How to cook an egg with two mobile phones

[chattanova]

What all users of mobile phones need to know.

1 Egg
2 Mobiles
65 minutes of connection between mobiles.
We assembled something as per image:

http://img37.picoodle.com/img/img37/4/4/1/f_eggs1m_7cefc30.jpg

Initiated the call between the two mobiles and allowed 65 minutes approximately...
During the first 15 minutes nothing happened;
25 minutes later the egg started getting hot;
45 minutes later the egg is hot;
65 minutes later the egg is cooked.

http://img29.picoodle.com/img/img29/4/4/1/f_eggs2m_28160af.jpg

"Conclusion: The immediate radiation of the mobiles has the potential to modify the proteins of the egg. Imagine what it can do with the proteins of your brains when you make long calls."]Conclusion: The immediate radiation of the mobiles has the potential to modify the proteins of the egg. Imagine what it can do with the proteins of your brains when you make long calls.

This information came from an email we received today and it is an experiment confirmed many times by other people.
D.I. todays headlines http://www.davidicke.com/content/blogcategory/30/82/
.

[chattanova]

Mobile phones 'more dangerous than smoking'

Brain expert warns of huge rise in tumours and calls on industry to take immediate steps to reduce radiation

Mobile phones could kill far more people than smoking or asbestos, a study by an award-winning cancer expert has concluded. He says people should avoid using them wherever possible and that governments and the mobile phone industry must take "immediate steps" to reduce exposure to their radiation.

The study, by Dr Vini Khurana, is the most devastating indictment yet published of the health risks.

It draws on growing evidence – exclusively reported in the IoS in October – that using handsets for 10 years or more can double the risk of brain cancer. Cancers take at least a decade to develop, invalidating official safety assurances based on earlier studies which included few, if any, people who had used the phones for that long.

Earlier this year, the French government warned against the use of mobile phones, especially by children. Germany also advises its people to minimise handset use, and the European Environment Agency has called for exposures to be reduced.

Professor Khurana – a top neurosurgeon who has received 14 awards over the past 16 years, has published more than three dozen scientific papers – reviewed more than 100 studies on the effects of mobile phones. He has put the results on a brain surgery website, and a paper based on the research is currently being peer-reviewed for publication in a scientific journal.

He admits that mobiles can save lives in emergencies, but concludes that "there is a significant and increasing body of evidence for a link between mobile phone usage and certain brain tumours". He believes this will be "definitively proven" in the next decade.

Noting that malignant brain tumours represent "a life-ending diagnosis", he adds: "We are currently experiencing a reactively unchecked and dangerous situation." He fears that "unless the industry and governments take immediate and decisive steps", the incidence of malignant brain tumours and associated death rate will be observed to rise globally within a decade from now, by which time it may be far too late to intervene medically.

"It is anticipated that this danger has far broader public health ramifications than asbestos and smoking," says Professor Khurana, who told the IoS his assessment is partly based on the fact that three billion people now use the phones worldwide, three times as many as smoke. Smoking kills some five million worldwide each year, and exposure to asbestos is responsible for as many deaths in Britain as road accidents.

Late last week, the Mobile Operators Association dismissed Khurana's study as "a selective discussion of scientific literature by one individual". It believes he "does not present a balanced analysis" of the published science, and "reaches opposite conclusions to the WHO and more than 30 other independent expert scientific reviews".

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-wellbeing/health-news/mobile-phones-more-dangerous-than-smoking-or-asbestos-802602.html?r=RSS

[chinchilla]

thanks

[uloodara]

:eek::eek::eek:

I was on the phone for around an hour last week!...I hope my egg isnt cooked :eek:

I read another thread about the FBI tracing people through phones and recording conversations, in other words I dont think theres much good about mobile phones

Thanks alot for this...

peace

[warren oaks]

this is absolutely horrifying...what horrifies me the most is ive unveiled this information about 20 days ago, yet my addiction to my phone has YET to end.

how are we going to do this?

[frank1974]

For years the warnings have been in the mobile phone manuals under the regulations section. For example I had a motorola and in the manuals list of offical regulations it says something about the phone has to be more than 1 inch away from the body while its just switched on (never mind making a call).

This means if the user/owner of the phone puts the phone closer to their body, then the user is breaking the regulations not the mobile phone maker. Because it states it in the manual. So if anyone tries to sue them for health reasons, they can claim misuse of the phone by the user.

