new moon - new problems

[clozaril]

was reading a post about someone who disliked new moons because they usually receive bad news whereas i always thought to be wary of full moons.

as it turns out this new moon i get handed a set of new problems.

but in the words of jim rohn 'don't wish it was easier wish you were stronger'

[curly]

was reading a post about someone who disliked new moons because they usually receive bad news whereas i always thought to be wary of full moons.

as it turns out this new moon i get handed a set of new problems.

but in the words of jim rohn 'don't wish it was easier wish you were stronger'

At the risk of major ridicule on myself i'll say i think i had a very positive experience with the moon last night.I went to bed with a lot of aches and pains last night as i had just done kettlebells for the first time in a couple of months and i had a few aches and pains anyway in my hip and shoulder, anyway don't know what these were or what bought them on.I couldn't get to sleep and was uncomfortable whichever way i lay and thought this was going to be a long night and also i'm on holiday this week and i was thinking hrmph i'm gonna ache all week now.I managed to get a few minutes then woke up and i was feeling something nice and warm like energy passing through me i felt very warm almost like a permanent hot flush it was quite powerful and very pleasant made me giggle,i was thinking something wierds happening here then i realised after about 5 minutes of this ALL my aches and pains had dissapeared,i was preoccupied with enjoying the sensations and i knew something funny had happened.Something made me look out the window and right in front of me was a beautiful full moon or close i'm not an expert on waning gibbous's or such things and it all seemed to be,sorry i mean i know it came from the moon.All i could think was the moon just healed all my aches and pains what did i do to deserve that.I had a similar experience down in wiltshire/devon whilst following ley lines in early september i went with my hip and shoulder giving me a bit of greif nothing bad but it's always there and i visited various sites of importance where feminine and male energy interacted with the earth.I sat in the church on brentor for a good while,in one of the chambers in the dolmen at west kennet and i spent about an hour at the swallowhead springs at west kennet amongst others but somewhere along the way all my aches and pains dissapeared but without any energetic feelings like i got in bed last night.I don't give a shit if anyone thinks i'm bonkers and i don't pretend to fully understand what happened but i know i'm getting there and i know that this energy can be very beneficial to people now imo.

[disorder2k8]

Did you know crime statistically goes up on a full moon, strange eh. Lots of weird events are in conjunction with the moons phases.

[father ted]

What makes this susspicious for me is that I think the moon might be an artificial object, or an object that was bought here artificially.

[armoured_amazon]

What makes this susspicious for me is that I think the moon might be an artificial object, or an object that was bought here artificially.

It's not; it's very much alive. :)

[father ted]

It's not; it's very much alive. :)

It doesn't rotate, whilst other moons around other planets do, it's the exact distance from the sun so that it's the same size from our point of view, the craters have a spiral formation viewing from one angle, these are some facts that I go by and does not suggest a natural object, the question for me is, how does a artificial planetary object fit in with astrology?

[jesta_g]

Did you know crime statistically goes up on a full moon, strange eh. Lots of weird events are in conjunction with the moons phases.

just like the moon controls and shapes the tides of our oceans it also controls and shapes the moods of us, this is simply because our body is 70% water and is affected by the magnetic resonance of the moon.

this is also very similar to how astrology works and why we become the specific "characters/personalities" that we are today, because the stars/moon/suns positions at the time of our conception right up to birth will "program" (by the magnetic resonance) our DNA along with the genetics (characteristics/appearances etcetc) of our ancestors which then makes us the person we are today. its all part of a system within our bodies (known as the mind cnsciousness system) that was "placed" there millions of years ago in order for us to experience our own individual expression of polarity.

the person that we "believe" we are is not really us, our emotions are all chemical reactions in the brain, our lives/paths are all pre-programmed, our appearence is programmed from our genepool while our conscious state altars and affects our appearance/ our difference in skin & physicalities etc are all there to keep us "seperated" to see each other differently when truly we are all ONE.
the only thing that is true within us is the "light" force within and around us that connects us to all there is and isnt within and out of existence, the unified consciousness that guides us towards enlightment and awareness to the oneness of the "reality"/universe around us.

