View Full Version : Princess Diana Inquest
crowngate
28-04-2007, 01:39 PM
I have no wish to intrude on anyone's personal grief but do have an interest in getting to the truth and would like to know how an ordinary member of the public may present evidence to the public inquest of Princess Diana.
I re-discovered the authentic Memoirs of King George III, which have been suppressed for 150 years because they substantiate the'Royal Bigamy'. Prince Charles and the Royal Family are neither the rightful nor lawful heirs to the Throne, technically.
I was in contact with Princess Diana and this is the story she said before her death she was going to give to the media. I believe this to be important and relevant. Can you help?
Martin Ball
mllab@hotmail.com
dondaz
28-04-2007, 01:58 PM
Hi crowngate & welcome to Mr Ickes wonderful forum.
This is interesting.
I re-discovered the authentic Memoirs of King George III, which have been suppressed for 150 years because they substantiate the'Royal Bigamy'.
Who, what, where, when time.
Who wrote these memoirs?
What do they actually contain?
Where are these memoirs?
How did you come by this infomation?
Please tell. This could be very interesting.
Best
Darren
crowngate
03-05-2007, 06:39 PM
Who, what, where, when time. (I am sorry but I do not understand this)
Who wrote these memoirs? (George III's Royal Biographer)
What do they actually contain? ( An account of His Majesty's private and public life)
Where are these memoirs? (Strangely, they are in London, Weymouth and California)
How did you come by this infomation? (By accident at first)
Please tell. This could be very interesting. (I would be grateful if you would let me know what your interest is)
Best
Darren
dondaz
14-05-2007, 10:18 PM
(I would be grateful if you would let me know what your interest is)
I would like to read these memoirs of King George III, as I'm sure many others would too!
Best
auron
14-05-2007, 11:02 PM
So would i. Links?
bob_jones
04-07-2008, 10:04 PM
Why They Murdered Lady Diana
It is all to do with the secret children of Henry the ninth Cardinal of York that died in 1807 and is buried in the Vatican labelled King Henry the ninth of England. The Pope recognised him as King. He is supposed to be the last of the Stuarts. He had children and as long as they are not Catholic they can legally take the crown. My uncle and father have abdicated and are too scared to tell me anything about it. But my grandmother on my father's side used to tell me things as a child. I legally own the royal estates. But as you know possession is nine tenths of the law.
When I was eight I won a competition in school to design a village. I had to write a contract. It read that ...I give permission for these buildings to be built on my land because I don't have any land. For this I receive the remuneration of one pound.
It is the Poundbury contract and gave Charles permission to build Poundbury in Dorset. What he hoped it would do is buy the entire royal estate off me for one pound. It was a con trick played by the teachers he bribed to do the exercise.
But if you understand the contract upon building of Poundbury the ownership of the royal estates is transferred to me. Because he has built those buildings on my land then I do have land. There was an article in the Daily Mail at the time saying that Charles had doubled the size of his estate by buying it off an eccentric for a pound.
In fact what he had done is try and con an eight year old out of the royal estates for a pound and ended up transferring ownership back to me.
When I was small we had some aristocrats come and stay at my parent’s house and they offered me £10,000 for their estate. I remember the girl was called Sandra. To me an estate was a car and I refused to sell despite my father urging me to do so. They left a white feather in the draw for me and my parents explained that it was to call me coward.
On 4/08/06 I was attacked using stage hypnotism by Prince Charles in Llanelli town centre. He wanted my abdication and I did not give it my usual signature.
He used the word "blackout" as I had been programmed by my friends as a teenager to go into a trance on hearing the word. Lee Sweetman borrowed my Scorpions album and never brought it back to stop me hearing the word "blackout" too much as it would undo the trick. That was when I was 16. The album was called Blackout.
He had done it before in the summer of 1991 or 1992. There was an article in Private Eye magazine about how stomachs were turning with the royal estate keepers at Prince Charles' strange new interest in stage hypnotism. I read it at the time. I told Jayne Williams about it in my camper van and all she said it “funny you should say that”. It happened outside Boots in Llanelli town precinct and Jayne Williams, Gavin Bailey and Adrian Benet were there and none of them told me about it. He comes along with a black curly wig on and says "blackout". He then told me to take my trousers down and puts a finger up my bum and walks behind me at a crouch telling me to say obscene things. The last time he did it on 4/08/06 at 14.40hrs he used Bear Gryles the celebrity SAS man as a mark and stole my art work. It was a comedy swastika drawn with ladies legs wearing illuminous yellow fishnet stockings and had a cat’s face with a Cavalier smile in the middle. The joke was that you could see a bit of pussy under the cat's chin. One foot was turned to profile to suggest the foot art work in Hancock the film and some of the legs were fat and the skinny one had an extra thick stocking band to stop the stockings falling down the skinny leg. It was drawn in a white circle set on a green rectangle.
