is there a mathematician in the house?

[thomascovenant]

Wasnt sure where to post this but here goes.
I`m not good with numbers.I`ve reduced a time and date from 11:11 21/12/2012 to (and this is the interesting bit);
1111211212
can anyone do anything with this?

[dedicate]

0+ 1. New start + a head start (what was learned will be remembered). Zero sum gain + 1. The Fool in the Tarot deck + the Alchemist. Sounds like better times. All things, of this Earth's trial period, made equel + 1.

Interesting that much of our technology is based on the binary system, also. But that system uses "0"s and "1"s. Prooves that technology is one step behind real advancement.--it misses a step or two.

[bigus_dickus]

Interesting that much of our technology is based on the binary system, also. But that system uses "0"s and "1"s. Prooves that technology is one step behind real advancement.--it misses a step or two.

please explain how the binary system of computing machines is proof of "one step behind real advancement.--it misses a step or two".

[cruise4]

4

and 0 doesn't exist, only 1 - 9

[ichi wa zen]

4

and 0 doesn't exist, only 1 - 9

0

[dedicate]

Hi. This was more or less a fun post for me. I just posted whatever came to my mind; having a good time. That was the spirit in which it was posted. But it is how I see things...

Science is a step or two behind.. I think the terms are reductionism (Things are explained by reducing them to commonality.. ie. fun sex/love is only chemicals in the body), materialism, and empiracism ("I have to see it", attitude) and added arrogance, you have a behind-the-times science. Also I wanted to use the word "proof" at least once in my posts.


Unfotunately " modern religion" is walking in the total wrong direction and needs to turn around to get behind.

Art may be the only truth the masses of society ever get in good doses.

Ken Wilber's books do the best job of presenting an honest, detailed and highly recommendable study on this subject of meeting science/religion/art.

[cruise4]

0

Thats a character

[bigus_dickus]

Science is a step or two behind..

behind who or what?

I think the terms are reductionism (Things are explained by reducing them to commonality.. ie. fun sex/love is only chemicals in the body), materialism, and empiracism ("I have to see it", attitude) and added arrogance, you have a behind-the-times science. Also I wanted to use the word "proof" at least once in my posts.

not all scientists believe or research the same things. science in general has made leaps from the time of material reductionism. it has even incorporated philosophy. even mathematics is so abstract that it has nothing to do with empiricism. for example, have you ever seen a real zero?

Unfotunately " modern religion" is walking in the total wrong direction and needs to turn around to get behind.

you mean new age neopaganism?

Art may be the only truth the masses of society ever get in good doses.

that's because art is an expression of feelings and emotions by way of "flowing". and our emotional intelligence is what deals mostly with the truth and the relationships between us, our selves and the world.

[dedicate]

A step or two behind the time. Every science teacher I've met is an atheist. They believe when you die you are dead.-- just like the subjects they teach.

You could clean your head gear... or maybe you are a Smith? -- one of those sentient programs sent out to stop the ONE.-- A TRUE ZERO, IAM.

That little history of science lesson you are giving is Brainwashing propaganda. The true scientists of the past like today are unrecognized and you do not see them printed in research bullitins or mentioned in the textbooks. Just like true Artists and true Religious leaders.-- any significant gain a Bacon,for example, did make has been hijacked and derailed. No leaps. No progress.

We are all pagans today. That is clear. We live in a pagan culture.. called Western "Civilization". And that Jesus you talk about mentions a New Age in the discourse at Olivet.

[bigus_dickus]

A step or two behind the time.

behind WHAT time?

Every science teacher I've met is an atheist.

so what? not every science teacher i have met is an atheist.

They believe when you die you are dead.-- just like the subjects they teach.

and you believe that they believe that when you die you are dead.

what do you mean the subjects they teach are "dead"?

You could clean your head gear... or maybe you are a Smith? -- one of those sentient programs sent out to stop the ONE.-- A TRUE ZERO, IAM.

what does 'sci-fi' movies have to do with this discussion?

That little history of science lesson you are giving is Brainwashing propaganda. The true scientists of the past like today are unrecognized and you do not see them printed in research bullitins or mentioned in the textbooks. Just like true Artists and true Religious leaders.-- any significant gain a Bacon,for example, did make has been hijacked and derailed. No leaps. No progress.

i was talking about true scientists, not fake ones. unless your idea of 'true' scientists is different than mine.

We are all pagans today. That is clear. We live in a pagan culture.. called Western "Civilization". And that Jesus you talk about mentions a New Age in the discourse at Olivet.

it depends on what you mean by "pagan". are you talking about capitalism? how am i pagan if i don't believe in and sacrifice to numerous social and personal gods?

[adimon]

(to be sung out loud)

ONE ADD ONE IS TWO
TWO ADD TWO IS FOUR
FOUR ADD TWO IS SIX, ADD SIX IS TWELVE!

TWELVE ADD TWELVE MAKES TWEN-TY-FOUR
ADD SIXTEEN AND YOU'VE GOT TWO SCORE

A SEVEN AND A THREE, MAKES HALF A CENTURY
AND IF WE HAVE NOT BLUN--DERED...

ADD FORTY-FOUR AND FIVE
AND SURE AS I'M ALIVE

YOU ONLY NEED ONE MORE TO MAKE A HUN-DRED!

[dedicate]

deprogram

[craven dark]

A centered triangular number is a centered figurate number that represents a triangle with a dot in the center and all other dots surrounding the center in successive triangular layers. The centered triangular number for n is given by the formula



The following image shows the building of the centered triangular numbers using the associated figures: at each step the previous figure, shown in red, is surrounded by a triangle of new points, in blue.



The first few centered triangular numbers (sequence A005448 in OEIS) are

1, 4, 10, 19, 31, 46, 64, 85, 109, 136, 166, 199, 235, 274, 316, 361, 409, 460, 514, 571, 631, 694, 760, 829, 901, 976, 1054, 1135, 1219, 1306, 1396, 1489, 1585, 1684, 1786, 1891, 1999, 2110, 2224, 2341, 2461, 2584, 2710, 2839, 2971

Each centered triangular number from 10 onwards is the sum of three consecutive regular triangular numbers. Also each centred triangular number has a remainder of 1 when divided by three and the quotient (if positive) is the previous regular triangular number.

The sum of the first n centered triangular numbers is the magic constant for an n by n normal magic square for n > 2.


[edit] Centered triangular prime
A centered triangular prime is a centered triangular number that is prime. The first few centered triangular primes are (sequence A125602 in OEIS)

19, 31, 109, 199, 409, ...

(corresponding to n: 3, 4, 8, 11, 16, ...)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centered_triangular_number"

Something beautiful is going to happen in 2112:):):)