Prince Harry's Paternity [Archive] - David Icke's Official Forums

hagbard_celine

04-04-2007, 10:53 PM

http://i10.tinypic.com/4grkutd.jpg

http://i13.tinypic.com/2na46m8.jpg

These two young men are supposed to be brothers, yet for brothers there's a certain lack of likeness between them. William certainly resembles his father, but I fail to see any such resemblance in Harry. However, I do notice certain hereditory traits in common with this man:

http://i3.tinypic.com/2itrnll.jpg

This is James Hewitt, a man Princess Diana had a relationship with. This was publically exposed in 1994, and Hewitt initially claimed that the relationship had begun in 1987 after he became Diana's horse-riding instructor; yet at another time he said that he first met her in 1981.

If Hewitt is Harry's biological father then it means Harry is not bloodline (unless Hewitt is bloodline and the conception was engineered). If he's not bloodline then I fear for Harry's safety. There are many accounts, even in offical history, of royal heirs being bumped off for political or dynastic reasons and if this happened to Harry then it would be not without precedent. The news that he's going to serve in Iraq makes me wonder what will happen to him over there. He needs to be very wary of the danger he's in... and the real danger is not from the Iraqis.

I wonder what they look like as reps! :cool:

mynameis

04-04-2007, 11:18 PM

I know that an attempt will be made, but I am betting that it will be sooner rather than later. The governments will probably blame it on Lebanon, Iran, or Al Quaeda.

jinjo5

04-04-2007, 11:20 PM

I think the only honest answer anyone can give now is......who gives a flying toss.

cheeb

04-04-2007, 11:29 PM

So theres a cuckoo in the nest,big deal ,they are still brothers a lot of peiple have step brothers and sisters there is no shame in this

lemonique

04-04-2007, 11:44 PM

tinmenace

05-04-2007, 12:12 AM

These two young men are supposed to be brothers, yet for brothers there's a certain lack of likeness between them. William certainly resembles his father, but I fail to see any such resemblance in Harry. However, I do notice certain hereditory traits in common with this man:

This is James Hewitt, a man Princess Diana had a relationship with. This was publically exposed in 1994, and Hewitt initially claimed that the relationship had begun in 1987 after he became Diana's horse-riding instructor; yet at another time he said that he first met her in 1981.

If Hewitt is Harry's biological father then it means Harry is not bloodline (unless Hewitt is bloodline and the conception was engineered). If he's not bloodline then I fear for Harry's safety. There are many accounts, even in offical history, of royal heirs being bumped off for political or dynastic reasons and if this happened to Harry then it would be not without precedent. The news that he's going to serve in Iraq makes me wonder what will happen to him over there. He needs to be very wary of the danger he's in... and the real danger is not from the Iraqis.

I wonder what they look like as reps! :cool:

I'm with you on this one. I don't think Harry is Charles's son. There was another thread on this if you want to see what others said about it before. Go here... (http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1117)

notaslave

05-04-2007, 12:36 AM

http://i164.photobucket.com/albums/u22/magswozhere/1.jpg

the larger of the 3 pics is Hewitt in younger days. lol done deal!

tinmenace

05-04-2007, 12:38 AM

http://i164.photobucket.com/albums/u22/magswozhere/1.jpg

the larger of the 3 pics is Hewitt in younger days. lol done deal!

Yep! The one of him with the children.....dead ringer!

falseflag

05-04-2007, 01:47 AM

I think we all agree that William is bloodline (21st of June birthday). Never really seen any resemblance though with Harry and Charles and have always doubted there relationship.

hagbard_celine

06-04-2007, 01:02 AM

http://i164.photobucket.com/albums/u22/magswozhere/1.jpg

the larger of the 3 pics is Hewitt in younger days. lol done deal!

