George Galloway

[juddfinn]

This is a copy of a letter I emailed to George Galloway (via his website) following remarks made (again) about David Icke on his weekend Radio Show over the TalkSport airwaves... Unfortunatley Our George is as blinkered and bad as they come on some things (9/11 truth etc) as he is good on attacking the US Congress, George Bush, Tony Blair and the warmongers... So we may need to lean on him a little now and again (or at least not let him get away with being a wimp, truthbender or unwitting gatekeeper?) - Thanks, John

----------------------------------------------ooo000OOO000ooo------------------------------------------

Hello George,

On your Saturday radio show you made mention of David Icke, in disparaging terms, yet again. Just in case you don't know, Icke has mentioned you from time to time and always only in good terms, mainly in connection with your campaigning to Stop The War (which he supports) or against the hypocrites in the US Congress.

I would think it safe to say that David Icke has many more activist 'listeners' worldwide than you do, and at some point somewhere there is a "crossover" with some of them (in the UK at least, hence the caller on the Saturday show).

James Whale (your "mentor", as you put it) is a big fan of David Icke too, and gives him a lot of air-time when he can get him to appear. Maybe it is fair to say that Icke is a Big Favourite of TalkSport listeners and it would be fairer of you (though I understand you have to maintain a "non loony" play it safe mainstream meat and two veg persona) to not slander him on the airwaves like you do from time to time, or in the least to just say "I disagree, let leave it at that" with Icke (if indeed you know his writings well enough to make such opinion) rather than always the name calling of the type you often use... "insane" or "crazy" slips from the tongue with ease at Icke as well as all the 9/11 Truthers that call in. Which is hypocritical of you George, following your agreement with William Rodriguez assertions.

And about Icke saying He was the "Son of God"... you should also be ashamed of yourself for such further hypocrisy, since having yourself been misrepresented (so you say) with your "indefatigability" speech to Saddam Hussein while you wee in fact addressing the Iraqi people (though this sounds a bit like that Basil Fawlty sketch to me... "I was insulting him but looking at you"). When Icke went on THAT Wogan show (15 plus years ago, if that means anything to you) while going through a major personal transformation (or upheaval, as those things can be and with which he has stayed and expanded upon since) he said "Yes" to Wogan's loaded question and also "We all are" about the Son Of God 'putdown' (and cheapshot) that was going around the media at the time. You'd also know about such things too, I would have thought.

Maybe you take all such comments as an insult to your religion. However if that's the case, you seem to allow your Muslim supporter to have their opinions (or beliefs - same difference) without ridicule, about their relationship with the true nature of a Son Of God, or to be precise something that they don't believe to be at all possible. Yet with Icke you wish jump on the bandwagon (which left Dodge over a decade ago, and isn't funny anymore as it once might have been, by the way) to ridicule David Icke's opinion of what he sees is the true nature of (the received wisdom surrounding that of) the Son Of God? As there are more people on Earth NOT believing in such an entity why is it in any sense a controversial subject to you? Following your thinking through to its logical conclusion, not so many years ago you your thinking here would be in agreement with having him stoned to death for saying such things?

Top Cat, give me a break! Anyway, Free Speech and all that

Best regards - John (a listener)

[steevo]

Very well put Judd and welcome to the forum :)

Now let's see if Mr Galloway replies.

[celtic isis]

This is a copy of a letter I emailed to George Galloway (via his website) following remarks made (again) about David Icke on his weekend Radio Show over the TalkSport airwaves... Unfortunatley Our George is as blinkered and bad as they come on some things (9/11 truth etc) as he is good on attacking the US Congress, George Bush, Tony Blair and the warmongers... So we may need to lean on him a little now and again (or at least not let him get away with being a wimp, truthbender or unwitting gatekeeper?) - Thanks, John

----------------------------------------------ooo000OOO000ooo------------------------------------------

Hello George,

On your Saturday radio show you made mention of David Icke, in disparaging terms, yet again. Just in case you don't know, Icke has mentioned you from time to time and always only in good terms, mainly in connection with your campaigning to Stop The War (which he supports) or against the hypocrites in the US Congress.

