Humongus Object found in Greenland [Archive] - David Icke's Official Forums

View Full Version : Humongus Object found in Greenland

chattanova

02-12-2007, 11:26 AM

chattanova

02-12-2007, 11:34 AM

Astronaut Photography of Mother-ship from Earth

http://img34.picoodle.com/img/img34/5/12/2/f_image005m_3ef38ab.jpg

Photo Courtesy of NASA

The region above where Mother-ship was near Greenland over the Atlantic Ocean. ISS Astronaut Photography of Earth from the NASA website where this photo was studied. Below is enhancement of above Mothership traveling above the atmosphere.

http://img29.picoodle.com/img/img29/5/12/2/f_image006m_c558189.jpg

Object appears metallic with dark rings at both ends. Analysis and discovery of unusual features was by Steve Tobias UFO Researcher USAF Veteran

http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.ufonews.in/supporting_pages_2/support_01_files/image005.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.ufonews.in/supporting_pages_2/support_01.htm&h=293&w=349&sz=14&hl=en&start=193&um=1&tbnid=FgE1phXfqJGf6M:&tbnh=101&tbnw=120&prev=

hagbard_celine

02-12-2007, 12:41 PM

Object found in the middle of Greenland. It is 79,83 kilometers/49,61 miles long.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iusq6j8cG1o

Close-up on google maps http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&time=&date=&ttype=&q=greenland&ie=UTF8&ll=70.422079,-39.616699&spn=1.100754,4.943848&t=k&z=7&om=0

Ok, so what can this be? Some underground(snow) facility that was ment to stay underground.. or am I too open-minded here:confused:

Could be:confused:. I was going to say it was a mountain sticking up out of the ice, but it doesn't appear in my Times atlas, even though other mountains on Greenland do. Also the northern edge is dead straight, too straight to be natural. The censors may have slipped up here!:D

(Lovely soundtrack on that vid BTW)

hagbard_celine

02-12-2007, 12:44 PM

Astronaut Photography of Mother-ship from Earth

I love the UFO photot from 1870! What are the skeptics going to blame this time? Plays about extraterrestrials down at the music-halls? :rolleyes:

chattanova

02-12-2007, 03:13 PM

Hey hagbard:):)
I'm very sure there are more under the ice at Greenland than what we thought,
it's sad but the more the ice melt, the more will be revealed! :eek:

greenleaf

02-12-2007, 07:02 PM

these are from my Google Earth and an attempt at making a slideshow.. enjoy (original pics available on request if needed)
[gohere]http://img137.imageshack.us/slideshow/player.php?id=img137/3677/1196616921rwp.smil[/formedia]
http://img409.imageshack.us/img409/8638/object01wo3.jpghttp://img112.imageshack.us/img112/7103/object02by5.jpg

http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/4006/object03iz5.jpghttp://img118.imageshack.us/img118/923/object04pe3.jpg

http://img412.imageshack.us/img412/6702/object05gr3.jpghttp://img155.imageshack.us/img155/1255/object06qu1.jpg
http://img114.imageshack.us/img114/4325/object07uf5.jpghttp://img142.imageshack.us/img142/5535/object08av8.jpg

http://img118.imageshack.us/img118/7559/object09ix6.jpghttp://img112.imageshack.us/img112/9876/object10ml1.jpg

greenleaf

02-12-2007, 07:29 PM

http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/3267/oblisk01cs0.gif

rasnalgoul

03-12-2007, 01:31 AM

thats out of this world
i wonder how long its gonna be before the world leaders start formally introducing there extraterrestrial friends to the world

greenleaf

03-12-2007, 02:37 PM

http://img518.imageshack.us/img518/6683/50milelongwi7.th.jpg (http://img518.imageshack.us/my.php?image=50milelongwi7.jpg);)

chattanova

03-12-2007, 05:40 PM

chattanova

03-12-2007, 05:44 PM

It's really amazing, the sky's are covering it partly in the pictures, so the object really is there physically...

