View Full Version : No Plane theory in jeopardy
lordzoma
11-09-2008, 08:26 PM
A Medical Doctor I know has multiple friends who are credible witnesses to seeing planes hit the second tower while in traffic. They are from two separate sources. If in the court of public scrutiny there is too many independent witnesses of seeing a plane hit then the theory can be laid to rest.
It does not discount however the make and model of the planes used. Personally I was never convinced either way, and for me this puts another nail in the coffin.
cruise4
11-09-2008, 08:56 PM
Unless the planes were holographic, not that I'm any great fan of NPT.
lordzoma
11-09-2008, 08:59 PM
Unless the planes were holographic, not that I'm any great fan of NPT.
Holy fuck you blew my mind.
Duh! Why didn't I think of that.
Holographic technology would be exactly the thing that could be used to stage an alien invasion. It's always possible the 9/11 event was ONLY A TEST of whether or not holographic technology and bombs, or maybe even high energy particle weapons could trick the mass public into believing the plane was real. If it worked with planes, why not with something else?
Interesting thought.
dave52
11-09-2008, 09:25 PM
Project Blue Beam, although I'm not a fan of the hologram theory - I can't discount it either. The other scenario is low and close fly-bys.
lordzoma
11-09-2008, 09:28 PM
Either way at this point it's all just intellectual masturbation. The end origin and end result are all that really matters. The how, ultimately, is without meaning and just satisfies baser urges to know.
mynameis
11-09-2008, 09:43 PM
Even the best hologram technology was laughable back then. How would said projection be able to be utilized on wide scale without a delivery system and pre-existing conditions to act as a screen?
lordzoma
11-09-2008, 09:59 PM
Even the best hologram technology was laughable back then. How would said projection be able to be utilized on wide scale without a delivery system and pre-existing conditions to act as a screen?
The only way I can think of that wouldn't involve insane technology would be using a special slow moving missile as a screen to make it look like a plane, but at that point might as well just use a plane.
killtown
11-09-2008, 10:40 PM
lordzoma remember, "hundreds" of witnesses "saw" a "plane" crash into the Pentagon.
xpleet
11-09-2008, 10:49 PM
Holy fuck you blew my mind.
Duh! Why didn't I think of that.
Holographic technology would be exactly the thing that could be used to stage an alien invasion. It's always possible the 9/11 event was ONLY A TEST of whether or not holographic technology and bombs, or maybe even high energy particle weapons could trick the mass public into believing the plane was real. If it worked with planes, why not with something else?
Interesting thought.
Hello? Why is everyone thinking fake-alien invasion?
There is a real battle of Reptilians, Greys + their counterpart going on...but the alien-denial seems still to be great anyway.
banoyes
11-09-2008, 11:04 PM
A Medical Doctor I know has multiple friends who are credible witnesses to seeing planes hit the second tower while in traffic. They are from two separate sources. If in the court of public scrutiny there is too many independent witnesses of seeing a plane hit then the theory can be laid to rest.
Is of no more value then any other eyewitness
What about those saying,was a small plane,had no windows,was a military planem ,was a missle
Eyewitness ain't worth squat
Stick with the evidence
lordzoma
11-09-2008, 11:08 PM
xpleet - Oh the one thing I am 100% on is the existence of reptilians, and their Orion and rebel factions. The whole point of a 'fake' alien invasion is that it would be a totally controlled event rather than a real war. Control the event control the outcome. A real war against those in power would mean a lot more to them!!!
But yes - you're right. Many people 'saw' the planes hit the pentagon. I for one think there's no way in hell a plane hit the pentagon.
Yes, I agree banoyes. I didn't speak to these witnesses personally and what they have to say may be fairly inaccurate. I didn't personally see it so I'm never going to fully believe one way or another.
But KILLTOWN - Yes, kudos to you. Very fascinating site filled with plenty of information that's for certain!
xpleet
11-09-2008, 11:22 PM
Also don't forget that the plane-theory shows by film that the "plane" flew not only descending but also rolled about 45° to it's left side which is a flightmanouver almost impossible with a 747, it is absolute nonsense.
graflok
11-09-2008, 11:35 PM
Holy fuck you blew my mind.
Duh! Why didn't I think of that.
Holographic technology would be exactly the thing that could be used to stage an alien invasion. It's always possible the 9/11 event was ONLY A TEST of whether or not holographic technology and bombs, or maybe even high energy particle weapons could trick the mass public into believing the plane was real. If it worked with planes, why not with something else?
Interesting thought.
You might find this link (http://www.ufoinfo.com/news/vanishing.shtml) interesting, lordzoma.
And this video:
John Lear - 9/11 & Strategic Perception Management - YouTube
lordzoma
11-09-2008, 11:45 PM
John Lear is a brilliant man.
All I have to say is 'technically' a holographic plane isn't a no plane theory.
A plane would have struck both towers.
They just had no mass.
killtown
13-09-2008, 01:53 AM
But KILLTOWN - Yes, kudos to you. Very fascinating site filled with plenty of information that's for certain!
cheers!
mynameis
13-09-2008, 10:58 AM
The only way I can think of that wouldn't involve insane technology would be using a special slow moving missile as a screen to make it look like a plane, but at that point might as well just use a plane.
A hologram needs a screen to be projected upon there is nothing that acts as a screen. Second there needs to be a certain amount of light density to be able to see the image you are projecting otherwise you'll get nothing.
demise_of_time
14-09-2008, 07:32 AM
Either way at this point it's all just intellectual masturbation. The end origin and end result are all that really matters. The how, ultimately, is without meaning and just satisfies baser urges to know.
Agreed.