Who's the liar, Shack or Lawson?

[killtown]

Anthony Lawson, the 10% truther (http://forum.911movement.org/index.php?showtopic=2455), has been calling Sept. Clues (http://forum.911movement.org/index.php?showtopic=629) maker Simon Shack not only a liar, but a proven liar (http://forum.911movement.org/index.php?showtopic=2512).

Is Shack a "proven liar," or is Lawson lying that Shack is a liar?

[masonfree party]

its obvious Lawson is the liar...he popped up out of the blue just to debunk september clues...anyone with that sort of accent is obviously an establishment shill...probably mind controlled at Eton with a fat bunged bank account

[john white]

http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=12671&start=0&postdays=0&postorder=asc&highlight=

Anthony Lawsons UK 9/11 thread

[killtown]

And Simon's lie is where?

[killtown]

Still waiting for the proof that Shack is a "proven liar". Maybe Lawson can come here and personally show us.

[killtown]

Hey Lawson, register over here and show us where Simon Shack lied before we think YOU are a fraud.

[ukor]

And Simon's lie is where?

There's the "missing background/inserted plane" deception in September Clues for one, and now we have the "faked cut" deception in 911 Amateur as just two examples.

These deceptions or "lies" don't make themselves, they're made by someone.
And that someone is generally called a "liar" by most people.
Except at 911 Movement where they're voted Number One.

QED and case closed.

[mr_pixie]

Anthony Lawson is the conman:;)

[ukor]

Anthony Lawson is the conman:;)


There's claims, and then there's claims backed by evidence.
And then there are those poor souls who can't tell the difference.

[weston white]

There's claims, and then there's claims backed by evidence.
And then there are those poor souls who can't tell the difference.

summed up well.

[killtown]

There's the "missing background/inserted plane" deception in September Clues for one, and now we have the "faked cut" deception in 911 Amateur as just two examples.

These deceptions or "lies" don't make themselves, they're made by someone.
And that someone is generally called a "liar" by most people.
Except at 911 Movement where they're voted Number One.

QED and case closed.
Funny, usually when providing proof, people post links to verify their "proof". But continue to slander him if it makes you feel big.

[ukor]

Funny, usually when providing proof, people post links to verify their "proof". But continue to slander him if it makes you feel big.

Right, as if you are unaware of these exposes:

http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=11608
http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=11695
http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=11664
http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=13099

... but continue aiding and abetting fraud if it makes you feel important.

[weston white]

lol, Ukor is funny... even while making a valid point.

[liltroofer]

i thought Lawson's argument was weak and it comes across as more of a personal attack than a forthright analysis of all the footage.

some of the footage he uses is even different from the stuff Sept. Clues claims is original.

that's equally misleading as Sept. Clues, so Lawson's argument against Clues as "misleading," is also against himself.

nevermind who's "misleading" ... who's doing better research?

so far, socialservice is better.

[killtown]

Right, as if you are unaware of these exposes:

http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=11608
http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=11695
http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=11664
http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=13099

... but continue aiding and abetting fraud if it makes you feel important.
At best we see where Simon *may* be wrong. Where is the proof that he purposely lied?

Reminds me when I accidentally called a plane's horizontal tail a "wing" and the trolls at the UK "truth" forum said I purposely lied. LoL! Stupid trolls.

[masonfree party]

Lawson ... The 911 Liar And Paid Whore Of Freemasonic Zionism

[killtown]

Still waiting for the proof that Simon lied. If someone doesn't provide it, then Lawson will be thought of as the real liar.

[ukor]

At best we see where Simon *may* be wrong. Where is the proof that he purposely lied?

Reminds me when I accidentally called a plane's horizontal tail a "wing" and the trolls at the UK "truth" forum said I purposely lied. LoL! Stupid trolls.

Your moral compass seems to be in urgent need of realignment Killtown.

No doubt you could say of Bush, Powell, Rice and Blair that they were just *wrong* and didn't purposely lie.

But we know better than that don't we?

Their being "wrong" just *happened* to serve an end they wanted to pursue, just like you and Shack are pursuing your agenda.

As with your "accidental" disinformation comparing the fibreglass construction of a small twinprop tailplane with that of a 200 ton airliner, it attempted to serve your purposes (whatever they may be).

You may easily be able to fool yourself KT, but that's as far as it goes.

[helloperator]

Personally, I think it's bloody hard to make any judegements on footage. Go back to the day. The vibe...it was wrong. When we storm the Bastille or whatever, we shouldn't need a laminate pass that says who we are and exactly why we are here. We should just blast in and wipe people out for their wrongs.

Then, when the people who stormed become corrupt and felonious, we can storm the fuck outta them, and so on...until we eventually realise tha, oh the very core of the system is fucked in the head....shit I won't make that mistake again...blah blah blah all you law makers and what not you're all maniacs

[liltroofer]

lol, i <3 above post