:D lol and before anyone states im quoting new ages bollox i came to this conclusion by self educating myself in the areas of cosmology, metaphysics, quantum theory, NMR (nuclear magnetic resonance), mass spectrometry molecular cell biology, cymatics,geometrics and much more. lol i have never read a "new age" book ,tho ive seen one wee documentary but t be honest it wasnt that good and was a bit to "religious" and mamby pamby for my liking, lol the closest ive probably got to a new age book (which i actually thoroughly enjoyed) is "flower of life 1 & 2" by Drunvalo Melchizedek however his ideas and understandings are quite far from new age theories as he tends to approach from the angle of geometrics, physics and biology, definatly a good read and worth checkin out.

anywho enough of my rant.

id like to add that i dont see the moon as a provider of problems, more an enhancer of emotions and energies and that if not understood or taken control of it will result in an individual (or many) reacting in a violent/aggresive way as they lose control of their emotions. On many full moons i have felt more at ease with myself and been my aware of my surroundings, particularly whe up town partying etc, my senses are more alert (maybe due to the moons enhancements) to pricks ruining other peoples nights.

very interesting subject tho :)

[jesta_g]

It doesn't rotate, whilst other moons around other planets do, it's the exact distance from the sun so that it's the same size from our point of view, the craters have a spiral formation viewing from one angle, these are some facts that I go by and does not suggest a natural object, the question for me is, how does a artificial planetary object fit in with astrology?

heres something that supports that its not a natural object :) ..... or further asks more questions, which is always good IMO :p (i posted this up a wee while ago but it fits nicely)

http://www.soulsofdistortion.nl/images/vitruvia3.jpg

interestingly when you get the human body and place the geometrics from da Vinci's virtruvian man and compare this image ive provided to the earth and moon you will find that the dimensions of the circle around the body and the circle above the head (the crown chakra) are in perfect ratio to the earth and the moon..... coincidence?

this point that is the "moon" in the virtruvian man image is known as the crown chakra...

http://www.celestialhealing.net/websitestuff/chakra.jpg

this is also very similar to the images we see of the egyptian god Horus ...

http://www.uwm.edu/Course/egypt/Pyr/horus.jpg

was the egyptians (or particularly Horus) aware of the Chakra systems?

[phildee3]

I think the moon might be an artificial object

It's not; it's very much alive.



I thought you believed in a creator.
If it was created, then it is an artifact - by definition.

(NB. an artificial object can be alive).

[jesta_g]

few more interesting things about the moon....

firstly here's a few moon facts :) ...

