View Full Version : 911 Taboo (NPT) - High Quality Torrent
sidlittle
03-12-2007, 04:05 AM
The HQ torrent is now available.
from Genghis6199
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=8JGUBYAP
killtown
03-12-2007, 11:11 AM
Just watched it yesterday and I believe it to be the best NPT video out to date.
The biggest smoking guns that even a 3yr old can see were the overlays he did with show that multiple videos were actually the same shots:
- CNN 9:10 & Devin Clark comparison
http://killtown.911review.org/images/2nd-hit/clark.cnn910.comparison.jpg
http://killtown.911review.org/2nd-hit.html#CNN_910
- Park Foreman & Naka Nathaniel comparison
http://killtown.911review.org/images/2nd-hit/Foreman.Nathaniel.comparison.jpg
http://killtown.911review.org/2nd-hit.html#Park_Foreman
and the flight path contradictions:
http://killtown.911review.org/images/2nd-hit/brooklyn.bridge.contradiction.jpg
http://killtown.911review.org/2nd-hit.html#Brooklyn_Bridge
Just watched it yesterday and I believe it to be the best NPT video out to date.
The biggest smoking guns that even a 3yr old can see were the overlays he did with show that multiple videos were actually the same shots:
- CNN 9:10 & Devin Clark comparison
http://killtown.911review.org/images/2nd-hit/clark.cnn910.comparison.jpg
http://killtown.911review.org/2nd-hit.html#CNN_910
- Park Foreman & Naka Nathaniel comparison
http://killtown.911review.org/images/2nd-hit/Foreman.Nathaniel.comparison.jpg
http://killtown.911review.org/2nd-hit.html#Park_Foreman
and the flight path contradictions:
http://killtown.911review.org/images/2nd-hit/brooklyn.bridge.contradiction.jpg
http://killtown.911review.org/2nd-hit.html#Brooklyn_Bridge
Ah yes - the old Simon Shack trick of putting together somewhat similar shots and then claiming they're the the same.
A similar demolition as applied to September Clues will appear on UK911 shortly for anyone who prefers not to be taken in by tricksters.
sidlittle
03-12-2007, 09:09 PM
Ah yes - the old Simon Shack trick of putting together somewhat similar shots and then claiming they're the the same.
A similar demolition as applied to September Clues will appear on UK911 shortly for anyone who prefers not to be taken in by tricksters.
can't wait..
:rolleyes:
can't wait..
:rolleyes:
Just as long as it's known they (Social Service/Genghis/Killtown) etc. - are only having a larf at their believer's expense, sidlittle.
Because they really can't - and it can be shown that they can't - be serious.
sidlittle
03-12-2007, 10:57 PM
Just as long as it's known they (Social Service/Genghis/Killtown) etc. - are only having a larf at their believer's expense, sidlittle.
Because they really can't - and it can be shown that they can't - be serious.
How's that DU tipped Boeing idea working out for you all ? Got to get that tail section through somehow I guess.
Like I said, looking forward to the next 'debunking'. Genuinely.
kblood
03-12-2007, 11:28 PM
I really find the NPT hard to believe, especially because the reasoning behind why no planes were to be used seems so lame and far out. Making it into something much more complex, making it seem simpler and less risky to "fake" it into looking like 3 planes crashing, and instead making 3 planes dissapear, and then make 3 other planes crash. Or making 3 hologram planes... or..?
In one of the NPTs I read about how 3 "drone" planes was used, and one of them then shot into the building so it could fly all the way into with hidden weapons on the plane...
Taking into account the weight of planes this size, and how strong metal they are made off, the scenario that actuall planes were used really does not seem that "unlikely". I find it scary that so many people believes this NPT. I would not be surprised if it started out as a joke to see how many people could be fooled by it.
sidlittle
04-12-2007, 12:37 AM
I really find the NPT hard to believe, especially because the reasoning behind why no planes were to be used seems so lame and far out. Making it into something much more complex, making it seem simpler and less risky to "fake" it into looking like 3 planes crashing, and instead making 3 planes dissapear, and then make 3 other planes crash. Or making 3 hologram planes... or..?
