PDA

View Full Version : War with Iran is likey


docmaturin
29-03-2007, 06:01 AM
http://www.harpers.org/sb-war-with-iran-1-1171385486.html


THIS IS A GREAT LINK AND A VERY GOOD ASSESSMENT AS TO WHAT IS GOING ON WITH IRAN AND THE U.S.

--> NOTE: IT SAYS, REALISTICALLY I BELIEVE, THAT NO MATTER WHO IS CALLING THE SHOTS THAT THE U.S. IS LIKELY TO FIGHT IRAQ. HERE IS THE SELLING POINTS I WANT TO ADD WITH IT:

1. There is a "fed up" stance between w/ "West" and Islamic Fundamentalists. If we topple the last bastion and serious threat to stability in the region, that will keep the rest in line so to speak.

2. Logistically and preparation wise--the "Coalition" is already there.

3. One more event like 9/11 or even half as big and elaborate as 9/11 would tilt many people over the edge (conspiracy or not is irrelevant, if "it" or anything like 9/11 happens again, on any scale, people will freak and be behind levelling Iran. At least enough for the shot-callers to justify doing it. Don't think Hillary wouldn't.). For those who are against war, even many of them will also be tired of "being tired" and would be more likely to up the stakes in order to end it.

4. Oil.

5. Other economic factors of being at war (Over paid contractors, a huge multi-billion dumping ground for government "gauranteed" contracts to private companys with bogus oversight and rampamt fraud waste and abuse.).

6. The media--even if legitimately reporting a war with Iran--they would fan the fires of paranoia and of people being "sick and tired of being sick and tired." Eventhough "being tired of it" is a bad reason to fight or not to fight, many people detached from it personally (most people) are sick of it.

HERE IS MY POINT. In light of North Korea quieting down, Europe having a union, the Americas going with a North American Union w/ constitution as Europe did (often over empowering them over "sovereign" countries), South America leveraging the last green patch of the earth in the name of economics, and Asia--to include China--becoming hooked on quality of living increases and the creature comforts of economics, THEN IRAN IS THE LAST REAL SQUEAKY WHEEL LEFT, AND THE OTHER "ANKLE BITERS" WILL DIE DOWN WHEN THEIR CHAMPION IS TURNED INTO A SCRAP HEAP LIKE IRAQ. IRAQ IN UPHEAVEL IS AN EXAMPLE, IRAQ AND IRAN BEING SET BACK YEARS WITHOUT OUR "HELP" WILL SCARE THE OTHERS WHO ARE OF EQUAL OR LESSER STRENGTH NATIONALLY, AS IRAQ AND IRAN WERE WHICH IS PRETTY MUCH THE REST OF THE MIDDLE EAST. EVERYONE STILL STANDING WILL PLAY ALONG AND IF TERROR ATTACKS HAPPEN HERE AND THERE--OH WELL, MORE REASON TO MICRO-CHIP ALL PEOPLE FOR SECURITY REASONS.

I point this out not as "my philosophy" but what I see as going to happen in one way shape or form if you pay attention and "read the tea leaves" (so to speak) correctly.

i_am
29-03-2007, 06:21 AM
I would actually go so far as to say it is a foregone conclusion :mad: I would be delighted to be proven wrong though!!

lappitypup
06-04-2007, 01:29 AM
Now they have 'pardoned' the hostages, what now?

timestop24
06-04-2007, 03:11 AM
Sometime this year. Highly unlikely the next.

whitenight639
06-04-2007, 05:24 AM
Now they have 'pardoned' the hostages, what now?

i would imagine they will play out the nuclear thing to epic proportion in the media, if we remember iraq was supposed to have WMD but turned out to be zip, just lies, but iran is actually developing uranium (all be it for power generation) so the media will blow this up when UN sanctions dont work, if public opinion is still not looking good for war then looks like some other catylist is needed like a smaller 911. its sad to think the media is that under the thumb, 15 navy people that signed up to fight the NWO dirty wars can get so much coverage whilst depleted uranium is still bieng used.. hey i say fuck those 15 navy people, anyway they got it easy from what i saw it looked like a holiday. anyway iv gone off topic im guessing these detention centres they are building in US and UK are for the relativly small riots that may break out as a result of going to war with iran.

timestop24
06-04-2007, 05:40 AM
anyway iv gone off topic im guessing these detention centres they are building in US and UK are for the relativly small riots that may break out as a result of going to war with iran.

