Prince Harry going fighting in Iraq???

[thirdwave]

Yeah a team full of half pig half frog from Mars are going to win the 2008 world cup final!!

that being said could be a sacrifice.... are all members of the royal family valued?

who knows....

Thoughts?

[mrguitarbear]

The Ministry of Defence are reviewing sending Harry now , maybe they read these forums ?

MOD to review Harry's Iraq role (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6594223.stm)

They can sacrifice Harry because his father is ex-army officer James Hewitt , NOT Charles. But they can't sacrifice Harry if theres a lot of suspicion that it might be a set-up.

I think the main reason they would sacrifice the lad is that it would interfere with the Diana inquest , the second coroner has just resigned from the job and its looking like the real reason might have been pressure from the Royal Family to declare it an accident. Now its a jury inquest , you can bet your life Al-Fayed is going to have the best lawyers money can buy working on the case , and it isn't going to be easy for the Establishment side to cover things up.

However the death of Harry would lead to calls to postpone the inquest for the sake of William and the Royal Family , it would give ammunition to the ' lets leave it alone , its been ten years ' cause and it would cast a shadow over the whole case.

[thirdwave]

yeah, they are defo up to something.... I am also wondering if this is a way to try and manipulate the public and slowly try and call people up for the army...

"if your prince goes and dies (for completely immoral and evil war) then so must you!" ..type thing...

[hagbard_celine]

The Ministry of Defence are reviewing sending Harry now , maybe they read these forums ?

MOD to review Harry's Iraq role (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6594223.stm)

They can sacrifice Harry because his father is ex-army officer James Hewitt , NOT Charles. But they can't sacrifice Harry if theres a lot of suspicion that it might be a set-up.

I think the main reason they would sacrifice the lad is that it would interfere with the Diana inquest , the second coroner has just resigned from the job and its looking like the real reason might have been pressure from the Royal Family to declare it an accident. Now its a jury inquest , you can bet your life Al-Fayed is going to have the best lawyers money can buy working on the case , and it isn't going to be easy for the Establishment side to cover things up.

However the death of Harry would lead to calls to postpone the inquest for the sake of William and the Royal Family , it would give ammunition to the ' lets leave it alone , its been ten years ' cause and it would cast a shadow over the whole case.

Yes indeed. I'd be very worried about going to Iraq if I were Harry; and it's not the Iraqis I'd be scared of!

[jinjo5]

Surprise,surprise,harry wont be going to fight!!
Never saw that one coming.:rolleyes:
The press have been building him up for months
so that he doesnt look like a proper royal jessy.
He was never going to fight.
The reason for not sending will be blamed on
something else,like it would attract more attention
to his fighting colleagues,put them in more danger.
How more dangerous can you get,youre fighting a
war however wrong.
..............or the other reason hes not going to fight
is that theyve had a Jeremy kyle DNA test and he his
actually charlie boy's son.

[siliconpsychosis]

It feels to me as if the media have been preparing people for Harrys assassination.

First we have the case of (deliberately) kidnapped British Navy personnel. ( With Fay Turney 'selling her story to the media' scandal thrown in, to deter people from questioning the official story.) This incident made everyone think, amongst other things, 'Wow. It really is dangerous being a soldier )

Then we had an increase of British casualties in Iraq. Magic 11 fatalities so far in April )

One of which happened to be a friend of Prince William. Therefore people started thinking, 'Oh my God! Even the Royals know people dying in Iraq. )

Then Prince William splits up with Kate Middleton. People think 'Poor old William! Lost a friend in Iraq and now he has no girlfriend. Bad luck always comes in threes!'

And then we have the destruction of a Challenger 2 tank, the first time ever in Iraq! Let me guess, er.... is that the same type of vehicle Harry's division will use in Iraq?

Two days ago a British soldier was shot dead in Basra. Guess what he was doing? He was providing top cover for a Warrior armoured personnel carrier on a routine patrol. This required him to have his head out of the hatch to act as the eyes and ears of the patrol leaving him vulnerable to attack by gunmen.

A possible scenario for Prince Harry, aged 22? With fingers pointing at Iran as the perpetrator? Don't bet against it.

