View Full Version : Nanorobots in Chemtrails!
thoth
06-04-2007, 05:59 PM
http://www.bariumblues.com/chemtrails_nanotechnology_aeroso.htm
http://www.matrix-explained.com/php/about-the-matrix-movies-7999.html
NanoBots - YouTube
http://www.bariumblues.com/chemtrails_nanotechnology_aeroso.htm
http://www.matrix-explained.com/php/about-the-matrix-movies-7999.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCMVTykWlno
and... somehow designers, testers and manifacturers of nanorobots and the ruling elite are impervious to the dangers that such unrestricted implementation of nanotech can bring?
do you think that they would risk their sorry asses?
do you think that they are nor aware of what "nanoware" bugs can do?
(nanotech software bugs)
when i read material from the links above the word "psyops" comes to mind.
seamus
06-04-2007, 08:16 PM
and... somehow designers, testers and manifacturers of nanorobots and the ruling elite are impervious to the dangers that such unrestricted implementation of nanotech can bring?
do you think that they would risk their sorry asses?
do you think that they are nor aware of what "nanoware" bugs can do?
(nanotech software bugs)
when i read material from the links above the word "psyops" comes to mind.
We need to ask ourselves once again, "cui bono"? The illuminati and higher-ups are defined and obsessed by one thing: bloodline.
A quote from the bariumblues link above:
"Airborne nanorobots can identify their host patient by chemical signature, much like a bloodhound or mosquito following its quarry's scent. Such chemical signatures or "odortypes" may include:
1. naturally-produced "baseline" chemical scents;
2. behaviorally-related scents which may appear or intensify during specific events such as heavy exercise, fear reactions (e.g., emotional excitement alone can increase the sweat rate by ~50%), defecation or flatulence, sexual activity, intoxication, and the like;
3. artificial scents such as perfumes, colognes, cosmetics and deodorants; and
4. artificial molecular taggants specially designed to simplify the recognition task, as for instance an odorless, volatile, digitally-encoded messenger molecule emitted from an external facility that is controlled by the patient.
Don't you think the bloodline might have a certain scent? That any nanorobots would be capable of being programmed to not attack anyone with 1,2,1 Methylfluorocellulose in their makeup?
I don't think this is such an easy thing to dismiss.
s
Don't you think the bloodline might have a certain scent? That any nanorobots would be capable of being programmed to not attack anyone with 1,2,1 Methylfluorocellulose in their makeup?
I don't think this is such an easy thing to dismiss.
if they have that power then they have already reprogrammed us and you and i are 2 nanomolecules arguing with "self".
lol
yes, they could potentially use this technology against us,
but what if the thing malfunctions and they are kill themselves?
do you think they would take that risk?
don't you think that there are forces in universe that far supersede the knowledge of ruling families?
and, since it seems that you and i have differing views -- why have not they reprogrammed us already to think the same?
i think that 'murder by nanotech' theory is psyops.
PTBs will never know all that they need to know to make the word takeover.
that is why they always fail.
they may know more than us, because they hide knowledge from us, but what is their knowledge compared to say our collective knowledge, if we just started communicating with each other?
lets see, say 200K PTBs, or 6.5 billion humans who could connect to each other or the creation.
Where is the greater pool of knowledge?
what is their knowledge with knowledge of creation/creator/universe/infinite one?
they are stupid for even trying.
seamus
06-04-2007, 09:00 PM
if they have that power then they have already reprogrammed us and you and i are 2 nanomolecules arguing with "self".
lol
yes, they could potentially use this technology against us,
but what if the thing malfunctions and they are kill themselves?
do you think they would take that risk?
don't you think that there are forces in universe that far supersede the knowledge of ruling families?
and, since it seems that you and i have differing views -- why have not they reprogrammed us already to think the same?
i think that 'murder by nanotech' theory is psyops.
PTBs will never know all that they need to know to make the word takeover.
that is why they always fail.
they may know more than us, because they hide knowledge from us, but what is their knowledge compared to say our collective knowledge, if we just started communicating with each other?
lets see, say 200K PTBs, or 6.5 billion humans who could connect to each other or the creation.
Where is the greater pool of knowledge?
what is their knowledge with knowledge of creation/creator/universe/infinite one?
they are stupid for even trying.
Yes well I didn't mean to say it was a reality... I just meant to say that it is a possibility. I mean, maybe a last option. Like, if we rose up against them and they knew their gooses were cooked, mightn't they try something so potentially hazardous? Hell, they don't mind seeding Iraq with DU. How smart can they be?
And yes I believe in forces greater than the ruling families. Much greater. Greater even than that being which many call "God". The law of one is one such. The oppressor on the top of the hill manifests his own oppressor, and so is doomed. These families have been binding all the despots of the world together for millenia, and are foolish enough to think that they will be able to escape justice simply because there are no humans capable of resisting them on a force vs. force basis. Fools.
s