List of Suspected 9-11 Criminal Coconspirators

[oiram]

About the List of Suspected 9-11 Criminal Coconspirators.

http://www.whodidit.org/

http://www.whodidit.org/
Analysis of the Suspected 9-11 Criminal Coconspirators.

Of the 103 people named on the list of Suspected 9-11 Criminal Coconspirators there are:
22 current or former members of George W. Bush’s White House (21.4%);
4 current or former members of Congress (3.9%);
6 current or former FBI agents or officials (5.8%);
6 current or former CIA agents or officials (5.8%);
6 current or former officials of New York (5.8%);
12 current or former high-ranking USG military commanders (11.7%);
13 current or former USG officials (not included above) (12.6%);
12 current or former members of PNAC (11.7%);
16 consultants, lobbyists, or members of a “think tank” (not including PNAC) (15.5%);
12 engineers (11.7%);
34 current or former corporate executives (33.0%);
4 senior “statesmen” (3.9%);
5 members of the Bush family (4.9%);
1 Canadian (1.0%);
1 Pakistani (1.0%);
2 Arabs (1.9%);
2 Brits (1.9%);
4 known or suspected Mossad agents (3.9%);
14 people who hold “dual citizenship” (13.6%); and
27 Israelis and Zionists (including people with “dual citizenship” noted above) (26.2%).

What Can We Do?
Don’t let anybody tell you, “One person can’t make a difference”! Tell your friends and family the uncomfortable truth about 9-11. Pass out copies of dvds like “9-11 Mysteries”. Organize talks about 9-11 in your community. Demand your elected officials launch a new and independent investigation of 9-11. Vote for 9-11 Truth Candidates for public office. Individually and together we can, must, and will see that the perpetrators of 9-11 are removed from power and brought to justice.
http://www.whodidit.org/


103 People Who are Likely or Suspected as 9-11 Criminal Co-Conspirators
http://educate-yourself.org/cn/list911coconspiratorsfromwhodidit26sep07.shtml

CEO of American International Group (AIG)
http://www.scoreboard-canada.com/aig/aig-illuminati2.htm

Life Technology™ Breaking News
http://www.lifetechnology.org/illuminati.php

[cyince]

A few questions come to mind.

1. Is there any tangible proof beyond speculation and conjecture that these suspects orchestrated the attacks?
2. Who would run and 'independent investigation, and fund it?

[ugizz]

A few questions come to mind.

2. Who would run and 'independent investigation, and fund it?

there are plenty of people who would do it for free :D:D:D

[cruise4]

"there are plenty of people who would do it for free"

and forget the investigation. If you earn over £25,000 you are guilty!!!

[oiram]

A few questions come to mind.

1. Is there any tangible proof beyond speculation and conjecture that these suspects orchestrated the attacks?
2. Who would run and 'independent investigation, and fund it?
The way you ask makes me think if I could get out of my own mass murder case by asking questions like you did.
Usually they put as slaves in jail first then they look for proof and evidence then 3 years later they release you and say sorry we made a mistake!
Are you not equal in front of the law ore did I miss something?
I even would strongly promote that the Victims of the 3000 Americans which got murdered be the judges in this special case so we don’t end up with corruption in the legal system!


I think if the Government can fund Wars and use taxpayer’s money and spend Billions and ones they stop they should have Billions spare!

Ones they started a investigation I suspect we will end up with more then only 103 suspects!

You got a point there; I never seen any criminal yet calling his own case!
So what’s about a partition Manipulating Government against Logical Public!

there are plenty of people who would do it for free :D:D:D
I love positive answers!
What can I say you hit the Nail right on his head!:D:D

[cyince]

The way you ask makes me think if I could get out of my own mass murder case by asking questions like you did.

If you were on trial for murder and the crown simply produced speculation and conjecture you most likely would get out of it. In order to secure an conviction you need real verifiable evidence.

Usually they put as slaves in jail first then they look for proof and evidence then 3 years later they release you and say sorry we made a mistake!
Are you not equal in front of the law ore did I miss something?

I'm not exactly sure what you are saying here.