[hagbard_celine]

It feels to me as if the media have been preparing people for Harrys assassination.

First we have the case of (deliberately) kidnapped British Navy personnel. ( With Fay Turney 'selling her story to the media' scandal thrown in, to deter people from questioning the official story.) This incident made everyone think, amongst other things, 'Wow. It really is dangerous being a soldier )

Then we had an increase of British casualties in Iraq. Magic 11 fatalities so far in April )

One of which happened to be a friend of Prince William. Therefore people started thinking, 'Oh my God! Even the Royals know people dying in Iraq. )

Then Prince William splits up with Kate Middleton. People think 'Poor old William! Lost a friend in Iraq and now he has no girlfriend. Bad luck always comes in threes!'

And then we have the destruction of a Challenger 2 tank, the first time ever in Iraq! Let me guess, er.... is that the same type of vehicle Harry's division will use in Iraq?

Two days ago a British soldier was shot dead in Basra. Guess what he was doing? He was providing top cover for a Warrior armoured personnel carrier on a routine patrol. This required him to have his head out of the hatch to act as the eyes and ears of the patrol leaving him vulnerable to attack by gunmen.

A possible scenario for Prince Harry, aged 22? With fingers pointing at Iran as the perpetrator? Don't bet against it.

Quite so. "They" will find a way to get to him.

[mrguitarbear]

I think its going to work like this :

The Ministry of Defence ' try to persuade ' Harry not to go to Iraq , Harry is persuaded by his regimental colonel he should go to Iraq , Harry says he is going to go , Harry goes to Iraq and gets killed , the Ministry of Defence wring their hands and say ' We told him not to go... <sob> '.

I reckon its a get-out clause for the politicians.

[jinjo5]

Hes not going to iraq.
The seed has been planted,its up
for public debate now.
So its gunna cause such a fuss that they
cant send him to fight.Job done.
............just had a thought........
i couldnt care less whether he goes or not.:p

[queenreptile]

Hes not going to iraq.
The seed has been planted,its up
for public debate now.
So its gunna cause such a fuss that they
cant send him to fight.Job done.
............just had a thought........
i couldnt care less whether he goes or not.:p

I care very much about if he goes. I care for all the soldierswho go.War is terrible. Both my Grandparents died in war.Not to go would be unpardonable dishonour for a Prince so he will fight.

[hagbard_celine]

.Not to go would be unpardonable dishonour for a Prince so he will fight.

I don't agree. There is no honour in fighting a war that kills innocent people for money and power. The Illuminati alone want this war; there is no justuce in it at all. The bravest and most honourable thing a man can do in this situation is say "No! I will not take part in it! It is wrong and it must be stoppoed!"

[thirdwave]

I don't agree. There is no honour in fighting a war that kills innocent people for money and power. The Illuminati alone want this war; there is no justuce in it at all. The bravest and most honourable thing a man can do in this situation is say "No! I will not take part in it! It is wrong and it must be stoppoed!"



If it was not so annoying it would be like a Monty python sketch....

We go into a War because our government tell us they have undeniable evidence of them having WOMD.... they MUST go in and get to it, even though they have no right to tell them they can have them or not, or there was any evidence that Iraq or Sadam had anything to do with 9/11, infact more pointed towards the oposit..... they were running out of time and it was vital they had to go in.....

here we are ... not one WOMD ....but we did liberate them from Sadam even though we chose not to bother a few years before.... and now look at Iraq!! it had the magic touch of the West and now look at it blossom!! I guess they have Israel to use as inspiration on how to create a harmonious country....


and now all of a sudden Harry Must go in for his country????

if he wants to do his country any favours he would stand up and tell people how wrong the war is and its not in his name!!

at this point in time money I pay in Tax is being spent on weapons to kill innocent people and im not to proud of that, let alone go in and pull the trigger!


then you will get Muppets like Jon Gaunt on mainstream radio tell people like me im a traitor and an idiot, for not bowing down to this Mass Murder plot, and start killing in the name of greed, evil, and dishonesty......

How ignorant can you get????