If it's not a sick joke..

chattanova

03-12-2007, 05:50 PM

Some more videos here:

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=object+greenland&search=Search

rynath

03-12-2007, 05:58 PM

If you zoom all the way out so you can see all of Greenland the whole thing looks pixelated in giant blocks. Why is it the only area that looks like that?

greenleaf

04-12-2007, 01:11 AM

hey guy'n'gals I made a quick Vid about this (well from these clips anyway) ..it blanks out at the end a few times as it is my first attempt at video edit... kindly let me know what you think please...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOd-zoFc1cY

moonfly

04-12-2007, 02:01 AM

http://www.flashearth.com/

look for your self

chattanova

04-12-2007, 04:21 PM

chattanova

16-12-2007, 03:56 PM

Mystery Of Greenland 'Object' Solved By Data4Science

With all the mysterious images found on the web today, it was time to take a closer look at one of these oddities. The mysterious object is located in the country of Greenland, which even today is melting at an incredible rate. We will look at this mysterious Greenland Object someone has found on Google Earth, which also has at least one spooky-music youtube video [1] describing it. Polar North is indicated in all images. The youtube video shows what can happen when image data falls into the hands of someone without an understanding of satellite imaging problems, and who may not look for rational explanations.

http://img28.picoodle.com/img/img28/5/12/16/f_obj1m_9d8aa2a.jpg

Fig. 1 - Untouched overview from Google Earth of long yellow and black object measuring about 79.83 Km. long. A black rectangular object appears to accompany it.

http://img34.picoodle.com/img/img34/5/12/16/f_obj2m_abf9a0d.jpg

Fig. 2 - Image of Greenland (like most all Google Earth images) is constructed of a mosaic of images taken from satellites. These images are taken in overlapping bands as these satellites orbit the Earth. Lighting conditions vary with each exposure causing edges of individual images to mis-match. Resulting mis-matched image borders create faint diagonal, horizontal and vertical lines. Red circles added here indicate some of the individual mosaic borders for various individual image areas.

http://img34.picoodle.com/img/img34/5/12/16/f_obj3m_4c5cf88.jpg

Fig. 3 - Closeup of the mysterious object in question. Here were can see that this object is simply a glimpse (in color) of the landscape below. A false color yellow band is visible along the top edge of the orange area, and can occur during image overlap. This image segment may have been imaged by a different satellite on a cloudless day, or imaged on a different day or perhaps even a different year. Various light and dark areas of the area in question also tend to be similar to those of the normal white image area shown just above it.

http://img30.picoodle.com/img/img30/5/12/16/f_obj4m_1901d68.jpg

Fig. 4 - Closer view of the mysterious black object in Fig. 1. What we see here is a total absence of any image in this area. Perhaps data was missing from the original image mosaic.

There are many reasons for the black rectangle in Fig. 4 including operator error during image alignment, satellite data dropouts, computer file processing errors, censoring, etc... Data for any satellite image travels a VERY long journey from the time the image data reaches Earth to Google Earth's image database. However, it's highly unlikely the black rectangle itself is an actual object. Though various articles and videos on the web focus more on the larger color rectangular object (see Fig. 1.) the absence of any image area here is actually more intriguing. If similar black rectangles do not appear on other Google Earth images and in this image of Greendland, then perhaps something was actually found here we are not supposed to see.

http://www.rense.com/general79/Adt.htm

greenleaf

16-12-2007, 05:43 PM

A friend of mine from Bradford (where my partner is from) works at The National Film and Photography museum and told me that when photos are quick viewed to be let into public domain, some are marked with a 'tag' (a black strip)..this is to let the 'Airbrusher' know to fade out images and blend in missing data... maybe someone forgot to do this image.