Frank

[ticker]

I'm trying it out right now, ill let you guys know how it goes. The two cells are make an awful noise when their that close to each other. Could it just be the fact that they are so close which causes the heat?

Update: left both cell phones in conversation for 70+ minutes with no effect to the egg. I'm not ruling out the possibility but I do encourage others to try it for themselves.

TiCkEr

[chattanova]

I'm trying it out right now, ill let you guys know how it goes. The two cells are make an awful noise when their that close to each other. Could it just be the fact that they are so close which causes the heat?

Update: left both cell phones in conversation for 70+ minutes with no effect to the egg. I'm not ruling out the possibility but I do encourage others to try it for themselves.

TiCkEr

Thanks for double-checking. Maybe they've used the worst mobil-models to this experiment, anyway the fact that they are so close have to have a significance ,if not our brains would be boiled years ago..
It's really hard to stop using it too, THEY've got us on the hook here:mad:

[light seeker]

I don't like mobile phones very much. I don't know about the detriment to health, but I really don't think I should have to be contactable on tap. They're such a "must have" accessory to many. I get really annoyed if we go out to dinner with friends, for example, and they can't leave their phones alone. Always texting away or taking calls, even during the meal! :mad:

I only carry one in the event that I break down and need recovery assistance. Apart from that, the darned thing's only used as my morning alarm and is on silent the rest of the time.

:)

[siscid]

I don't like mobile phones very much. I don't know about the detriment to health, but I really don't think I should have to be contactable on tap. They're such a "must have" accessory to many. I get really annoyed if we go out to dinner with friends, for example, and they can't leave their phones alone. Always texting away or taking calls, even during the meal! :mad:

I only carry one in the event that I break down and need recovery assistance. Apart from that, the darned thing's only used as my morning alarm and is on silent the rest of the time.

:)

Yeah me too! I got a w810i with all sorts of rubbish on it and I only use it as a alarm clock and phone for necessary calls.

[madthumbs]

It's a hoax. Funny how gullible people are even on April 1.

[clozaril]

it had me going :o

[alexc]

It's a hoax. Funny how gullible people are even on April 1.

It's not a hoax, it's a very real phenomena and has caused severe damage to cell phone users. I'm sure you all remember the woman who was a heavy user of early cell phoned and actually had a brain tumor in the shape of her phone antenna, right next to where the antenna nearly contacted her head!

I'm really surprised people on this forum are so easily duped by a cell industry shill.

[oneofthemasses]

I'm trying it out right now, ill let you guys know how it goes. The two cells are make an awful noise when their that close to each other. Could it just be the fact that they are so close which causes the heat?

Update: left both cell phones in conversation for 70+ minutes with no effect to the egg. I'm not ruling out the possibility but I do encourage others to try it for themselves.

TiCkEr


That's because this is yet another urban myth....:D

I'm NOT saying that cell phones and all of the other radiation sources that we are exposed to are good (of course not), just that 2 cell phones won't *actually* generate enough heat to cook an egg.

I mean, your ear may get hot after being on a cell for 2 hours, but it doesn't burn up and fall off.

This started because of a viral video ad campaign from some company. They showed what looked like a homemade video of groups of 'friends' cooking eggs with cell phones.

Again, not saying that cell phones are 100% safe and 'good' (I wouldn't let my future kid have one), but we also can't be suckered in by the other extreme end of false propaganda either.

:D

[arty2000]

.

saw somethin like this couple yrs back..its like puttting a microwave oven to your head...been tryin to tell folks...but you know how that goes:)

[alexc]

I finally got my nephew to get rid of his mobile phone thanks to videos like this!

[theperceivingeye]

I too believe this is a hoax. There is another one, also fake, with popcorn.

But hey, it gets the point across so that's a positive.;)

I only use speaker when I use the cell phone & try to keep it at least an arm's-length away from my head at all times. Have been digging around the basement looking for a corded phone but so far they have all been broken...

[godgoo]

.

Because the frequency of the microwave is similar to the frequency of the water molecules. And so the water molecules are agitated, they vibrate and transfer kinetic energy onto other neighbouring molecules as heat energy.

Thats how a microwave works.

[eustacekidd]

This was proven to be a myth on a tv show, they surrounded an egg with multiple phones and there was no change whatsoever. -Edit- Here's the video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WL1uu595F3c
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WL1uu595F3c

[godgoo]

Because the frequency of the microwave is similar to the frequency of the water molecules. And so the water molecules are agitated, they vibrate and transfer kinetic energy onto other neighbouring molecules as heat energy.