I would think it safe to say that David Icke has many more activist 'listeners' worldwide than you do, and at some point somewhere there is a "crossover" with some of them (in the UK at least, hence the caller on the Saturday show).

James Whale (your "mentor", as you put it) is a big fan of David Icke too, and gives him a lot of air-time when he can get him to appear. Maybe it is fair to say that Icke is a Big Favourite of TalkSport listeners and it would be fairer of you (though I understand you have to maintain a "non loony" play it safe mainstream meat and two veg persona) to not slander him on the airwaves like you do from time to time, or in the least to just say "I disagree, let leave it at that" with Icke (if indeed you know his writings well enough to make such opinion) rather than always the name calling of the type you often use... "insane" or "crazy" slips from the tongue with ease at Icke as well as all the 9/11 Truthers that call in. Which is hypocritical of you George, following your agreement with William Rodriguez assertions.

And about Icke saying He was the "Son of God"... you should also be ashamed of yourself for such further hypocrisy, since having yourself been misrepresented (so you say) with your "indefatigability" speech to Saddam Hussein while you wee in fact addressing the Iraqi people (though this sounds a bit like that Basil Fawlty sketch to me... "I was insulting him but looking at you"). When Icke went on THAT Wogan show (15 plus years ago, if that means anything to you) while going through a major personal transformation (or upheaval, as those things can be and with which he has stayed and expanded upon since) he said "Yes" to Wogan's loaded question and also "We all are" about the Son Of God 'putdown' (and cheapshot) that was going around the media at the time. You'd also know about such things too, I would have thought.

Maybe you take all such comments as an insult to your religion. However if that's the case, you seem to allow your Muslim supporter to have their opinions (or beliefs - same difference) without ridicule, about their relationship with the true nature of a Son Of God, or to be precise something that they don't believe to be at all possible. Yet with Icke you wish jump on the bandwagon (which left Dodge over a decade ago, and isn't funny anymore as it once might have been, by the way) to ridicule David Icke's opinion of what he sees is the true nature of (the received wisdom surrounding that of) the Son Of God? As there are more people on Earth NOT believing in such an entity why is it in any sense a controversial subject to you? Following your thinking through to its logical conclusion, not so many years ago you your thinking here would be in agreement with having him stoned to death for saying such things?

Top Cat, give me a break! Anyway, Free Speech and all that

Best regards - John (a listener)

fair play to you for writing this letter/email juddfinn!

i got a bit confused with the bit i highlighted haha i took it in the wrong context at first :o hehe icke wants the war! doh!



kool i didn't know james whale is a fan of icke! i hope it's the james whale i'm thinking of...i forget who people are being away from UK/irish media...


great letter, and for taking the time to do it, well done. :) i'm really impressed.

BTW what happened with the caller?

[shodan]

Hello George,

On your Saturday radio show you made mention of David Icke, in disparaging terms, yet again. Just in case you don't know, Icke has mentioned you from time to time and always only in good terms, mainly in connection with your campaigning to Stop The War (which he supports) or against the hypocrites in the US Congress.

I would think it safe to say that David Icke has many more activist 'listeners' worldwide than you do, and at some point somewhere there is a "crossover" with some of them (in the UK at least, hence the caller on the Saturday show).

James Whale (your "mentor", as you put it) is a big fan of David Icke too, and gives him a lot of air-time when he can get him to appear. Maybe it is fair to say that Icke is a Big Favourite of TalkSport listeners and it would be fairer of you (though I understand you have to maintain a "non loony" play it safe mainstream meat and two veg persona) to not slander him on the airwaves like you do from time to time, or in the least to just say "I disagree, let leave it at that" with Icke (if indeed you know his writings well enough to make such opinion) rather than always the name calling of the type you often use... "insane" or "crazy" slips from the tongue with ease at Icke as well as all the 9/11 Truthers that call in. Which is hypocritical of you George, following your agreement with William Rodriguez assertions.