In one of the NPTs I read about how 3 "drone" planes was used, and one of them then shot into the building so it could fly all the way into with hidden weapons on the plane...
Taking into account the weight of planes this size, and how strong metal they are made off, the scenario that actuall planes were used really does not seem that "unlikely". I find it scary that so many people believes this NPT. I would not be surprised if it started out as a joke to see how many people could be fooled by it.
I mean no disrespect but I get the impression you haven't really researched this at all. That's ok but then you are completely vulnerable to 'big lie' propaganda tactics. Of course it all sounds 'far out' and that's exactly how you would want it if you were the perps. No?
Why are you talking about 3 planes? Do you think flight 93 crashed in shanksville or flight 77 flew into the pentagon? Why are you associating 'drone' planes with NPT? Talk to the plane huggers if you want to talk drones. Your last paragraph is ludicrous. Anyway, how about downloading the torrent for a start and watching it?:)
steevo
04-12-2007, 12:48 AM
I really find the NPT hard to believe, especially because the reasoning behind why no planes were to be used seems so lame and far out. Making it into something much more complex, making it seem simpler and less risky to "fake" it into looking like 3 planes crashing, and instead making 3 planes dissapear, and then make 3 other planes crash. Or making 3 hologram planes... or..?
In one of the NPTs I read about how 3 "drone" planes was used, and one of them then shot into the building so it could fly all the way into with hidden weapons on the plane...
Taking into account the weight of planes this size, and how strong metal they are made off, the scenario that actuall planes were used really does not seem that "unlikely". I find it scary that so many people believes this NPT. I would not be surprised if it started out as a joke to see how many people could be fooled by it.
I'm open minded on it all but I agree that this could be the case.
killtown
04-12-2007, 02:28 AM
Just as long as it's known they (Social Service/Genghis/Killtown) etc. - are only having a larf at their believer's expense, sidlittle.
Because they really can't - and it can be shown that they can't - be serious.
What are you exactly saying about me here?
killtown
04-12-2007, 02:32 AM
I really find the NPT hard to believe, especially because the reasoning behind why no planes were to be used seems so lame and far out.
Read the logic of why no planes were used before you say you think it sounds "lame and far out":
Why They Didn't Use Planes To Hit The WTC
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=15057
lennart
06-12-2007, 03:41 AM
I really find the NPT hard to believe, especially because the reasoning behind why no planes were to be used seems so lame and far out. Making it into something much more complex, making it seem simpler and less risky to "fake" it into looking like 3 planes crashing, and instead making 3 planes dissapear, and then make 3 other planes crash. Or making 3 hologram planes... or..?
In one of the NPTs I read about how 3 "drone" planes was used, and one of them then shot into the building so it could fly all the way into with hidden weapons on the plane...
Taking into account the weight of planes this size, and how strong metal they are made off, the scenario that actuall planes were used really does not seem that "unlikely". I find it scary that so many people believes this NPT. I would not be surprised if it started out as a joke to see how many people could be fooled by it.
It sounds bizarre....we all know that! But really take a look at 9/11 taboo and be amazed! Also look at 'september clues' on youtube. It,s on youtube in 8 parts.
Again, how weird it sounds just look at it! Dont, read about it but look at it! Here is part 1:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IeIVD5wT4KE
white horse
16-12-2007, 11:43 PM
I like many have found the NPT a bit hard to swallow.
But watch the evidence, sleep on it for a few nights then watch it again. I did this and it sits well with me now that I have just accepted it.
OMG - the truth will reveal itself, and honestly, I am really coming round to this theory now!
It is like 911 itself, I remember a few years ago seeing a website about 911 being an inside job and despite being fond of conspiracy theories and no trusting the US govt I thought 'phooey'! Now it seem almost a given that 911 was an inside job, so much so it seems obvious.
Now I am beginning to see that the video evidence of the 2nd plane hitting is... well dodgy to say the least!
