PDA

View Full Version : Fears of Internet predators unfounded study finds


cruise4
20-02-2008, 01:42 AM
Fears of Internet predators unfounded, study finds

Frank Greve
McClatchy Newspapers
Tuesday February 19, 2008

A lot of parental worries about Internet sex predators are unjustified, according to new research by a leading center that studies crimes against children.

"There's been some overreaction to the new technology, especially when it comes to the danger that strangers represent," said Janis Wolak, a sociologist at the Crimes against Children Research Center at the University of New Hampshire in Durham.

"Actually, Internet-related sex crimes are a pretty small proportion of sex crimes that adolescents suffer," Wolak added, based on three nationwide surveys conducted by the center.

Two of the surveys contacted 3,000 Internet users aged 10-17 in 2000 and again in 2005. The third sums up findings from 612 interviews with investigators at a nationally representative sample of agencies that deal with Internet sex crimes involving children.

In an article titled "Online 'Predators' and Their Victims," which appears Tuesday in American Psychologist, the journal of the American Psychological Association, Wolak and co-researchers examined several fears that they concluded are myths:

* Internet predators are driving up child sex crime rates.

Finding: Sex assaults on teens fell 52 percent from 1993 to 2005, according to the Justice Department's National Crime Victimization Survey, the best measure of U.S. crime trends. "The Internet may not be as risky as a lot of other things that parents do without concern, such as driving kids to the mall and leaving them there for two hours," Wolak said.

* Internet predators are pedophiles.

Finding: Internet predators don't hit on the prepubescent children whom pedophiles target. They target adolescents, who have more access to computers, more privacy and more interest in sex and romance, Wolak's team determined from interviews with investigators.

* Internet predators represent a new dimension of child sexual abuse.

Finding: The means of communication is new, according to Wolak, but most Internet-linked offenses are essentially statutory rape: nonforcible sex crimes against minors too young to consent to sexual relationships with adults.

* Internet predators trick or abduct their victims.

Finding: Most victims meet online offenders face-to-face and go to those meetings expecting to engage in sex. Nearly three-quarters have sex with partners they met on the Internet more than once.

* Internet predators meet their victims by posing online as other teens.

Finding: Only 5 percent of predators did that, according to the survey of investigators.

* Online interactions with strangers are risky.

Finding: Many teens interact online all the time with people they don't know. What's risky, according to Wolak, is giving out names, phone numbers and pictures to strangers and talking online with them about sex.

* Internet predators go after any child.

Finding: Usually their targets are adolescent girls or adolescent boys of uncertain sexual orientation, according to Wolak. Youths with histories of sexual abuse, sexual orientation concerns and patterns of off- and online risk-taking are especially at risk.

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/28029.html

jamston
20-02-2008, 01:56 AM
Interesting post, ive long thought the internet predator risk was overhyped along with ID theft and teen crime. In some of those cases concern is warranted , in most it seems like hype as part of a problem-reaction-solution scenario. In this case, more monitoring and restriction of the internet is the solution, ironic when we know 'the elite' are the biggest child abuse ring going. See The Franklin Cover Up, The Waterhouse Inquiry etc etc

deliciously_fresh
20-02-2008, 01:59 AM
One internet predator is one too many imo.

Anyway, I hope this relieves alot of parents out there who were worried everytime their offspring went online.

i_am
20-02-2008, 02:23 AM
One internet predator is one too many imo.

Anyway, I hope this relieves alot of parents out there who were worried everytime their offspring went online.

ditto!!!

Only 5% is 5% too many.

A hard one as I do not believe in censorship as a rule but where this sort of thing is concerned, something needs to protect these children from the 'small' percentage of predators.

It probably is a case pf PRS but what is the alternative?

madthumbs
20-02-2008, 02:30 AM
Most victims of predators were probably victims of their parents either by neglect or lack of love/ concern beforehand.

i_am
20-02-2008, 03:02 AM
Most victims of predators were probably victims of their parents either by neglect or lack of love/ concern beforehand.

yes in many cases this is so true, not all, but do we just then write these children off?

If they are not being protected by their parents, then are we to just say tough luck kids?

parents SHOULD be watching what their children are doing on the net. It is primarily the parents responsibility but who looks out for them if not their parents?

dangermouse
20-02-2008, 03:31 AM
Its the job of parents to educate their children about these dangers ..

i_am
20-02-2008, 03:45 AM
Its the job of parents to educate their children about these dangers ..

Yes it is. I said that!

but if the parents do not do their job, do we just abandon these children to whatever happens to them and say it is not our responsibility?

montag
20-02-2008, 04:13 AM
It is primarily the parents responsibility but who looks out for them if not their parents?
The State.;)

deliciously_fresh
20-02-2008, 12:25 PM
ditto!!!

Only 5% is 5% too many.

A hard one as I do not believe in censorship as a rule but where this sort of thing is concerned, something needs to protect these children from the 'small' percentage of predators.

It probably is a case pf PRS but what is the alternative?

We can only hope that more parents wake up and get hip to the fact that there are some unsavoury characters out there who wish to take advantage of vulnerable youth.

cruise4
20-02-2008, 07:43 PM
The answer and problem is not the internet. Its the people and how they are dealt with. Currently they are encouraged by the tptb. Thats where the issue is to be solved. Check out:

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=20210

and realise where the battleground really is and keep a sense of proportion of the dangers of the internet which will probably do more to cure this particular evil than anything else, unless you aid them to censor this stuff which will lead to the exact opposite of what you intend, in your well meaning but ill thought out way.