It's about time google earth updated anyway...I still have a four yr old car in my drive on its images.

stargazer

16-12-2007, 06:08 PM

Mystery Of Greenland 'Object' Solved By Data4Science

There is a thin red strap by the clean edge (top left on above images - Fig.2). This strap goes under the fog. You can observe this here: http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&time=&date=&ttype=&q=greenland&ie=UTF8&ll=70.422079,-39.616699&spn=1.100754,4.943848&t=k&z=7&om=0

If you zoom just to highest possible setting - before it writes you must zoom-out, you will see that on gray area is written "2006 Google". When you zoom out again to see the whole area, you will see that this "fog" is nothing like anywhere else and that are applied with graphic brush (Photoshop :) ) to cover the area.

This red strip and the yellow beside look like runways. An I guess the orange area represents greenland today(or in summer). I don't think there is much ice left on greenland.

About the black strap; errors occur but don't they have old images to replace the black strap? I don't remember any black straps on greenland from previous visitation to Google earth or maps.

This is very fishy and something is being covered-up, something big.

chattanova

17-12-2007, 04:32 PM

There is a thin red strap by the clean edge (top left on above images - Fig.2). This strap goes under the fog. You can observe this here: http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&time=&date=&ttype=&q=greenland&ie=UTF8&ll=70.422079,-39.616699&spn=1.100754,4.943848&t=k&z=7&om=0

If you zoom just to highest possible setting - before it writes you must zoom-out, you will see that on gray area is written "2006 Google". When you zoom out again to see the whole area, you will see that this "fog" is nothing like anywhere else and that are applied with graphic brush (Photoshop :) ) to cover the area.

This red strip and the yellow beside look like runways. An I guess the orange area represents greenland today(or in summer). I don't think there is much ice left on greenland.

About the black strap; errors occur but don't they have old images to replace the black strap? I don't remember any black straps on greenland from previous visitation to Google earth or maps.

This is very fishy and something is being covered-up, something big.

Thanks for the information greenleaf & stargazer,
Yes there have to be something were not supposed to see here, I'm totally convinced.

And these 'errors'(black strips,squares) always seems to occur on the most mysterious places, north & south pole etc. :cool:

hagbard_celine

17-12-2007, 06:34 PM

If I were a Google Earth censor and I was looking at a page of my previous work and realized: "Oh my God! I forgot to airbrush that bit!" . I'd get on the server as quickly as possible and try to rectify my mistake. But then I find that it's too late: people have already noticed it. One has even made a YouTube vid about it! If I change it now then it will actually prove those people right and give them an impetus that could even get accepted by the mainstream. So what would I do? In fact I would concoct exactly this story:

http://www.rense.com/general79/Adt.htm

"Whew! that was a close one! I'd better pay more attention to my job in future.":o;)

the om

10-08-2009, 04:47 AM

Very true. And no one would be more qualified for that kinda cover-up than a guy who's meant to be making sure it isn't seen.

mrindigo

10-08-2009, 08:03 AM

Hard to say what it might be. It reminds of a boat, but may not even be that all. I'd be interested in seeing what it is exactly.

I don't buy the cover story either, that was just lame.

the om

10-08-2009, 08:14 AM

metacomet

10-08-2009, 08:18 AM

Ah... it kind of hurts to see these pop up so often.

What's this mysterious black thing?

What's this missing artifact?

What's this or that... they are always satellite imaging artifacts. :o

mrindigo

10-08-2009, 08:20 AM

It actually reminds me of a huge version of this:
http://www.sacredsites.com/middle_east/lebanon/images/greatest-baalbek-stones-500.jpg
Dunno, maybe another (but bigger) Baalbek?
http://www.habeeb.com/lebanon.photos.51.html

It kind of does look that way. Baalbeck is very interesting, and I believe to this day we don't have the technology to move even one of those blocks of stone. If memory serves me correctly, ancient texts/lore/mythology claim it was the first city built by giants/nephilim after the great deluge, as a sign of good faith toward humans. To move those blocks it's going to take technology beyond our current capability, or an level of physical strength we can't comprehend. It's very mysterious. :)