I urge you to look up NPT and TV fakery on google/you tube. Some are better than others.
It does raise a lot of questions tho.
Well done Killtown, Genghis et al, I salute your tenacity and research!
steevo
16-12-2007, 11:52 PM
I like many have found the NPT a bit hard to swallow.
But watch the evidence, sleep on it for a few nights then watch it again. I did this and it sits well with me now that I have just accepted it.
OMG - the truth will reveal itself, and honestly, I am really coming round to this theory now!
It is like 911 itself, I remember a few years ago seeing a website about 911 being an inside job and despite being fond of conspiracy theories and no trusting the US govt I thought 'phooey'! Now it seem almost a given that 911 was an inside job, so much so it seems obvious.
Now I am beginning to see that the video evidence of the 2nd plane hitting is... well dodgy to say the least!
I urge you to look up NPT and TV fakery on google/you tube. Some are better than others.
It does raise a lot of questions tho.
Well done Killtown, Genghis et al, I salute your tenacity and research!
There is only one problem with the no planes theory....it's Bullshit!
Welcome to the forum white horse :)
white horse
17-12-2007, 12:21 AM
Thanks Stevo!
Am looking forward to having some good debates here, specially on 911.
I'm still looking into NPT, and I can see why people have a problem with it. it's bad enough that 911 was an inside job, but if NPT is accurate then we are in even bigger trouble! from the PTB!!
helloperator
17-12-2007, 05:17 AM
What about the hundreds or thousands of people who actually saw, from buildings, from the streets in NYC, the second passenger looking plane impact the building? Everyone's eyes were on the trade centre at that stage. Many, many impartial, regular people saw an airliner fly into the building.
I'm not arguing....but what is your take on that fact, npt people?
I'm very open minded on this...so don't categorise me too much.
I will say however, that I lean towards planes.
veritas2007
17-12-2007, 07:48 PM
What about the hundreds or thousands of people who actually saw, from buildings, from the streets in NYC, the second passenger looking plane impact the building? Everyone's eyes were on the trade centre at that stage. Many, many impartial, regular people saw an airliner fly into the building.
I'm not arguing....but what is your take on that fact, npt people?
I'm very open minded on this...so don't categorise me too much.
I will say however, that I lean towards planes.
Witnesses:
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=134&Itemid=60
white horse
17-12-2007, 08:46 PM
What about the hundreds or thousands of people who actually saw, from buildings, from the streets in NYC, the second passenger looking plane impact the building? Everyone's eyes were on the trade centre at that stage. Many, many impartial, regular people saw an airliner fly into the building.
I'm not arguing....but what is your take on that fact, npt people?
I'm very open minded on this...so don't categorise me too much.
I will say however, that I lean towards planes.
I honestly do not know, I have only just walked into the NPT room and am still getting used to the atmos in here...
When you say hundreds if not thousands of witnesses... where??? I have seen very little evidence of this. I have seen video footage of media execs phoning in to report planes, and they are watching TV when they do this. I have also seen footage of reporters on the ground who SAW NO PLANE, but are told by the anchors in the studio 'Well we just saw a plane hit'.
Only one witness granted, but it is a guy covered in dust near the buildings, not a media exec phoning in from 3 miles away...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zCeDpZnEeu8
Washington
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4gVEhvEnJzk&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h8mGvFzvwFM&feature=related
NY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Tlz0qw4EcU&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtSyKfeA7fQ&feature=related
I dont believe there are many who saw an airliner hit when you delve into it. There are many who say 'that was no passenger plane', there are others who look stunned when a reporter asks if they saw a plane; 'there was no plane' they saw 'the building just blew up'. If they were able to see and hear the building explode, would they not also hear a huge Boeing screaming along??
It's all very very iffy.
Genghis believes that they flew black military medium sized planes by remote control; others including me believe they were cruise missiles.
Whatever it was, from the video footage i Have been watching (endlessly for a few weeks now, over and over!) It looks like 3 different planes hit the tower according to the footage. One is jet black. Another is silver, another is white.
