2tuff
16-11-2007, 04:19 AM
Is Tony Gambino an infiltrator of the truth movement?
By Craig Oxley
16th November 2007
http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showtopic=36125
Right folks I've had a few worries about Tony Thomas Gambino and some of his information. He was recently interviewed by Greg Szymanski and Eric Jon Phelps at the Arctic Beacon website twice. He's been on Nelson Thall's, Cloak & Dagger also with Eric Jon Phelps in the interview. I noticed a few things which I've quickly mentioned over time but not wrote anything upon until now. I had a friend question Tony Gambino very early on and wondered if he was another Leo Wanta put in to infiltrate the Vatican exposing movement. Well there was a few things which rang the alarm bells for myself:
1. He's supposed to be out on bail and under some sort of witness protection type system. He claims he's living in a small town he detests and that he's had a name change. What I'd like to know is how come he's been able to call people and let them know who he is. When you're under these schemes you must never phone relatives let alone strangers and especially not give your name out etc. It doesn't take a scientist to know this, as it's all over the movies and documentarys you see on the tell-a-lie-vision. So whys he on the phone to these shows? Who put Eric Jon Phelps in touch with him? Does it seem very fishy to you? Sure does me!
2. We hear him claim he witnessed both planes hit the twin towers on September 11th 2001. He tops this off by claiming that he saw also that the wings of the planes fall off just before impact. Now you tell me how he would see this from his jail cell? We need proof that it was located facing the Twin Towers and then that it has windows in order to see through. Then we need to ask how the hell he viewed the first hit live in his cell? Does this mean he knew the attack was going to occur? Do not rush to this conclusion thus making him out to be a safe concern again. It would have to be a big coincidence he was viewing the towers if at all, perfectly to see the first attack on the tower.
Now does Gambino have adrenaline or whatever chemical reaction causes your mind to see things in slow motion during an accident, running through his body 24/7? No? Well how can this man see so clearly the attacks and notice wings falling off? I'd say this is an utter impossibility. I'd like to know what his vision is like and if he wears glasses, then what their made of. Anyone who's watched the video footage of planes wether computer graphics or real will know that they come like grease lightening and wham. All the footage on the net where they tell you whats going to happen then show the film, you always have to rewind it numerous times to see it clearly as it's so fast. So please people how can Gambino be so sure? He certainly didn't view what he's claiming and if it's true what he's saying then I'd say he was informed of this and never witnessed it himself. Now if it did ever come out that infact there were no planes and it was a combination of explosive napalm and maybe a missile or two then that would really highlight Gambino as a disinformation plant. Right now I'm pretty open to both ideas of planes and no planes. Let's not forget the talk of a missile launched from the Jesuit, Woolworth Building also.
FULL ARTICLE:
http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showtopic=36125
By Craig Oxley
16th November 2007
http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showtopic=36125
Right folks I've had a few worries about Tony Thomas Gambino and some of his information. He was recently interviewed by Greg Szymanski and Eric Jon Phelps at the Arctic Beacon website twice. He's been on Nelson Thall's, Cloak & Dagger also with Eric Jon Phelps in the interview. I noticed a few things which I've quickly mentioned over time but not wrote anything upon until now. I had a friend question Tony Gambino very early on and wondered if he was another Leo Wanta put in to infiltrate the Vatican exposing movement. Well there was a few things which rang the alarm bells for myself:
1. He's supposed to be out on bail and under some sort of witness protection type system. He claims he's living in a small town he detests and that he's had a name change. What I'd like to know is how come he's been able to call people and let them know who he is. When you're under these schemes you must never phone relatives let alone strangers and especially not give your name out etc. It doesn't take a scientist to know this, as it's all over the movies and documentarys you see on the tell-a-lie-vision. So whys he on the phone to these shows? Who put Eric Jon Phelps in touch with him? Does it seem very fishy to you? Sure does me!
2. We hear him claim he witnessed both planes hit the twin towers on September 11th 2001. He tops this off by claiming that he saw also that the wings of the planes fall off just before impact. Now you tell me how he would see this from his jail cell? We need proof that it was located facing the Twin Towers and then that it has windows in order to see through. Then we need to ask how the hell he viewed the first hit live in his cell? Does this mean he knew the attack was going to occur? Do not rush to this conclusion thus making him out to be a safe concern again. It would have to be a big coincidence he was viewing the towers if at all, perfectly to see the first attack on the tower.
Now does Gambino have adrenaline or whatever chemical reaction causes your mind to see things in slow motion during an accident, running through his body 24/7? No? Well how can this man see so clearly the attacks and notice wings falling off? I'd say this is an utter impossibility. I'd like to know what his vision is like and if he wears glasses, then what their made of. Anyone who's watched the video footage of planes wether computer graphics or real will know that they come like grease lightening and wham. All the footage on the net where they tell you whats going to happen then show the film, you always have to rewind it numerous times to see it clearly as it's so fast. So please people how can Gambino be so sure? He certainly didn't view what he's claiming and if it's true what he's saying then I'd say he was informed of this and never witnessed it himself. Now if it did ever come out that infact there were no planes and it was a combination of explosive napalm and maybe a missile or two then that would really highlight Gambino as a disinformation plant. Right now I'm pretty open to both ideas of planes and no planes. Let's not forget the talk of a missile launched from the Jesuit, Woolworth Building also.
FULL ARTICLE:
http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showtopic=36125