I doubt it would even come to that. The populace of America is so complacent and compliant when it comes to what its government does abroad they would support Bush invading a country they never knew existed. I remember when a fake news show(I think British or Australian) was asking random Americans if they would support a bombing of Kyrgyzstan(which hosts a U.S. base), virtually all the interviewees agreed.

earthseed
06-04-2007, 07:03 AM
The elites know to make every war religious so the people will always support it and send their children to kill other people's children. All over the world this is how it is and has always been. So people think to have the wars they are defending their god as well as their people. But, of course it is actually depopulation, ritual sacrifice, money making, new world order and mind control.

friendsinthesky
06-04-2007, 12:15 PM
I would actually go so far as to say it is a foregone conclusion :mad: I would be delighted to be proven wrong though!!
There is NO absolute reason for attacking Iran with Nu-Clear weapons! If the US strike (with Nu-Clear weapons) then it's a full on NWO! BUT it can't be implemented just like SO! The attack won't happen, you've been conned! WAKE-UP!

paulski
06-04-2007, 02:14 PM
The attack won't happen, you've been conned! WAKE-UP!

Not if the Project For The New American Century is to be believed

The 2000 Rebuilding America's Defenses report recommends improved planning. The report states that "while the unresolved conflict in Iraq provides the immediate justification [for US military presence], the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein" and "Over the long term, Iran may well prove as large a threat to U.S. interests in the Gulf as Iraq has. And even should U.S.-Iranian relations improve, retaining forward-based forces in the region would still be an essential element in U.S. security strategy given the longstanding American interests in the region".

light worker
06-04-2007, 10:02 PM
A war with Iran is def coming. Any half-intelligent and informed commentator will tell you that (although maybe not always on camera). As well as the nuclear issue the US/UK/Israel will be stressing over the next few weeks that all the insurgency activities going on in Iraq are down to Iran.

This is already going on with the constant claims from Blair that Iran is down to all the recent attacks on British forces in Basra. Only today Blair reminded us that they are blaiming Iran for the violence in a statement. This and the nuclear issue will be enough for the "USUK" war machine to kick off this potentially huge conflict.

illuminist
07-04-2007, 03:58 AM
It seems that the Middle-East as a whole is going to be used for any 'major' war. Iran being a 'taster'.

friendsinthesky
07-04-2007, 02:43 PM
A war with Iran is def coming. Any half-intelligent and informed commentator will tell you that (although maybe not always on camera). As well as the nuclear issue the US/UK/Israel will be stressing over the next few weeks that all the insurgency activities going on in Iraq are down to Iran.
This is already going on with the constant claims from Blair that Iran is down to all the recent attacks on British forces in Basra. Only today Blair reminded us that they are blaiming Iran for the violence in a statement. This and the nuclear issue will be enough for the "USUK" war machine to kick off this potentially huge conflict.


Yeah right, just like russia v usa in the 1980's.

truthsayer
13-04-2007, 12:43 PM
If you take the document ref. The New American Century and then the Bible (Revelations) you can see they laid out their plans for the middle east and Asia eons ago.

Were in the seventh age to witness their plan come to fruition.

This is just one of many countries that need to be placed into their plan for NWO.

mrguitarbear
13-04-2007, 06:51 PM
The Hopi Indians say that there will be 3 great ' Earth Shakings ' before there will be peace on the Earth , these are meant to refer to three World Wars. Well , we've already had the first 2 World Wars , maybe I'll get to serve in the third ? :rolleyes:

WW3 can't happen in Europe because the destruction would be too great , therefore I reckon the Middle East is being set aside for the task. Isn't the Final Battle meant to be fought somewhere near Megiddo or wherever ?