1. Moon’s Age: The moon is far older than previously expected. Maybe even older than the Earth or the Sun. The oldest age for the Earth is estimated to be 4.6 billion years old; moon rocks were dated at 5.3 billion years old, and the dust upon which they were resting was at least another billion years older.
2. Rock’s Origin: The chemical composition of the dust upon which the rocks sat differed remarkably from the rocks themselves, contrary to accepted theories that the dust resulted from weathering and breakup of the rocks themselves. The rocks had to have come from somewhere else.
3. Heavier Elements on Surface: Normal planetary composition results in heavier elements in the core and lighter materials at the surface; not so with the moon. According to Wilson, "The abundance of refractory elements like titanium in the surface areas is so pronounced that several geologists proposed the refractory compounds were brought to the moon’s surface in great quantity in some unknown way. They don’t know how, but that it was done cannot be questioned."
4. Water Vapor: On March 7, 1971, lunar instruments placed by the astronauts recorded a vapor cloud of water passing across the surface of the moon. The cloud lasted 14 hours and covered an area of about 100 square miles.
5. Magnetic Rocks: Moon rocks were magnetized. This is odd because there is no magnetic field on the moon itself. This could not have originated from a "close call" with Earth—such an encounter would have ripped the moon apart.
6. No Volcanoes: Some of the moon’s craters originated internally, yet there is no indication that the moon was ever hot enough to produce volcanic eruptions.
7. Moon Mascons: Mascons, which are large, dense, circular masses lying twenty to forty miles beneath the centers of the moon’s maria, "are broad, disk-shaped objects that could be possibly some kind of artificial construction. For huge circular disks are not likely to be beneath each huge maria, centered like bull’s-eyes in the middle of each, by coincidence or accident." .
8. Seismic Activity: Hundreds of "moonquakes" are recorded each year that cannot be attributed to meteor strikes. In November, 1958, Soviet astronomer Nikolay A. Kozyrev of the Crimean Astrophysical Observatory photographed a gaseous eruption of the moon near the crater Alphonsus. He also detected a reddish glow that lasted for about an hour. In 1963, astronomers at the Lowell Observatory also saw reddish glows on the crests of ridges in the Aristarchus region. These observations have proved to be precisely identical and periodical, repeating themselves as the moon moves closer to the Earth. These are probably not natural phenomena.
9. Hollow Moon: The moon’s mean density is 3.34 gm/cm3 (3.34 times an equal volume of water) whereas the Earth’s is 5.5. What does this mean? In 1962, NASA scientist Dr. Gordon MacDonald stated, "If the astronomical data are reduced, it is found that the data require that the interior of the moon is more like a hollow than a homogeneous sphere." Nobel chemist Dr. Harold Urey suggested the moon’s reduced density is because of large areas inside the moon where is "simply a cavity." MIT’s Dr. Sean C. Solomon wrote, "the Lunar Orbiter experiments vastly improved our knowledge of the moon’s gravitational field . . . indicating the frightening possibility that the moon might be hollow." In Carl Sagan’s treatise, Intelligent Life in the Universe, the famous astronomer stated, "A natural satellite cannot be a hollow object."
10. Moon Echoes: On November 20, 1969, the Apollo 12 crew jettisoned the lunar module ascent stage causing it to crash onto the moon. The LM’s impact (about 40 miles from the Apollo 12 landing site) created an artificial moonquake with startling characteristics—the moon reverberated like a bell for more than an hour. This phenomenon was repeated with Apollo 13 (intentionally commanding the third stage to impact the moon), with even more startling results. Seismic instruments recorded that the reverberations lasted for three hours and twenty minutes and traveled to a depth of twenty-five miles, leading to the conclusion that the moon has an unusually light—or even no—core.
11. Unusual Metals: The moon’s crust is much harder than presumed. Remember the extreme difficulty the astronauts encountered when they tried to drill into the maria? Surprise! The maria is composed primarily illeminite, a mineral containing large amounts of titanium, the same metal used to fabricate the hulls of deep-diving submarines and the skin of the SR-71 "Blackbird". Uranium 236 and neptunium 237 (elements not found in nature on Earth) were discovered in lunar rocks, as were rustproof iron particles.
12. Moon’s Origin: Before the astronauts’ moon rocks conclusively disproved the theory, the moon was believed to have originated when a chunk of Earth broke off eons ago (who knows from where?). Another theory was that the moon was created from leftover "space dust" remaining after the Earth was created. Analysis of the composition of moon rocks disproved this theory also. Another popular theory is that the moon was somehow "captured" by the Earth’s gravitational attraction. But no evidence exists to support this theory. Isaac Asimov, stated, "It’s too big to have been captured by the Earth. The chances of such a capture having been effected and the moon then having taken up nearly circular orbit around our Earth are too small to make such an eventuality credible."
13. Weird Orbit: Our moon is the only moon in the solar system that has a stationary, near-perfect circular orbit. Stranger still, the moon’s center of mass is about 6000 feet closer to the Earth than its geometric center (which should cause wobbling), but the moon’s bulge is on the far side of the moon, away from the Earth. "Something" had to put the moon in orbit with its precise altitude, course, and speed.
14. Moon Diameter: How does one explain the "coincidence" that the moon is just the right distance, coupled with just the right diameter, to completely cover the sun during an eclipse? Again, Isaac Asimov responds, "There is no astronomical reason why the moon and the sun should fit so well. It is the sheerest of coincidences, and only the Earth among all the planets is blessed in this fashion."
15. Spaceship Moon: As outrageous as the Moon-Is-a-Spaceship Theory is, all of the above items are resolved if one assumes that the moon is a gigantic extraterrestrial craft, brought here eons ago by intelligent beings. This is the only theory that is supported by all of the data, and there are no data that contradict this theory.



Greek authors Aristotle and Plutarch, and Roman authors Apolllonius Rhodius and Ovid all wrote of a group of people called the Proselenes who lived in the central mountainous area of Greece called Arcadia The Proselenes claimed title to this area because their forebears were there "before there was a moon in the heavens." This claim is substantiated by symbols on the wall of the Courtyard of Kalasasaya, near the city of Tiahuanaco, Bolivia, which record that the moon came into orbit around the Earth between 11,500 and 13, 000 years ago, long before recorded history.
1. Ages of Flashes: Aristarchus, Plato, Eratosthenes, Biela, Rabbi Levi, and Posidonius all reported anomalous lights on the moon. NASA, one year before the first lunar landing, reported 570+ lights and flashes were observed on the moon from 1540 to 1967.
2. Operation Moon Blink: NASA’s Operation Moon Blink detected 28 lunar events in a relatively short period of time.
3. Lunar Bridge: On July 29, 1953, John J. O’Neill observed a 12-mile-long bridge straddling the crater Mare Crisium. In August, British astronomer Dr. H.P. Wilkens verified its presence, "It looks artificial. It’s almost incredible that such a thing could have been formed in the first instance, or if it was formed, could have lasted during the ages in which the moon has been in existence.
4. The Shard: The Shard, an obelisk-shaped object that towers 1½ miles from the Ukert area of the moon’s surface, was discovered by Orbiter 3 in 1968. Dr. Bruce Cornet, who studied the amazing photographs, stated, "No known natural process can explain such a structure."
5. The Tower: One of the most curious features ever photographed on the Lunar surface (Lunar Orbiter photograph III-84M) is an amazing spire that rises more than 5 miles from the Sinus Medii region of the lunar surface.
6. The Obelisks: Lunar Orbiter II took several photographs in November 1966 that showed several obelisks, one of which was more than 150 feet tall. ". . . the spires were arranged in precisely the same was as the apices of the three great pyramids."


this information i have rounded up from various books, sites, documentaries and historical accounts of the moon.

with these questions/facts and theories I personally can only (for now) come to the conclusion that the earth is artificial and was placed there for specific means.

