Oops -- what's this? An intelligent gun law?

[graflok]

A new law passed in Texas reaffirms that citizens have the right to defend themselves.

"The right to defend oneself from an imminent act of harm should not only be clearly defined in Texas law, but is intuitive to human nature," [Governor] Perry said ..."

Story here:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/27/AR2007032701384.html


graflok

[cleft_asunder]

Even though we're in the big push of the NWO, I feel like they're losing many important strategies. For example, the September 9/11 lie is crumbling.

[azure]

Even though we're in the big push of the NWO, I feel like they're losing many important strategies. For example, the September 9/11 lie is crumbling.

It was meant to crumble from the beginning. It will be deliberately exposed to make America the next Problem to get their next Reaction for their next Solution.

[graflok]

It [9/11] was meant to crumble from the beginning. It will be deliberately exposed to make America the next Problem to get their next Reaction for their next Solution.

Complete nonsense but thanks for the laugh! :)

graflok

[graflok]

Even though we're in the big push of the NWO, I feel like they're losing many important strategies. For example, the September 9/11 lie is crumbling.

Yes, indeed.

graflok

[teslafire]

It was meant to crumble from the beginning. It will be deliberately exposed to make America the next Problem to get their next Reaction for their next Solution.

I think they could play it this way, but I'm leaning more to the idea that elements within the 9/11 truth movement were setup from the getgo as planned damage control, controlled opposition to the elite. Its hard to cover-up a crime that is meant to be broadcast round the globe, literally for eternity, so you take the next best step and create deliberate sloppiness meant to be exposed chiefly by your own planted inquisitors. Divide and conquer the truth movement which would inevitably pop up.

[graflok]

I'm leaning more to the idea that elements within the 9/11 truth movement were setup from the getgo as planned damage control, controlled opposition to the elite. Its hard to cover-up a crime that is meant to be broadcast round the globe, literally for eternity, so you take the next best step and create deliberate sloppiness meant to be exposed chiefly by your own planted inquisitors. Divide and conquer the truth movement which would inevitably pop up.

I really doubt this. I don't see it as their modus operandi for any earlier problem-reaction-solution type event, e.g., OK City bombing, Columbine, etc. I also don't see it for any of the high profile assassinations such as JFK, RFK, MLK, etc. I believe they would consider such a tact far too risky and far too likely to backfire.

Their methods never seem to vary:
1) total blanket denial of any wrong doing
2) heavy media propaganda against anyone who says differently
3) offer up a fall guy, if necessary

They might toss out a few planted individuals who appear to support the 9/11 Truth Movement but who behave in a crazy manner so as to discredit the movement by association but that's about as close as they seem to come to what you suggest in my view.

graflok

[cleft_asunder]

It was meant to crumble from the beginning. It will be deliberately exposed to make America the next Problem to get their next Reaction for their next Solution.

I see your point, but it doesn't make sense. They can't create another PRS BECAUSE september 9/11th was carried out so poorly. They have big plans for the US to go all the way to China, but the people don't buy it anymore. Iran, for example, isn't something they can just convince everyone to accept. Another PRS might not even work. I'm not saying we aren't going into Iran, I'm saying that I believe people are waking up and things aren't going as smoothly as they would like.

I say this all the time, but I theorise that they wanted the NWO to be FULLY in place by 2000. The Y2K thing was most likely the conduit.

[cleft_asunder]

I really doubt this. I don't see it as their modus operandi for any earlier problem-reaction-solution type event, e.g., OK City bombing, Columbine, etc. I also don't see it for any of the high profile assassinations such as JFK, RFK, MLK, etc. I believe they would consider such a tact far too risky and far too likely to backfire.

Their methods never seem to vary:
1) total blanket denial of any wrong doing
2) heavy media propaganda against anyone who says differently
3) offer up a fall guy, if necessary

They might toss out a few planted individuals who appear to support the 9/11 Truth Movement but who behave in a crazy manner so as to discredit the movement by association but that's about as close as they seem to come to what you suggest in my view.

graflok


I'll have to agree.

[phenylamine]

Myself,I'm pretty sceptical of all 'laws' that are passed,well maybe laws repealing previously passed laws are ok.For some 'odd' reason laws only seem to apply when they find it convenient,otherwise "the constitution's just a goddamn piece of paper" as bush put it.I'm pretty sure,at this point,that the laws aren't structured to benefit us joe public's,but maybe I'm just paranoid?Please,somebody tell I'm just paranoid and its all a bad dream.The law is for our protection right?,teachers,news,school,parents,they couldn't possibly have all lied to me?:p

[arch]

When America attacks the socialist Venezuela and 9/11 gets heavily exposed in the new socialist Europe and Russia (it's developing), they've divided the world in four regions. Oceania, Eurasia, Eastasia and the undisputed area of Africa the Middle East.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/1f/1984_Orwell_arrows_2.png/800px-1984_Orwell_arrows_2.png

Do you realize how close we are to Orwell's map?? Keep this picture of the world in mind while you read the news.

Why do you think Americans don't know what's going on, while foreigners are far more informed? Why do you think the United Nazis are against foreign U.S. policies? Why do you think Putin, de Villepin, Chavez and European socialists heavily critize Bush? Why do you think England didn't take the Euro? Why do you think they put bridges from America to England on Euro bills (hint (http://www.jordanmaxwell.com/articles/british-israel/index.html))? Why the Iron Curtain on the Euro coins coming from the East and then on the small coins cover the entire world? Etc. etc. etc.

America will be the next Problem to get their next Reaction for their next Solution. That solution is for Europe (without the U.K.) to join Russia and fight Oceania. Paris will be attacked to get the thing rolin'.

[arch]

Myself,I'm pretty sceptical of all 'laws' that are passed,well maybe laws repealing previously passed laws are ok.For some 'odd' reason laws only seem to apply when they find it convenient,otherwise "the constitution's just a goddamn piece of paper" as bush put it.I'm pretty sure,at this point,that the laws aren't structured to benefit us joe public's,but maybe I'm just paranoid?Please,somebody tell I'm just paranoid and its all a bad dream.The law is for our protection right?,teachers,news,school,parents,they couldn't possibly have all lied to me?:p
Yes, they did.
Look, Santaclaus (Satan's claws) exists. Freemasons dress like him and its organization claims to believe that Santaclaus existed long ago. (bullocks, they talk about Satan)
So. Santaclaus exists!!! We learned that the creature is just a silly myth, because the real Santaclauses are far different from what the public gets to see.
It's not paranoid to think the opposite of everything the authority tries to sell you.
Were Kennedy and Diana paranoid when they said they were afraid of secret societies?
The law is to keep you in line so that those above you can do whatever they want without you stopping them. You can't kill authoritative people (slaves to the mob and Satanists, as simple as that) but they can kill you. This new gun law allows the bad people to kill the good ones by law. Because when you kill a bad guy, you WILL get punished.