Thats how a microwave works.

Wiki quote

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microwave

Health effects
Main article: Electromagnetic radiation and health

Microwaves contain insufficient energy to directly chemically change substances by ionization, and so are an example of nonionizing radiation. The word "radiation" refers to the fact that energy can radiate. The term in this context is not to be confused with radioactivity. It has not been shown conclusively that microwaves (or other nonionizing electromagnetic radiation) have significant adverse biological effects at low levels. Some but not all studies suggest that long-term exposure may have a carcinogenic effect.[4] This is separate from the risks associated with very high intensity exposure, which can cause heating and burns like any heat source, and not a unique property of microwaves specifically.

During World War II, it was observed that individuals in the radiation path of radar installations experienced clicks and buzzing sounds in response to the microwaves radiation. This microwave auditory effect was thought to be caused by the microwaves inducing an electric current in the hearing centers of the brain.[5] Research by NASA in the 1970s has shown this to be caused by thermal expansion in parts of the inner ear.

When injury from exposure to microwaves occurs, it usually results from dielectric heating induced in the body. Exposure to microwave radiation can produce cataracts by this mechanism, because the microwave heating denatures proteins in the crystalline lens of the eye (in the same way that heat turns egg whites white and opaque) faster than the lens can be cooled by surrounding structures. The lens and cornea of the eye are especially vulnerable because they contain no blood vessels that can carry away heat. Exposure to heavy doses of microwave radiation (as from an oven that has been tampered with to allow operation even with the door open) can produce heat damage in other tissues as well, up to and including serious burns which may not be immediately evident because of the tendency for microwaves to heat deeper tissues with higher moisture content.

Denaturation

Denaturation is a process in which proteins or nucleic acids lose their tertiary structure and secondary structure by application of some external stress or compound, such as a strong acid or base, a concentrated inorganic salt, an organic solvent (e.g., alcohol or chloroform), or heat. If proteins in a living cell are denatured, this results in disruption of cell activity and possibly cell death. Denatured proteins can exhibit a wide range of characteristics, from loss of solubility to communal aggregation.

Tertiary structure is the proteins final specialised structure.

Secondary structure is the protein beginning to fold into it's final specialised structure.

Primary structure is the sequence of amino acids that make up the protein. The primary structure defines the tertiary structure and so defines the proteins specialised function.

Hydrogen Bonds

A hydrogen bond is the attractive interaction of a hydrogen atom with an electronegative atom, like nitrogen, oxygen or fluorine (thus the name "hydrogen bond", which must not be confused with a covalent bond to hydrogen). The hydrogen must be covalently bonded to another electronegative atom to create the bond. These bonds can occur between molecules (intermolecularly), or within different parts of a single molecule (intramolecularly).[2] The hydrogen bond (5 to 30 kJ/mole) is stronger than a van der Waals interaction, but weaker than covalent or ionic bonds. This type of bond occurs in both inorganic molecules such as water and organic molecules such as DNA.

Intermolecular hydrogen bonding is responsible for the high boiling point of water (100 °C) compared to the other group 16 hydrides, which have no hydrogen bonds. Intramolecular hydrogen bonding is partly responsible for the secondary, tertiary, and quaternary structures of proteins and nucleic acids. It also plays an important role in the structure of polymers, both synthetic and natural.

[alexc]

This was proven to be a myth on a tv show, they surrounded an egg with multiple phones and there was no change whatsoever. -Edit- Here's the video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WL1uu595F3c
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WL1uu595F3c

Those phones must have been tampered with.

I repeated the original test with four cell phones from family members. They were all more recent "more efficient" phones but once we found the right angles the popcorn started popping.

After the test, those four family members used the LAND LINE to call their cell phone providers and cancel their accounts over their safety concerns. They didn't even get charged an early termination fee!

[eustacekidd]

Those phones must have been tampered with.

I repeated the original test with four cell phones from family members. They were all more recent "more efficient" phones but once we found the right angles the popcorn started popping.

After the test, those four family members used the LAND LINE to call their cell phone providers and cancel their accounts over their safety concerns. They didn't even get charged an early termination fee!

I'll just take your word for it shall I?

[alexc]

I'll just take your word for it shall I?

Of course not. Do the test yourself. Just remember it may take a few tries to get the popcorn popping.

[malingerer]

I gotta keep phoning myself every 6 months or they take the number away!