Should the headlines page contain....

[bicycle]

'more' positive news?

[ho1ogram]

It contains whatever people post on it. If you find something you feel is positive, go for it. I reckon there must be breakthroughs, or rediscoveries of ancient knowledge, in the science world about the nature of reality that are inspiring. I haven't looked but if I find something I'll post it.

[bicycle]

It contains whatever people post on it. If you find something you feel is positive, go for it. I reckon there must be breakthroughs, or rediscoveries of ancient knowledge, in the science world about the nature of reality that are inspiring. I haven't looked but if I find something I'll post it.

I'm not on about this site, i'm on about Icke's latest headlines page, go check for yourself its very difficult to find anything positive!

[melbo]

I voted yes because it can get very depressing at times, especially if you're new to all this.

[ho1ogram]

Yep I've found it depressing. It's not always accurate either. There was a story last week Wed 2nd about the video TRON being confiscated by the NSA or some agency... the story was a hoax. The headlines are mainly about Big Brother and NWO, and having lots of links to access in one spot is pretty cool. It can be depressing or it can inspire one to do something about this crap.

[lumukanda]

i think having those negative headlines is kind par for the course, we can't expose the illuminati by not seeing what they're doing.
i agree it can be quite depressing, but that should be what spurs us on to do something about it, you just got to see it in the right light, if you allow it to depress you, it will, if you see it as valuable insights into something we're trying to stop, it becomes, by proxy positive.
it's all about perspective.

[narcolepticwatchman]

I see this and other sites like it as an alternative news source. The news is what it is, positive or negative it should be reported the same way. I don't think that whoever puts it together should purposley trawl for positive stories just for the sake of it.

If there was more positive news, would that mean there would be more news in general? By this i mean, would there be more items posted everyday that we would have to sift through or, alternatively, would some negative news be dropped to make way? if its the latter then its practically what is happening now on mainstream media.....paint a rosy picture, possible censorship to make people feel better about the world?

And finally.....:D

IMO people need to realise the real story of what is going on rather than the movie version spoon fed before bed every night. Keep it as it is.

[edelweiss pirate]

I don't even read the Icke main site anymore for that reason....

He also needs to hire more writers for his articles as it's all Rense and BBC links...

It's not great journalism I'm afraid...

I'd write some stuff for him for free. Any chance of allowing our contributions..?

Sorry David... Love you loads and your Brixton show was ace but I don't love your site so much these days.

[lumukanda]

there is a section on the site for reader contributions, not sure how one goes about it though.
maybe some stuff from here could go on there?