courtcase status?

[janeway]

quote from David's site: All this was revealed in a public court at a second hearing of the case in December, the judgement from which is still pending because of court administration delays.

So what is the status so far? What is the next term for this courtcase? Or when is judgement expected?

I still have problems with the fact that there seems to be an informationstop.
Make people empathic, make them involved and than stop any information??

If this will be the next book David is writing about....
I am sorry but that would be a big dissapointment.

Just gives us some update; that is all I am asking for.
Why? Because I am curious and because I care!

[emma royds]

quote from David's site: All this was revealed in a public court at a second hearing of the case in December, the judgement from which is still pending because of court administration delays.

So what is the status so far? What is the next term for this courtcase? Or when is judgement expected?

I still have problems with the fact that there seems to be an informationstop.
Make people empathic, make them involved and than stop any information??

If this will be the next book David is writing about....
I am sorry but that would be a big dissapointment.

Just gives us some update; that is all I am asking for.
Why? Because I am curious and because I care!

Let It Be.

[mynameis]

Best thing I could have done besides trying to find a book in America.

[janeway]

The reason that I don't just "let it be" is why I caught up with David Icke in the first place.:rolleyes:

[truthcommission]

Let It Be.
I am seriously beginning to wonder about you and your motivations on this forum when I read this and the your other sham posts.

[i_am]

quote from David's site: All this was revealed in a public court at a second hearing of the case in December, the judgement from which is still pending because of court administration delays.

So what is the status so far? What is the next term for this courtcase? Or when is judgement expected?

I still have problems with the fact that there seems to be an informationstop.
Make people empathic, make them involved and than stop any information??

If this will be the next book David is writing about....
I am sorry but that would be a big dissapointment.

Just gives us some update; that is all I am asking for.
Why? Because I am curious and because I care!

Did you contribute?

I did and I gave it with love. If I am informed of the outcome, cool. If not, so be it. It was not given with any strings attached.

[limelady]

I am seriously beginning to wonder about you and your motivations on this forum when I read this and the your other sham posts.

I don't feel emma-royds was being in any way offensive in this post. I got that what was meant was 'just let it be' .....we will hear about the court case as soon as there is an outcome to report.

So I agree.

For the time being, lets just 'let it be'. ;)

[naturesdaughter]

Is it the opinion of members of this forum that publicity would be helpful to David Icke or detrimental? I too am curious, after all, we get to hear the minute details of frivolous trials all the time. Are no reporters covering this? Why the silence from the webmasters? Is it considered in David's and the cause's best interest to maintain hush status, and if so, why?
:confused:

[truthcommission]

I don't feel emma-royds was being in any way offensive in this post. I got that what was meant was 'just let it be' .....we will hear about the court case as soon as there is an outcome to report.
It is hard not to think someone is being facetious when it appears that she is either stringing people along or being deliberately misleading in other posts.

See here (http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=2195) and here (http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?p=483)

Perhaps if Emma is inclined to post she can offer an explanation?

[melbo]

I'm sure there are quite a few of us who have chipped in for David's legal fund and it would be nice of him to let us know how its going, even if there's no actual news, i.e. adjournments etc.

[janeway]

Did you contribute?

I did and I gave it with love. If I am informed of the outcome, cool. If not, so be it. It was not given with any strings attached.

Good for you.
I didn't make it an issue whether I contributed or not and I won't.
I am not talking about strings attached.
I am curious, like we all are, that is why we are here on this forum.

Limelady: I don't feel emma-royds was being in any way offensive in this post. I got that what was meant was 'just let it be' .....we will hear about the court case as soon as there is an outcome to report.

So I agree.

For the time being, lets just 'let it be'.

I felt offensive appearently. It was answered on my question.
If Emma had said: I don't care; I just let it be, than that was her opnion.
But by saying: "just let it be"..... is patronizing.

I am beginning to get a very strange feeling about this courtcase and this forum, because of the "sensitivity" of the question. While it should be a normal question. Is this somewhat Orwellian??
How far would David have come if he had taken "just let it be" as a serious answer to all of his investigations out of curiosity??

[i_am]

I am curious, like we all are, that is why we are here on this forum.

Sorry, but I am not the least bit curious. David has told us he will tell all when the time is right and that is good enough for me. I think the reason most people are on this forum is to talk to like-minded people and exchange ideas and information regarding this illusion in which we live.

When you are waiting on a ruling from the court, it would not be wise to talk about it until such ruling has been brought down. It could be detrimental to the outcome.

This subject has been discussed at length in earlier threads and that would be the reason, I think, that Emma said, 'let it be.'

[purple is a fruit]

In my understanding, when a courtcase is in progress, the people involved are not to speak of what is happenning as it could be, as mentioned by iaaia above, detrimental to its outcome. I am sure David, being the man he is will tell all when he is able to do so. there are certain times that it is quite important to follow the rules, especially when your livlihood is on the line.
I hope David and his family are managing to rise above the stress and remain positive. The truth will come out.

