View Full Version : Does the New World Order consist of 6,000 people?
rebel_man
22-05-2008, 12:52 AM
I came across a website by a group calling themselves "The Meritocracy Party". They talk about a global elite - a "superclass" of 6,000 super rich people. Sounds pretty much like the New World Order to me. I bet the Bilderberg group is part of this global elite.
http://www.meritocracy.org.uk says:
"The Facts
(Source: Superclass: The Global Power Elite and the World They Are Making by David Rothkopf.)
1) The world is controlled by a global elite of approximately 6,000 people.
2) 94% of them are men, and their average age is 60.
3) 2% of the world's population own 50% of the world's wealth.
4) 1,100 billionaires have double the assets of the poorest 2.5 billion people.
5) The world's 50 largest financial institutions control a third of the world's assets.
6) The world's 250 biggest companies generate sales of about a third of the world's GDP.
Very few of this super-rich elite are elected. Many have attended well-known schools, colleges and universities. Many belong to well-known clubs and societies. Many inherited great wealth and many just happened to be present when great assets became available (as in the case of the 36 Russian oligarchs). Many have strong family and religious links. Many are close friends. They control practically everything worth controlling. They don't listen to us, and they don't care about us. Are we just going to stand by and do nothing as though we were peasants bowing to feudal kings? Or are we prepared to stand up to the elite and take what is ours? It's time to replace the system that oppresses us. Democracy gave birth to this global elite, and is their main instrument of political control of the masses. Meritocracy, the antidote to democracy, will eliminate nepotism and cronyism. It's time to change the world we live in. It's time for meritocracy."
So, is this meritocracy bunch right? Should we be very worried about democracy? Is democracy the chosen political instrument of the NWO to manipulate and control us?
creamfields usa
30-05-2008, 12:43 AM
I came across a website by a group calling themselves "The Meritocracy Party". They talk about a global elite - a "superclass" of 6,000 super rich people. Sounds pretty much like the New World Order to me. I bet the Bilderberg group is part of this global elite.
http://www.meritocracy.org.uk says:
"The Facts
(Source: Superclass: The Global Power Elite and the World They Are Making by David Rothkopf.)
1) The world is controlled by a global elite of approximately 6,000 people.
2) 94% of them are men, and their average age is 60.
3) 2% of the world's population own 50% of the world's wealth.
4) 1,100 billionaires have double the assets of the poorest 2.5 billion people.
5) The world's 50 largest financial institutions control a third of the world's assets.
6) The world's 250 biggest companies generate sales of about a third of the world's GDP.
Very few of this super-rich elite are elected. Many have attended well-known schools, colleges and universities. Many belong to well-known clubs and societies. Many inherited great wealth and many just happened to be present when great assets became available (as in the case of the 36 Russian oligarchs). Many have strong family and religious links. Many are close friends. They control practically everything worth controlling. They don't listen to us, and they don't care about us. Are we just going to stand by and do nothing as though we were peasants bowing to feudal kings? Or are we prepared to stand up to the elite and take what is ours? It's time to replace the system that oppresses us. Democracy gave birth to this global elite, and is their main instrument of political control of the masses. Meritocracy, the antidote to democracy, will eliminate nepotism and cronyism. It's time to change the world we live in. It's time for meritocracy."
So, is this meritocracy bunch right? Should we be very worried about democracy? Is democracy the chosen political instrument of the NWO to manipulate and control us?
That's about right.
cruise4
30-05-2008, 01:11 AM
Not exactly what I mean by meritocracy. Merit must be but one part of any replacement structure, otherwise its all a judgement call on what constitutes 'merit'. In fact some of their ideas are downright insane from the brief read I've had so far. I'll have to find a new term now. :mad:
The extract above is good and unarguable against really. Its when you go a bit deeper into their site the fascism starts to show up. Controlled opposition startup or something.
ichi wa zen
30-05-2008, 11:13 AM
You forget to mention about 99,999% of them is from Europe/USA or we could say "white" guys.
Lets not be political correct here, so just state the facts!
numbersix
03-06-2008, 11:50 PM
There are plenty of very wealthy Africans, Arabs , Russians and even Chinese
Its completely untrue to say 99.9% of the wealthy are white European or American.
