View Full Version : BUSTED!! Digg this shit!
chris
26-02-2007, 11:19 PM
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/february2007/260207building7.htm
LOL this is on par with the Silverstein Blooper.
Sign up to digg and digg it! If this blows up on Digg, it will create a huge viewing from people who normally don't get this information.
chris
26-02-2007, 11:21 PM
Ha, I dugg it 30 minutes ago and I was the 263rd to have digg it and now it's already on 412+ This is blowing up big time...There will be shitloads of people being exposed to this new smoking gun.
seamus
26-02-2007, 11:56 PM
we need to boost the user ghstofbillhicks. His comment near the top is buried. But i voted for it cause i saw his name. It's a classic David Icke line. I'll let you see it for yourself LOL!
s
chris
27-02-2007, 12:01 AM
Yeah I've seen ghostofbillhicks about in the forums and stuff, I'll help him out too...I added a comment myself, my user there is 'Kombaiyashii'
seamus
27-02-2007, 12:05 AM
take note... the clip is in the Political News section, but if you go to the popular post section, it shows posts with way less diggs, but not the one with the clip. What i am saying is that they are filtering the "newly popular" page to keep this one out.
http://digg.com/politics/popular/24hours
s
Edit: It's over 500 diggs now, but still not on the popular page. 01:05 GMT
midwich cuckoo
27-02-2007, 01:07 AM
Video wont play!. Have Google removed it?.:confused:
chris
27-02-2007, 01:49 AM
Video wont play!. Have Google removed it?.:confused:
Yes they took it off the BBC website pronto and I'm not surprised that google would remove it but I'm sure it's due to traffic, try it a few more times...
I downloaded it anyway har dee har har..
graflok
27-02-2007, 02:00 AM
Video wont play!. Have Google removed it?.:confused:
Looks like Google removed it!
You can see it here:
http://www.esnips.com/doc/47ae2fd7-0a9f-4928-9d30-f53741139733/911Building7Collapse
move the video forward to about 14:30 to see the part about Bldg 7.
graflok
midwich cuckoo
27-02-2007, 02:05 AM
Looks like Google removed it!
You can see it here:
http://www.esnips.com/doc/47ae2fd7-0a9f-4928-9d30-f53741139733/911Building7Collapse
move the video forward to about 14:30 to see the part about Bldg 7.
graflok
Thanks very much! :) Checking it out now.
midwich cuckoo
27-02-2007, 02:28 AM
That's some crazy shit right there!. I felt like screaming at her "IT'S BEHIND YOU!" but this isn't a pantomime.:(
I'm downloading it incase this one also disappears!.
seamus
27-02-2007, 02:50 AM
none of this explains why it fails to make it onto the digg popular page.
s
heretic
27-02-2007, 03:36 AM
none of this explains why it fails to make it onto the digg popular page.
s
Take a look at this.
http://www.infowars.net/articles/february2007/230207Digg.htm
seamus
27-02-2007, 03:54 AM
Yeah but it's got 7-hundred some diggs! it's way over much of what's on the popular page. I don't get it. If someone wants to bury it, fine. but more are digging it. i don't get.
s
chris
27-02-2007, 04:10 AM
none of this explains why it fails to make it onto the digg popular page.
s
I just checked out one of the most popular 'diggs' which had over 2000+ diggs and that didn't even have 200 comments, the wtc7 blooper only has 700 and has almost 400 comments..
Looks like Google removed it!
You can see it here:
http://www.esnips.com/doc/47ae2fd7-0a9f-4928-9d30-f53741139733/911Building7Collapse
move the video forward to about 14:30 to see the part about Bldg 7.
graflok
Well!! That was interesting! I got to 21.25 in the video and it just stopped and had all pretty colours on the screen :confused:
seamus
27-02-2007, 04:22 AM
It has 760-some diggs as i write this.
it SHOULD make it onto this list.
http://digg.com/politics/popular/24hours
http://img1.putfile.com/thumb/2/5622214845.jpg (http://www.putfile.com/pic.php?img=4868697)
but it's not here!!!
s
chris
27-02-2007, 04:27 AM
It has 760-some diggs as i write this.
it SHOULD make it onto this list.
