***David Icke's First UK Radio Interview 1991***

[son of the godhead]

This has just surfaced. It's explosive stuff!

http://download.yousendit.com/787AF49E7C100F86

NOTICE

[thirdwave]

ouch!... David's Favourite Interview I bet! :eek:


despite how up you can see he was totally away with the fairies at that time... You can still see the power of the mainstream here and how they took this and it was converted to David Icke claiming to be the Son of God....

It was not only David's condition at the time that created the bad press but it was also down to the extreme ignorance of the mainstream and the masses back then....

infact listening to David in that, he does actually come across as a bit insecure.... I think he comes across as very over whelmed... and may well have been close to the edge...

which when you think about it shows how crap people where back then... no ones seemed very concerned for the guy... to busy trying to make him look like a fool and take him to pieces....

I wonder what the press would have said if down to their ridicule David ended up in a home somewhere? ... would it have still been funny?

thankfully that did not happen and today David comes across as extremely secure.

[son of the godhead]

ouch!... David's Favourite Interview I bet! :eek:


despite how up you can see he was totally away with the fairies at that time... You can still see the power of the mainstream here and how they took this and it was converted to David Icke claiming to be the Son of God....

It was not only David's condition at the time that created the bad press but it was also down to the extreme ignorance of the mainstream and the masses back then....

infact listening to David in that, he does actually come across as a bit insecure.... I think he comes across as very over whelmed... and may well have been close to the edge...

which when you think about it shows how crap people where back then... no ones seemed very concerned for the guy... to busy trying to make him look like a fool and take him to pieces....

I wonder what the press would have said if down to their ridicule David ended up in a home somewhere? ... would it have still been funny?

thankfully that did not happen and today David comes across as extremely secure.

Just a thought: Jesus Christ procliamed to be the "Son of God". Icke here proclaims to be the reincarnted Soul of Jesus Christ - the Son of God. Therefore Icke's latter admissions that he was the "Son of the Godhead" and not THE actual "Son of God" are heavily conradictory here.

My opinion from listening to this is Icke's revisionism of his own history is obvious. But still a fascinating interview.

[i am all i am]

Just a thought: Jesus Christ procliamed to be the "Son of God". Icke here proclaims to be the reincarnted Soul of Jesus Christ - the Son of God. Therefore Icke's latter admissions that he was the "Son of the Godhead" and not THE actual "Son of God" are heavily conradictory here.

My opinion from listening to this is Icke's revisionism of his own history is obvious. But still a fascinating interview.

G'day son of the Godhead.

You can access cellular memory through the DNA.

As the DNA moves from one form to another (plant to human for example), it collects the experiences and stores them. The current form of the DNA has the accumulated history of experiences of every form that the DNA has been.

Therefore, David Icke (the DNA represented as D. I.), in all probability, has the inFORMation that was encoded on the DNA when it was known as Jesus.

So, David Icke, as well as a lot of others, could claim this to be true AND it is true.


With LOVE.

[thirdwave]

Just a thought: Jesus Christ procliamed to be the "Son of God". Icke here proclaims to be the reincarnted Soul of Jesus Christ - the Son of God. Therefore Icke's latter admissions that he was the "Son of the Godhead" and not THE actual "Son of God" are heavily conradictory here.

My opinion from listening to this is Icke's revisionism of his own history is obvious. But still a fascinating interview.



With a lot of help from the interviewer it appeared he was implying to be another kind of Jesus... but he also clearly stated that we are all on a journey to become apart of the god head with what we learn and he is already apart of it ...and he stated it did not mean he as any more special or different to anyone else... so on...

it was more a case of his explaining re incarnation and explaining what Jesus would have actually been going on about...

where about in the interview did he claim to be the reincarnated soul of Jesus Christ?, I did not get that part... I could pick up on the interviewer asking questions about it and trying to bring it out of David... not really latching on to the main point in what he was trying to say...

like I say, he was clearly out of it back then you can see this purely by the way he could not see how the interview was coming across... and what ever he said did not deserve the abuse he got and if he really was on the edge then the media acted like a pack of wild wolfs.

IMO I actually think David is speaking allot of sense in the interview... but was completely oblivious to how it was coming across in the interview and where the interviewer was trying to push it...