[tinmenace]

David will gain full control of his books and will be more successful than ever. Stress will melt away, along with it's physical manifestation of pain. It's going to be much easier for him going forward. Guaranteed!

[emma royds]

I don't feel emma-royds was being in any way offensive in this post. I got that what was meant was 'just let it be' .....we will hear about the court case as soon as there is an outcome to report.

So I agree.

For the time being, lets just 'let it be'. ;)

That is exactly what I meant Limelady, thanks. I mean it's not going to achieve anything this consist request for David Icke to give answers. I think it has already been mentioned countless times that the legal process concerning davids case is an ongoing process.These things take time to sort out, let us please concentrate on something else. It really feels as though there is an icke bashing crusade sometimes. The man has had enough unjustified critisms to deal with in his lifetime without members of this board adding to it. I'm sure when everything concerning the court case is finally cleared up he will be in a position to inform everyone of the outcome. In the meantime can we just steer the ship in a different direction.

[emma royds]

It is hard not to think someone is being facetious when it appears that she is either stringing people along or being deliberately misleading in other posts.

See here (http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=2195) and here (http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?p=483)

Perhaps if Emma is inclined to post she can offer an explanation?

I'm sorry, what is it I need to explain? If there is something that is bothering please get it off your chest, I mean what exactly is it that I need to defend myself for.

[emma royds]

janeway are you saying you are here on the forum because you are curious about the outcome of David's court case?



Is this a little bit of paranoia creeping in here? We have already been told that we will be informed about the outcome as soon as David has a verdict he can pass it on. I'm just wondering why this explanation isn't good enough for you?

I cannot speak for others, but quite frankly, I find your attitude rather offensive, especially your implication that there is something "Orwellian" going on because your curiosity hasn't been satisfied on this matter!

Naturally we're all curious about the outcome of the court-case, and we're hoping like heck it all goes well for David's sake, but since this is not a life and death situation effecting any of us, may I suggest that you try and wait patiently like the rest of us?

David will tell us when he has something to tell us!

Maybe if I had explained things as eloquently as you Chocky pud I would not of been accused of being offensive, although I don't see how my words could have been construed as such. I was pushed for time and thought that a quick reply to a subject that keeps persistently cropping up would suffice, apparently not.
I personally think that people are being a little over sensitive to think I meant anything by my reply other than a plea for patience, and I agree with you chocky, that the accusation of something Orwellian in nature occurring on this board could likewise be construed as offensive.

[janeway]

[QUOTE=chocky pud;21013]janeway are you saying you are here on the forum because you are curious about the outcome of David's court case?

No, because I am curious in GENERAL. What a stupide question.


Is this a little bit of paranoia creeping in here? We have already been told that we will be informed about the outcome as soon as David has a verdict he can pass it on. I'm just wondering why this explanation isn't good enough for you?

This is like be-LIE-ve (a David phrase again). That is why it is not good enough for me; and David wouldn't be satisfied with that either, just read all of his books, like I did:)

I cannot speak for others, but quite frankly, I find your attitude rather offensive, especially your implication that there is something "Orwellian" going on because your curiosity hasn't been satisfied on this matter!

I am merely using Davids assumptions/ language to try to make you understand that I appreciate his investigations very much.

Naturally we're all curious about the outcome of the court-case, and we're hoping like heck it all goes well for David's sake, but since this is not a life and death situation effecting any of us, may I suggest that you try and wait patiently like the rest of us?

David will tell us when he has something to tell us!

Oh my... what a SENSITIVITY towards David. As if I am attacking him.
The courtcase was held in a PUBLIC court for gods sake!
But you made your point; don't question anything about David; he is the saviour, he is untouchable by this forum.

I said I was curious and I care. The care is less. Thanks!

[truthcommission]

That is exactly what I meant Limelady, thanks...
Thanks Emma. All we have here are words on the screen.

[purple is a fruit]

[QUOTE]

No, because I am curious in GENERAL. What a stupide question.




This is like be-LIE-ve (a David phrase again). That is why it is not good enough for me; and David wouldn't be satisfied with that either, just read all of his books, like I did:)



I am merely using Davids assumptions/ language to try to make you understand that I appreciate his investigations very much.



Oh my... what a SENSITIVITY towards David. As if I am attacking him.
The courtcase was held in a PUBLIC court for gods sake!
But you made your point; don't question anything about David; he is the saviour, he is untouchable by this forum.

I said I was curious and I care. The care is less. Thanks!

Someone has their cranky pants on.:eek:

If the courtcase was in a public court then maybe there are other places you could go to get the information you so desperately seek. The rest of us will just be patient.

David the saviour? the untouchable? Not the last time I checked.
Simply a man, going through a legal trial and most of us are respecting how stressful this must be for hm and his family (after all they are also people with feelings) and being patient. Maybe you should bowl over to his house knock on the dam door and ask him yourself?

Purple