Ian2day

10-08-2009, 05:35 PM

Looks to be made from gold to me. Anyone fancy a treasure hunt er I mean fact finding mission to Greenland. :D

silvabak

10-08-2009, 08:12 PM

looks like an underground tunnel or container of some sorts

deckard666

10-08-2009, 08:21 PM

Looks to be made from gold to me. Anyone fancy a treasure hunt er I mean fact finding mission to Greenland. :D

Great idea .... just HOW shall the 2 of us transport a 79,83 kilometer big goldbrick back home? :D

majorion

10-08-2009, 08:35 PM

Nice find.

While I remain skeptical as to the true nature of this strange anomaly and what the hell it actually is, there is absolutely no doubt in my mind that there are bases underground or otherwise in these remote locations, usually the icey locations where no one would suspect. But alas, us conspiracy theorists live another day just to look for these things and give the TPB a good thorn in the ass while at it!

These kinds of facilities are most likely for genetic experimentation, extraterrestrial operations, mind control, for continuing the development of space based weaponry, etc... and much more than that, probably as an extra hideout for the PTB in case some global disaster in which most/rest of the world populous get sidelined like expired meat, and the cycle begins all over again.

the mark

10-08-2009, 09:22 PM

Looks to be made from gold to me.

The lost city of gold. :eek:

:cool:

kasalt

11-08-2009, 04:11 PM

Please refer to post #17 of this thread. The mystery has been solved.

777equals666

12-08-2009, 01:50 AM

http://www.crystalinks.com/ufo1465.jpg
1465 - Cigar Shaped UFO - Flaming Girder seen in the sky
during the reign of Enrico IV. From Notabilia Temporum by
Angelo de Tummulillis

http://www.crystalinks.com/ufoclock.jpg
Renaissance illustration of a UFO sighting in Rome detailed
in a book by Roman historian Julio Obsequens.

Does anybody see the similarities in the above paintings and the Greenland Object in question?...:D

yerathrall

15-08-2010, 11:01 PM

Looks to be made from gold to me. Anyone fancy a treasure hunt er I mean fact finding mission to Greenland. :D

YES YES and YES! I'm saying yes on behalf of the THREE Of us!
No need to haul that thing anywhere. Once we get there I imagine things will start happening so fast and furious that taking home some GOLD will be the least of our concerns.

I have perused all the many posts on the web on this topic for about 2 months now and I have yet to find any reference made to what initially clued me into the existence of this ARTIFACT.

In 2004 I read a book which mentioned this very artifact. It was described as being a 50 mile long cylindrical object buried underneath the ice and snow in the center of Greenland and its existence was revealed through sonar or seismic readings or something. Needless to say I'm now DYING to find this quote again. Because at the time I read that quote, this object was NOT visible!
AND so 6 years later I suddenly get a flash of inspiration to go on the web and look for it and I am FLOORED by all the YOUTUBE vids and such on the object!

And even more disconcerting is the fact that the ONLY mention of this object is from the general public! No news stories that I've found whatsoever!

And then there's the fellow on another thread who says he tried to hire a helicopter to do a flyover of the area and was told it was RESTRICTED AIRSPACE. And he then promptly received a phone call from the Danish embassy inquiring as to his business in Greenland!

Interesting how QUICK they were to respond to his even beginning an investigation into the matter...

So YES this site is to me the most mysterious in the WORLD (with the underwater cities in Lake Titicaca and India's Gulf of Cambay not far behind.

Mainstream Archaeology seemingly has NO INTEREST in discovering anything
too disconcerting about our past let alone our origins, so trust me folks, we can't leave stuff like this entirely up to them. Because it seems their job is to
take everything that remains mysterious and unknown on our planet and explain it all away in the most mundane of terms.

