BBC Set To Launch New Smear Attack On 9/11 Truth

[mr_self_destruct]

Excellent article by Paul Joseph Watson:

http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/june2008/062008_smear_attack.htm

[mrguitarbear]

Ask the Beeb what happened to their 9/11 footage - they have lost it ! The most important news event of the 21st century and they have lost their footage of it ( this was the answer to why they couldn't comment on the WTC 7 fiasco anyway ).

This is an attempt to bolster the credibility of ' big media ' over internet stories I imagine , or an attempt to justify the BBC's establishment stance in the face of growing contention on the web.

[stealth_0073]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-wI6uAOHzvo



deleted Richard jones fake wq2rx alqaida
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Anbokqb5wt0


actors and agents time to wake up to fake tv brought to you by
tavistock institute mi5 and mossad ABM fakery crew
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cW089fj94vY[/url]

[phaid]

Interesting who the BBC have dug up to speak about 7/7 and create the inevitable backlash.

Nicholas Kollerstrom (anybody ever heard of this guy or his crediblity as a spokesman? No, I didn't think so. So where did the BBC find such a convenient face to smear so-called 'conspiracy theorists?).

Last month Dr Kollerstorm, an astronomer and historian, was stripped of an honorary research fellowship at University College London after it emerged he had written a paper entitled The Auschwitz 'Gas Chamber' Illusion on a Far-Right website.

He claimed the Nazi concentration camp was like a holiday complex where inmates could sunbathe beside a swimming pool and watch water polo matches.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1025385/Relatives-fury-BBC-pays-expenses-Holocaust-denier-pestered-bereaved-families-7-7-bombing.html

The whole of the Daily Mail piece rests on the 'fury' generated by the BBC paying this guy expenses of £8 train fare to get to the interview. That seems to be the only reason to print this article (oh, and of course to get in a dig at the madness of people who don't go along with the government version).

[mr_self_destruct]

I listened to a radio interview Alex Jones did with the guy who produced the 9/11 Conspiracy hit-job for the BBC. Very good, the guy seemed very genuine but he just didn't have the answers to Alex's questions.

The bloke they've filmed representing the truth movement is an obvious tactic to make people associate truthers with offensive nutjobs. And losing the footage of 9/11 quite frankly takes the piss!

[bryan]

Interesting that Paul Joseph Watson has joined forces with the BBC and the Daily Mail to launch a smear campaign against Nick Kollerstrom.

By sheer coincidence I've read one of Dr Kollerstrom's books! It's called 'Gardening and Planting by the Moon', which is not the kind of subject you'd expect from a raging neo-nazi thug.

It amazes me how people who know the media are lying about 9/11 and 7/7 can be taken in so easily by tabloid propaganda and Alex Jones's limited hangout.

[phaid]

Interesting that Paul Joseph Watson has joined forces with the BBC and the Daily Mail to launch a smear campaign against Nick Kollerstrom.

By sheer coincidence I've read one of Dr Kollerstrom's books! It's called 'Gardening and Planting by the Moon', which is not the kind of subject you'd expect from a raging neo-nazi thug.

It amazes me how people who know the media are lying about 9/11 and 7/7 can be taken in so easily by tabloid propaganda and Alex Jones's limited hangout.

Point taken - I know nothing about Kollerstrom except for this media coverage concerning the TV programme, so if he's being smeared by them incorrectly then that's outrageous, but is it also not possible that somebody who writes about gardening might also hold extremist political views, eh? I'm afraid haven't followed up on AJ's angle on this, only being an occasional visitor to his website.

Assuming that few people here know Kollerstrom personally, no-one can really vouch for his intent or integrity.

The main point here is the BBC's choice of spokesman on these topics - why choose someone who might be seen as having a controversial CV rather than somebody with impeccable credentials (if such a person exists, LOL).

[bryan]

Point taken - I know nothing about Kollerstrom except for this media coverage concerning the TV programme, so if he's being smeared by them incorrectly then that's outrageous, but is it also not possible that somebody who writes about gardening might also hold extremist political views, eh? I'm afraid haven't followed up on AJ's angle on this, only being an occasional visitor to his website.

Assuming that few people here know Kollerstrom personally, no-one can really vouch for his intent or integrity.

The main point here is the BBC's choice of spokesman on these topics - why choose someone who might be seen as having a controversial CV rather than somebody with impeccable credentials (if such a person exists, LOL).