If I was the interviewer I would have said with a concerned tone... I understand the points you are making and its all very interesting stuff... but you do understand that the way you sound now may come across to allot of people as you are saying you are the return of Jesus Christ... so on....

but the interviewer seemed to just want to lead him on as much as he could...

n e way.... WAAAAYYY in the past,the mainstream don't have as much fun with him nowadays...

[father ted]

I thought some of the songs were syncronistic, especially the first two.

It just shows how your ideas can evolve if you open your mind. He was talking about jesus the way some others in this movement do now, only Icke's moved on and evolved. Shows where those people who still beliieve in jesus, are at, and what they've gotta do.

[thirdwave]

I felt the whole attitude of people back then was so immature.... its like there brains were so slow they could not even see the points he was making and where instead entertained by the oddness of it.... really you look back and the people who mocked him or made out he was crazy actually come across now as a bit silly and thick.... more so as time goes by...

[son of the godhead]

bump

[hagbard_celine]

Thanks, S of the G!

It comes as an RAR file so you might need this to play it:

http://www.freedownloadscenter.com/Best/free-rar-player.html

[lookfar]

Cheers for the rar player link Hagbard :) It's really wound me up in the past when I couldn't play these things!!

[dragonfly]

thank you for providing this interview. i´ve watched other samples of mr. David Icke on the "youtube" forum, and he is very genuine and wise too.

[geewhizz]

Firstly SOGH thanks so much for this, it amazes me how things pop up after so many years.

I have always liked Nicky campbell and even watching him today on Watchdog he comes across so genuine. You can tell he has a very open mind and believes in all paranormal stuff (Listen to the Timothy Good Interview).

Moving swiftly on, As for Icke, you cant blame the British Media for character assassinating him for what he did in 1991. I HATE the media but god, did David come across sooo preacher like and 'Only I know the truth' mentality."I will have to confirm it with the Guys" .Yes he had his kundalini blown, wasn't grounded,but doesn't it tell you something about 'channelled information'!

It astonishes me how different David's philosophy is today 2007:eek: Where once he preached about how WE rape and pillage 'Mother earth' or 'Gaia' (very new age) for our sinful,greedy ways and how the 'Mother Spirit' will seek revenge with her manifestations of doom and gloom earth changes. Yes the Tsunami happened (and more to come) but I dont think they had drilling platforms hundreds and thousands of years ago where earth changes are just as common if not, a part of existence as a whole. (Cycles im afraid)

So are we to believe that David was a victim of 'False Channelling'? Dont get me wrong here I believe sincerely what David Icke went through is 100% true and I feel for the guy, but it was the Information and how David passed on the Info sounds very suspect, it reminded me of a hippy in Glastonbury and let us not forget that many in the USA with 'flowers in their hair' were saying exactly the same thing in the 60s and 70s.:confused:

I know I know " David is just on a journey like eveyone else", "The information Changes as WE Change as a species", but to come from 'I am the son of the Godhead' and we are killing 'Mother Earth' TO 'Nature and Earth(rest of planets/Universe) are just an illusion and a reflection of the Matrix' is an enormous change in thought dont you think?

Did 'The Guys' in 1991 spread Disinfo because the only thing it achieved was to assassinate David Icke's character and lead many weak people into a New Age though process and way of life?
The way they sell david the story that Jesus really did exist and he was a modern day version (listen to the interview for proof)..

It leaves me to finish with this question.... We are not ALL kids and Im sure we could have stomached the Reality is an illusion and is self/internally created? Seth / Paladian channellings were saying this in the 70s:eek:

Good interview and I still love David's present day work;) but David needs to address his past just to remove any unfinished buisness, not just try to deny and change philosophies...
afterall, isnt that what our world leaders do to suit their agenda?

[thirdwave]

Firstly SOGH thanks so much for this, it amazes me how things pop up after so many years.

I have always liked Nicky campbell and even watching him today on Watchdog he comes across so genuine. You can tell he has a very open mind and believes in all paranormal stuff (Listen to the Timothy Good Interview).

Moving swiftly on, As for Icke, you cant blame the British Media for character assassinating him for what he did in 1991. I HATE the media but god, did David come across sooo preacher like and 'Only I know the truth' mentality."I will have to confirm it with the Guys" .Yes he had his kundalini blown, wasn't grounded,but doesn't it tell you something about 'channelled information'!

