What'ya reckon?

[lemonique]

Is this for real? or just another hoax?

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article713438.ece
Pictures show life on Mars | The Sun |HomePage|News

Lemonique

[rynath]

I really want that pic to be a lifeform but I think the arm and head are shadows in the background and the main body is a rock. Ofcourse I've been wrong countless times before so keep that beautiful mind open :)

Here's another story about it with a few more pics...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=509693&in_page_id=1770

[saab1981]

Very interesting, could well be something in that.

Project Camelot in particular answers a lot of questions about Mars - some are astonishing.

[lemonique]

There is also something that looks like a serpent to the right of the main figure.
Hmmm......quite strange

Lem.

[hagbard_celine]

Are there other photoes of the same place because if the object has moved then that will be the proof?

[sleepycat64]

Maybe bigfoot on holiday?

[lemonique]

It's midnight here so I'll look for other photos tomorrow :)

Lemonique

[nsa_]

If that is an alien it must be two inches tall.

[hagbard_celine]

If that is an alien it must be two inches tall.

It's not possible to judge because we don't know the scale.

[nsa_]

http://img.thesun.co.uk/multimedia/archive/00423/mars1_682_423043a.jpg

The heavy pixelating effect should suggest how big it is as well. I think this was just an interesting image that astronomers were passing round, as they usually do when interesting images come about (and as a side point, we're not told who's doing this 'intense scrutiny' which gives me doubts).

[kashmirz]

If you look into richard hoaglands works on sydonia and his evidence is correct (which their is no reason to dismiss since he only works on data facts with sources) then i would say if it is real, then it would be the remains of a human statue from the destroyed civilization.

Its also interesting to note that david wilcock seems to have been coming forward with alot of supposed information about mars civilizations in the past, as well as current base operations in the present.

Now if you cross reference richard hoaglands works, with the history and information provided by michael tsarion, understanding how a mars civilization could have been destroyed starts to be made clear.

this is now whats interesting.

if you cross reference richard hoaglands works on sydonia, and then you take his data evidence, then you look at tsarions works where he documents the destroyed planet tiamant (spelling?) and the way everything was frozen in space. Then it starts to raise the prospect that the debris could indeed be from this cultures civilization, and not left over from a civilization on mars.

Of course this does not rule it out, as it is plausable that if the affects of the earths cataclysm had a affect on the entire solar system, that devastation could have taken place on mars, also affected by that planets destruction in itself.


... yes ... time for coffee

[nsa_]

Any recomendations on what to read by Hoagland and Wilcock? Something preferably free.

[rynath]

Any recomendations on what to read by Hoagland and Wilcock? Something preferably free.

There are many free video interviews which you can stream, download or listen to in mp3 format:

http://www.projectcamelot.org/interviews.html

I'd recommend just about every interview from this site. I really like the video interviews because you can see what these people look like and read their facial expressions while they're talking.

Both Hoagland and Wilcock are included on the site.

[kashmirz]

yeah my knowledge of both hoagland and wilcock comes from project camelot.

[rynath]

yeah my knowledge of both hoagland and wilcock comes from project camelot.

In that case I'm not sure of any further free reading material aside from the transcripts from those interviews on the same site. Maybe there's a torrent out there with some goodies. I haven't searched those yet.

[hagbard_celine]

http://img.thesun.co.uk/multimedia/archive/00423/mars1_682_423043a.jpg

The heavy pixelating effect should suggest how big it is as well. I think this was just an interesting image that astronomers were passing round, as they usually do when interesting images come about (and as a side point, we're not told who's doing this 'intense scrutiny' which gives me doubts).

It's odd perspective, down a hill. Or maybe Martians are only 2 inches tall, who Knows? Their systems may well not be carbon-based and be run by different chemical reactions to terrestrial life.

I'm wondering on my question above: Why didn't they take another photo and see if the object had moved? Could this be a mistake? Perhaps it was meant to be edited out! NASA may well not want us to know that Little Green Men on Mars are real! This one slipped into the out-tray through the censor's error; or maybe he missed a bit with the airbrush.

[rynath]

I'm wondering on my question above: Why didn't they take another photo and see if the object had moved?

I completely agree, this would be the simplest way of answering the question. Or just drive over there and take a closer look. They should be all over these odd anomolies with that little rover.

[lemonique]

Hi Guys, Joseph P. Skipper's analysis of the Mars photo...


http://www.marsanomalyresearch.com/evidence-reports/2008/134/rover-sta

tue-or-person.htm


Lemonique

[hagbard_celine]

Hi Guys, Joseph P. Skipper's analysis of the Mars photo...


http://www.marsanomalyresearch.com/evidence-reports/2008/134/rover-sta

tue-or-person.htm


Lemonique

Dead link. What does he say? Is it alive or not?

[hagbard_celine]

This will make you laugh! If it's not clear enough to read, the alien is Peter Hain and the caption says: "Er...Gordon, remember you told me to keep out of the way for a while and not attract attention...?":

http://img292.imageshack.us/img292/5269/picture007qh7.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[kashmirz]

That is hilarious hagbard haha good find