http://digg.com/politics/popular/24hours
http://img1.putfile.com/thumb/2/5622214845.jpg (http://www.putfile.com/pic.php?img=4868697)
but it's not here!!!
s
Ask that to the digg community...Then they could either see for themself that this story is becoming a conspiracy in itself or they will give the explanation why it's not displayed there...I'm not quite sure how digg works, maybe there is a reason for it so fashion the question objectively.
seamus
27-02-2007, 04:39 AM
Click here to watch WTC7-Demolition-BBC-BUSTED (http://media.putfile.com/WTC7-Demolition-BBC-BUSTED)
alternately http://media.putfile.com/WTC7-Demolition-BBC-BUSTED
if you don't like to click unlabeled links.
well there's the video.. a little blocky... wmv version.
s
limelady
27-02-2007, 06:43 AM
Just posting the google and youtube links.........
YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?...01055684448882
megatron
27-02-2007, 08:49 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tt9kU9VZ-f8
video is here
anoninnyc
27-02-2007, 08:59 AM
this is explosive information.
limelady
27-02-2007, 09:17 AM
Here is another vid link put together by megatron. This one has more evidence.
YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.
paulski
27-02-2007, 09:36 AM
Let's hope this reaches as many as possible:cool:
anoninnyc
27-02-2007, 09:41 AM
i already knew the truth, but this is such idiocy on their part. wow is all i can say. how do we get this out to everyone. this is the most important piece of information in a very very long time
anoninnyc
27-02-2007, 10:06 AM
YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.
this is one of the videos
go to it and try this. try searching by the title, also by the tags. you can't find it that way. you have to know exact address!!! wtf???
how do we get this info out?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tt9kU9VZ-f8
go to it and try this. try searching by the title, also by the tags. you can't find it that way. you have to know exact address!!! wtf???
After reading this, I did a google search for wtc7 and bbc and I found a reference stating BBC jumps the gun or something similar. I clicked on the link, black screen, nothing. Went back to Google to double check and see if I could find another and guess what? Gone!!!
This vid has them in a real spin. How cool :D
anoninnyc
27-02-2007, 11:36 AM
in a way bc it means that it is true and a threat to them. not cool that many people will never see this very important information. we need to post links everywhere. like on the gossip websites like www.tmz.com the mainstream news sites, everywhere and anywhere. hey, if spammers do it then so can we.
thirdwave
27-02-2007, 01:14 PM
If it can be proved then its a good brake through... the only thing is, the only thing letting us know what time it is is the people making the video... there is no time on the actual BBC page...
also how do we know that the building behind her is defiantly building 7.
if those 2 points can be cleared up then its a great brake through.... if they cant then it will just create another chance for people to make it all sound like a farce.
graflok
27-02-2007, 02:30 PM
If it can be proved then its a good brake through... the only thing is, the only thing letting us know what time it is is the people making the video... there is no time on the actual BBC page...
The reporter is clearly visible standing in front of Bldg 7 saying it's collapsed and we can see that it's still standing. So, it's obviously prior to the actual collapse.
also how do we know that the building behind her is defiantly building 7.
It is clearly Bldg 7. Many photos exist as well as maps that show its position relative to other buildings in the area.
graflok
The reporter is clearly visible standing in front of Bldg 7 saying it's collapsed and we can see that it's still standing. So, it's obviously prior to the actual collapse.
It is clearly Bldg 7. Many photos exist as well as maps that show its position relative to other buildings in the area.
graflok
Also if you watch the one put up by megatron ( posted by LL) and watch to the end, you see THAT buiding coming down.
midwich cuckoo
27-02-2007, 02:41 PM
It's time the BBC gave us an explaination. I have just sent an email and I urge you all reading this to contact the BBC and ask just how this happened!.
You can contact the BBC here -
http://news.bbc.co.uk/newswatch/ukfs/hi/feedback/default.stm
thirdwave
27-02-2007, 04:02 PM
well this is a big brake through... although It will not revel how the whole event was staged, it will certainly show that the media can be extremely miss leading..
that being said we already have a mass amount of evidence that the whole day was packed full of lies but it does not seem to make any difference... all be it word of mouth is being very effective.
graflok
27-02-2007, 04:11 PM
If this gets too much exposure or attention I'm afraid they will simply "debunk" it and we'll lose it as evidence. It's already being pulled from sites almost as fast as it's being uploaded and some uploaders are reporting their accounts being suspended too.