They seem to work very hard to prove that building the pyramids wasn't THAT hard and no those are NOT lightbulbs and other lost technologies emblazoned proudly on so many egyptian edifices crying out to all the ages of man to come "YES! WE could do all these wondrous things and so much more! And they went to almost unimaginable lengths to prove their point.

I will be going to see both Michael Tellinger and Mr Icke at their speaking engagements here in the Bay Area (October 3rd and 23rd respectively) and I look forward to hearing THEIR thoughts on this subject.

But more than anything I think its high time we organized an expedition to this site! I've checked into the logistics and basically the only way the expedition could be made is by DOGSLED or cross-country skiing. (which is EXACTLY why no wandering Greenlander has stumbled across it. Virtually NO ONE goes there!) There are NO roads in the vast majority of Greenland (obviously) but cross country dogsled treks can be organized. So this expedition could really only happen during the summer months.

So is anyone out there foolhardy enough to join me in my attempts to change the WORLD?
For I guarantee once this thing is unearthed, our understanding of the universe will change dramatically. As someone pointed out, for something to be sitting there under the ice so deep it is likely 100s of thousands of years old. Discovering a piece of ancient technology 50 miles long and 4 miles wide would certainly change MY world!

And TIME is most definitely of the ESSENCE here, as I have a sneaking inner suspicion that SOMEONE had better get there soon so as to puzzle through the meaning behind its existence and purpose on our planet before it all falls away into the melting glacier right before our eyes.

ANYONE CARE TO SIGN ON for a road trip to the Gods!?
if SO contact: yerathrall@gmail.com

omegasol

15-08-2010, 11:39 PM

lol you people are funny. this is some kind of graphical glitch.

sexi_co

16-08-2010, 12:05 AM

Object found in the middle of Greenland. It is 79,83 kilometers/49,61 miles long.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iusq6j8cG1o

Close-up on google maps http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&time=&date=&ttype=&q=greenland&ie=UTF8&ll=70.422079,-39.616699&spn=1.100754,4.943848&t=k&z=7&om=0

Ok, so what can this be? Some underground(snow) facility that was ment to stay underground.. or am I too open-minded here:confused:

I spotted this a few months back, but assumed it was just one of the many google cock ups, given it's size and shape in relation to the ground around it. I think I'd prefer to be wrong though, would be a lot more interesting eh?

godgoo

16-08-2010, 12:09 AM

Lets face it, it's a bug. It's the overlay thats all.

nectars

16-08-2010, 12:14 AM

So has anyone on greenland reported seeing this 70+ km thing lying around?

godgoo

16-08-2010, 12:19 AM

Lets face it, it's a bug. It's the overlay thats all.

It's a surface temperature reading. Some composite error.

http://img842.imageshack.us/img842/3209/32725439.jpg

http://img441.imageshack.us/img441/3899/86549030.jpg

It is the sunlight and cloud cover data layer ;)

godgoo

16-08-2010, 12:28 AM

What they have tried todo I think is to cover the Alien mothership? With a piece of this data-layer :)

http://img836.imageshack.us/img836/9792/91105241.jpg

manxboz

16-08-2010, 01:26 AM

Just did it on my Google Earth, it is nearly 50 miles end to end.

70.510241, -40.187988 These are the Coorids

yerathrall

16-08-2010, 04:20 AM

lol you people are funny. this is some kind of graphical glitch.

It's simple
all you kids that are so hard up to make this out to be a glitch
please take the following into account:
1 When google earth images of this site from 2007 are compared to
CURRENT images of the same site, there is LESS SNOW on the artifact NOW than there was then, which coordinates with the well-known fact that Greenland is melting steadily.

2 A graphics glitch would not be 50 miles long. That's too big for a glitch. Especially one that lasts and CHANGES ITS APPEARANCE GRADUALLY over the entire duration of Google Earths existence thus far. Do any of you doubters see any OTHER glitches of this size on Google Earth? Glitches that actually GROW and CHANGE in size and shape? If so I'd like to know about them.