Blimey! I'd never seen these ones before. The likeness to Harry is uncanny!

saturn

10-04-2007, 05:37 PM

i doubt harry is hewitt's son. harry has charles' small eyes and he also has charles' sausage fingers. they look alike. red hair is a spencer trait.

i am fascinated by william's changed looks. he does not look like diana anymore; he now looks like a windsor horse.

i wonder if anyone can explain this???

of course he can't look the same as he did when he as 15 to 18 but still....it's like two different people altogether. i don't think it's normal. he has also lost his hair too quickly even for someone with MPB - stress perhaps? he strikes as being very deeply unhappy. i don't know what to make of the guy, when i see his picture i see someone putting on a mask; you can't see his personality in the way that you could seven years ago. i think he has been severely traumatised by the windsors and has had a very disturbing attitude towards his mother bred into him. he has been abandoned IMO. charles is too caught up in camilla to parent him and he seems to be alone.

synergy777

10-04-2007, 05:55 PM

he is being groomed for the postion he was bred for. they wanted the original royal bloodline, the bloodline of diana.once she provided the heir and the spare. the current royal family are saxe conurg gotha, a german bloodline.

father ted

10-04-2007, 06:19 PM

Looking at Harry, he has his Father's nose and ears, also the Spencer's red hair and freckles. It's William that looks a bit like someone else, VERY much like his Mum , but. I'm sure they are both Fathered by Prince Charles...they are just very different looking from one another. Even twins can be completely different looking.
Cheers

Yes, there's more to genetics than hair, and as saturn pointed out, red hair is a spencer trait. These royals also know about breeding and genetics, that's probably why the queen is so into her hobby with breeding those dogs. As harry 's grown older, he's starting to look more lice charles. There is also a more than likeley possibility that he has the (immediate) genes of more than just two people.

quelyn

10-04-2007, 09:20 PM

father ted

11-04-2007, 02:02 AM

I recall reading in one of David's books or similar author that it was quite possible that one or both sons were fathered in one of the Windsor reptilian ceremonies. The name Pindar comes to mind as the possible DNA donor. I suppose it isn't crucial to really KNOW. Interesting to speculate......................however!

Namaste'

Arizona mentioned that william's genes came from pindar on the father's side whilst charles is the father of harry. She also mentioned that diana's first and third born were to be sacraficed. Her third born already was, and william is her first born. See what happens.

She also mentioned that charles in his reptilian form looks a lot like pindar.

tinmenace

11-04-2007, 02:21 AM

Maybe it's the other way around. Maybe there was one before William and he was sacrificed?

femina

11-04-2007, 12:10 PM

A family member worked for the ministry of defence and she said at a formal lunch one of the topics of conversation was Harry's paternity so even high ranking members of the military have their doubts! :eek:

Mo0n5tar

11-04-2007, 12:28 PM

What you need to understand is that Princess Diana was a Spencer and of WIndsor descent, now I am no bloodline expert but i know this much, the windsor line has more claim to the throne than the house of Coburg-Goethe, our current royal family is not british in descent, Diana was, this IMO is why she was bumped off and why Harry will also be denied access to the throne.

So Harry could be descended from Diana and James Hewitt and still have more claim to the throne than Charles and even maybe his brother William, it is interesting to remember that eversince the accession to the throne of George I the monarchy of Britain has resided with the European Black Nobility, i.e house of Hanover, Diana was the only heir to have complete British Lineage...

saturn

11-04-2007, 01:52 PM

Arizona mentioned that william's genes came from pindar on the father's side whilst charles is the father of harry. She also mentioned that diana's first and third born were to be sacraficed. Her third born already was, and william is her first born. See what happens.

She also mentioned that charles in his reptilian form looks a lot like pindar.

if william is to be sacrificed why do they bother grooming him? have seen a website claiming that he is being groomed as the antichrist. i personally don't believe it; i feel william is not inherently evil but is being forced and controlled by the windsors. but why go to the trouble of traumatizing him and creating multiples if they don't have a future planned for him?

also it should be mentioned that harry as a child looked exactly like diana's sister sarah's son named George. harry gets his looks from spencer side and from charles. that first meeting that hewitt talks about with diana was at a polo field. he never spoke to her; he was on a horse playing polo and she was there watching charles play and she left early because she broke down in tears, the entire 'meeting' is captured in film.