I even would strongly promote that the Victims of the 3000 Americans which got murdered be the judges in this special case so we don’t end up with corruption in the legal system! [/B]

So why have they not began this investigation yet? If there is such a call for it raising the funds and mobilizing the man power should be the least of the troubles.


[B]I think if the Government can fund Wars and use taxpayer’s money and spend Billions and ones they stop they should have Billions spare!

Ones they started a investigation I suspect we will end up with more then only 103 suspects!

If you want an independent investigation why should the government pay for it?

So my two questions stand
1. Is there any tangible proof beyond speculation and conjecture that these suspects orchestrated the attacks?
2. Who would run and 'independent investigation, and fund it? (keeping in mind if the government funded it I don't think it would constitute an independent investigation because FEMA, FBI, NIST etc apparently aren't good enough)

[oiram]

So my two questions stand
1. Is there any tangible proof beyond speculation and conjecture that these suspects orchestrated the attacks?
2. Who would run and 'independent investigation, and fund it? (keeping in mind if the government funded it I don't think it would constitute an independent investigation because FEMA, FBI, NIST etc apparently aren't good enough)
Not to worry logic & reality will kick in and will solve the problems. I place my bet on 2008 then I will go back and read my previous posts and comments.

[cyince]

Not to worry logic & reality will kick in and will solve the problems. I place my bet on 2008 then I will go back and read my previous posts and comments.

So in short, you cannot address those two questions.

[oiram]

So in short, you cannot address those two questions.

Lets get a baseline are you supporting the Terrorist, FOX, CNN, BBC claim or the Governments 9/11 Reports! Are you pro WWIII?
You are not trying to cover up something “Right?”
Did you not loss one Familie member and like to get answers for what really happend on that special day?
Because rhetoric will not defeat logic also if the American people would like to keep any type of respect internationally the independent investigation should take place no mater if it is all just a stupid, dam, mad, idiotic public speculation!


1) If only one of these tangible speculation sticks to one of these 103 candidates it’s enough to start the Investigation!
Don’t you think so?
http://www.whodidit.org/cocon.html

2) Maybe the money the public collected for the 9/11 monument could be used to pay for an independent investigation if the Government don’t have Taxpayers money spare and the investigation team could be made up from incorrupteble people out of the international community!

If there is a will there is away!

[cyince]

Yes. I am supporting the media accounts of what happened the day of September 11th.

Why hasn't Al Jezzera done an expose? Or some other middle eastren backed investigation, even a Russian investigation. All of these countries would have an interest in exposing the US and Israel.

What is not to support in the NIST report, the FEMA report and the 9/11 commission report (calling it the omission report isn't a reason, nor is blaming a Zionist agenda)

[quote]Did you not loss one Familie member and like to get answers for what really happend on that special day?

No I didn't lose any family that day.

Because rhetoric will not defeat logic also if the American people would like to keep any type of respect internationally the independent investigation should take place no mater if it is all just a stupid, dam, mad, idiotic public speculation!
[/B]

I am of the opinion that the majority of people who believe 9/11 was an inside job use rhetoric to forward their claims, whereas proponents of the 'official story' use logic. That is just my subjective opinion though.

I don't see any international outrage at the 'lack of independent investigation' outside 'truth' websites.


1) If only one of these tangible speculation sticks to one of these 103 candidates it’s enough to start the Investigation!
Don’t you think so?
http://www.whodidit.org/cocon.html

2) Maybe the money the public collected for the 9/11 monument could be used to pay for an independent investigation if the Government don’t have Taxpayers money spare and the investigation team could be made up from incorrupteble people out of the international community!

If there is a will there is away!

Virtually all of the 'evidence' shown on that page has been proven false, debunked, or demonstrated to have been taken greatly out of context. And some of the claims are laughable.

Again why should the government pay for it. It is after all independent, i believe you mean of the government and the alleged corruption. IF there is such and international outrage etc, why doesn't some one simply get the ball rolling?

[veritas2007]

I think you'll find the majority here have researched the New World Order/Illuminati and have informed opinions.

I'm not sure if you have any knowledge of these subjects cyince but researching them may answer some of your questions and help with understanding much of what is posted regarding 9/11.