And also there was a white plane circling. Many of the 'plane witnesses' have reported a plane circling, then later they may have considered this was the plane that crashed - i.e 'yeah I saw the plane BEFORE it hit the building' (different plane tho??)
Honestly I have not made up my mind. This one is a real mindfugger!
I'm a trained historian, and I have to go a)where the evidence takes me and b) my gut.
The evidence is taking me somewhere i do not know, but it is AWAY from what we were shown on the day; my gut just feels sick.
Still a lot of research to do..
kblood
17-12-2007, 09:20 PM
I mean no disrespect but I get the impression you haven't really researched this at all. That's ok but then you are completely vulnerable to 'big lie' propaganda tactics. Of course it all sounds 'far out' and that's exactly how you would want it if you were the perps. No?
Why are you talking about 3 planes? Do you think flight 93 crashed in shanksville or flight 77 flew into the pentagon? Why are you associating 'drone' planes with NPT? Talk to the plane huggers if you want to talk drones. Your last paragraph is ludicrous. Anyway, how about downloading the torrent for a start and watching it?:)
Oh yes, btw, I say 3 planes because that is what I have heard from my sources. No the 3rd plane did clearly not hit the pentagon, and it is a mystery to me what became of it. I just know of a plane with "terrorists" on it, which werent targetting for WTC. Isnt this even the plane that there is a movie about?
And this is another reason I have a hard time believing the no planes theory, since as far as I know, people did hijack planes. The only one I am certain about though, did not hit its target. Still the NPT needless have to include a rather huge number of people in on it. People who needed to place explosives (which was needed either way I know), people in on it working at the TV networks, people placing wreckage on Manhatten, false witnesses, pilots needing to disapear or be in on it as well, but then all of the passenger lists of the planes would have had to dissapear.
Why not actually putting forward some concrete evidence, like faked passenger lists and that these places never took off? If NPT is true, there such be much more very rock solid evidence... but where is it?
The evidence so far is weak, and the fact so many here cannot see the evidence to be very lacking worries me.
white horse
17-12-2007, 09:42 PM
The evidence so far is weak, and the fact so many here cannot see the evidence to be very lacking worries me.
To be honest the evidence for the official story is far far weaker. In fact there is virtually nil evidence.
veritas2007
17-12-2007, 09:50 PM
I think its wrong to assume that NPT has all the answers. What we are talking about here is evidence - stuff you can see with your own eyes - that the video footage is anomalous.
Rather than providing the definitive answer to what happened that day, it instead serves as a springboard into another line of questioning.
The real problem isn't the theory anyway, its the people who beat their chest demanding their version of events is right and any deviation is farsicle. That goes for all theorists on 9/11 including NPTers.
white horse
17-12-2007, 11:53 PM
I would be really really very grateful if someone could kill the NPT once and for all 100%
I am not being facetious or sarcastic.
I have arrived at NPT after watching hundreds of hours of 911 footage over the last year or so.
I am there reluctantly.
I DO NOT WANT TO BELIEVE in NPT!! If NPT is accurate (whichever flavour) then we are really screwed.
I think something hit those buildings, but it wasn't Boeings piloted by Muslims with box cutters...
The video footage is definately screwy... what that means, or what really happened I do not know... cruise missiles, holograms????? Who knows?
I have heard interviews with whistle blowers who cliam the US military is at least 40 technology years ahead of the rest of us, and moving 2 years to every one year we advance. That is scary.
I have downloaded Google Earth and I can see my mum weeding her front garden for crippens sake!!
I find it doesnt stretch the realms of possibility at all to think that 'they' could control 5 networks remotely (without them knowing about it)...
The only thing people have a problem with is 'how could they do that'? In the military you compartmentalise and you follow orders, you do not question, analyze or confere. Maybe 90% of the perps aqctually thought they were taking part in the exercise until it wa too late; then they either 'bought in' or were bumped off????
Please tho, kill NPT, let me sleep at night. With hard evidence, not just slander and off the cuff remarks.