Iraq, oil and ??

[umbrex]

I just havent been able to get it out of my head since i stumbled across it when doing some ressearch on sumerian culture. It's pretty obvious to everyone that the primary reason for the US to invade Iraq was oil, at first it would seem that way anyways. But it's a thick plot i must admit.

A few things u need to know about for considering this are:

The Annunaki.
Monatomic gold.
Sumerian culture.

The thing which wonders me is this:
When the americans invaded Iraq and established themsleves they chose to setup camp directly on the ancient ruins of Babylon. Babylon is considered the cradle of our civilization and very interesting information about it's past has been uncovered, especially in relations to the Annunaki. Many artefects and important iraqi (sumerian) relics have been recovered from arceologic excatvations during the past 2 centuries.
The interesting part, and what makes it stink, is the fact that there are 2 public samples of monatomic gold (were). One of them was brought back too Enland from Mt. Sinai in 1904 and is preserved on some British museum, far away from public reach (http://www.karenlyster.com/genesis4.html) and the other was kept at the Baghdad Histric Museum which was bombed by the US (Leaving the only other sample remaining under control, and destroying some ancient world history) "accidently".

Now i'm really wondering: Why the hell would you choose to put a big military base on ANCIENT HISTORIC RUINS ?!?!? It makes no sence what soever, excluding perhaps the possibility for the symbolic value of having a base at that location.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4177577.stm

"Yes, people of Iraq, we are here to protect your ancient relic, and in order to do so we have to make a 300.000 squarefeet pavement for all the jeeps, tanks and hummers"

The thing is they actually destroyed some parts of it.

Now, here comes what really had me going:

http://highstrangeness.tv/news/04210601.php

Am i the only one thinking: What the f... is going on here ?!?

A gigantic cargoplane. A 1 km wall giving them privacy to do whatever they like. Massive excavations ?!?

And why are the churches interested ?!?
Regarding this bit it must mean it can have religios implications - real history ftw eh?

Placing a base at the site in order to "protect it" leaves the US with the perfect opportunity to use their shield as a transparent mirror to hide what exactly is going on. The abvious destruction of some parts of the ruins are being explained as collateral damage from building on the base and transportation.
This is a disgracefull way of mmanaging an ancient site and what are all these shanannagans going on. This stinks, what have they uncovered and what gave them the foreknowlegde of there being something there and this comes at a very odd time.

A stargate ?

An ancient being brought back for 2012 ?

Just a place for horny rituals of the elite ?

Have anyone stumbled across this as well ? Please let me know, im only getting dead ends now.

Sincere - Umbrex.

[levitas]

Yeah Umbrex I was thinking the same thing. Everything appears to have lots of layers these days. What if we're caught at one of the last layers but still havent gotten to the VERY last one? A good book about all the interesting stuff is Stairway to Heaven by Zecharia Sitchin. You can really understand how important that geographical area really is. I dunno... maybe they're doing something like the Templers did a while back? Same place? Same situation? What do you think? (I dont really think they're destroying stuff).

[premasai]

I just havent been able to get it out of my head since i stumbled across it when doing some ressearch on sumerian culture. It's pretty obvious to everyone that the primary reason for the US to invade Iraq was oil, at first it would seem that way anyways. But it's a thick plot i must admit.

A few things u need to know about for considering this are:

The Annunaki.
Monatomic gold.
Sumerian culture.

The thing which wonders me is this:
When the americans invaded Iraq and established themsleves they chose to setup camp directly on the ancient ruins of Babylon. Babylon is considered the cradle of our civilization and very interesting information about it's past has been uncovered, especially in relations to the Annunaki. Many artefects and important iraqi (sumerian) relics have been recovered from arceologic excatvations during the past 2 centuries.
The interesting part, and what makes it stink, is the fact that there are 2 public samples of monatomic gold (were). One of them was brought back too Enland from Mt. Sinai in 1904 and is preserved on some British museum, far away from public reach (http://www.karenlyster.com/genesis4.html) and the other was kept at the Baghdad Histric Museum which was bombed by the US (Leaving the only other sample remaining under control, and destroying some ancient world history) "accidently".

Now i'm really wondering: Why the hell would you choose to put a big military base on ANCIENT HISTORIC RUINS ?!?!? It makes no sence what soever, excluding perhaps the possibility for the symbolic value of having a base at that location.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4177577.stm

"Yes, people of Iraq, we are here to protect your ancient relic, and in order to do so we have to make a 300.000 squarefeet pavement for all the jeeps, tanks and hummers"

The thing is they actually destroyed some parts of it.

Now, here comes what really had me going:

http://highstrangeness.tv/news/04210601.php

Am i the only one thinking: What the f... is going on here ?!?

A gigantic cargoplane. A 1 km wall giving them privacy to do whatever they like. Massive excavations ?!?

And why are the churches interested ?!?
Regarding this bit it must mean it can have religios implications - real history ftw eh?

Placing a base at the site in order to "protect it" leaves the US with the perfect opportunity to use their shield as a transparent mirror to hide what exactly is going on. The abvious destruction of some parts of the ruins are being explained as collateral damage from building on the base and transportation.
This is a disgracefull way of mmanaging an ancient site and what are all these shanannagans going on. This stinks, what have they uncovered and what gave them the foreknowlegde of there being something there and this comes at a very odd time.

A stargate ?

An ancient being brought back for 2012 ?

Just a place for horny rituals of the elite ?

Have anyone stumbled across this as well ? Please let me know, im only getting dead ends now.

Sincere - Umbrex.