And about Icke saying He was the "Son of God"... you should also be ashamed of yourself for such further hypocrisy, since having yourself been misrepresented (so you say) with your "indefatigability" speech to Saddam Hussein while you wee in fact addressing the Iraqi people (though this sounds a bit like that Basil Fawlty sketch to me... "I was insulting him but looking at you"). When Icke went on THAT Wogan show (15 plus years ago, if that means anything to you) while going through a major personal transformation (or upheaval, as those things can be and with which he has stayed and expanded upon since) he said "Yes" to Wogan's loaded question and also "We all are" about the Son Of God 'putdown' (and cheapshot) that was going around the media at the time. You'd also know about such things too, I would have thought.

Maybe you take all such comments as an insult to your religion. However if that's the case, you seem to allow your Muslim supporter to have their opinions (or beliefs - same difference) without ridicule, about their relationship with the true nature of a Son Of God, or to be precise something that they don't believe to be at all possible. Yet with Icke you wish jump on the bandwagon (which left Dodge over a decade ago, and isn't funny anymore as it once might have been, by the way) to ridicule David Icke's opinion of what he sees is the true nature of (the received wisdom surrounding that of) the Son Of God? As there are more people on Earth NOT believing in such an entity why is it in any sense a controversial subject to you? Following your thinking through to its logical conclusion, not so many years ago you your thinking here would be in agreement with having him stoned to death for saying such things?

Top Cat, give me a break! Anyway, Free Speech and all that

What a cracking letter and welcome to the forum.:)
Intriuged to see his reply if he does.

[them]

He always replies, eventually..

[strider]

Good letter.. I would certainly like to see the reply...

[juddfinn]

Thanks for the comments on my letter to George Galloway (it was in fact my 2nd letter to him - the 1st is below, and still no reply all these weeks later, and the reason I'm 'going public' with them on this Forum) - A caller to his show had made the grevious error of likening his stance against the establishment to some of David Icke's work, which Gorgeous George couldn't handle at all and brought up the Son Of God stuff. When he was challenged on that He said "I saw him say he was the Son Of God, I've saw it with my own eyes, I watched his lips... (then added rather oddly)... you'll have to choose between us, you can't have both George Galloway and David Icke" (or words to that effect)... anyway, my first letter to him was more polite than my 2nd you'll notice... though all-in-all I think there is little to gain in losing your point in a rant or aggressive outburst.

The idea is to employ Skilful Means, and hoist the buggers on their own petard - Thank You one & all - Enjoy!:)
-------------------oooo0000OOOOOO000000oooooooo---------------------

Hello George,

After your excellent web-TV interview with the 9/11 hero William Rodriguez you said you were now also a "9/11 Truther", and that you too had problems with the official story. This I was glad to hear. Indeed, words about you to that effect were announced by William at his full-house East London Mosque presentation in the days following your interview with him. I guess the people of your electoral ward would have beaten a path to you surgery door otherwise seeking your support for 9/11 truth, after his powerful public talk.

Why then do we hear you yet again condemning callers who question 9/11 on your Radio Show where they express even the very basic anomalies of '9/11 Truth'. You dismiss them as "Conspiracy Nuts" (and much worse).

I find your show to be otherwise excellent, and following your contact with William Rodriguez I must ask you "which is it to be George"? 9/11 Truth or The Official (Bin Laden did it) Story?

I think the next step 'on the road to 9/11 truth' (excuse me for that) would be something like Peter Tachell has set out this week in an article for The Guardian below (to be congratulated for going so very public).

I was going to suggest that you should make an 'on-air' apology to all the common-folk who persist, unwaveringly, in the attempt to get the truth out about 9/11, which to some degree they may think is your job too. It's clear that you aren't afraid to speak your mind. Maybe you haven't looked into the 9/11 anomalies deeply enough to find as Peter Tachell obviously has. He was also a Labour MP too, or wanted to be, was he not?

