Hollow earth

[chinsup]

http://i214.photobucket.com/albums/cc11/chinsup/googleearth.jpg
Google earth's done a crap Job at covering it up.

[madthumbs]

OMFG! The most boring, uneventful, non mappable part of the earth is lacking in intricate detail on google earth. :rolleyes:

Damn you google for making your cover up so obvious! :rolleyes:

[aznality]

Come on, they can do better than that. Photoshop isnt very hard to use for advanced graphics people.

[gordonfreeman]

Good job, Google team for ruining the cover up.

[harris999]

wow, just wow. :O

[father ted]

http://i214.photobucket.com/albums/cc11/chinsup/googleearth.jpg
Google earth's done a crap Job at covering it up.

Haha, I agree, it's so obvious that they have covered something up. Who would actually believe that there's an area that looks like that on Earth?

[majicdragon]

Satellite photos are taken from satellites which orbit around the equator.

[esse]

Wow - thanks for that one! V. Interesting pic. Have been reading all about the Hollow Earth, very compelling.

[ashyr]

http://nz.youtube.com/watch?v=5ma779eCH-8

heh. might be a bit heavy for some.

[beldazar]

oh no! Not 'her' again :D

[audiolink]

Google Earth is not the only software that is hiding things from us. I downloaded Virtual Earth and Nasa' World Wind and both of these show absolutely nothing in that area. In fact in virtual earth it is a circle and you can definately see a change in shade on the white when you zoom out. I am sorry but I still can't get the hang of posting pics into forums. Also on the subject of World Wind you get pretty good views of the moon and mars. Anyone with it should check out the south pole area of the moon and see if you can come up with an answer on what you see.

[hagbard_celine]

http://i214.photobucket.com/albums/cc11/chinsup/googleearth.jpg
Google earth's done a crap Job at covering it up.


There's a lot of things on Google Earth that are censored. There was a great website dedicated to the subject. But I know for a fact there's a place in Scotland, on the Firth of Clyde, that I've seen with my own eyes that is omitted from the Ordinence Survey Lanranger map, even though it's a huge building. The building is actually the Royal Navy Explosive Handling Wharf, a covered dock where Trident missiles are loaded aboard submarines. On Google Earth, guess what! That very same building is covered by a convenient passing cloud!:rolleyes::rolleyes::cool:

It's also interesting how few maps there are of the poles. Most maps are either Mercator or Hanmer projections; they have the poles cut off, supposedly for convenience:rolleyes:, but could there be another reason? Check out this thread: http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=16708

One more thing: Have you got Microsoft Flight Simulator 2004? If so can you repeat an experiment for me: Try to fly to the poles and see what happens... I reckon someone in Building 5 knows more than he's telling!

The situation is that we're told that we live on a planet that's a solid sphere, but there are challenges to this. One of those is that spherical models of the Earth don't always fit in with actual physical descriptions of the Earth or attempts to create virtual Earths, whether in a computer or on a paper map. Modern maps are supposed to be acurate representations of the Earth, but then so was this:

http://img260.imageshack.us/img260/8255/zzz4g7h02akq4.gif (http://imageshack.us)

This is the oldest known map of the world. At the time the authorities told the people it was accurate; it was how the world really looked. Even back then we know they were lying; it wasn't just ignorance. Today we have the ability to travel the whole world and see it from above, but the lying hadn't changed, so why should modern maps be any more accurate than this one?