View Full Version : Law of One - Ra Material
shellygurrrl
06-02-2008, 01:00 AM
I've started reading these books (there's a total of five of them) and they REALLY resonate with me. Anybody into these channelings? There's such a wealth of knowledge contained within, from everything to the consciousness of the universe, to what God is, to Ascension, to guidance on psychic attacks, ancient Egypt, to healing, to our Higher Selves... every topic of interest to one searching for truth and spiritual growth is contained within.
Here's Carla Rueckert and the L/L Research group's site. The books are all free online to read, plus lots of other information about the Law of One series.
Peace and Love! :)
http://www.llresearch.org/
http://www.lawofone.info/
From the "Positive Path":
The Confederation of Planets in the Service of the Infinite Creator has only one important statement. That statement, my friends, as you know, is that all things, all life, all of the creation is part of one original thought.
We will exercise each channel if we are able to. The reception of our beam is a somewhat more advanced feat than some of the more broad vibration channels opened by other members for more introductory and intermediate work.
Let us for a moment consider thought. What is it, my friends, to take thought? Took you then thought today? What thoughts did you think today? What thoughts were part of the original thought today? In how many of your thoughts did the creation lie? Was love contained? And was service freely given? You are not part of a material universe. You move your body, your mind, and your spirit in somewhat eccentric patterns for you have not completely grasped the concept that you are part of the original thought.
GOODSTUFF
drael
06-02-2008, 04:27 AM
Yup. Must read material, IMO :)
Also an amazingly clear channel, perhaps the clearest of modern times....
If your into dimensions, ascension or metaphysics, u cant go past the ra material...
shellygurrrl
09-02-2008, 12:28 PM
Yup. Must read material, IMO :)
Also an amazingly clear channel, perhaps the clearest of modern times....
If your into dimensions, ascension or metaphysics, u cant go past the ra material...Thanks for the response!
:)
I agree 100%!
cruise4
10-02-2008, 09:11 AM
I'm also reading this stuff at the moment. Its taking ages as its really hard to grasp some of the concepts. Impossible sometimes. My impressions so far are:
Book 1 - The law of free will has been constantly broken by the very entities supposedly following it. Their interference invariably results in complete disaster. If they exist in the future how on earth can you be this bad at planning out events in the past.
Book 2 - I'm only a little bit into this one.
clipwip
12-02-2008, 02:45 AM
I'm reading these too. Currently on Book 3. Yes, it is quite dense material and hard to get your head around. But well worth it. I would say that these books have been more influential on me than anything else I've read for a very long time.
rebel ins
17-02-2008, 10:44 AM
I've read it, it's an interpretation of how a higher dimensional being interprets existance, essentially it's is still wrong, that being is still part of the ''matrix''
marpat
22-02-2008, 01:19 PM
I have been reading Edgar Cayce's reincarnation and the Law of One stuff comes up in there. I even manage to pass the wanderer test that it refers to, but my finger does not glow like a torch yet.
What I don't get is if Ra is acutally a social/ group consciousness then why does it always state 'I am Ra'. Would it not be more accurate to say 'We are Ra'. Little things like that sometimes make me question the source
One thing I did find interesting is that RA states that one of Cayce's sources was a negative entity called Halaliel, which is obviously a Hewbrew name. This entity is the one that gave Cayce the prophecy of part of the US sinking, etc. and Ra said that this wa incorrect. Question: If Wilcock is stating he is the incarnation of Cayce, and Cayce prophesied that parts of the US would sink around 1998, and then Ra states after the event that Cayce's sources was lying, then does this mean that Ra as Wilcocks source is trying to justify a failed prophecy by Cayce. Not sure....
marpat
22-02-2008, 01:29 PM
Clipwip did you get that pic off the Ecstacy through Tantra book cover? I got that book.
deliciously_fresh
22-02-2008, 03:32 PM
Is there a reason why this 'entity' needs to constantly repeat 'I am Ra'?
marpat
22-02-2008, 03:40 PM
Is there a reason why this 'entity' needs to constantly repeat 'I am Ra'?
Probably so people know what is talking, but I still don't understand using the personal form for a collective mind
cruise4
22-02-2008, 03:47 PM
The way I read it is Ra is an alien lifeform. Whilst having a grasp of earth language its still an alien conciousness. I also read the statement 'I am Ra' at each paragraph as an attempt to preclude distortion or corruption of the channel. A collective mind is of course an 'I'. Its passed the level of collective individuals, which might be termed we, to the point of becoming a single identity within itself. The description is only necessary at all because its talking to us at our level of understanding.
deliciously_fresh
22-02-2008, 03:48 PM
Probably so people know what is talking, but I still don't understand using the personal form for a collective mind
If the transcript of the author's 'channeling' session has been written down, why would they need to do that? Wouldn't it be obvious to the reader who was saying what?
Perhaps 'Ra' is a collective of souls/aliens who merged together to become one. :confused:
LOL
cruise4
22-02-2008, 04:40 PM
You answer your own question. Its a transcript.
"Perhaps 'Ra' is a collective of souls/aliens who merged together to become one."
You have read it... right?
deliciously_fresh
22-02-2008, 05:15 PM
You answer your own question. Its a transcript.
"Perhaps 'Ra' is a collective of souls/aliens who merged together to become one."
