up a bit.

In Mark Crispin Miller's Bush Dyslexicon he says he discovered through a study of Bush's habits of language that under the surface of the funny, backslapping, gladhanding, nicknaming, cheerleading guy, somewhat goofy and not particularly cerebral, there is another much darker, more determined, cagier, personality lurking. It is the right side of the face where you can see a flicker of the soul of Nixon."

http://www.davidcogswell.com/HeadBlast/BushFaceSplit.jpg

;)

[freespark]

All the images from that video clip are VERY disturbing, in my opinion.

http://www.globalfailure.com/images/barbbushuglyashell.jpg

http://www.globalfailure.com/images/clintdope.jpg

http://www.globalfailure.com/images/whatarethoseeyes.jpg

http://www.globalfailure.com/images/sq.jpg

http://www.globalfailure.com/images/end.jpg

All of them, except for the last one perhaps, have uneven eyes. One eye is looking up and the other down.

OMFG. It looks like these people are all 'dead' inside. The hollow eyes and blank faces say it all. Hows Bill and BB? Flippin' hell she looks like a zombie and Bill looks like he forgot to turn his brain on when he got out of bed that morning.

And the twat in the middle...are those eyes for real??

Mindfucked slaves the lot of them. Pawns just like the rest of us.

[freespark]

Years ago I used to perform television magick to see into the images created by the media. It was a form of ritual and divination that could also be used to pierce the veil of 3D reality and see what was behind appearances.

You can quite easily tweak your reality like you tune a TV to reveal the hidden layers of reality. Deep inside the TV Eye are hidden symbols, subliminal messages and meta themes that come from the collective unconscious. These meta themes are constantly revealing themselves to us either consciously or unconsciously through TV shows and movies.

http://i3.tinypic.com/4r8mhoi.gif

Hi tc...

I was very intrested in your comments...can you tell us more please?

;)

[11kushna11]

And the twat in the middle...are those eyes for real??

Can't be. He doesn't look even remotely human. His eyes look like those of 'Data' from Star Trek TNG. Fucked up shit.

All of these jokers look messed up... BUT I'm sure some of us would probably look like mind-controlled slaves if we were represented photographically at certain times of day or in certain ways. Try taking a picture of me on a Saturday night and just see if I don't look sub-human as well. Plus my left side can look different from my right side at times and in certain photos it's obvious... either I'm as mind-controlled as the rest of them or I just don't always photograph symetrically.

But I do agree that this band of freaks aren't right at all...

[tinmenace]

I didn't read that about sticking things into their eyes. Do you know where that is?

She does have that wide-eyed stare that is common with DID types (multiple personality)?


graflok


I believe it's in The Biggest Secret (http://www.davidickebooks.co.uk/index.php?act=viewProd&productId=12). I think Cathy O'Brien talks about it also, but I think that David mentions a Rothschild and his drooping eye because of 'rods' (or something) being forced into the socket, pushing they eye to the side, for the insertion of microchips behind the eyeball. Something like that, it's been a while since I've read the book, so please forgive the vague answer.

Anyway, it just struck a chord with me when I noticed how uneven these people's pupils were.




Yeah, Barbara is a scary looking person. There's a rumor that she's the illegitimate daughter of Aleister Crowley. I think it was supposed to be a joke, but some people think there's more to it, considering the strange circumstances around her mother's death....etc

[tinmenace]

Tinmenace, In the Manchurian candidate i thought she also looked a lot like or was modeled after Hillary Clinton. No wonder Hillary Clinton freaked. It cut too close to home for her. ;)

Absolutely!;)

[adramelech]

http://www.globalfailure.com/images/whatarethoseeyes.jpg
And the twat in the middle...are those eyes for real??


http://stargods.org/ClintonDarthMaul.jpg

:D

http://img502.imageshack.us/img502/9459/busheyes2xc3.jpg

http://www.davidgergen.com/resources/newdgphoto.jpg

http://img224.imageshack.us/img224/5144/badmanbl4.jpg

http://img502.imageshack.us/img502/4134/reptoid200md5.jpg

http://img502.imageshack.us/img502/7826/bushfingerja4.jpg

[thoth]

Rumsfeld gotta glass eye or something? Looks kind of lizard like. Who is that with the 'reptilian' eyes?

[chicken_little]

Man this is some freaky stuff, though I have to say I'm highly skeptical. I have a feeling that the male in that BB clip was put on there by someone editing the video.

But crazy eyes...yikes! The picture of Bill Clinton almost makes it look like he was "turned off" at the time while they put on his makeup.

I like that Hillary was upset by the Manchurian Candidate movie. :D I saw that movie before I started learning about the history of mind control uses, so in hindsight I can see how it might give her a scare. She should have been happy though too since Meryl Streep is much more pleasing to the eyes!

[graflok]

I posted this pic on another thread but it seems to apply with the recent chat here:

http://www.alexwaterhousehayward.com/blog/uploaded_images/William%20F%20Buckley-764597.jpg

This is William F. Buckley, Jr.