3. Just take the time to look at the intricate patterns and lines on this artifact from as CLOSE A ZOOM on it as you possibly can. That's one heck of a complicated GLITCH! And well designed too! It's actually aesthetically pleasing to the eye (from my perspective).

4. If this really is some HOAX, joke or otherwise, how come there has been NO MENTION OF IT ANYWHERE in the media. PERIOD?
most HOAXES get MUCH BETTER COVERAGE IN THE MEDIA THAN THIS! But there's not a whit about it from anything except various forums and youtube vids of google earth?

(ok that last one is meant to be slightly humorous...)

All you fans of the "glitch" theory can go back to your safe little bubble now.:cool:

majorlee

16-08-2010, 08:00 AM

was just reading another thread here

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=129488

has this got anything to do with it u think? might be nothing, could be wrong but worth exploring

baphomet58

16-08-2010, 12:16 PM

i'm going to take a drive there in a few hours. might as well see what's up. wish me luck.

sugarray

16-08-2010, 03:28 PM

i'm going to take a drive there in a few hours. might as well see what's up. wish me luck.

Surely it'd be easier to drag the little man to it for street view... lol

Ok, i know there aren't any streets there :)

aurora borealis

16-08-2010, 03:30 PM

That seems to be Beacon 2

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=129488

majorlee

16-08-2010, 08:25 PM

That seems to be Beacon 2

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=129488

so where are the other beacons?

anthr4x

16-08-2010, 09:11 PM

So let me get this straight. According to the community, the NWO have been hiding our ET friends for years, but suddenly, the appearance of some object on google maps points to the existance of ET? Lets for one minute believe that ET exists (which they dont of course) and considering the unbelievable technology everyone on here claims the superpowers have, do you really, honestly believe that they would let this fly under the radar? So the NWO can create earthquakes, tsunamis, time travel etc, but they dont monitor google maps? Strange that.

If I took a picture of a scratch on my car and posted it on here there would be a 5 page thread claiming it was proof that aliens exist.

Im all for the existence of ET, but lets face facts, we have no proof. I dont call the random mutterings of some scientist "proof"

moving finger

16-08-2010, 10:23 PM

It's simple
all you kids that are so hard up to make this out to be a glitch
please take the following into account:
1 When google earth images of this site from 2007 are compared to
CURRENT images of the same site, there is LESS SNOW on the artifact NOW than there was then, which coordinates with the well-known fact that Greenland is melting steadily.

2 A graphics glitch would not be 50 miles long. That's too big for a glitch. Especially one that lasts and CHANGES ITS APPEARANCE GRADUALLY over the entire duration of Google Earths existence thus far. Do any of you doubters see any OTHER glitches of this size on Google Earth? Glitches that actually GROW and CHANGE in size and shape? If so I'd like to know about them.

3. Just take the time to look at the intricate patterns and lines on this artifact from as CLOSE A ZOOM on it as you possibly can. That's one heck of a complicated GLITCH! And well designed too! It's actually aesthetically pleasing to the eye (from my perspective).

4. If this really is some HOAX, joke or otherwise, how come there has been NO MENTION OF IT ANYWHERE in the media. PERIOD?
most HOAXES get MUCH BETTER COVERAGE IN THE MEDIA THAN THIS! But there's not a whit about it from anything except various forums and youtube vids of google earth?

(ok that last one is meant to be slightly humorous...)

All you fans of the "glitch" theory can go back to your safe little bubble now.:cool:

It's not too big for a glitch.

It's not a hoax. A hoax would be someone deliberately putting something there and pretending it's something it isn't. The only people pretending it's something it isn't are people in places like this.

Do you have evidence of it 'gradually emerging? Because my google earth images show it as not there, then there, no gradual change.

Let's do what you suggested and zoom as close in as possible and see what there is. I've done a screendump of the 'object' and pasted it in photoshop. I've tweaked the levels to make what I'm describing more obvious, but no other changes have been changed.