It's sadly true that most politicians today aren't worth wasting time in approaching about 9/11 Truth! Though there are a few, and it's surprises me that you are not really among them, even after the rodriguez interview. Another Labour MP (M. Meacher) is openly questioning many aspects of the whole thing, and then there are two other senior politicians that I know you do admire, if don't think much of the likes of Tachell and Meacher. Both Hugo Chavez and Fidel Castro hold the some of the very same '9/11 Truth' opinions that you ridicule your callers for bringing up each and every week.

So, please George can you look into this a bit further and clarify your position to us listeners of your show.

Thank you for your time - John

(then I attached the Gaurdian/Tachell article)
---------------------------------------------------------------------

The 9/11 Commission Report was 'far from the truth'.

Peter Tatchell - London Guardian - Wednesday, September 12, 2007

Six years after 9/11, the American public have still not been provided with a full and truthful account of the single greatest terror attack in US history.

[celtic isis]

don't you just hate it when they dredge up the old "son of god" business to undermine poor icke. :rolleyes:

just cause icke couldn't articulate things properly back then in the craziness of the awakening process and he's forever doomed to live this one down..

it's simple: icke meant he is the son of god, that WE ALL are!!! :rolleyes:

duh

even i kno what it's like talking to sheeple, you use one less well chosen word to describe somehting and that's it, it's all just conspiracy, far fetched, no basis in truth etc...:mad::rolleyes:


anyway, good work juddfinn :)

[joyful]

Galloway is a politician and David is a new age free thinker. George has to deal with dirty political reality. David Icke might be away to talk about lizards and get away with it but Galloway has to be taken seriously. he might have seen David Ickes films and liked them but they are too far out for daily politics.

[revolutionary_jam]

well done for sending the letter! It's true David Icke has spoken in good terms of George Galloway, and not nice for Galloway to reciprocate by calling him a looney!

[juddfinn]

Galloway is a politician and David is a new age free thinker. George has to deal with dirty political reality. David Icke might be away to talk about lizards and get away with it but Galloway has to be taken seriously. he might have seen David Ickes films and liked them but they are too far out for daily politics.

That is the compromise he has chosen, and must live with, even if he comes across things which are in sharp contrast to such a position, so many people are STUCK like that, it seems - "Galloway (thinks he) has to be taken seriously" which is another way of saying he will only talk about things that make him "look good" and he considers what others will think about him BEFORE he considers the TRUTH. I think David Icke broke through that one (as an example for us all) when dealing with what is sometimes hard to believe! Dirty Political "reality" indeed.:eek:

Icke maybe too far out for him, sure. But The 9/11 Truth movement is another matter, and Galloway is a fool. Somewhat hypocritical too following his interview with William Rodriguez. Which, oddly, is nowhere to be found online anymore!:rolleyes:

A while ago, before all his Icke/9-11 Truth bashing, I had written to Galloway with some helpful info on the "Fake Sheikh" who had tried to entrap him (like a few other well-known people had fallen for... he's a News of the World "journalist" called Mazher Mahmood who fooled Sven, Prince Edwards wife and I think Princess Michael, but who cares about them). Anyway, he didn't even reply to that one... so I guess he must be a very busy man! :confused:

[timelord]

Galloway believes in the Bible stories yet calls David Icke barmy for giving us information on things that he gives us information about. I find anything about a book translated several times from a reported 2,000 year old original publishing date to be barmy in my mind, but there you go.

[mcmenek1]

Hi,

George Galloway's public profile is a phoney one, he is what’s called 'controlled opposition'......."The Powers That Be" use people like Galloway to help keep the lid on things, by giving the impression that there is out spoken opposition to government policy or what ever....

While it may appear to the public that he is opposition to certain things these people will only go so far they will never go as far as the truth, hence his refusal to look at the truth about 9/11 and the ridiculing of the David Icke.....

Can you see how a person like George Galloway can help to keep the lid on the false reality that the "The Powers That Be" have created for us, he would never ask the questions in parliament that David Icke would ask or a real truth seeker.

