View Full Version : Next US president?
bernardsmith
26-03-2008, 05:00 PM
Considering she's high up in the Illuminati hierarchy, my money's on Clinton...
What do other people think?
cheeney1
26-03-2008, 05:06 PM
Considering she's high up in the Illuminati hierarchy, my money's on Clinton...
What do other people think?
yup its going to be clinton alright......:eek:
stealth
26-03-2008, 05:06 PM
I think there's to much mud slinging going on between clinton & obama and mcain could gain from that and he looks more like a president to me .;)
loderlive
26-03-2008, 05:07 PM
Bush, Clinton, Bush, Clinton?, Bush?, Clinton?, Bush?, Clinton?, Bush?, Clinton?, Bush?, Clinton?........
I hope so then at least we can see the agenda in public. Off course if Clinton does not get in it simply means the agenda is less obvious.
zero1
26-03-2008, 05:18 PM
From what I've heard, this is how it's set up:
IF its Clinton, that means BAU (Business As Usual) as regards the Agenda and the NWO.
IF its Obama, that means Plan B for the Agenda and NWO: its going ahead but with a different strategy. The Powers That Be are undecided. This is why Obama is the candidate for "change" - see, they're telling you...
IF its McCain, that means War. McCain will intensify the Hidden Powers agenda, and lead us all to World War III - literally.
Because if its McCain, certain factions are gonna cancel diplomacy and break out the Ninjas...and a lot of people are going to die. :(
loderlive
26-03-2008, 05:24 PM
Is their much difference between the outcomes you describe?
snoopsnuffleopagus
26-03-2008, 05:28 PM
Cordial Felicitations:
I just scared myself; for a few seconds I imagined Bill O'Reilly as President,.........point being: Can't The Powers That Be put who-ever they want in Office?
McCain is Bat-Shit Crazy; Hillary is Bat-Shit Crazy, Obama is Bat-Shit Crazy
Myself, I am totaly Apolitical, the Government in the USA is hopeless, structuraly unsound.
If it were a Building it would be Dis-Mantled.
SAME CIRCUS, DIFFERENT CLOWNS
Kind Regards: Snoopsnuffleopagus
zero1
26-03-2008, 05:28 PM
Is their much difference between the outcomes you describe?
I think the way the underlying plan is enacted will change if its Obama or McCain.
With Hilary, I'm not so sure.
Either way, we end up with what is desired: a NWO.
But the outcomes importance is really in the degree of opposition and on what level it will mandate in future.
Hilary will be observed and opposed pretty much at the level we have now.
Obama will be closely observed and prevented from going to far.
McCain will be opposed on every level.
loderlive
26-03-2008, 05:34 PM
Obama will be the best bet if they want to keep the agenda hidden.
zero1
26-03-2008, 06:21 PM
Obama will be the best bet if they want to keep the agenda hidden.
I take your point, but the agenda is mostly visible now. At least, the exoteric side of it is.
adimon
08-08-2008, 05:18 PM
From what I've heard, this is how it's set up:
IF its Clinton, that means BAU (Business As Usual) as regards the Agenda and the NWO.
IF its Obama, that means Plan B for the Agenda and NWO: its going ahead but with a different strategy. The Powers That Be are undecided. This is why Obama is the candidate for "change" - see, they're telling you...
IF its McCain, that means War. McCain will intensify the Hidden Powers agenda, and lead us all to World War III - literally.
Because if its McCain, certain factions are gonna cancel diplomacy and break out the Ninjas...and a lot of people are going to die. :(
Should you come across this thread again, I'd like to hear more about why you think "certain factions are gonna cancel diplomacy", please.