WHAT ABOUT AMERICAN EMBASSY IN BAGHDAD? IT IS JUST ANOTHER RITUAL CENTER. 22 BUILDINGS, 5500 PEOPLE. ONLY LOOKING AT NUMEROLOGY MAKES ME SICK........



http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=20070124&articleId=4579


Global Research, January 24, 2007
Associated Press


Email this article to a friend
Print this article


New embassy in Iraq a mystery
Baghdad locale, slated to be completed in 2007, to be largest of its kind
The Associated Press
Updated: 5:45 p.m. ET April 14, 2006
BAGHDAD, Iraq - The fortress-like compound rising beside the Tigris River here will be the largest of its kind in the world, the size of Vatican City, with the population of a small town, its own defense force, self-contained power and water, and a precarious perch at the heart of Iraq’s turbulent future.
The new U.S. Embassy also seems as cloaked in secrecy as the ministate in Rome.



“We can’t talk about it. Security reasons,” Roberta Rossi, a spokeswoman at the current embassy, said when asked for information about the project.
A British tabloid even told readers the location was being kept secret — news that would surprise Baghdadis who for months have watched the forest of construction cranes at work across the winding Tigris, at the very center of their city and within easy mortar range of anti-U.S. forces in the capital, though fewer explode there these days.
The embassy complex — 21 buildings on 104 acres, according to a U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee report — is taking shape on riverside parkland in the fortified “Green Zone,” just east of al-Samoud, a former palace of Saddam Hussein’s, and across the road from the building where the ex-dictator is now on trial.
The Republican Palace, where U.S. Embassy functions are temporarily housed in cubicles among the chandelier-hung rooms, is less than a mile away in the 4-square-mile zone, an enclave of American and Iraqi government offices and lodgings ringed by miles of concrete barriers.
5,500 employees at the embassy
The 5,500 Americans and Iraqis working at the embassy, almost half listed as security, are far more numerous than at any other U.S. mission worldwide. They rarely venture out into the “Red Zone,” that is, violence-torn Iraq.
This huge American contingent at the center of power has drawn criticism.
“The presence of a massive U.S. embassy — by far the largest in the world — co-located in the Green Zone with the Iraqi government is seen by Iraqis as an indication of who actually exercises power in their country,” the International Crisis Group, a European-based research group, said in one of its periodic reports on Iraq.
State Department spokesman Justin Higgins defended the size of the embassy, old and new, saying it’s indicative of the work facing the United States here.
“It’s somewhat self-evident that there’s going to be a fairly sizable commitment to Iraq by the U.S. government in all forms for several years,” he said in Washington.
Higgins noted that large numbers of non-diplomats work at the mission — hundreds of military personnel and dozens of FBI agents, for example, along with representatives of the Agriculture, Commerce and other U.S. federal departments.
They sleep in hundreds of trailers or “containerized” quarters scattered around the Green Zone. But next year embassy staff will move into six apartment buildings in the new complex, which has been under construction since mid-2005 with a target completion date of June 2007.
Iraq’s interim government transferred the land to U.S. ownership in October 2004, under an agreement whose terms were not disclosed.
“Embassy Baghdad” will dwarf new U.S. embassies elsewhere, projects that typically cover 10 acres. The embassy’s 104 acres is six times larger than the United Nations compound in New York, and two-thirds the acreage of Washington’s National Mall.
Estimated cost of over $1 billion
Original cost estimates ranged over $1 billion, but Congress appropriated only $592 million in the emergency Iraq budget adopted last year. Most has gone to a Kuwait builder, First Kuwaiti Trading & Contracting, with the rest awarded to six contractors working on the project’s “classified” portion — the actual embassy offices.
Higgins declined to identify those builders, citing security reasons, but said five were American companies.
The designs aren’t publicly available, but the Senate report makes clear it will be a self-sufficient and “hardened” domain, to function in the midst of Baghdad power outages, water shortages and continuing turmoil.
It will have its own water wells, electricity plant and wastewater-treatment facility, “systems to allow 100 percent independence from city utilities,” says the report, the most authoritative open source on the embassy plans.
Besides two major diplomatic office buildings, homes for the ambassador and his deputy, and the apartment buildings for staff, the compound will offer a swimming pool, gym, commissary, food court and American Club, all housed in a recreation building.
Security, overseen by U.S. Marines, will be extraordinary: setbacks and perimeter no-go areas that will be especially deep, structures reinforced to 2.5-times the standard, and five high-security entrances, plus an emergency entrance-exit, the Senate report says.
Higgins said the work, under way on all parts of the project, is more than one-third complete.
© 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12319798/from/ET/

[premasai]

Not only Babylon got hurt. 90% of ancient artefacts from most Iraqi museums (especially the National Museum in Bghdad) were stolen. To be accurate: they were allowed to be robbed. Americans allowed it to happen and probably partially took part in the robbery.
I agree with you. Oil was not main reason why they went after Iraq. They could have Iraqi oil in many other ways. Oil is cover up for something much bigger and it has to do with ancient history of Sumeria and Babylon.
Research Michael Tsarion. He says that there have been some infos coming lately about one (or more) Annunakis (whatever name you give them) beeing asleep for thousands of years somewher in Iraq. Is it to wake them up?
You'll find the info in one of videos (I can not remember in which) of M. Tsarion:

http://www.taroscopes.com/webstream/webstream_startpage.html

Take care.

[elpee]

Can anyone tell me how high those mountains in that area are ? I might have an idea...

[space lizard]

Remember Space Oddessy 2001

Remember the big black obleisk.

Thats what they are digging for.