I remember a caller asked him a question about the Freemasons and secret societies holding the real power in Government and the country and he ridiculed the idea by saying something to the effect we have nothing to worry about from silly men with rolled up trouser legs doing funny hand shakes......so you can see where he is coming from as soon as anybody starts to get near the truth he ridicules their ideas...... this is his job he is there to control the opposition......

The US Congress TV extravaganza where Galloway was grilled in the USA over his dealings in Iraq was nothing more than phoney show trial to reinforce Galloway's phoney public profile.....

Another person who is 'controlled opposition' is Ken Livingstone his public profile is anti government..... can you remember when he first became London Mayor and how he fell out with the Government over it and he was even thrown out of the Labour Party...... well this again was nothing more than a phoney drama for the public to give the impression he was anti Government.....

"The Powers That Be" would never have been able to get away with the 7/7 London Bombings unless Ken Livingstone was in there pockets.....The London Mayor is in charge of the Metropolitan Police and therefore he would have known about the anti terror practice drills that where taking place at the very same stations and times as the real bombs went off...... after the events of 7/7 Ken Livingston sang from the official hymn sheet...... for Ken Livingstone and 7/7 see Mayor Giuliani and 9/11........

Sorry about digressing away from George Galloway but I wanted people to understand how 'controlled opposition' works by giving another example......

Love
&
Peace

[revolutionary_jam]

he is what’s called 'controlled opposition'......."The Powers That Be" use people like Galloway to help keep the lid on things, by giving the impression that there is out spoken opposition to government policy or what ever....


I don't think thats true
Galloway believes in everything he says
He's just not always right in his analysis, much as anyone else


"The elite" doesn't need to deliberately control every member of parliament, because Galloways and such naturally emerge,

Even though he's a bombastic sod who loves the sound of his own vvoice we're still lucky to have him because he's the only radical MP we've got, and he does educate a lot of people as to some of the nasty tricks the West has been up to,

you have to have faith that people will use this information with information they find elsewhere to eventually come to the correct conclusions

[hagbard_celine]

I met Galloway briefly a couple of weeks ago. He was demonstrating outside the Oxford Union along with several thousand student activists. They were trying to stop a free-speech debate from going ahead. I wrote about it here: http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=14839&highlight=oxford+union

[pri01]

Hi,

George Galloway's public profile is a phoney one, he is what’s called 'controlled opposition'......."The Powers That Be" use people like Galloway to help keep the lid on things, by giving the impression that there is out spoken opposition to government policy or what ever....

While it may appear to the public that he is opposition to certain things these people will only go so far they will never go as far as the truth, hence his refusal to look at the truth about 9/11 and the ridiculing of the David Icke.....

Can you see how a person like George Galloway can help to keep the lid on the false reality that the "The Powers That Be" have created for us, he would never ask the questions in parliament that David Icke would ask or a real truth seeker.

I remember a caller asked him a question about the Freemasons and secret societies holding the real power in Government and the country and he ridiculed the idea by saying something to the effect we have nothing to worry about from silly men with rolled up trouser legs doing funny hand shakes......so you can see where he is coming from as soon as anybody starts to get near the truth he ridicules their ideas...... this is his job he is there to control the opposition......

The US Congress TV extravaganza where Galloway was grilled in the USA over his dealings in Iraq was nothing more than phoney show trial to reinforce Galloway's phoney public profile.....

Another person who is 'controlled opposition' is Ken Livingstone his public profile is anti government..... can you remember when he first became London Mayor and how he fell out with the Government over it and he was even thrown out of the Labour Party...... well this again was nothing more than a phoney drama for the public to give the impression he was anti Government.....

"The Powers That Be" would never have been able to get away with the 7/7 London Bombings unless Ken Livingstone was in there pockets.....The London Mayor is in charge of the Metropolitan Police and therefore he would have known about the anti terror practice drills that where taking place at the very same stations and times as the real bombs went off...... after the events of 7/7 Ken Livingston sang from the official hymn sheet...... for Ken Livingstone and 7/7 see Mayor Giuliani and 9/11........

Sorry about digressing away from George Galloway but I wanted people to understand how 'controlled opposition' works by giving another example......