It astonishes me how different David's philosophy is today 2007:eek: Where once he preached about how WE rape and pillage 'Mother earth' or 'Gaia' (very new age) for our sinful,greedy ways and how the 'Mother Spirit' will seek revenge with her manifestations of doom and gloom earth changes. Yes the Tsunami happened (and more to come) but I dont think they had drilling platforms hundreds and thousands of years ago where earth changes are just as common if not, a part of existence as a whole. (Cycles im afraid)

So are we to believe that David was a victim of 'False Channelling'? Dont get me wrong here I believe sincerely what David Icke went through is 100% true and I feel for the guy, but it was the Information and how David passed on the Info sounds very suspect, it reminded me of a hippy in Glastonbury and let us not forget that many in the USA with 'flowers in their hair' were saying exactly the same thing in the 60s and 70s.:confused:

I know I know " David is just on a journey like eveyone else", "The information Changes as WE Change as a species", but to come from 'I am the son of the Godhead' and we are killing 'Mother Earth' TO 'Nature and Earth(rest of planets/Universe) are just an illusion and a reflection of the Matrix' is an enormous change in thought dont you think?

Did 'The Guys' in 1991 spread Disinfo because the only thing it achieved was to assassinate David Icke's character and lead many weak people into a New Age though process and way of life?
The way they sell david the story that Jesus really did exist and he was a modern day version (listen to the interview for proof)..

It leaves me to finish with this question.... We are not ALL kids and Im sure we could have stomached the Reality is an illusion and is self/internally created? Seth / Paladian channellings were saying this in the 70s:eek:

Good interview and I still love David's present day work;) but David needs to address his past just to remove any unfinished buisness, not just try to deny and change philosophies...
afterall, isnt that what our world leaders do to suit their agenda?


I don't think his message has changed as such... its just he no longer really goes into his spiritual experiences so much... just more about the info he has researched.... we all learn stuff that influenced our views over time....

I agree you cant blame the mainstream for hooking onto the the whole thing.... but he was a famous sports presenter on mainstream TV and then according to the media a guy who is claming to be the new sun of god so on.... so with a bit of common sense, if you did not know what he was talking about, the only other explanation was that the guy was starting to go a bit mad....

madness is not pleasant and I don't think he should have been mocked as he was, infact he should have been left and not exposed as anyone who is "ill" should be left.... not allowed on mainstream TV shows to be mocked and humiliated.... as far as the media new he could have been on the verge of going senile, but they showed no compassion.... they were not pointing out he was mad, they were mocking him.... which to me almost leans more towards they felt some of his views were not so crazy, they just did not like them.

nowadays we all know what he was trying to say, and he was not claming to be the second coming of Jesus Christ the way the media would like people to see it, and like so many people have ejaculations while making it out he did...

He was simply talking about people like John Lennon.... Bob Marley.... Bill Hicks.... people who make an impression and effect peoples outlook on life, because they were sent to do so.... just as (if he was real) Jesus would have done, before being used as a symbol of a certain scenario...

Yes David was clearly on another planet at the time and was a bit over whelmed looking and should not have dug him self in such an un nesaserry whole... although I think he would tell you know it was necessary, as it took him to a place where he no longer had to worry about how people took him... they already thought he was a joke so he was in a win win situation, and today he is seeing the benefits of this....

I personally don't like David icke just because of his info as I think you cant get it from many sources now... I just like the way David stands out from the mainstream.... he is like a virus in it.... he will turn up on a mainstream TV show and cut through the bullshit and make his point... ok it might all get serious and quite when he speaks.... but it reminds me a little bit of the film V for Vendetta when the guy there brakes into the TV show.... stands out so much because it rare you actually hear someone express honesty on TV with out a mask.

The Mainstream did not take him seriously.... so what where they implying he was going through??, and since when does going mad not merit a little more sympathy?

on top of all that, how do they know he was not what he said he was??? answer, they don't.

[hagbard_celine]

I never used to like Nicky Campbell, but I'see him in a new light now. Thanks God David found a real professional journalist who was willing to give him respect on the air! Back in 1991 it must have seemed a lonely world for him. It's a good interview too and David comes across very strongly and informatively. His basic message hasn't changed; all that he does now is deliver it with more detail and from a different angle (I typoed "angel" there for "angle"; what a coincidence!).

Geewhiz, when did Campbell interview Timothy Good?

[druggalo]

nyce