The main point for me is that many people who complain about being called nutjobs by the MSM for questioning the official version of 9/11 are perfectly happy to use the same language to dismiss sceptics of the official version of WW2. It seems that the 9/11 truth movement is being used to promote a bigger lie than the one it's trying to expose.

The big difference between revisionists and most 9/11 truthers is that the revisionists have been doing it for longer and they've looked farther down the rabbit hole. They frequently end up in jail for publishing their research on the holocaust, which indicates that it's much more of a threat to the Establishment than the truth about 9/11.

[mynameis]

The main point for me is that many people who complain about being called nutjobs by the MSM for questioning the official version of 9/11 are perfectly happy to use the same language to dismiss sceptics of the official version of WW2. It seems that the 9/11 truth movement is being used to promote a bigger lie than the one it's trying to expose.

The big difference between revisionists and most 9/11 truthers is that the revisionists have been doing it for longer and they've looked farther down the rabbit hole. They frequently end up in jail for publishing their research on the holocaust, which indicates that it's much more of a threat to the Establishment than the truth about 9/11.

I disagree. Anything remotely connected to nazi Germany or its allies except, maybe Japan, are unable to wash the blood of the events from their hands. These people gain more members through the use of indoctrination and racial hatred, based in tribalism/nationalism, and bigotry; hate groups like neo-nazi lure low to average IQ people into their ranks. A gathering of morons is allowable by law, but creating environments to incite violence and attacks is prohibited by those in the establishment. Race has never been a computational factor for differences in human beings until the rich decided they needed what they call the slaves and cattle to fight in other parts of the world.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J3Xe1kX7Wsc

[bryan]

I disagree. Anything remotely connected to nazi Germany or its allies except, maybe Japan, are unable to wash the blood of the events from their hands. These people gain more members through the use of indoctrination and racial hatred, based in tribalism/nationalism, and bigotry; hate groups like neo-nazi lure low to average IQ people into their ranks. A gathering of morons is allowable by law, but creating environments to incite violence and attacks is prohibited by those in the establishment. Race has never been a computational factor for differences in human beings until the rich decided they needed what they call the slaves and cattle to fight in other parts of the world.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J3Xe1kX7Wsc

Thanks for proving my point!

[lightgiver]

Just ask em to play the WTC7 footage on the day,they cocked up:rolleyes:;)

that will soon shut em up,or just e mail it to them:D

like mr guitarbear man said a right fiasco....

don't worry BBC we have the footage.....

[mr_self_destruct]

If anyone could record this program when it's on (6th July) and make a torrent it would be much appreciated!

[stealth_0073]

If anyone could record this program when it's on (6th July) and make a torrent it would be much appreciated!

i will record it and upload in high quality mpeg2 which will be about 4.0gb
i will make a 2nd version in xvid or x264 for the people who dont have high bandwidth.

[belial]

If the sheep stopped paying the 'TV Licence' then the BBC wouldn't be able to pump out propaganda like this.

The BBC are clearly pissed off after the embarassment they suffered through this comedy:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rJidW9_AhXE

People who fund this government propaganda machine [The BBC] need shooting.

[mr_self_destruct]

i will record it and upload in high quality mpeg2 which will be about 4.0gb
i will make a 2nd version in xvid or x264 for the people who dont have high bandwidth.

That would be great - thanks a lot!

[mr_self_destruct]

According to this BBC blog, the BBC tapes of 9/11 haven't been lost after all...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/

[mrguitarbear]

According to this BBC blog, the BBC tapes of 9/11 haven't been lost after all...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/

Would the coverage tapes of the most important day in 21st century history really be put on the shelf for the wrong year in the archives ? I leave you to judge on that one. ' Oh look , our tapes have conviniently appeared again ! '

Its like when they don't want to answer questions about something then the tapes ' go missing ' , but then when they get accused of being part of a conspiracy , the tapes ' miraculously ' turn up again...hmmm...

Personally I seriously doubt the Beeb is part of any 9/11 conspiracy , but the fact remains that they inadvertently reported that WTC 7 had collapsed before it really did.

Mike Rudin says ' Having talked to key eyewitnesses who were actually at Ground Zero that day it is clear that, as early as midday, the fire service feared that Tower 7 might collapse. '

Its a shame that the people who said that they had heard bombs go off in the North tower and whatever - who were also on the scene - aren't treated with the same deference as those whose statements seem to confirm the ' official version '.

It should be interesting to watch the programme , lets see them explain away this one !