What you should be able to see at the edge of the yellow where it meets the snow is the pattern on the glacier showing on both the 'object' and the glacier. I've outlined where you can see it in red. Please don't try and say they tried to camouflage it.

http://img51.imageshack.us/img51/6374/greenland.jpg

Zoomed in that close, does it really look like a 3D object? Go to back to google earth and see for yourself.

admajic

03-01-2011, 11:51 AM

So what is this? Its still on Google Maps. 60+ km is a very large perfectly straight object in the middle of all that white. You can easily see this from space...

smokey_shaman

03-01-2011, 02:20 PM

jjeanjeane

03-01-2011, 02:39 PM

[QUOTE=chattanova;203752] Hi,has this object been featured on any news casts? or in any papers?

apollo_gnomon

03-01-2011, 06:11 PM

mapping glitches are not news.

admajic

04-01-2011, 07:47 AM

mapping glitches are not news.

How come its still there 3 years later? Doesn't google update there maps at least every 3 months?

moving finger

04-01-2011, 08:31 AM

How come its still there 3 years later? Doesn't google update there maps at least every 3 months?

It depends if there has been any updates to that particular part of the satellite image data.

If you look at my image earlier in the thread, it's clearly a mapping glitch beause you can see the underlying glacier features through it.

limitufo

04-01-2011, 06:36 PM

Hey hagbard:):)
I'm very sure there are more under the ice at Greenland than what we thought,
it's sad but the more the ice melt, the more will be revealed! :eek:

sad? I think that's fantastic.

ashtarcommand

05-01-2011, 08:06 AM

To me this seems to be the real deal..

Although since i do not live over there and do not have the possibility to check it by myself i can not say its the truth, only that i think it is a real mothership.. I am not sure i believe this being a glitch but since i basically know nothing about glitches i can´t say that it is not an glitch either.

The thing to me that makes it much more convincing is the fact that it has what seems to be a metallic structure and it does not look to be hoaxed or being a glitch.

Just my opinion thats all.

malkor

05-01-2011, 09:02 AM

it would have been convincing if there were no terrain features on the anomaly itself.

ashtarcommand

05-01-2011, 09:10 AM

it would have been convincing if there were no terrain features on the anomaly itself. That depends on how long the object have been out there.. If it´s been there for hundred or thousands of years i do not think it is impossible that it has certain terrain growing on top of it(grass for example)

Just think about the bosnian pyramids they are all cowered in mud,grass and even have trees growing on top of them regardless they are still pyramids.

malkor

05-01-2011, 11:56 PM

That depends on how long the object have been out there.. If it´s been there for hundred or thousands of years i do not think it is impossible that it has certain terrain growing on top of it(grass for example)

Just think about the bosnian pyramids they are all cowered in mud,grass and even have trees growing on top of them regardless they are still pyramids.

well if there is something, it's only the tip of the iceberg. zooming a little out and it would appear to be a square object of around 70 square miles. that would make it visible from space, the only other artificial object next to the great wall of china visible from space.

mido

06-01-2011, 02:05 AM

zzzzzzzzzzz.........

iwkya

06-01-2011, 03:57 AM

ok ill bite,

I have ran this through a few things, it could be a mapping glitch, but I personally think that its not. That being said, if it is an actual bit of geometry under the ice etc, then it is a huge leap to say its a mother-ship or alien at all. It is prob something natural. You must take this image and images like it for what they are, not for what you want it to be.. I am no skeptic at all, but alien mother-ships and government secret bases are huge assumptions based on nothing at all. I feel this is what lets the UFO field down, people making big leaps like this.

admajic

06-01-2011, 09:18 AM

I dont think its a huge mother ship!!

Could be a dam or a wall or building sems like some of it is covered up. of some kind. Just know that in nature I dont think perfectly straight things would exist. Look at your arm or leg bone they arent even very long and they are slightly bent.

Other option is they put this here to cover up what is really there like some sort of buildings and a run way etc.