doyouknowyourdead
09-07-2008, 03:02 AM
Hi all
We went to David Ickes conference in Hull and left, feeling amongst other things just a little puzzled as to what David Icke actually thinks about NPT.It would be interesting to see what others think about this.
Now then, for us NPT presents an interesting scenario, lets just for a minute assume that NPT is in fact the correct theory, what would that mean?. Would it not take this whole thing to another level? Would it not be concrete evidence that there are technologies available and in use by the powers at be that far super cede what we believe to be available, possibly free energy being one of them. Would the massive political issues and implications behind 9/11 not be taken to a whole other level if NPT proved to be correct?
Anyway, enough rambling, back to my original point, we were in Hull on Sunday and during the open question session a guy got up, i forget his name now, but he started to ramble a little before getting onto his point about there being No Planes used on 9/11. Now, the guy kind of wasted an opportunity in my book, it would of been far more useful if instead of standing up and giving it the 'i am so and so from so and so website and i think 9/11 was all a cartoon, watch September clues' he actually just got straight to the point and asked David what his thoughts were on the NPT, I think the answer would have been quite useful to the current conflicts going on amongst 9/11 truthers about weather or not No planes were used, instead the guy came across as a little nuts, im not saying he is nuts but all we got for his efforts from David was 'Thanks mate, next question'
Next up, Just an observation which im sure im not alone on this one, but there was another lady that spoke during the question session, Belinda from wholetruth.org.Although i dont quite remember her question,she used the opportunity well to get her 5 mins of fame. David mentioned that she had organized and paid for something to the tune of 500 quid, i don't remember if David said it was the political campaign, or the conference or what it was, but she was definitely involved financially in some way shape or form in David being there. I find it interesting that the wholetruth.org coalition are supporters of the NPT and that one of the founders of wholetruth.org should be none other than Andrew Johnson, much denounced on these very forums by the likes of 'John white' for being a shill. Interesting NO?
For David Icke to align with and accept funding from such a group,To me means one or possibly none of several things.
On the one hand maybe David must think there is something of the NPT, although my gut reaction based on his response to the 'NPT nutter' who got up tells me he either doesnt think anything of it, or at least doesn't want to publicly acknowledge so.
On the other hand, isn't he publicly acknowledging his support for the NPT by accepting financial backing and support from wholetruth.org who quite obviously stand on the NPT side of the fence?
Im sure we shall never get a definite answer to this but it would be nice if we could.A few opinions wouldn't go a miss though!
The list of paranoia fueled questions going around my head is growing by the minute the more i think about this one.
Anyway, im sure someone will be along to bash me in a minute, but hey ho, just getting some things of my mind.
We went to David Ickes conference in Hull and left, feeling amongst other things just a little puzzled as to what David Icke actually thinks about NPT.It would be interesting to see what others think about this.
Now then, for us NPT presents an interesting scenario, lets just for a minute assume that NPT is in fact the correct theory, what would that mean?. Would it not take this whole thing to another level? Would it not be concrete evidence that there are technologies available and in use by the powers at be that far super cede what we believe to be available, possibly free energy being one of them. Would the massive political issues and implications behind 9/11 not be taken to a whole other level if NPT proved to be correct?
Anyway, enough rambling, back to my original point, we were in Hull on Sunday and during the open question session a guy got up, i forget his name now, but he started to ramble a little before getting onto his point about there being No Planes used on 9/11. Now, the guy kind of wasted an opportunity in my book, it would of been far more useful if instead of standing up and giving it the 'i am so and so from so and so website and i think 9/11 was all a cartoon, watch September clues' he actually just got straight to the point and asked David what his thoughts were on the NPT, I think the answer would have been quite useful to the current conflicts going on amongst 9/11 truthers about weather or not No planes were used, instead the guy came across as a little nuts, im not saying he is nuts but all we got for his efforts from David was 'Thanks mate, next question'
Next up, Just an observation which im sure im not alone on this one, but there was another lady that spoke during the question session, Belinda from wholetruth.org.Although i dont quite remember her question,she used the opportunity well to get her 5 mins of fame. David mentioned that she had organized and paid for something to the tune of 500 quid, i don't remember if David said it was the political campaign, or the conference or what it was, but she was definitely involved financially in some way shape or form in David being there. I find it interesting that the wholetruth.org coalition are supporters of the NPT and that one of the founders of wholetruth.org should be none other than Andrew Johnson, much denounced on these very forums by the likes of 'John white' for being a shill. Interesting NO?
For David Icke to align with and accept funding from such a group,To me means one or possibly none of several things.
On the one hand maybe David must think there is something of the NPT, although my gut reaction based on his response to the 'NPT nutter' who got up tells me he either doesnt think anything of it, or at least doesn't want to publicly acknowledge so.
On the other hand, isn't he publicly acknowledging his support for the NPT by accepting financial backing and support from wholetruth.org who quite obviously stand on the NPT side of the fence?
Im sure we shall never get a definite answer to this but it would be nice if we could.A few opinions wouldn't go a miss though!
The list of paranoia fueled questions going around my head is growing by the minute the more i think about this one.
Anyway, im sure someone will be along to bash me in a minute, but hey ho, just getting some things of my mind.