You have read it... right?
On the website, it reads 'Ra: I am Ra.....etc etc'. This is what I am referring to.
The book? Nope. Just checked out the link on the net.
marpat
22-02-2008, 06:57 PM
You answer your own question. Its a transcript.
"Perhaps 'Ra' is a collective of souls/aliens who merged together to become one."
You have read it... right?
Ra is a group soul, a combination of the individuals that compose it. The whole becomes greater than the sum of it's part by a huge degree. I can see why it would say I am, if it indicates a particular point within that group soul is the communicating entity. Group souls exist everywhere, every country having it's own group soul built upon the combined minds of all people who have lived and died within it. Every city and town and village is the same, each having it's own unique atmosphere.
The thing with a group soul is that it's individual units are joined by a common purpose. They are still capable of independent action and thought, just they have access to a common store of information
julieray
22-02-2008, 08:38 PM
I would love to read these books, I have read clippings but I don't know from which one it was, but when I am not so busy, I will certainly look into them.
One thing I do remember thinking is that, elements of everything I read seem to link together and I wonder whether you all have similar experiences?
For example, in the clip of the Book of RA, I read, he stated that there was a harvest of souls every 25,000 years. This also reminded me of the Realian belief that we are all clones. They were told by the Nephlim that every 25,000 years we discover the technology to become Gods ourselves i.e. clone another human race. Also similarly is the cycle of our sun orbiting the black sun albeit this cycle is every 26,000 years, but I have to say that there seems to be a pattern emerging and wonder what it is truely all about. There could be more, but that is all I have read. Any ideas or am I just trying to link things up that shouldn't be linked?
marpat
23-02-2008, 12:34 AM
I would love to read these books, I have read clippings but I don't know from which one it was, but when I am not so busy, I will certainly look into them.
One thing I do remember thinking is that, elements of everything I read seem to link together and I wonder whether you all have similar experiences?
For example, in the clip of the Book of RA, I read, he stated that there was a harvest of souls every 25,000 years. This also reminded me of the Realian belief that we are all clones. They were told by the Nephlim that every 25,000 years we discover the technology to become Gods ourselves i.e. clone another human race. Also similarly is the cycle of our sun orbiting the black sun albeit this cycle is every 26,000 years, but I have to say that there seems to be a pattern emerging and wonder what it is truely all about. There could be more, but that is all I have read. Any ideas or am I just trying to link things up that shouldn't be linked?
I have never studied those Ra books, but have heard reference to them from other books. What I find curious is that if the technology is discovered every 25,000 years then why do we never find traces of it, unless it look so unfamiliar to us. I am more familiar with the Law of One through Edgar Cayce's books, though the style seems quite different.
rebel ins
24-02-2008, 03:27 PM
why does it say ''Adonai'' at the end of the sessions?
not worth bothering imo
marpat
24-02-2008, 03:38 PM
why does it say ''Adonai'' at the end of the sessions?
not worth bothering imo
Does it? never read any of the sessions. Adonai a Hewbrew God title formed by the letters ADNI. I think the full title is Lord of the Earth, along that line, and has been compressed into a single name.
Also note that Aleister Crowley also used Adonai as the name for his own higher self, his Holy Guardian Angel in the terminaology of the time.
Seems strange that Ra would identify himself as the start of a session then end it with a totally different name.
cruise4
24-02-2008, 07:13 PM
As a simple serach would answer your question re. Adonai why have you not done one?
There is something wrong with this material though, I feel so far (reading Book 3) and its along the lines of this...
The Carrot and Stick approach is used throughout.... yet they talk about 'Free Will' and the 'Law of Confusion'.
So Coercion and mis-information rules this supposedly 'Free Will' experience.
This isn't possible from my perspective.
Then there's this idea of catalyst. How is that not cause and effect?
But its all for the sake of Evolution... because left to our own devices the process takes a lot longer. So now in an idea of 'infinite' we introduce a 'definitive period' which in 'timelessness' is meaningless. And another case of breach of free will for the idea of 'purpose'.
shellygurrrl
27-02-2008, 01:25 AM
I've read it, it's an interpretation of how a higher dimensional being interprets existance, essentially it's is still wrong, that being is still part of the ''matrix''
I don't see the legitimacy of that statement considering a being that much further ahead of us would understand concepts we are not able to fathom.
shellygurrrl
27-02-2008, 01:33 AM
One thing that I've found is that analyzing a message too much proves contradictory. The message is what's important, not understanding why "I am Ra" comes first, etc. etc.
I resonate with the material so much because I believe in that interpretation of how it all began and what happens afterwards. I'm not going to split hairs over the details. If it feels right to you, dig it, if not, move on.
Another reason is because I have had spiritual visions and experiences that showed me many things discussed in the books before I read this or Edgar Cayce or knew who David Wilcock was or read anything by David Icke or researched ANYTHING like the topics discussed here.
rebel ins
27-02-2008, 10:52 PM
I don't see the legitimacy of that statement considering a being that much further ahead of us would understand concepts we are not able to fathom.
I think we can understand any concept, the difference is only in a way how that being interprets reality
shellygurrrl
29-02-2008, 01:34 AM
I think we can understand any concept, the difference is only in a way how that being interprets reality
I think a being in the sixth density would have a better concept of everything compared to us in 3D.