I had been showing it off in the pub the day before. He said "You had better give me that priceless work of art." and took it off me. It reported the theft to the police and spoke to Pc1125 about it; incident number 308 4/08/06.
What can I say except for YOU COULDN'T MAKE IT UP!!
It is all to do with the Stuart claim to the throne
I only found out about it in 2006.
Lady Diana sent a man to warn me that Charles was bribing all my friends in the mid 1990s. She could have got back at him for his affair by telling the press that he is not first in line to the throne. That is why they murdered her in Paris. The motive was covered-up by operation Paget after I had told them about it.
The royal family are not legitimate and rely on abdications from my family to stay on the throne.
I remember when I was four. My grandmother took me for grapes in Burry Port and as my grandmother was bugged by Prince Charles he had phoned ahead to the shop and bribed the manager to put the price of grapes up to a pound. That was too much for my pensioner grand parents in 1978. I went to cry as my expectations were up about having some grapes. The manager had the sack after my grandfather took it to the top.
This is the start of a catalogue of behaviour of Prince Charles towards me. When I was a teenager I was hypnotised to forget about it by my friends that had been bribed and trained to do it. I brought it all back using self regression.
My doctor told the last tribunal that he had been working with Prince Charles' royal protection police for months at ways of getting me under section before they actually managed it. The lay person told me that I had had a nervous breakdown in Scotland. He did not have any information from the reports or doctor that I had ever been to Scotland. In Scotland they electronically raided my bank account to make me homeless as my money had gone. I was going to get a job but could not afford to work for a month until the first pay came in. So I had to go to a homeless hostel.
I inherited a mountain in North Wales when I was four and Prince Charles wanted it, so my parents made me sign it away and the royals decreed that my signature was legally binding. It was theft. If you went into a nursery school and started taking signatures from four year olds to gain their inheritance you would go to jail. But not if you are a pampered royal prince. I could write a comprehensive catalogue of human rights abuses I have suffered at the hands of Charles but it would take too long. Maybe another day. But Lady Diana's crash was caused deliberately by LAMPING the driver with a bright light. There is plenty of evidence for that.
The reason for it is because the Royal Family descends from George of Hanover. He became king with the act of settlement in 1701 that prevents Catholics from taking the crown. He didn’t own the land. The Act of Settlement doses not; as some people claim; prevent Stuarts from taking the crown.
They became Saxe-Coburg-Gotha when Prince Albert married Queen Victoria and change their name to Windsor during the First World War during the reign of George the Fifth.
I heard a story as a child about my great, great grandmother having her birth certificate altered by the Victorians and having to have it change back again.
Also that my great grandmother; on my father’s mother’s side; was shelled during the First World War while with a French Hospital party. She is said to have had a telegram from George the Fifth telling her that they had not given her co-ordinates to the German battery.
Spike Milligan was campaigning for me to be King. He wanted it for me and suffered at the hands of psychiatrists as a consequence. I met him as a child and I told him he was boring and I like Lenny Henry, he was upset and I said…but he hasn’t got the hat. He replied…neither have you. I think that is why he bought a fez as I meant Henry Cooper.
It is because the Stuart line still exists to this day. The current royal family are German they are Saxe-Coburg-Gotha and changed their name to Windsor during the First World War and they do not own the land.
Finalised by Robert Alexander Jones 23/12/07.
numbersix
13-07-2008, 11:55 PM
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4987792074301578381&hl=en
See the above google video link. An interesting docdumentary by Tony Riobinson (formerly Baldrick in Blackadder !!):p
illuminotti
14-07-2008, 11:55 AM
So would i. Links?
links....lmao.....duh, i think the kind of info crown is referring to is not widely available on the net....me thinks in an old dusty book in some museum/personal library of sorts........
bob_jones
24-07-2008, 05:37 PM
Thanks,
But I've already seen the Tony Robinson documentary. It was on TV too. The fudge was about Henry the seventh. He took the crown by force at the battle of Bosworth. That is what made him legitimate?
He came long after Edward the fourth son of an archer.
You could argue that the Queen is legitimate because they won legitimacy over the Jackobites at Culloden.
