just what is the nwo

[kbeet]

what can they do. change the world to one global gov. one world global law. think about that a minut.. what gov will take over the world. what law will be primary law. usa?. UK?. far east?. it has to be one of them. in order to be a one world global gov. it cant be all of them because thats the way it is now. so no mater how you look at it. some countrys laws and gov will have to take over the world. and to do that is to eliminate other govnorments and laws.
and even countrys.. so this NWO thing is just plain stupid and cant be done without killing off the rest of the world in order for a NWO.. and this is totaly insane. and a worthles debate

[combichrist]

Flame suit on!!

[spoons]

When they make their move for total power, few people will notice and the rest will willingly submit simply because of the two words that will have been injected into the formula.

[kbeet]

When they make their move for total power, few people will notice and the rest will willingly submit simply because of the two words that will have been injected into the formula.

would these be the two words
baphe and metis

[merlincove]

what can they do. change the world to one global gov. one world global law. think about that a minut.. what gov will take over the world. what law will be primary law. usa?. UK?. far east?. it has to be one of them. in order to be a one world global gov. it cant be all of them because thats the way it is now. so no mater how you look at it. some countrys laws and gov will have to take over the world. and to do that is to eliminate other govnorments and laws.
and even countrys.. so this NWO thing is just plain stupid and cant be done without killing off the rest of the world in order for a NWO.. and this is totaly insane. and a worthles debate

So why then are TPTB driving toward a unilateral conditioning?

Consider the following.


Europe is now one state with one currency, it is effectively run from HQ in Brussels.


NATO. North Atlantic Treaty Organisation. An effective conglomeration uniting 28 independent member countries under one format.


The UN. One united army formed from 102 member states.


The United states of America, a combined coalition of individual member states, although having separate laws, have a central governance.


The soon to come American union, based on the European Union test child, combining America, Canada and Mexico with a common government and currency, the Amero.


‘Democracy’ being bought to Afghanistan, Iraq, soon to be Iran.



These pieces are being slowly slotted in to place, conditioning the people into accepting ever expanding unions.

The world at the moment has several bases of government / rule, to a degree this dilutes the proportionate representation of power to several ‘houses.’ If the houses are then combined into one house, one central gvt body taking over from several regional bodies, TPTB are able to centralise their operations rather than feed their agenda’s down through several avenues they can apply their rule directly.

Take the European Union. 27 member states each with their own government and currency, now those 27 states have one centralised government and one currency, their individual affairs are being driven by one hand rather than a representational 27.


We are seeing a unified Europe.


We are seeing a soon to be unified American Union.


We are seeing American philosophies being furthered through invasion of foreign host countries.


We are seeing collateral emphasis forced across individual sovereign states to fall under one banner.


We are seeing a unification of individual country identities being masked with one identity.


We are seeing the centralisation of currency.


We are seeing the centralisation of power.


We are seeing the centralisation of corruption.



Just how much more evidence do you need kbeet?

It isn't a matter of

what can they do. change the world to one global gov. one world global law.

it is more a matter of what they ARE doing.

So yeah, lets "think for a minute" eh?

:rolleyes:

[kbeet]

So why then are TPTB driving toward a unilateral conditioning?

Consider the following.


Europe is now one state with one currency, it is effectively run from HQ in Brussels.


NATO. North Atlantic Treaty Organisation. An effective conglomeration uniting 28 independent member countries under one format.


The UN. One united army formed from 102 member states.


The United states of America, a combined coalition of individual member states, although having separate laws, have a central governance.


The soon to come American union, based on the European Union test child, combining America, Canada and Mexico with a common government and currency, the Amero.


‘Democracy’ being bought to Afghanistan, Iraq, soon to be Iran.



These pieces are being slowly slotted in to place, conditioning the people into accepting ever expanding unions.

The world at the moment has several bases of government / rule, to a degree this dilutes the proportionate representation of power to several ‘houses.’ If the houses are then combined into one house, one central gvt body taking over from several regional bodies, TPTB are able to centralise their operations rather than feed their agenda’s down through several avenues they can apply their rule directly.

Take the European Union. 27 member states each with their own government and currency, now those 27 states have one centralised government and one currency, their individual affairs are being driven by one hand rather than a representational 27.


We are seeing a unified Europe.


We are seeing a soon to be unified American Union.


We are seeing American philosophies being furthered through invasion of foreign host countries.


We are seeing collateral emphasis forced across individual sovereign states to fall under one banner.


We are seeing a unification of individual country identities being masked with one identity.


We are seeing the centralisation of currency.


We are seeing the centralisation of power.


We are seeing the centralisation of corruption.



Just how much more evidence do you need kbeet?

It isn't a matter of



it is more a matter of what they ARE doing.

So yeah, lets "think for a minute" eh?

:rolleyes:

combining canada and usa as one government???
lol.. never happen. canada is allso part of the UK united kingdom durin war time like now. when its not its a child state of england

[merlincove]

combining canada and usa as one government???
lol.. never happen. canada is allso part of the UK united kingdom durin war time like now. when its not its a child state of england

Yeah, you might well lol

Until last year the UK was a sovereign state and we were all told that there would be a referendum on joining Europe.

that all changed in a heartbeat.

Men and women died in two wars to keep England a sovereign nation from European oppressors, we mark their sacrifice every year on November the 11th, the Queen (or the head of state) places a wreath on the memorial.

Brown signed away our sovereignty in closure to a motion set forth by Ted Heath more than twenty years ago. What men and women died for Brown signed away, he sold our sovereignty to his pay masters.

England will never join Europe, yeah ok.

Canada and Mexico will do exactly as they are told, just like Brown did.

Get over it.

It's gonna happen.

EDIT: Correction, it IS happening.

[kappy0405]

kbeet, you're missing the plot by thinking it's one country having to take over the world. The framework has already been built with the UN. It's not a matter of overt imperialism by one country, it's every country slowly losing sovereignty to the already existing UN and its subsidiaries until national identity is irrelevant.

To say it doesn't exist or it isn't going to happen is like saying the UN and EU don't exist.

[banktop]

Amazing predictions from 1958 that came true will blow your Mind

Amazing predictions from 1958 that came true will blow your Mind - YouTube

Found this last year thought i post it and see what you think :)