Love
&
Peace


Hi mcmenek1, you have a good point. I used to think that George Galloway was a top guy the way he stood up to the Americans and fought for the plight of innocent Iraqis. However, i recently became suspicious more so when he appeared on that ridiculous celebrity big brother show. More recently on this forum. If you look carefully at his eyes in this clip where he is giving it what for to the senate, you can clearly see he is reading an autocue. Even if this is normal procedure, I don't think the state controlled media would allow this outburst to be shown without good reason.

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=16491

[mcmenek1]

Hi mcmenek1, you have a good point. I used to think that George Galloway was a top guy the way he stood up to the Americans and fought for the plight of innocent Iraqis. However, i recently became suspicious more so when he appeared on that ridiculous celebrity big brother show. More recently on this forum. If you look carefully at his eyes in this clip where he is giving it what for to the senate, you can clearly see he is reading an autocue. Even if this is normal procedure, I don't think the state controlled media would allow this outburst to be shown without good reason.

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=16491




Hi pri01,

Yeah I've been suspicious of George Galloway for a while now he gets far to much media attention, the US Senate hearing being a prime example....... he has been given this media platform but he only goes so far with it and this helps to keep the lid on things....... people will hear things about 9/11 being an inside job and they will look to people like George Galloway because of his public profile to see what he has to say about it and when he ridicules the idea of 9/11 being an inside job lots of people will believe him....... to me George Galloway is part of the false reality that the "The Powers That Be" have created for us........

Love
&
Peace

[juddfinn]

He always replies, eventually..

I'm still waiting many months later! Of course nothing is going to be sent. In fact I spoke to somebody at a 9/11 Truth Meeting this week who lives in Galloway's constituency (and voted for him) who said he had also written to The Gorgeous George about 9/11, and did get a reply of only four curt words > "This is all bunkom" < INDEED!

G.G. interviewed William Rodriguez and said something quite different. Check for your self at http://www.911blogger.com/node/9871 - it's a clip on Google video, from 07.20 - it gets interesting at 21.00 - where G.G. say to William. "You're wearing a badge that says '9:11 Truth' and it's fairly clear that you think we don't have the truth and I am certainly willing to accept that... but my problem with the Truth Movement... and I've been guilty of this in the past... of calling people conspiracy theorists... we should call it a group of people who don't accept the official version of 9/11...(William agrees)... well in that case I'm one of them, because I don't accept the official version either" Pity he goes no further than that!

But like when making popcorn, if we raise the heat a little, (when it's their turn) they all go POP eventually or are left behind all hardened and burnt up.

[whatsontv]

I'm not a massive fan of Icke (yes, even though I find this forum fascinating) but find many of his opinions thought provoking and well worth further consideration. However, even I can see/hear what David meant in that now infamous Wogan 'interview' which was more like an interrogation. For Galloway to keep bringing it up shows a massive lack of respect and judgement on his behalf.
This forum is possibly more likely to be biased, but if I were to put a, "Who would I most like to spend the next 10 years with on a desert island - David Icke or George Galloway?" poll up on any number of forums, I can practically guarantee that David Icke would poll the most votes on each and every one of them.
Galloway really is a knob.

[quickening666]

Damn I really like Galloway. I expected more from him. Nice letter.

[thirdwave]

and David is a new age free thinker.

No he is not.... he is a free thinker...

[thirdwave]

Regarding Galloway, I think he is just a politician, none of them are %100 up front , but I think he is very good at exposing the media and how the government are compleatly corrupt.

Like anyone who is in the public eye they always worry about how the media will judge them... now if Galloway came out praising Icke and going on about how 9/11 was set up, then he would be knocked down and not given the air time he gets.... and this like many other people is also important to him....

He does not come across as the most spiritually enlightened person so its no shock that he may simply not be able to contemplate ickes stuff and shows a bit of ignorance.

