wakeup2nwo
26-11-2010, 10:43 PM
http://www.irna.ir/ENNewsShow.aspx?NID=30083815
Hidden agenda behind Nato defence shield, says British analyst
London, Nov 21, IRNA - The entire concept of NATO’s new alliance wide ballistic missile defense system is “not only deeply flawed but also has a hidden agenda,” according to Middle East consultant and columnist Peter Eyre.
http://img.irna.ir/1389/13890830/30083815/T30083815-703834.jpg
“When the missile defence system was first planned Russia became aware that the true intention was for it to be used as a defence mechanism against Russia,” Eyre said.
“The US however played this down and stated that it was to act as a defence against any possible Iranian attack, which as we all know was not the case,” he told IRNA.
“There is no threat from Iran and never has been so it is very clear that the 'Cold War' continues and that the Russians were correct in their original understanding,” said the consultant, who is also a regular columnist for the Palestine Telegraph.
Eyre said it was his belief that NATO was now the military arm of the 'New World Order' and has gone far beyond its original intention of defending the US and Europe to become “truly global with the US at the helm and with geo-politics at its centre.”
“The purpose of the New World Order is to take control, where possible, of the world’s natural resources, their markets and transit corridors,” he said.
At their weekend summit in Lisbon, NATO leaders pressed ahead with the development of the controversial joint missile shield covering and agreed a new 10-year strategic concept, which included committing all of its 28 member countries to counter so-called new threats.
The Middle East consultant said that the role of NATO has “totally changed” from the days of the Cold War and would have collapsed if it had not sought other areas of operation for its massive military infrastructure.
“The US were very quick in pulling NATO into their own areas of conflict” after the 9/11 attacks leading to such wars as in Iraq and Afghanistan and to some degree the military buildup in the Gulf of Aden,” he said.
The intention to create a missile shield in Poland and Czech Republic “obviously failed bitterly because Russia knew of its original intention,” Eyre said.
Butt the US was now “pretending to bring Russia onboard whilst at the same time having a hidden agenda of self preservation. Its all a game and Russia certainly has reason to be suspicious of the US.”
During his interview, Eyre also described “entire NPT drive as a total farce” as is the missile defense system. The usage of the term the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) certainly has gone well outside of its remit, he said.
“We are now seeing evidence that certain NATO partners are not happy with the extended area of operations ie Afghanistan etc. It is only a matter of time before some of the allies pull out of this war,” he said.
NATO was being “totally abused by the US to manipulate its own foreign policy.”
He said previously many conflicts initiated by US “put tremendous pressure on their image” but by using the term NATO or coalition forces this has taken that pressure away.
Hidden agenda behind Nato defence shield, says British analyst
London, Nov 21, IRNA - The entire concept of NATO’s new alliance wide ballistic missile defense system is “not only deeply flawed but also has a hidden agenda,” according to Middle East consultant and columnist Peter Eyre.
http://img.irna.ir/1389/13890830/30083815/T30083815-703834.jpg
“When the missile defence system was first planned Russia became aware that the true intention was for it to be used as a defence mechanism against Russia,” Eyre said.
“The US however played this down and stated that it was to act as a defence against any possible Iranian attack, which as we all know was not the case,” he told IRNA.
“There is no threat from Iran and never has been so it is very clear that the 'Cold War' continues and that the Russians were correct in their original understanding,” said the consultant, who is also a regular columnist for the Palestine Telegraph.
Eyre said it was his belief that NATO was now the military arm of the 'New World Order' and has gone far beyond its original intention of defending the US and Europe to become “truly global with the US at the helm and with geo-politics at its centre.”
“The purpose of the New World Order is to take control, where possible, of the world’s natural resources, their markets and transit corridors,” he said.
At their weekend summit in Lisbon, NATO leaders pressed ahead with the development of the controversial joint missile shield covering and agreed a new 10-year strategic concept, which included committing all of its 28 member countries to counter so-called new threats.
The Middle East consultant said that the role of NATO has “totally changed” from the days of the Cold War and would have collapsed if it had not sought other areas of operation for its massive military infrastructure.
“The US were very quick in pulling NATO into their own areas of conflict” after the 9/11 attacks leading to such wars as in Iraq and Afghanistan and to some degree the military buildup in the Gulf of Aden,” he said.
The intention to create a missile shield in Poland and Czech Republic “obviously failed bitterly because Russia knew of its original intention,” Eyre said.
Butt the US was now “pretending to bring Russia onboard whilst at the same time having a hidden agenda of self preservation. Its all a game and Russia certainly has reason to be suspicious of the US.”
During his interview, Eyre also described “entire NPT drive as a total farce” as is the missile defense system. The usage of the term the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) certainly has gone well outside of its remit, he said.
“We are now seeing evidence that certain NATO partners are not happy with the extended area of operations ie Afghanistan etc. It is only a matter of time before some of the allies pull out of this war,” he said.
NATO was being “totally abused by the US to manipulate its own foreign policy.”
He said previously many conflicts initiated by US “put tremendous pressure on their image” but by using the term NATO or coalition forces this has taken that pressure away.