In fact some Russians are now so wealthy that they own many properties in London and a number of Premiership football clubs eg Chelsea, Portsmouth etc
pac3lli
04-06-2008, 02:15 AM
There are plenty of very wealthy Africans, Arabs , Russians and even Chinese
Its completely untrue to say 99.9% of the wealthy are white European or American.
In fact some Russians are now so wealthy that they own many properties in London and a number of Premiership football clubs eg Chelsea, Portsmouth etc
Quite true. In fact as I understand, most of the world's millionaires live in Mexico.
I've been thinking about the "who" of the elite for the past few months. Who are they? In other words, if there really is a secret group of incredibly rich individuals with access to technology that is 30-years in the future, setting global and national policies (which I believe such groups do exist), how would they be unable to control the release of their identities?
Are they really the people who are publically going to Bilderberg, Trilateral, Royal Institute, Bohemian Grove, etc.? I'm at the point now where I think these groups are almost public distractions. I think these groups are setting policies and laying plans, but the mere fact that they are publically known leads me to think there are other groups that are completely underground, consisting of people that are truly at the top of the pyramid who are totally out of the public eye (and always have been).
There just seems to be a continuity to the globalist plans, across decades, which transcends the reported attendance at these meetings. I think David Rockefellar, for instance, is relatively low-level in comparison to the reaches of these groups.
ichi wa zen
04-06-2008, 11:12 AM
There are plenty of very wealthy Africans, Arabs , Russians and even Chinese
Its completely untrue to say 99.9% of the wealthy are white European or American.
In fact some Russians are now so wealthy that they own many properties in London and a number of Premiership football clubs eg Chelsea, Portsmouth etc
Is not like 99,99% of the conspirators (TPTB) from Europe/USA?
Thats what i meant, not who has the most money, ofcourse there are rich people outside of europe/usa, my bad.
jvx19
04-06-2008, 12:23 PM
Are they really the people who are publically going to Bilderberg, Trilateral, Royal Institute, Bohemian Grove, etc.? I'm at the point now where I think these groups are almost public distractions. I think these groups are setting policies and laying plans, but the mere fact that they are publically known leads me to think there are other groups that are completely underground, consisting of people that are truly at the top of the pyramid who are totally out of the public eye (and always have been).
.
That is what Icke says, we never really see the true controllers. Look at how powerful Bush is, yet he has his strings pulled by those above him, and so on and so on. If they go against those above them they get promoted to Full Dead.
freedomnonfighter
05-06-2008, 09:13 AM
Those figures just make my stomach turn........
nikolaijovanovic
07-06-2008, 01:57 AM
I came across a website by a group calling themselves "The Meritocracy Party". They talk about a global elite - a "superclass" of 6,000 super rich people. Sounds pretty much like the New World Order to me. I bet the Bilderberg group is part of this global elite.
http://www.meritocracy.org.uk says:
"The Facts
(Source: Superclass: The Global Power Elite and the World They Are Making by David Rothkopf.)
1) The world is controlled by a global elite of approximately 6,000 people.
2) 94% of them are men, and their average age is 60.
3) 2% of the world's population own 50% of the world's wealth.
4) 1,100 billionaires have double the assets of the poorest 2.5 billion people.
5) The world's 50 largest financial institutions control a third of the world's assets.
6) The world's 250 biggest companies generate sales of about a third of the world's GDP.
Very few of this super-rich elite are elected. Many have attended well-known schools, colleges and universities. Many belong to well-known clubs and societies. Many inherited great wealth and many just happened to be present when great assets became available (as in the case of the 36 Russian oligarchs). Many have strong family and religious links. Many are close friends. They control practically everything worth controlling. They don't listen to us, and they don't care about us. Are we just going to stand by and do nothing as though we were peasants bowing to feudal kings? Or are we prepared to stand up to the elite and take what is ours? It's time to replace the system that oppresses us. Democracy gave birth to this global elite, and is their main instrument of political control of the masses. Meritocracy, the antidote to democracy, will eliminate nepotism and cronyism. It's time to change the world we live in. It's time for meritocracy."
So, is this meritocracy bunch right? Should we be very worried about democracy? Is democracy the chosen political instrument of the NWO to manipulate and control us?
Would that be anything to do with capitalism? Just wondering.