View Full Version : The Mudman Photos
size_of_light
22-11-2010, 05:42 PM
http://i52.tinypic.com/2ljsrbq.jpg
http://i52.tinypic.com/w8qhvq.jpg
http://i54.tinypic.com/4kuwrn.jpg
http://i53.tinypic.com/2uduyon.jpg
Read the full investigation here: http://www.bltresearch.com/robbert/apparition1.php
It includes photos of other bizarre apparitions allegedly caught by the same cameraman.
whatsinaname
22-11-2010, 05:49 PM
That's a fascinating website.
size_of_light
22-11-2010, 06:08 PM
Thought this one looked pretty cool:
http://i56.tinypic.com/2i7va1g.jpg
size_of_light
22-11-2010, 06:12 PM
Followed by this:
http://i56.tinypic.com/2nriuq.jpg
size_of_light
22-11-2010, 06:17 PM
The levitating boy:
http://i54.tinypic.com/143ksx3.jpg
size_of_light
22-11-2010, 06:20 PM
The little man:
http://i53.tinypic.com/29xgkl1.jpg
chickadee
23-11-2010, 12:51 AM
Those pics are seriously distrubing :eek:
bharvey
23-11-2010, 02:01 PM
Isn't it amazing that some of these photo's seem to match
other photo's taken from different sources? Like Readers Digest?
In the second "Mudman" photo, the background under the right
arm even seems to match.
Amazing!
Is it not also amazing that when there are multiple pics of
what seems to be the same subject, they are so very static.
As in, it seems to be the same pose, or position, only distorted
or blurry in some way.
Amazing!
Could this guy be channeling and projecting other photographers work?
Does he have some sort of mental photo manipulation lobe in his brain?
Amazing!
Wow.
I thought I'd click on this thread and see something slightly debatable like a half assed bigfoot photo. Instead, I see pictures of some sort of action figure with a new head on it shoved right up in the camera lens when taking a picture.
No offense to you of course, size of light. I like your threads and all. But this photographer and his pictures are a pile of horse shit.
Great for a laugh though.
micklemus
23-11-2010, 02:23 PM
LOL!
This is very funny! Oh, sorry, I've just seen that this isn't in the "Have a Laugh" forum!
Excuse me.
Definitely real. Definitely not poor PhotoShopping and resizing. Definitely not.
Great thread!
:D
The foundation/organization of the site which the pics were taken from, has had some shady funding....not surprising.
On the history page, I quote....
In 1999 an opportunity to carry out some new research presented itself when New York philanthropist Laurance S. Rockefeller offered funding. In order to meet Mr. Rockefeller's requirements Ms. Talbott sought and was granted non-profit, tax-exempt status, and BLT Research Team Inc. was created, with Ms. Talbott as President.
size_of_light
23-11-2010, 06:19 PM
No offense to you of course, size of light.
No offense taken - I didn't take the damn photos! :D
The story that accompanies this makes it much more interesting than what initially just looks like some dodgy Photoshop cut-and-paste jobs though.
According to guy who wrote it, the photographer can snap the photos in the presence of others, using someone else's camera and never owned a computer when these photos were taken.
Some of the photos look pretty neat, like the levitating boy, the old man's face 'configuring' and the little man floating in front of the curtains, whereas others look pretty lame like this one:
http://i52.tinypic.com/w8qhvq.jpg
where it looks like somebody has forgotten to cut out the background scenery between the figure's right arm and it's torso.
There's another one with a German soldier that seems to be taken from a book on World War 2 that it was later matched to, right down to part of the soldier's elbow being missing because in the book photo the soldier marching in from of him obscured it. But the buttons etc. on the uniform in the two photos are different, which makes it an odd combination of obvious, clumsy fakery and intentionally altered details.
If anyone hasn't but is interested, it's worth reading the whole investigation.
The foundation/organization of the site which the pics were taken from, has had some shady funding....not surprising.
On the history page, I quote....
That is interesting.
lyrag
23-11-2010, 08:16 PM
This made me laugh, they all look so fake, anybody with any knowledge of playing around with a camera can clearly see that?!
miguean
24-11-2010, 08:39 PM
instantly i knew these were fake good laugh though :cool:
metacomet
30-11-2010, 10:32 PM
Cmon man... stop bringing this shit into the crypto forum...
Your imaginary rock face thread was bad enough.
bharvey
01-12-2010, 12:01 AM
Hey SOL,
Watch yer backside.
Da'Comet seems to have a Red Rocket for Ya.
metacomet
01-12-2010, 12:39 AM
Hey SOL,
Watch yer backside.
Da'Comet seems to have a Red Rocket for Ya.