He's a former CIA agent, founder of a political magazine, and was a news
commentator in the 60's.

He is, according to former iluminati members, secretly the head of the Janus
Mind Control center based in Brussels.

He's as spooky as they come. :eek:


graflok

[tinmenace]

I posted this pic on another thread but it seems to apply with the recent chat here:

http://www.alexwaterhousehayward.com/blog/uploaded_images/William%20F%20Buckley-764597.jpg

This is William F. Buckley, Jr.

He's a former CIA agent, founder of a political magazine, and was a news
commentator in the 60's.

He is, according to former iluminati members, secretly the head of the Janus
Mind Control center based in Brussels.

He's as spooky as they come. :eek:


graflok




Yeah, like we say in South Africa, "something not lekker with this guy". I found more...

http://www.globalfailure.com/images/buck.jpg

http://www.globalfailure.com/images/buck2.jpg

http://www.globalfailure.com/images/buck3.JPG

[truthcommission]

I was very intrested in your comments...can you tell us more please?
I am going to put something together with a lot more detail so I will PM when it is complete.

* Graflok et Tinmenace all those people pictured are half breeds.

[tinmenace]

Halfbreed mutts! Ooops, sorry, I didn't mean to offend the mutts!

Hey TC, you've been on my mind. Sending good vibes your way :)

[graflok]

Buckley was a frequent guest on TV talk shows in the 60s-70s.
His haughty arrogance is beyond belief.
I couldn't stand him and wondered why anyone
would want put him on television (now I know,
of course).

graflok

[domtak]

I don't know if I would say all that, but there is a chance that the makers of Illuminati 2 put it there. This was one of my original thoughts about it when I first saw it. Why, I am not sure. But are we sure it isn't in the actual footage? I am not so sure.

Yes I'm pretty sure. The original footage doesn't have that glitch.

[truthcommission]

Yes I'm pretty sure. The original footage doesn't have that glitch.
Which would lead me into thinking that it was deliberately put in there.

Lets not beat around the bush. These creeps are capable of far worse.

Maybe I am at the stage where I see potential corruption and conspiracies everywhere but when you come to a MASSIVE realization as to who they are and what their plans are for the world you begin to become suspicious of everything they say and do.

[avatar]

Well I'm glad we can put this BS theory to bed now..

The man is just a white house spokesman

http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-7344181953466797353&q=Spin

FFWD to about the 9m30sec mark

[avatar]

Man, I wish I could somehow retrieve the massive "left eye" thread from the old forum

Yeah that was a good one. Start a new one, I know I've got some material.

[mk72]

I believe it's in The Biggest Secret (http://www.davidickebooks.co.uk/index.php?act=viewProd&productId=12). I think Cathy O'Brien talks about it also, but I think that David mentions a Rothschild and his drooping eye because of 'rods' (or something) being forced into the socket, pushing they eye to the side, for the insertion of microchips behind the eyeball. Something like that, it's been a while since I've read the book, so please forgive the vague answer.

Anyway, it just struck a chord with me when I noticed how uneven these people's pupils were.




Yeah, Barbara is a scary looking person. There's a rumor that she's the illegitimate daughter of Aleister Crowley. I think it was supposed to be a joke, but some people think there's more to it, considering the strange circumstances around her mother's death....etc

I think it is more than a rumour and there might be truth in it. Look at these websites: If anything you'll be entertained.
http://thefreemanperspective.blogspot.com/ - at the botom of the page
hhttp://forum.truthout.org/blog/comments/2006/8/11/20128/7981/2ttp://www.illuminati-news.com/barbara-bush-and-crowley.htm

[outlaworder]

this interview with bb was on the news
the man figure is the news reader fading out and thats why it looks freaky its just a fadeout from the news clip to her clip talking but its a good illusion

[tinmenace]

I think it is more than a rumour and there might be truth in it. Look at these websites: If anything you'll be entertained.
http://thefreemanperspective.blogspot.com/ - at the botom of the page
hhttp://forum.truthout.org/blog/comments/2006/8/11/20128/7981/2ttp://www.illuminati-news.com/barbara-bush-and-crowley.htm

Whoa! Thanks for that link. You know, at this point nothing really surprises me anymore...so if it's true, it would explain a lot. GWB's granddaddy on the one side was a Nazi supporter, and on the other side a dark magician. No wonder he's such a sick twisted freak! He was bred to be the monster that he is.

[pluto]

To be precise: BB sits in a boot/studio and does numerous takes that are transmitted via satellites.
No mind control, just the boring task to bring the same message again and again for the various satellite feeds.
( I agree she's one unhealthy, unbalanced, toxic soul puppy though)
The guy below is not a newsreader.
He's responsible for the connection with the satellites.
He's sitting in BB's chair to test them.

http://i148.photobucket.com/albums/s37/Boogiefish/Spin.jpg

Case closed.

The man reciting the Bhagavad Gita is Robert Oppenheimer.
He invented the bomb and called it Trinity.
"I become death, the destroyer of worlds"

[tinmenace]

Good job!