Let's not fool ourselves -- it wouldn't be hard for them to debunk this, if necessary.
They can bring out the reporter in the video who will say it was all a big mistake or they'll produce some guy who will "confess" that he hoaxed it. They can broadcast their debunk on all the major networks. They will compare it to "the alien autopsy" and it will become a big joke -- ha ha ha. All they have to say is that the video is not legitimate and the masses will believe this. The debunk won't even have to make sense or be logical.
Then the masses will nod and say, "I knew it was fake." And, they'll go back to watching Anna Nicole, Britney, etc.
But, if we simply add it to the list of evidence and move on, it can at least be included in the 911 Truth documentaries distributed on DVDs, etc. Then at least some people will see it in its original "un-debunked" form and maybe wake up.
That's my feeling anyway.
graflok
thirdwave
27-02-2007, 04:20 PM
yeah i think people would be so shocked if they new the extent people went to cover stuff like this up...
it was the same with the 7/7 bombings...
a "whiteness" was live on BBC explaining what happened to that Brazilian guy who was shot dead in the under ground...
but after the family really pushed the matter the police were forced to revel the story and it was completely different to what the "whiteness" said.... it SOOOO clear that the "whiteness" was not a "whiteness" but probably an m15 agent or something who was told to go there and lie and cover up the truth...
not hard to do...just show up and lie.
a few days later the news had this silly little section where it was explaining how whiteness's can get things wrong and ar not good at remembering what they saw.... just to try and dust the mess under the door mat, most people would have eaten it all up, I saw it and it just looked pathetic.
chris
27-02-2007, 05:54 PM
This should be blown up but displayed objectively...If this is a hoax, then why would the BBC think about Hoaxing on one of the worst days in our history?
I don't see how this can be debunked, the fact that they are fighting it means it is very explosive stuff and further proof.
They are digging a deeper hole for themselves.
If this gets too much exposure or attention I'm afraid they will simply "debunk" it and we'll lose it as evidence. It's already being pulled from sites almost as fast as it's being uploaded and some uploaders are reporting their accounts being suspended too.
Let's not fool ourselves -- it wouldn't be hard for them to debunk this, if necessary.
They can bring out the reporter in the video who will say it was all a big mistake or they'll produce some guy who will "confess" that he hoaxed it. They can broadcast their debunk on all the major networks. They will compare it to "the alien autopsy" and it will become a big joke -- ha ha ha. All they have to say is that the video is not legitimate and the masses will believe this. The debunk won't even have to make sense or be logical.
Then the masses will nod and say, "I knew it was fake." And, they'll go back to watching Anna Nicole, Britney, etc.
But, if we simply add it to the list of evidence and move on, it can at least be included in the 911 Truth documentaries distributed on DVDs, etc. Then at least some people will see it in its original "un-debunked" form and maybe wake up.
That's my feeling anyway.
graflok
It would be easy to debunk. All the 'experts' need to say is that the interview with Jane Stanley was superimposed onto 'one we prepared earlier' Of course the times would probably be a bit of a problem if they can be proven to be correct. But most of the sheeple would blindly accept the debunking and shake their head at all of these stupid conspiracy theorists.
Of course the fact that the videos are disappearing as fast as they can go up should ring alarm bells, shouldn't it? Nah! Probably not!
graflok
28-02-2007, 01:53 AM
It would be easy to debunk. All the 'experts' need to say is that the interview with Jane Stanley was superimposed onto 'one we prepared earlier' Of course the times would probably be a bit of a problem if they can be proven to be correct. But most of the sheeple would blindly accept the debunking and shake their head at all of these stupid conspiracy theorists.
Yes, exactly. All they'd have to do is say it was a hoax or a mistake and the masses will buy that. They don't even have to give much of an explanation.
I say let it go and let them have their little cover up for now so they won't feel compelled to debunk it. Many people have already seen it, I'm sure.
graflok