View Full Version : Edgar Cayce was a Freemason?
mcthompson2x
28-07-2008, 08:40 PM
I just read this in one of the threads here and I figured by replying to it, it would get lost or I'd get one person who responded and I wouldn't get enough information. I googled it and found a couple of sites, but I can't find any compelling evidence other than accusation, and I didn't see that on a great deal of sites. Most just compared the higher eschelons of Masonic teaching to the works of Cayce, but guilt-by-association is a tactic used by disinformers on a regular basis, so I don't really trust any of that. Does anyone have any compelling information on this?
alexph777
29-07-2008, 01:06 AM
Its most likely illuminati disinformation.
I don't see the relevance of the argument anyway and the guy is not here to defend himself. Even if he was it does not mean that he was an agent etc and his information can still be valid. Also he helped alot of people.
I've read some of his books in the early 1990s it was relavent at the time for insights. Enjoyed the book on dreams.
I might be wrong but I don't see his material available in book shops these days.
mcthompson2x
29-07-2008, 01:29 AM
Its most likely illuminati disinformation.
I don't see the relevance of the argument anyway and the guy is not here to defend himself. Even if he was it does not mean that he was an agent etc and his information can still be valid. Also he helped alot of people.
I've read some of his books in the early 1990s it was relavent at the time for insights. Enjoyed the book on dreams.
I might be wrong but I don't see his material available in book shops these days.
Yeah, I never got any negative vibes while reading or hearing about him, and nothing he said seems to be of a negative nature. It was all pretty positive, and I had a very good intuitive feeling about it. I guess even if he were a Freemason, it doesn't change what rings true.
agelnessdotcom
11-08-2008, 09:42 PM
Its most likely illuminati disinformation.
I don't see the relevance of the argument anyway and the guy is not here to defend himself. Even if he was it does not mean that he was an agent etc and his information can still be valid. Also he helped alot of people.
I've read some of his books in the early 1990s it was relavent at the time for insights. Enjoyed the book on dreams.
I might be wrong but I don't see his material available in book shops these days.
Apparently, he was experiencing Oversoul awareness according to expansions.com, which rings true to me.
exclamatio
11-08-2008, 09:56 PM
like he always said "I dont do anything you cant"
cleft_asunder
11-08-2008, 10:00 PM
I just read this in one of the threads here and I figured by replying to it, it would get lost or I'd get one person who responded and I wouldn't get enough information. I googled it and found a couple of sites, but I can't find any compelling evidence other than accusation, and I didn't see that on a great deal of sites. Most just compared the higher eschelons of Masonic teaching to the works of Cayce, but guilt-by-association is a tactic used by disinformers on a regular basis, so I don't really trust any of that. Does anyone have any compelling information on this?
Sounds like crap. That's like saying that a person who meditates is deceived by the New Age movment. See how easy it is to create a lie? And then the people on the receiving end have to spend 100 times more effort in defence to a simple sentence. People get payed to stir stuff up on a forum. BOY, do they have it easy.
"A lie can travel twice around the world, whle the truth is still getting it's boots on."