View Full Version : Yonaguni - Earth's oldest megalithic ruins?
brainstormer
20-08-2008, 01:30 AM
More than twice as old as the pyramids, and 3 times the size!
More here:
http://fr.youtube.com/watch?v=XMMBLNJqw1M
Yonaguni - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Interestingly there are no no planned investigations by mainstream scientists.
ericdubay
20-08-2008, 07:20 AM
In Japan the Yonaguni megalith is undoubtedly man-made yet it has been underwater since at least 8000 BC. It is 8 stories high, 500 feet long with internal and external right angles, steps, rooms, and “the Stage” altar-like area with huge human faces and head-dresses carved into the stone. In the Gulf of Cambay in Northwest India are two multiple mile long/wide underwater cities which taken together are the size of Manhattan. About 2000 human fossilized remains have been found in these cities and have all carbon dated to around 7500 BC. Many underwater ruins have been found off the coast of Cuba 2,200 feet below sea level. There have been over 200 sunken cities found in the Mediterranean alone.
http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com/search/label/Atlantis
~Eric
www.atlanteanconspiracy.com
limelady
20-08-2008, 09:46 AM
Incredible video footage....thankyou!!
Mainstream archaeologists ought to bury their heads in shame ....their profession's attitude and their close-minded scientific dogma (which they stick to with ferocious religious zeal) is both an utter disgrace and an insult to humanity as a whole.
Anyone with even half a brain can see those ruins beneath the sea are ancient artificial structures, and they are at least 8,000 years old, most likely a lot older.
Meh! :rolleyes:
brainstormer
20-08-2008, 01:18 PM
Just an afterthought, would this be better in the Ancient History / Forbidden Knowledge / History Rewritten forum?
upsetbrit
20-08-2008, 02:01 PM
Incredible video footage....thankyou!!
Mainstream archaeologists ought to bury their heads in shame ....their profession's attitude and their close-minded scientific dogma (which they stick to with ferocious religious zeal) is both an utter disgrace and an insult to humanity as a whole.
Anyone with even half a brain can see those ruins beneath the sea are ancient artificial structures, and they are at least 8,000 years old, most likely a lot older.
Meh! :rolleyes:
I posted my own comments but they pretty much fall in line with what you're saying. For some reason my comment didn't post, so i'll share yours :)
I will add however that this is another example of our hidden history which our children will not find in their school books, much like the Antikythera mechanism and spaceships at Atlantis!
rixxmixxhell
20-08-2008, 04:03 PM
Wow this is most interesting:)!
I will be researching this tonight ;)
Cheers
Rick
brainstormer
21-08-2008, 01:06 AM
It is a shame that the mainstream scientists are overlooking possibly the oldest structure known to man, that predates the pyramids by twice their age. Anyway, there's some more info here for those interested:
http://www.morien-institute.org/yonaguni.html
notthisshitagain
21-08-2008, 03:56 AM
Maybe it would be uncomfortable for "someone" if people started to check on history, hmm? ;P Could that be one of the reasons why it doesn't get too much mainstream attention?
By the way, excelent thread, brainstormer :D
bill23
21-08-2008, 10:43 PM
i would suggest that a geologist would know a bit more about it then u give them credit.
limelady
21-08-2008, 11:12 PM
i would suggest that a geologist would know a bit more about it then u give them credit.
I do not share your trust/faith!
How can geologists have any credibility when they have no studies even planned for those ruins, when clearly there is strong evidence there to warrant a serious investigation?
What are they afraid of? ;)
When you looked at that video clip bill23, did you not see a massive artificial megalith yourself?
If not, perhaps you are wearing the same blinkers as those mainstream geologists.
rixxmixxhell
21-08-2008, 11:29 PM
I do not share your trust/faith!
How can geologists have any credibility when they have no studies even planned for those ruins, when clearly there is strong evidence there to warrant a serious investigation?
What are they afraid of? ;)
When you looked at that video clip bill23, did you not see a massive artificial megalith yourself?
If not, perhaps you are wearing the same blinkers as those mainstream geologists.
Yea, i done geology to 4th level, ((as hobby to fill time up when on another course, in little stages nothing major-but fun trips to the coast though and digging around rock pools was best :) )) and i can say- they are pretty much repeaters. Also, they will not even look at the facts that Earth grew, and not just land separated from 'Pangea'. But saying that, an old tutor understood and believed the Earth Grew as gained density from matter created by the mathematician machine that is our Solar system and from our Galaxy centre etc.
But i think it's also because to be a ''real'' researching geologist you can't be a 'repeater', you really need to be a forward researcher. And of course will involve meta physics, which the sheep will not even give a thought of. You know, they just work under other ''scientists'' who tell them this and that and that's finale.
5 sense and 3d is all they think with, anything else, is 'pompous' 'nutty' son of God David Icke ''''followers''''. Ahh well, at least you have some system minds that see out further like said Tutor - facts don't even matter, the intent and searching does. Like women, flowers cost 5 quid, intent and thought matters more ;)
Science isn't the problem, it's the ''ten science illuminati indoctrination system', falsities that is. Knowing how something works is good, but as it is used and taught in today's 'public' forum, I.E, universities, college, blah blah blah is what traps most people to a system thinking. They leave uni ''thinking'' the y''know'' something....but...you can not teach someone something that they 'think' they already know. Worse even than trying to teach old stubborn dogs new tricks.
Ricky
bill23
22-08-2008, 10:03 PM
the idea of a sunken temple isnt far fetched nor is it impossible but why do you have to believe it? i find it interesting but if a geologist says its natural then maybe it is?
limelady
22-08-2008, 10:25 PM
the idea of a sunken temple isnt far fetched nor is it impossible but why do you have to believe it? i find it interesting but if a geologist says its natural then maybe it is?
And maybe said geologist is nicely stuck inside his box and doesn't WANT to believe its real because it means he'd have to climb out of his box, throw away everything he thought he knew to be "truth" (dogma), and start all over again.
Far too scary!
Besides, what would your peers think if you strayed from the fold like that? :eek:
who elsie
22-08-2008, 11:01 PM
It's like Icke's 'elephant in the living room' - everyone can see it, but they don't want to believe it's actually there. Geologists explain it by looking at small sections in isolation and saying 'this effect could occur naturally', but that doesn't explain how so many freak natural formations came together to form one giant structure that shows clear signs of design and form.
Graham Hancock's book 'Underworld' gives alot of background to this and other equally amazing underwater structures around the world.