Hey man, I just find it ironic for someone with "bullshit detective" in their AV to propagate so much of it.
macgyver1968
01-12-2010, 12:50 AM
Isn't it amazing that some of these photo's seem to match
other photo's taken from different sources? Like Readers Digest?
In the second "Mudman" photo, the background under the right
arm even seems to match.
Amazing!
Is it not also amazing that when there are multiple pics of
what seems to be the same subject, they are so very static.
As in, it seems to be the same pose, or position, only distorted
or blurry in some way.
Amazing!
Could this guy be channeling and projecting other photographers work?
Does he have some sort of mental photo manipulation lobe in his brain?
Amazing!
LOL!!
http://forgetomori.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/mudmanrobbertmudmand.jpg
pound
01-12-2010, 01:24 AM
Hmm, Yeah I don't know about this one. It literally looks like someone took an action figurine, covered it in mud and then held it up to camera. Very, very suspect, almost hokey and not that believable at all IMHO.
size_of_light
03-12-2010, 05:22 PM
Hey SOL,
Watch yer backside.
Da'Comet seems to have a Red Rocket for Ya.
That's disgusting!
But yeah, I noticed. :eek: :o ;)
tits mcgee
03-12-2010, 05:48 PM
LOL!
This is very funny! Oh, sorry, I've just seen that this isn't in the "Have a Laugh" forum!
Excuse me.
Definitely real. Definitely not poor PhotoShopping and resizing. Definitely not.
Great thread!
:D
My dog could come up with better photoshops than those.
I don't have a problem with pushing the bounds of what is real or possible or I wouldn't be on the Icke forum but people should really try to be a little more discerning.
size_of_light
03-12-2010, 05:58 PM
My dog could come up with better photoshops than those.
I don't have a problem with pushing the bounds of what is real or possible or I wouldn't be on the Icke forum but people should really try to be a little more discerning.
Every culprit who shot their mouths off without reading the full investigation will naturally lie about that now and say they did, when it's patently obvious they didn't.
Jesus fucking christ. :D
The point IS that some of the photos look lame.
Intellectual laziness has reached epidemic proportions.
This is why Bill Hicks did the bit about Americans in the South needing photos of the food on their fucking menus in diners.
Oo-oo! Aa-aa!! Aaarrrrgh!
This is why Bill Hicks did the bit about Americans in the South needing photos of the food on their fucking menus in diners.
Oo-oo! Aa-aa!! Aaarrrrgh!
Hey! *indignant*
A picture of chicken fried steak smothered in pepper gravy with a side of mashed potatoes and corn and the cob and biscuits and a tall, frosty sweet tea makes me want to order.
Hmpf!
macgyver1968
03-12-2010, 06:53 PM
Hey! *indignant*
A picture of chicken fried steak smothered in pepper gravy with a side of mashed potatoes and corn and the cob and biscuits and a tall, frosty sweet tea makes me want to order.
Hmpf!
Hmmmm...that's sounds good! Damn you making me want to break my diet!!
OMG!!! It's an apparition!
http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i41/macgyver1968a/macnewapt1.jpg
Lol!
Friendly spirits are in your home!
P.S. Thank you for adding me. :)
metacomet
04-12-2010, 04:15 AM
Every culprit who shot their mouths off without reading the full investigation will naturally lie about that now and say they did, when it's patently obvious they didn't.
Hang them!
Jesus fucking christ. :D
... It's not that big a deal.
The point IS that some of the photos look lame.
You said nothing in your OP to suggest that was the point of this thread :confused:
Methinks the back-pedaling is about to kick in gear.
Intellectual laziness has reached epidemic proportions.
Errr yeah... that's the issue here. We're all just intellectually lazy for not investigating pictures which are obvious fakes.
Righto!
This is why Bill Hicks did the bit about Americans in the South needing photos of the food on their fucking menus in diners.
Oo-oo! Aa-aa!! Aaarrrrgh!
:confused: What do Americans have to do with this?
Getting a bit flustered and just jumping to the nationality insults eh? Alrighty then.
size_of_light
04-12-2010, 08:33 AM
You said nothing in your OP to suggest that was the point of this thread :confused:
:D Why should I?
Methinks the back-pedaling is about to kick in gear.
Over what? :D
Errr yeah... that's the issue here. We're all just intellectually lazy for not investigating pictures which are obvious fakes.
Who's stalking who? :D
:confused: What do Americans have to do with this?
Nothing.
How fucking dumb are you? :D
Getting a bit flustered and just jumping to the nationality insults eh? Alrighty then.
What does this have to do with Americans? :D
Somebody - anybody - read the link FFS! :D
sugarray
04-12-2010, 10:32 AM
I think the link is interesting and without reading it you just think the pix are stoooopid.
But then again, are the pix as stupid as the people commenting on them without reading the link?
There's only one way to find out........ FIGHT! :D