All the same; 57 more hereditarily legitimate heirs were passed over to get to George of Hanover in order to procure a Protestant Monarch and comply with the Act of Settlement (1701).
I think they were worried that if Lady Diana told the press about the doggy claim to the throne then I would be in a beauty contest with Charles.
They came by Act of Parliament they could go by Act of Parliament!
They much prefer the myth of a legitimate, unbroken hereditary descent from the Anglo-Saxon kings of Wessex going back before the battle of Hastings.
I must have a good claim, because they are very concerned with me.
Their concern came long before I had any knowledge of Royal blood.
All I was told is that I had a blood line going back to Llewellyn the last King of Wales.
(Not including Owain Glyndwr)
Nice to have a dash of Welsh Royal blood too!
bob_jones
27-10-2010, 11:38 PM
Why They Murdered Lady Diana
It is all to do with the secret children of Henry the ninth Cardinal of York that died in 1807 and is buried in the Vatican labelled King Henry the ninth of England. The Pope recognised him as King. He is supposed to be the last of the Stuarts. He had children and as long as they are not Catholic they can legally take the crown. My uncle and father have abdicated and are too scared to tell me anything about it. But my grandmother on my father's side used to tell me things as a child. I legally own the royal estates. But as you know possession is nine tenths of the law.
When I was eight I won a competition in school to design a village. I had to write a contract. It read that ...I give permission for these buildings to be built on my land because I don't have any land. For this I receive the remuneration of one pound.
It is the Poundbury contract and gave Charles permission to build Poundbury in Dorset. What he hoped it would do is buy the entire royal estate off me for one pound. It was a con trick played by the teachers he bribed to do the exercise.
But if you understand the contract upon building of Poundbury the ownership of the royal estates is transferred to me. Because he has built those buildings on my land then I do have land. There was an article in the Daily Mail at the time saying that Charles had doubled the size of his estate by buying it off an eccentric for a pound.
In fact what he had done is try and con an eight year old out of the royal estates for a pound and ended up transferring ownership back to me.
When I was small we had some aristocrats come and stay at my parent’s house and they offered me £10,000 for their estate. I remember the girl was called Sandra. To me an estate was a car and I refused to sell despite my father urging me to do so. They left a white feather in the draw for me and my parents explained that it was to call me coward.
On 4/08/06 I was attacked using stage hypnotism by Prince Charles in Llanelli town centre. He wanted my abdication and I did not give it my usual signature.
He used the word "blackout" as I had been programmed by my friends as a teenager to go into a trance on hearing the word. Lee Sweetman borrowed my Scorpions album and never brought it back to stop me hearing the word "blackout" too much as it would undo the trick. That was when I was 16. The album was called Blackout.
He had done it before in the summer of 1991 or 1992. There was an article in Private Eye magazine about how stomachs were turning with the royal estate keepers at Prince Charles' strange new interest in stage hypnotism. I read it at the time. I told Jayne Williams about it in my camper van and all she said it “funny you should say that”. It happened outside Boots in Llanelli town precinct and Jayne Williams, Gavin Bailey and Adrian Benet were there and none of them told me about it. He comes along with a black curly wig on and says "blackout". He then told me to take my trousers down and puts a finger up my bum and walks behind me at a crouch telling me to say obscene things. The last time he did it on 4/08/06 at 14.40hrs he used Bear Gryles the celebrity SAS man as a mark and stole my art work. It was a comedy swastika drawn with ladies legs wearing illuminous yellow fishnet stockings and had a cat’s face with a Cavalier smile in the middle. The joke was that you could see a bit of pussy under the cat's chin. One foot was turned to profile to suggest the foot art work in Hancock the film and some of the legs were fat and the skinny one had an extra thick stocking band to stop the stockings falling down the skinny leg. It was drawn in a white circle set on a green rectangle.
I had been showing it off in the pub the day before. He said "You had better give me that priceless work of art." and took it off me. It reported the theft to the police and spoke to Pc1125 about it; incident number 308 4/08/06.
What can I say except for YOU COULDN'T MAKE IT UP!!
It is all to do with the Stuart claim to the throne
I only found out about it in 2006.
Lady Diana sent a man to warn me that Charles was bribing all my friends in the mid 1990s. She could have got back at him for his affair by telling the press that he is not first in line to the throne. That is why they murdered her in Paris. The motive was covered-up by operation Paget after I had told them about it.
The royal family are not legitimate and rely on abdications from my family to stay on the throne.