He is not here to save the world but I think he is playing a part at exposing the system...

this does not seem like bad work to me..
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=249JaIaubVw

[kweli]

I'm not a massive fan of Icke (yes, even though I find this forum fascinating) but find many of his opinions thought provoking and well worth further consideration. However, even I can see/hear what David meant in that now infamous Wogan 'interview' which was more like an interrogation. For Galloway to keep bringing it up shows a massive lack of respect and judgement on his behalf.
This forum is possibly more likely to be biased, but if I were to put a, "Who would I most like to spend the next 10 years with on a desert island - David Icke or George Galloway?" poll up on any number of forums, I can practically guarantee that David Icke would poll the most votes on each and every one of them.
Galloway really is a knob.

I've never been able to take him seriously since his cringeworthy antics on Celebrity Big Brother.. man that was embarrassing to watch.

http://i68.photobucket.com/albums/i28/annie1pw/gw2.jpghttp://i68.photobucket.com/albums/i28/annie1pw/gw1.jpg

[diamond dogs]

Hi pri01,

Yeah I've been suspicious of George Galloway for a while now he gets far to much media attention, the US Senate hearing being a prime example....... he has been given this media platform but he only goes so far with it and this helps to keep the lid on things....... people will hear things about 9/11 being an inside job and they will look to people like George Galloway because of his public profile to see what he has to say about it and when he ridicules the idea of 9/11 being an inside job lots of people will believe him....... to me George Galloway is part of the false reality that the "The Powers That Be" have created for us........

Love
&
Peace

Totally agree his rebuke of facts about The Masons, 9/11 and D I draws me to the only conclusion that he is a stooge....listened to him at the anti war rally (youtube) and he never said anything from 'the heart' instead resorts to well rehearsed rhetoric that 'all in all' says nothing....wouldn't surprise me if he was on the payroll of The SIS
George Galloway Stop The War March 2008 - YouTube

[peachped]

It would be fairly mind blowing if he was a state asset there to soak up opposition.

[diamond dogs]

I must admit he did give a good performance in response to the US that has accused North Korea of helping Syria to build a nuclear reactor - the site was then bombed by Israel in 2007.

He does seem to be in his element when on the Radio and the Vine show in particular??? f/fwd to 30 mins....

http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio/aod/mainframe.shtml?http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio/aod/radio2_aod.shtml?radio2/r2_vine_fri

[guuna]

Galloway goes on about 'media bullying' yet when he was on cbb a couple of years ago he and Barrymore had a good crack at bullying Jodie Marsh. I wouldn't give this plonker the time of day.

[revolutionary_jam]

Totally agree his rebuke of facts about The Masons, 9/11 and D I draws me to the only conclusion that he is a stooge....He's blatantly not a stooge, he believes eveything he says.

[aw_la]

Hi guys, first post here, just recently found David Icke and the truth he spreads, and wow has he opened my eyes!

Anyway I listen to George Galloway’s show every so often, he's on the ball on many things but doesn't see the bigger picture always, and he was having a go at David Icke again last Friday.

He clearly hasn't read anything or taken the time to get really into investigating the message of David Icke, it made me really mad.

The points where David Icke is mentioned start at 24 min 30 seconds, at 2 hours 28 minutes 45 seconds and at 2 hours 55 minutes and 5 seconds.

You can hear the show here, - http://www.spiderednews.com/GeorgeGalloway.htm?vid=489947


I don't think we should let George Galloway to repeatedly spread lies and insult David Icke.

I think we should call up his show this Friday and Saturday to counter the slander and actually let Galloway and people that listen to his show to know the truth!

[bendoon]

Galloway has sold his soul, so to speak. He is allowed to carry on and earn a good living as long as he toes the official line on certain subjects (911/Holocaust/Immigration)

And if you think his meeting in the US with the 2 senators wasn't a set up, think again.

[hagbard_celine]

Galloway has sold his soul, so to speak. He is allowed to carry on and earn a good living as long as he toes the official line on certain subjects (911/Holocaust/Immigration)

And if you think his meeting in the US with the 2 senators wasn't a set up, think again.