father ted

11-04-2007, 03:13 PM

It makes no difference whether they're grooming him or not. They groomed marilyn monroe as a hollywood star, she was also a mind controlled slave, they didn't mind sacraficing her, did they?

synergy777

11-04-2007, 06:44 PM

for the cause all is worth sacrificng. you have to understand the elite lifestyle, viewpoint. the people the profane look up to as stars, idols are owned, they are nothing to the elite. they are the playthings, the money making perfomers, merely commodities. this is why the elite do what they like. people are so desperate to be famous, etc, they do anthing to become famous and hence get exploited, certainly brings a new meaning to the accounting term, "sweating your assets".

its not nice but its the way it is. half of the so called stars are well,lets say casting couch graduates, pornstars, hookers/escorts. madonna, cameron diaz, the disney club chicks like christina, britney. they were sucking middle aged cock in their teens. this is the real hollywood, and people worship these people, why, they lack self esteem, and see association as a measure of success. how many male actors are gay, how many are fucked by powerbrokers, but have lavendar marriages to create the right image, and start jumping around on sofas, lol. hollywood/music is mostly mareketing/illusion.some, well very few who have the real talent/confidence tell them where to go, and don't sell out to the fame game. agents/stars, pimps/bitches, correlation baby.

don't hate the playa, hate the game.

dondaz

11-04-2007, 07:35 PM

So, if Harry is another mans son, then he could be in great danger by going into Iraq?

I understand the implications, that if Harry is killed then everyone, especially here in the UK, would be game for further mass slaughter and mayhem in Iraq, or any so called terrorist countries they then choose to pick on.

I can see how the elites would do that against their own, absolutely no morals or standards what so ever.

But what if Charles is Harrys' dad? Would they sacrifice their future kings brother to further their agenda?

Obviously William wouldn't be in on it?

Are these lads aware of the full agenda I wonder?

Interesting thread:)

Best

mrguitarbear

12-04-2007, 12:40 AM

Hewitt was definitely having a relationship with Diana before Harry was born , despite what was said later. I think he also admitted it under hypnosis on some TV show.

Sending Harry into the battle zone could be one way to rid the Royal Family of the ' cuckoo in their nest ' , the son of the French Emperor Napoleon III was killed in the Zulu War in an ambush so this sort of thing can happen.

I also seriously doubt Prince Charles will ever be King , Jean Cocteau said that he wouldn't and he had some interesting esoteric connections.

saturn

12-04-2007, 01:20 PM

i don't think either of the boys are truly aware of what is going on. they seem zombied alot of the time; william especially if you see the blank, dead look in his eyes. are these still the same people or are they clones? i get this strange vibe from his girlfriend as well. the whole thing looks forced and i don't believe the press hype that they're in love and are 'soulmates'.

hewitt did go on a tv show and said he was harry's father under hypnosis. but i am suspicious about that. he was quite broke at the time and in serious need of money and they paid him. also this happened on the eve of harry's 21st birthday - looked like a publicity stunt more than anything else.

i have always known that charles will never be king. ever. gut feeling. if they are going to kill harry in iraq and sacrifice william, the eldest son, who will be monarch?

if hewitt was harry's dad woudn't they have bumped him off a long time ago? he wrote books and they did not know what he was going to say and they could have killed him to make sure that he didn't say he fathered harry. they could also have killed him after that tv appearance when he 'confessed' harry was his son.

mrguitarbear

12-04-2007, 05:51 PM

Hewitt has always maintained that his relationship with Diana started after Prince Harry was born , thats probably good enough for the Royal Family. I mean , what proof is there ? Unless someone does a DNA test on Harry - which will never happen - nobody can prove a damn thing !

The concern may be that as Harry gets older , he may start to look more and more like his father and less and less like Charles. This may be a reason for having him ' bumped off ' , sending him into the warzone and then getting him shot with the potential for a ' causus belli ' against Iran or whoever in the bargain.

My own opinion is that William will be the next King , Charles may even abdicate the succession to his son.