PDA

View Full Version : Ace Baker shill calls Wood / Hutchison frauds


masonfree party
19-08-2008, 09:55 PM
Sunday, August 17, 2008

$100,000 Hutchison Effect Challenge

August 17, 2008

To John Hutchison and Judy Wood:

I hereby challenge John Hutchison and/or Judy Wood to reproduce the "Hutchison Effect". If successful, according to the criteria below, I will pay a reward of $100,000.00 in U.S. currency.




1. I will travel at my own expense to Hutchison's laboratory (shown above) in the Vancouver area.

2. I will bring 3 video cameras with tripods.

3. Hutchison will describe and point out his apparatus components on video. I will have unrestricted access to the laboratory area, being allowed to video anything which piques my curiosity.

4. Hutchison will then produce the levitation of a steel wrench, as depicted in at least one of his previous videos. The wrench must fly upwards off of the table.

5. During the levitation demonstration, I will video tape continuously on all 3 cameras. One camera will be aimed at Hutchison as he operates any controls, one camera will be aimed at the wrench, and the last camera I will hand-hold, aiming at anything I choose.

While Hutchison formerly claimed to have had trouble recreating the Hutchison Effect, as of this past January, he claims to be able to reproduce it "regularly". I don't believe him. I think John Hutchison is a fraud.

Judy Wood is also a fraud. Wood claims that a weaponized version of the Hutchison Effect was used to destroy the twin towers. In trying to discredit me, and rehabiliate the Hutchison Effect, Judy Wood has issued demonstrably false claims about me, e.g. calling me a "plagiarist" with respect to my music writing.

I have reproduced the "Hutchison Effect" for exactly what it is - video fakery. Judy Wood created this page about my efforts, and intentionally left off most of the evidence that I supplied her with, a clear case of scientific fraud on the part of Judy Wood.

This is an opportunity for Hutchison/Wood to prove it up, and have a very nice payday. I warrant that I have I line of credit exceeding $100,000. Offer stands until January 1, 2009.

Sincerely,

Alexander "Ace" Baker


cc

Judy Wood
John Hutchison
Jerry Leaphart
Morgan Reynolds
Jim Fetzer

http://acebaker.blogspot.com/2008/08/10000...-challenge.html

masonfree party
19-08-2008, 10:05 PM
http://www.acebaker.com/9-11/JudyWood/JudyWould.html

john white
19-08-2008, 10:40 PM
Must admit, always had a soft spot for old "Ace": a good lad at heart

While Hutchison formerly claimed to have had trouble recreating the Hutchison Effect, as of this past January, he claims to be able to reproduce it "regularly". I don't believe him. I think John Hutchison is a fraud.

Well it shouldn't be hard for John Hutchinson to categorically and repeatedly demonstrate that Ace Baker is wrong: Should it?

What does it mean in Hutchinson CAN'T do that? And what would that mean for Judy Wood's "reputation" with her backing him and all?

Could it be that, despite prior mis-steps along the way, Ace Baker is finally RIGHT?

masonfree party
20-08-2008, 10:12 PM
eh john i think you should look at this?

YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.



the above film is mainly of the people in Seattle handling Hutchisons metal samples (29th May 2008).


John please explain :



1) How the metal samples were formed (all of them)

2) Why John would let people handle them if he was a fraud (wouldn’t he be found out)?

cheers,MFP

christophera
20-08-2008, 10:21 PM
Sunday, August 17, 2008

$100,000 Hutchison Effect Challenge

August 17, 2008

To John Hutchison and Judy Wood:

I hereby challenge John Hutchison and/or Judy Wood to reproduce the "Hutchison Effect".

Excellent!

mynameis
20-08-2008, 11:27 PM
eh john i think you should look at this?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZqvNrIWwoUc



the above film is mainly of the people in Seattle handling Hutchisons metal samples (29th May 2008).


John please explain :



1) How the metal samples were formed (all of them)

2) Why John would let people handle them if he was a fraud (wouldn’t he be found out)?

cheers,MFP

1.) Does this matter if it is not scientific? In science, what counts is anyone can reproduce the results. How is John to know what kind of fraud or skill is being perpetrated? Science was alchemy before people gained knowledge. Just because something looks magical doesn't mean there's not a scientific principle at work.

2.) If a hoaxer wants a good laugh that's reason enough.

john white
21-08-2008, 04:24 AM
eh john i think you should look at this?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZqvNrIWwoUc



the above film is mainly of the people in Seattle handling Hutchisons metal samples (29th May 2008).


John please explain :



1) How the metal samples were formed (all of them)

2) Why John would let people handle them if he was a fraud (wouldn’t he be found out)?

cheers,MFP

And how many metallurgists and/or other specialists have you consulted about this Video evidence? Do you know if their are effects that could produce similar results from other known methods? Can you categorically state that what is seen in these Videos is "impossible" within "conventional science"? I can think straight away of some likely processes that could be used to potentially make metal break in this way

Meanwhile, what have we got? No scientific theory, no experimental method, no re-creatable results

I don't dis-believe people for the sake of it. But neither do I believe someone because it sounds exciting until I'm forced to recognise in-controvertable evidence they are putting one on

My requirements of Hutchinson are the same for all the other Free Energy Merchants out there: put up or shut up. Hutchinson, like many others, appears to shut up about putting up instead

Why should that impress me?

stealth_0073
21-08-2008, 04:36 AM
wheres baker pulling the money from? thats the question i ask.

mynameis
22-08-2008, 07:44 PM
wheres baker pulling the money from? thats the question i ask.

It shouldn't matter to you since it's his money. Are you IRS or something?

stealth_0073
23-08-2008, 07:54 AM
It shouldn't matter to you since it's his money. Are you IRS or something?

yes it does matter!! would you take drug money or mossad money
ace bakers wife is mossad

mynameis
23-08-2008, 02:54 PM
yes it does matter!! would you take drug money or mossad money
ace bakers wife is mossad

You have proof that it's drug money?

Is Ace Baker his wife?

So what if CIA is mossad, what if MI5 is Mossad, what if Britney Spears is mossad? At this point people blaming mossad, zionism, and jews for all ills of the world sound like a broken record.

People like them revisionist neo nazis always blame someone else xenophobically; they can't help doing transferring their delusions like a Pavlovian dog.

NPTer's seek attention and when they get the attention they act like the victims of abuse, which takes energy from researching 911, and the true victims on 9/11 or WWII.

mr_self_destruct
23-08-2008, 05:48 PM
Ace Baker's a shill now is he? The plot thickens!

stealth_0073
24-08-2008, 06:06 AM
Ace Baker's a shill now is he? The plot thickens!

yes hes a shill don't get me wrong he is a good video editor
but he is wrong on many things.

bryan
24-08-2008, 11:04 PM
People like them revisionist neo nazis always blame someone else xenophobically; they can't help doing transferring their delusions like a Pavlovian dog.



Only a deluded Pavlovian tabloid-reader would assume revisionists are neo nazis!