Dianna inquest

[largejack]

Now that this huge exercise in official debunking is coming to an inevitable and abysmal conclusion with a verdict of 'accidental death', is there anyone actually shocked and expecting a different verdict?:rolleyes:

[angelicangel]

Not really always thought there was something fishy about what went on. But who are we to judge, I only wish there was powers that could really tell us what went on, on that awful day. We lost one of the most beautiful peope who was kind and loving to everyone. Now look what's taken her place, a miserable woman who I just can't bear to watch or look at on telly or newspaper. Good to wrap chips in I suppose.

[quest]

I'm more concerned that the judge got away with telling the jury what they couldn't do; let Burrell and numerous other witnesses get away with lying throughout the staged trial; and -worst of all - stopped us hearing philip & the so-called queen lying through their teeth whilst sitting in the witness box.

[exicutioner151]

Now that this huge exercise in official debunking is coming to an inevitable and abysmal conclusion with a verdict of 'accidental death', is there anyone actually shocked and expecting a different verdict?:rolleyes:


Hi ,
It shows what kind of power the royals have and the fact they use it . wonder if the coroner will make a run for it or die mysteriously anytime soon ,baring he can sleep well at night ! and if he has a consciounce . Thiers too much to suggest otherwise . As for me i believe thier murdering pigs along with MI5 MI6 and anyone else involved . nothing can sway my thoughts on this from what ive seen and read . only thing i can say: gud ana daku ina sahu !!!!
Exicutioner151

[who elsie]

Can someone please tell me how it is possible for a judge to just do away with a jury at the end of a long and complex case. Surely this can not be? I can not recall anything like this happening before. And there was not even a glimmer of surprise or debate on the mainstream news broadcasts. Of course, we all expected an outcome like this, but as blatant as that?! It would be nice to know from any legal experts here, what are the conditions in a case for simply doing away with a jury.

[dangermouse]

It was MI6

I have heard from 2 different sources that they did it.:cool:

[largejack]

I've written this to the Daily Mail. At least if nothing else it's got what I want to say off my chest. Please feel free to email them as well?

To whom it may concern

In today's newspaper your headline states that Diana coroner decides what we all knew... "she wasn't murdered".

Please... come on! With all the evidence that wasn't used (naturally) in the inquest how can you come up with that assertion? Of course the inquest will say it was an accident, that's what inquests are for, an opportunity for a guilty establishment to bury the truth and attempt to derail and debunk conspiracies that have them running scared. Remember the Hutton enquiry and the Butler enquiry? Everyone knows Dr Kelly was murdered and yet the official verdict of suicide still stands. The guilty people got let off or even promoted, while the innocent are sacked and humiliated. Personally I think more and more people will wake up and see how self evident her murder was. I mean the whole thing was a none starter from the begining. I mean if Prince Philip and the Queen, etc were being accused of murder then how come they weren't forced to appear in the dock and give evidence? Is it simply because they are above the law, and nobody would have the nerve to even try them? If so what was the whole point of the enquiry?

Many thanks for reading my thoughts on it

regards

Scott

[largejack]

Oh wait! Hold our breaths?:eek: I've just heard the closing stages of the inquest have been put on hold in light of further evidence.
"Oh Dear Prince Philip, don't breathe easily yet?" lol:rolleyes:

[bam fest]

I really did laugh so much ,when on the bbc news they read out the letters/correspondents that philip had supposedly written to diana and vice versa:) ,to show that they were mates and got on with one another.


oh dear papa lololololololoolololololo

[howie]

The female fantasist who stalked herself (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=551888&in_page_id=1770)

But when officers found the security camera monitoring the property had been switched off at the time - something only someone with inside knowledge could do - they became suspicious.

Diana's merc would have been recorded on up to 18 cctv cameras, all 18 were switched off & police didn't find that suspicious?

Releasing their fake verdict of no evidence on 1st April only shows how stupid they think we all are. This inquest has been a bigger farce than the WMDs inquiry or the David Kelly "suicide" investigation.

[kallista]

Not really always thought there was something fishy about what went on. But who are we to judge, I only wish there was powers that could really tell us what went on, on that awful day. We lost one of the most beautiful peope who was kind and loving to everyone. Now look what's taken her place, a miserable woman who I just can't bear to watch or look at on telly or newspaper. Good to wrap chips in I suppose.

I'm not sure she was that fantastic.

[diamond dogs]

I only wished Diana would have taken heed a bit more after she had indicated she feared for her life. The Royals obviously turned a blind eye to Hewiitt and many others incl the Pakistani Doctor but she went too far with what happened with Dodi. If only for her children, now motherless she might have shown more concern for their wellbeing if she felt in danger.

As for the murdering scum.. They will have to meet their maker one day.......Sleep tight...

[Jane643]

The female fantasist who stalked herself (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=551888&in_page_id=1770)



Diana's merc would have been recorded on up to 18 cctv cameras, all 18 were switched off & police didn't find that suspicious?

Releasing their fake verdict of no evidence on 1st April only shows how stupid they think we all are. This inquest has been a bigger farce than the WMDs inquiry or the David Kelly "suicide" investigation.
During all terrorist attacks the power is turned off because they need to transmit the subliminal frequency to the sub conscious brain of the person due to commit suicide via the cctv equipment or mobile phones they carry. Any micro chips that may be under the skin of the mind controlled bomber or car driver will work better without external interference. The power was turned off in Paris to make sure the mind control worked.The driver would probably have had a massive electrical blast sent to the brain via the micro chip sending his arms and legs into spasam also the car was remote controlled.In Parkistain when Bhutto was blown up the electric was turned off for the same reason - to keep the suicide bomber under sub conscious mind control via mobile phone frequency. All our mobile phones we carry have this sub conscious frequency you just have to be telepathic to here it - and thats not an April fools joke - its the truth that will set you free.

[diamond dogs]

The female fantasist who stalked herself (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=551888&in_page_id=1770)



Diana's merc would have been recorded on up to 18 cctv cameras, all 18 were switched off & police didn't find that suspicious?

Releasing their fake verdict of no evidence on 1st April only shows how stupid they think we all are. This inquest has been a bigger farce than the WMDs inquiry or the David Kelly "suicide" investigation.

There is the infamous speeding ticket one most received

The CCTV cameras

There were more than 14 CCTV cameras in the Pont d'Alma underpass, yet none have recorded footage of the fatal collision.

Sources have claimed that they were turned to face the wall, or were simply switched off. The official French judicial enquiry into the crash was told that none of the cameras were working.

However, one motorist received a speeding ticket after being caught on a nearby camera 15 minutes before the accident.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/diana-just-a-car-crash-or-a-murder-mystery-428355.html


and then there is the 'enquiry' version

CCTV

It had been suggested that CCTV in the tunnel was missing. The inquiry concluded that there was no CCTV that would have assisted it and no record of an alleged motorist who had received a speeding ticket as a result of being caught on camera shortly before the crash. Lord Stevens was satisfied that the original inquiry by the French authorities had been conducted by the "creme de la creme" of their detectives.

Make your own mind up...:(

[synergy777]

just bread and circus with the inevitable conclusion.

also coincided rather well with the queen showing her caring side and cancelling her party due to economic gloom.

also will she come clean about the eu treaties she signed, i always thought the queen was suppose to defend her realm, lol