[curly]

good stuff jesta.LOL i think i had my "vehicle" pimped by the moonies:D

[jesta_g]

good stuff jesta.LOL i think i had my "vehicle" pimped by the moonies:D

lmao pimp my moon buggy!!!! :D

thats killer sweeeeeet.

tho no hydrolic suspension! or you will be floating of the moon before ya know it. lol :p

[jakeuk999]

This is cool stuff jesta_g, I was just wondering if you know of any websites that have photographs of these strange moon structures.

[jesta_g]

This is cool stuff jesta_g, I was just wondering if you know of any websites that have photographs of these strange moon structures.

most of the images i have seen come from books or magazines but i did a quick wee google image search the now and came across a few that i recognised....

http://www.thelivingmoon.com/43ancients/04images/Moon8/Castle/Castle02.jpg

"The Castle". This strange object, photographed during an Apollo mission, has been named "the castle" by Hoagland. It seems to have a definite structure, like the remnant wall of some ancient building. The bottom looks as if it has rows of support columns, above which is a high spire. Whatever it is, it's much brighter than the surrounding landscape.
Close scrutiny by legitimate scientists place the "castle" at being around 9 miles above the surface of the moon.
Is it just a trick of light and shadow?
A photographic anomaly?
Or is it all that remains of some rich Martian's get-away retreat:p?

http://www.thelivingmoon.com/43ancients/04images/Moon8/Castle/Castle03.jpg

and an even closer image of "the castle" shows some sort of "wire" that goes through or past the top of this 9 mile high "structure"....

http://www.thelivingmoon.com/43ancients/04images/Moon8/Castle/Castle04.jpg

http://www.thelivingmoon.com/43ancients/04images/Moon8/Castle/Castle04a.jpg

hmmm no doubt raises a few more questions.

http://www.thelivingmoon.com/43ancients/04images/Moon8/Malibu2/4822_H1.gif

the above image shows an area of the moon where many anomalies have been seen and found. The area where the "castle" was found can be seen just to the right in the image.

this next image is known as the "mega cube" , all i can ask is ... what the fuck is that ??? ....

http://www.thelivingmoon.com/43ancients/04images/Moon8/Cube/Megacube02.jpg

could it be the Borg ship ? ... fuck i hope not :D

the next "structure"/anomalie is known as "the shard"...

http://www.thelivingmoon.com/43ancients/04images/Moon8/Shard/Shard05.JPG

http://www.thelivingmoon.com/43ancients/04images/Moon8/Shard/Shard02.gif

the strange structure (if that's what it is) would be enormous - seven miles high, by Hoagland's calculations. (The star-like shape above the tower is a camera registration mark.) It's difficult to believe that such a huge structure actually stands on the moon.
Its overall irregular spindly shape (containing a regular geometric pattern) with constricted nodes and swollen internodes, if natural, has got to be a wonder of the Universe. No known natural process can explain such a structure.
The amount of sunlight reflecting from parts of the Shard indicate a composition inconsistent with that of most natural substances. Only crystal facets and glass can reflect that much light (polished metallic surfaces are unnatural). Single crystals the size of city blocks are currently unknown.
Richard Hoagland suggests that the Shard may be a highly eroded remnant of some sort of artificial structure made of glass-like material.

hmmmmmm further questions and ideas come to mind....

sorry thats all i could find just now on the structures i mentioned in my previous post. Ill be sure to post up some more images and also any more information should i come across it.

[jakeuk999]

Nice 1, thanks for spending the time on that one. These pics are very interesting.

[jesta_g]

Nice 1, thanks for spending the time on that one. These pics are very interesting.

shnae problems at all, back to pickin my nose and wondering what i could find and learn about today :p ...... or i could roll a dooby after that searching session hhhmmmmmmm ..... DING! decision made :D *whistles off to get skins 'n' weed*

[curly]

shnae problems at all, back to pickin my nose and wondering what i could find and learn about today :p ...... or i could roll a dooby after that searching session hhhmmmmmmm ..... DING! decision made :D *whistles off to get skins 'n' weed*

hey jesta have you ever seen the "hey pendejos" scene from cheech and chong.This thread sort of reminded me of it,it's on you tube and i recommend it for a laugh:D see you later pendejos

[jesta_g]

this video fits nicely here ;):) .....

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=nTw2ZE4cljc&eurl=http://www.truthtube.info/

hmmmmm...

[jakeuk999]

Fecking cool