PDA

View Full Version : Israel Continues to Defy International Law


mynameis
11-09-2008, 04:57 PM
Israel 'annexes' West Bank areas
West Bank barrier in Abu Dis near Jerusalem
B'Tselem says the annexations more than doubled the size of settlements

Israel has annexed thousands of hectares of West Bank land beside the barrier it is building, according to an Israeli rights group.

B'Tselem says the land has been taken with the justification that it is needed to protect Israeli settlements.

The group says some settlements have seized up to two and a half times more land than they have been designated by fencing it off or through intimidation.

Under international law the settlements in the West Bank are illegal.

This is disputed by Israel, which has settled about 450,000 people in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem.

Israel argues that its West Bank barrier is a security measure intended to stop suicide bombers, though Palestinians see the barrier as a means to grab land.

The International Court of Justice issued an advisory ruling in 2004 that the barrier breached international law where it is built on occupied territory and should be dismantled.

'Access denied'

B'Tselem calculates that the annexation of the land has more than doubled the size of the settlements, with Palestinians, who still own the land, denied access.



The objective of these zones is to provide warning of an attack on a community, providing enough time to respond

Israel Defense Forces

Guide to the West Bank barrier

It says that the unofficial closing off of land to Palestinians, around these settlements, has been going on for 30 years.

But what has been happening more recently is the Israeli military formalising the expansion of these settlements through what are called "special security areas".

The group has calculated that this has more than doubled the overall area of the settlements.

Palestinians, despite privately owning half the land, now have no access to it.

The Israeli authorities argue that these measures are for security, to protect against Palestinian attacks, and that they need only be temporary.

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) said in a statement to the BBC that the security zones were needed to protect settlements. The IDF said the use of these zones had been approved a number of times by the Israeli Supreme Court and any building in them was illegal.

But B'Tselem insists that the security argument is specious: they say that settlers often move into the designated security buffer zones.

They also argue that it makes the agreed goal of a future Palestinian state all the more difficult to reach.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7609905.stm

tyler
11-09-2008, 06:13 PM
Israel is an illegal gangster state that needs to be wiped off the map.

Send the Khazars home to Georgia and give the Holy Land back to the Palestinians and re-name the country Palestine.

runciter
11-09-2008, 06:20 PM
Israel is an illegal gangster state that needs to be wiped off the map.

Send the Khazars home to Georgia and give the Holy Land back to the Palestinians and re-name the country Palestine.

one-state solution is the way, imho.

duckingdafta
11-09-2008, 06:34 PM
this may seem like a really complicated plan..

ask the people who live in the houses and on the land what they want rather than some suits in an office deciding what is best for them 1000's miles away.

milone
11-09-2008, 06:34 PM
yes I agree, israel should never have even been, they are behind most of the shit in this world, i dont think Mel Gibson was taht far off with his drunken comments a few years ago.

runciter
11-09-2008, 06:43 PM
this may seem like a really complicated plan..

ask the people who live in the houses and on the land what they want rather than some suits in an office deciding what is best for them 1000's miles away.

Two Peoples, One State

By MICHAEL TARAZI
Published: October 4, 2004

(...) Support for one state is hardly a radical idea; it is simply the recognition of the uncomfortable reality that Israel and the occupied Palestinian territories already function as a single state. They share the same aquifers, the same highway network, the same electricity grid and the same international borders. There are no road signs reading "Welcome to Occupied Territory" when one drives into East Jerusalem. Some government maps of Israel do not delineate Israel's 1967 pre-occupation border. Settlers in the occupied West Bank (including East Jerusalem) are interspersed among Palestinian towns and now constitute nearly a fifth of the population. In the words of one Palestinian farmer, you can't unscramble an egg.

But in this de facto state, 3.5 million Palestinian Christians and Muslims are denied the same political and civil rights as Jews. These Palestinians must drive on separate roads, in cars bearing distinctive license plates, and only to and from designated Palestinian areas. It is illegal for a Palestinian to drive a car with an Israeli license plate. These Palestinians, as non-Jews, neither qualify for Israeli citizenship nor have the right to vote in Israeli elections.

In South Africa, such an allocation of rights and privileges based on ethnic or religious affiliation was called apartheid. In Israel, it is called the Middle East's only democracy.

Most Israelis recoil at the thought of giving Palestinians equal rights, understandably fearing that a possible Palestinian majority will treat Jews the way Jews have treated Palestinians. They fear the destruction of the never-defined "Jewish state." The one-state solution, however, neither destroys the Jewish character of the Holy Land nor negates the Jewish historical and religious attachment (although it would destroy the superior status of Jews in that state). Rather, it affirms that the Holy Land has an equal Christian and Muslim character.

For those who believe in equality, this is a good thing. In theory, Zionism is the movement of Jewish national liberation. In practice, it has been a movement of Jewish supremacy. It is this domination of one ethnic or religious group over another that must be defeated before we can meaningfully speak of a new era of peace; neither Jews nor Muslims nor Christians have a unique claim on this sacred land.

The struggle for Palestinian equality will not be easy. Power is never voluntarily shared by those who wield it. Palestinians will have to capture the world's imagination, organize the international community and refuse to be seduced into negotiating for their rights.

But the struggle against South African apartheid proves the battle can be won. The only question is how long it will take, and how much all sides will have to suffer, before Israeli Jews can view Palestinian Christians and Muslims not as demographic threats but as fellow citizens.

Michael Tarazi is a legal adviser to the Palestine Liberation Organization.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/04/opinion/04tarazi.html