I remember when I was four. My grandmother took me for grapes in Burry Port and as my grandmother was bugged by Prince Charles he had phoned ahead to the shop and bribed the manager to put the price of grapes up to a pound. That was too much for my pensioner grand parents in 1978. I went to cry as my expectations were up about having some grapes. The manager had the sack after my grandfather took it to the top.
This is the start of a catalogue of behaviour of Prince Charles towards me. When I was a teenager I was hypnotised to forget about it by my friends that had been bribed and trained to do it. I brought it all back using self regression.
My doctor told the last tribunal that he had been working with Prince Charles' royal protection police for months at ways of getting me under section before they actually managed it. The lay person told me that I had had a nervous breakdown in Scotland. He did not have any information from the reports or doctor that I had ever been to Scotland. In Scotland they electronically raided my bank account to make me homeless as my money had gone. I was going to get a job but could not afford to work for a month until the first pay came in. So I had to go to a homeless hostel.
I inherited a mountain in North Wales when I was four and Prince Charles wanted it, so my parents made me sign it away and the royals decreed that my signature was legally binding. It was theft. If you went into a nursery school and started taking signatures from four year olds to gain their inheritance you would go to jail. But not if you are a pampered royal prince. I could write a comprehensive catalogue of human rights abuses I have suffered at the hands of Charles but it would take too long. Maybe another day. But Lady Diana's crash was caused deliberately by LAMPING the driver with a bright light. There is plenty of evidence for that.
The reason for it is because the Royal Family descends from George of Hanover. He became king with the act of settlement in 1701 that prevents Catholics from taking the crown. He didn’t own the land. The Act of Settlement doses not; as some people claim; prevent Stuarts from taking the crown.
They became Saxe-Coburg-Gotha when Prince Albert married Queen Victoria and change their name to Windsor during the First World War during the reign of George the Fifth.
I heard a story as a child about my great, great grandmother having her birth certificate altered by the Victorians and having to have it change back again.
Also that my great grandmother; on my father’s mother’s side; was shelled during the First World War while with a French Hospital party. She is said to have had a telegram from George the Fifth telling her that they had not given her co-ordinates to the German battery.
Spike Milligan was campaigning for me to be King. He wanted it for me and suffered at the hands of psychiatrists as a consequence. I met him as a child and I told him he was boring and I like Lenny Henry, he was upset and I said…but he hasn’t got the hat. He replied…neither have you. I think that is why he bought a fez as I meant Henry Cooper.
It is because the Stuart line still exists to this day. The current royal family are German they are Saxe-Coburg-Gotha and changed their name to Windsor during the First World War and they do not own the land.
Finalised by Robert Alexander Jones 23/12/07.
http://i637.photobucket.com/albums/uu100/RobertAlexanderJones/img078-1.jpg
bob_jones
31-10-2010, 10:57 AM
I has come to my attention that I am losing friends from the so-called "truth" movement on Facebook.
Namely Jeff Rense, Kim Blond, The Love Police, Luke Redowski and David Ickerman.
These event co-inside with comments about Budda bores...Universal Love is the only truth...that is what they told me at Sundance Renewables and stole my property, attacked me with bio-warfare germs and put steralisation chemicals on my clothes.
Since I left University I have been trying to full fill a plan to meet a nice woman, have a good job and settle down with a family.
People have made a lot of money out of Prince Charles' plot to murder me and a lot of them undermine me with lies to fabricate the illusion of mental illness in order to weaken my security and these people claim that they are trying to help me.
While I have saved lives by thwarting false flag terrorism those were innocent people.
However I have for many years said that should I ever get the ministry that I will punish guilty criminals with crusifixion...there is noting new about that...a lot of people campaign for me to be hung...I am campaigning for them to be crusified.
And it put off the plot to hang me and say I committed suicide as their like to think that If I campaign to crusify them they will crusify me...very hard to pretend I killed myself by self crusifixion.
But also the utilmate insult is the chemical steralisation and the lies they tell to make out it is a good thing, predictions of the terrible things I would do.
For that crime I see the fitting punishment as the slaughter of all the off spring of those involved in the plot, had they not done the crime this would not have been an issue.
We are talking about protection of my future generation from aggreesive harm, we are talking about defending innoccence from wicked malice.
While I do more than the love Police to prevent the crimes of false flag terrorism, I see the real need to correct society with effective deterent against sin.
If you do not respect this then please stop pretending to be my friend on facebook as most of you are only doing it for money to maintain an information shiled for a murder conspiracy...Yes you think it is OK to get rich while I lose my life but you do not think you deserve the death penalty..you do no...backchat.