[cyince]

I have a superficial knowledge of the NWO/Illuminati mythos. It is my skepticism with regards to the concept of them that drives my questions. My feelings with regards to an apparent secret society that controls virtually all aspects of life is that is doesn't exist, or at least not in the grand form many imagine it. I have no doubt that much of the worlds politics are brokered behind closed doors, but the power/credit attributed to an alleged secret society is vastly overblown.

[veritas2007]

You maybe right about the Illuminati Cynice but I don't know for sure so I keep an open mind. It helps to research these things though to get a better insight on certain topics.

[cyince]

I'm not saying that i personally think 100% that so such organization exists. However, I am highly skeptical of any such claims. I feel be closing you mind completely to anything you are limiting yourself and your understanding.

[boots]

Dear cyince look into the CFR the Buldberger These think tank groups get together and decide the policy of all the nations on earth for the coming years and what they say becomes reality. Do you think that is good and democratic? You see the backers of these groups are incredibly wealthy and as the old saying go's Absolute power corrupts absolutely. have you not read any of David Ickes books.

[cyince]

Dear cyince look into the CFR the Buldberger These think tank groups get together and decide the policy of all the nations on earth for the coming years and what they say becomes reality. Do you think that is good and democratic?
I have looked into these groups. If they had the power/control you believe they did, then I would say no that is not democratic at all. I believe however they don't exercise near the power of influence that you do.
You see the backers of these groups are incredibly wealthy and as the old saying go's Absolute power corrupts absolutely. have you not read any of David Ickes books.

This assumption ignores the human element, and assumes money and power are all that drive people. Can you honestly imagine a conspiracy as vast as the one proposed where no one (in hundreds of years) suddenly got a conscious, or dissented. Consider even the past 5 years the technology that has developed, to expose such a group seemingly would be the perfect time and almost effortless.

[sunyatta60]

I am of the opinion that the majority of people who believe 9/11 was an inside job use rhetoric to forward their claims, whereas proponents of the 'official story' use logic.

Logic dictates that you cannot violate the law of physics, so to say the towers collapsed because Jet fuel melted steel is illogical and your strawman won't stand up to any test of logic.

[cyince]

Logic dictates that you cannot violate the law of physics, so to say the towers collapsed because Jet fuel melted steel is illogical and your strawman won't stand up to any test of logic.

I did not say that the Jet Fuel melted steel. However logic would dictate that fire would create heat. The heat would no doubt heat steel. I simply believe that the heat generated by the fires coupled with the plane impacts was enough to cause the collapse.

What specific laws of physics is that assumption violating?

EDIT: What logic test is that failing?

[sunyatta60]

What specific laws of physics is that assumption violating?

The amount of fuel was not enough to heat the Steel to the required temeprature you should go and read what professor Steve Jones had to say about it he is a Physicist and he got fired from his post for going public with his concerns. So if according to the good professor the laws of physics would need to be violated for the official story to be true, then I suggest your logic is not that logical LOL

[sunyatta60]

About the List of Suspected 9-11 Criminal Coconspirators.

I posted your OP to another site and the Robots could only respond with LOL

[cyince]

What specific laws of physics is that assumption violating?

The amount of fuel was not enough to heat the Steel to the required temeprature you should go and read what professor Steve Jones had to say about it he is a Physicist and he got fired from his post for going public with his concerns. So if according to the good professor the laws of physics would need to be violated for the official story to be true, then I suggest your logic is not that logical LOL

Do any other physicists share his concerns. There have been in fact several people who have refuted his claims.

I will post links later toady.

Also simply stating I'm illogical with no proof is infact a violation of logic.

[cyince]

Here are a few links which question Dr. Jones' work

http://www.debunking911.com/jones.htm
http://www.debunking911.com/civil.htm
http://drjudywood.com/articles/scientific/JonesScientificMethod.html <-- as much as it pains me to link Dr. Judy Wood.

In addition there have been may discussions about Dr. Jones at other forums. (JREF, SLC and even the loose change forums)

Here is a quick vdeo with regards to the thermate/mit 9/11 Debunked: Thermate Chemical Signatures Disproven - YouTube