Ron Paul 2008: RICO suit filed

[cruise4]

What the public needs to understand is that FOX, ABC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC and the other established *mainstream " mass media"/news sources [*see definition @ Wikipedia.org] are perpetrating criminal fraud (via omissions, distortions and outright lies) and a deliberate censorship of Dr. Ron Paul in 2008 Presidential race—with malice and aforethought and evil intent to control the 2008 presidential elections.

This is an outrage and "We the People" need to organize against this dangerous plot and TAKE ACTION by filing "class action" criminal charges and civil suits against the owners and executives of these news sources.

This illegal censorship is not only harming Americans because they wield the power to control the outcome of elections via the quantity and quality of the news coverage they provide the candidates; it constitutes an unAmerican and antiAmerican criminal enterprise; not to fail to mention a violation of the first amendment/freedom of the press.

These accused individuals—the elitist media executives—exercise monopolized and Fascist-control over media/news sources with intent to get the candidate preferred by them elected while simultaneously wrongfully hiding and/or playing down the true facts, popularity and success of the Ron Paul campaign.

http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2008/01/ron-paul-200-11.html

Please spread this message and let's get criminal charges and a class action lawsuit executed against this dangerous organized crime syndicate identified as the present mainstream media outlets which are collaborating in a RICO [ Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act, Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1961-1968; reference: www.ricoact.com] conspiracy to censor Dr. Ron Paul and control the outcome of the 2008 Presidential Election. This is definitely "RICO" if it can be shown that any of the accused media executives have donated money to any of the other presidential candidates, directly or indirectly! The accused individuals herein have wrongfully utilized their outrageous MONOPOLY over the media across America to injure Dr. Ron Paul and his millions of supporters; all Americans, in fact. These accused individuals need to go to prison upon conviction. They need to be criminally prosecuted and have their personal assets seized. They need to have their Federal FCC licenses revoked for participating in this criminal conspiracy. Help us spread this felony information far and wide. Let's get these elitist outlaws criminally prosecuted and civilly sued.

[cyince]

The reality of the Ron Paul situation is that his perceived success is in his supporters heads. Was/is he downplayed in election coverage, yes. To be fair he was/is polling nationally at around 4%, and has 14 delegates (40 but some 'shady' calculations), these facts essentially preclude him from reasonable discussions of the election, as he is not a factor. Fact is, he is a third tier candidate, and is unelectable.

Another thing that RP supporters seem to ignore is the disproportionate amount of coverage he got relative to other 3rd tier candidates, (Chris Dodd, Richardson, Tancredo, Gravel, Kusinich et al). He was on all the Sunday shows serveral times, a full hour with Glen Beck, on HC multiple times, was on all the debates pre and post, and countless others (see YouTube). Really how much more attention do you want from the media when the real data suggests that RP is an also ran.

http://youdecide08.foxnews.com/states/#washington-20080209 Just to show where he stands...and the lack of millions of supporters

[cruise4]

"The reality of the Ron Paul situation is that his perceived success is in his supporters heads"

His success is the increased numbers of people who have awoken to whats really going on. This is the whole point.

Freedom has real enemies on some of these forums, whether they know it or not.

[john white]

The reality of the Ron Paul situation is that his perceived success is in his supporters heads. Was/is he downplayed in election coverage, yes. To be fair he was/is polling nationally at around 4%, and has 14 delegates (40 but some 'shady' calculations), these facts essentially preclude him from reasonable discussions of the election, as he is not a factor. Fact is, he is a third tier candidate, and is unelectable.

Another thing that RP supporters seem to ignore is the disproportionate amount of coverage he got relative to other 3rd tier candidates, (Chris Dodd, Richardson, Tancredo, Gravel, Kusinich et al). He was on all the Sunday shows serveral times, a full hour with Glen Beck, on HC multiple times, was on all the debates pre and post, and countless others (see YouTube). Really how much more attention do you want from the media when the real data suggests that RP is an also ran.

http://youdecide08.foxnews.com/states/#washington-20080209 Just to show where he stands...and the lack of millions of supporters

Ron Paul is right, and Ron Paul is telling the absolute truth... which just shows what a sorry state the media mind washed public is in

What about you cyince? You going Obama for more War?

[cyince]

Ron Paul is right, and Ron Paul is telling the absolute truth
This is the problem I have with RP supporters...he is telling the absolute truth. I do find it hard to believe that his internet 20 something supporters agree with him on social issues. Separation of Church and State, Evolution, social programs, right to life, college tuition etc. Its like just because he says he would leave Iraq immediately people minimize all that other stuff. Know what, in those issues RP=Mike Huckabee.

which just shows what a sorry state the media mind washed public is in

What about you cyince? You going Obama for more War?

Well, if I was American, and had to vote with one of the 5 remaining candidates, I would vote for Obama, at least he says he will talk with America`s perceived enemies. If I had my choice of all the candidates from the start I would vote for Gravel, Kushinch, or Edwards. Ron Paul is unelectable in todays America. I do place the blame largely on the media, as they eat this dog and pony show election crap up. It is their own fault though, most people unfortunately don`t care about anything but themselves, and will enjoy the crap the media spoon feeds to them. A large portion of the blame has to go on individuals though, people need to realize that cable news, and radio news are a business, and as such are only motivated by one factor.

I like Ron Pauls position on the War, and `some` of his views on foreign policy, however even if he was elected I don`t think he would be able to carry it out. His radical ideas simply would not pass the house and senate. To say America could just leave Iraq today with no consequences is foolish. I hate the War, I hate American foreign policy, I hate the direction America is going, I opposed this war from day one. With all of that said, the unfortunate reaily of the US`s current position is that there is no easy way out. We, rather They created this mess, and it is there moral responsibility to clean it up. It really is a tragic for the people atcualy fighting the war, and being killed by it (soldiers, Iraqi citizens).

To paraphrase, I DO NOT SUPPORT THE WAR, but Ron Paul is a third tier candidate who is running on the strength of one of his positions and is unelectable in the General Election. THis I feel is the reason he is marginalized by party insiders, and the right wing media. (Hes marginalized by the left media for obvious reasons).

Sorry for the incoherent rant.

[cyince]

"The reality of the Ron Paul situation is that his perceived success is in his supporters heads"

His success is the increased numbers of people who have awoken to whats really going on. This is the whole point.

Freedom has real enemies on some of these forums, whether they know it or not.

I am glad that this election cycle saw the awakening of the `youth`vote in large part thanks to the internet. I just find it baffling that a right wing libertarian slash constitutionalitist is captivating the internet. Its my opinion that there were candidates who have far more progressive ideas than Paul (Gravel and Dennis K) and would be far more electable than Paul. They both wanted to leave Iraq, both called shenanigans on the current establishment, and share social ideals with young America.