I am very disappointed that George Galloway, who in some ways is such a Herculean figure of rebellion and sedition, still parrots the official line on some issues. As I awote here: http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=14839 He supported the move to ban Nick Griffin and David Irving from the Oxford Union, a serious mistake in my view.

[bendoon]

Yes, there are a lot of his radio phoneins on youtube, he does speak out well against the war and Israel, but anything remotely to do with "conspiracy" he just rubbishes the caller.

[91181]

I remeber listenig when 2tuff called up and he got cut off when he mentioned the Royal institue of iternal affairs and Obamas links to cfr ect .. Iv lost alot of rspect for Galloway for the way he mocks 911 truthers , how many more fucking times is gonna say, '' if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck , then it probably is a duck '' lol...

[fuggles]

i listen to his show every week, and I agree, hes alternative, but not alternative enough.

Just some nice views on Israel and other social topics.

However he is still definitely worth a listen to twice a week.

[thirdwave]

when it comes to exposing the mainstream news and the lies and unjust actions of the government he is great...

but the bottom line he is still a politician... and there for will be out for his own beef as well...

I think probably knows alot more than he goes into but does not want to stick his neck out to far.... rather listen to him than Jon Gaunt though that's for sure.... you wana talk about a fascist promoter in disguise then there is your man.

[hagbard_celine]

Gaunty is a bonehead!:rolleyes:

Galloway's problem in my view is that because he was elected by appealing to the far left he has got locked into continuing to appease them.

[dark skies]

Dont know which one I hate more Gaunty or Galloway they are as bad as each other in my opinion

I used to like George when he first started on talksport but he got to annoying with his clique of callers

bring back the Whale to talksport I say now theres apresenter who knows how to treat callers;)

[hagbard_celine]

Dont know which one I hate more Gaunty or Galloway they are as bad as each other in my opinion

I used to like George when he first started on talksport but he got to annoying with his clique of callers

bring back the Whale to talksport I say now theres apresenter who knows how to treat callers;)

God yes! James Whale was irreplacible!:cool: He did some brilliant shows; the ones with our Dave were David's best.

[keithm]

this being the anniversary of 9/11,

i wonder if galloway will allow people to bring up the subject on talksport 10pm friday 12th
or just go off into an abusive rant and call everyone who brings up the subject, lunatics.

[fuggles]

Listen to roy basnett on liverpool's city talk

Hes really open minded and talks a lot about conspiracies, aliens, time travel, and all bizarre subjects and NWO aswell, veyr open minded, doesnt judge or argue with people. I reccomend everyone listen.

Even had David icke on his show !

http://www.citytalk.fm/sectional.asp?id=25007

[fuggles]

he talked about conspsiracy theories a bit tonight, not as harsh on them as he usually is

he talked about himself being called a mossad agent ? and he used masonic gestures ? anyone else know about this ?

[miss_splitfoot]

i listened to him tonight, and i heard him mention that someone had written about his "masonic hand gestures" at a ufo conspiracy forum, but i didn't catch the name of the site. i've tried to google for info, but there're too many ufo sites.

i'd be interested to read this too.

[guuna]

I stopped listening to Gaunty, hes just boring and repetitive really. Galloway and Gaunty apparently despise each other, despite working for the same station.

They really are 'oppo-sames' one appeals to robot right wingers, the other to robot left wingers, it does not matter which side you pick, the system controls both sides of the argument anyhow.;)

[hagbard_celine]

I stopped listening to Gaunty, hes just boring and repetitive really. Galloway and Gaunty apparently despise each other, despite working for the same station.

They really are 'oppo-sames' one appeals to robot right wingers, the other to robot left wingers, it does not matter which side you pick, the system controls both sides of the argument anyhow.;)

Very true:cool:. That's why they make such an insipid double-act.:rolleyes:

[fuggles]

life in the mix.co.uk

http://lifeinthemix.co.uk/ABOUT%20US.html

that guy is an interesting listen, I just found out hes a regular on the show, i thought he was a random guest

Its an excellent listen

[joyce7]

Yes I do get fed-up with George.He does seem to think he's right all the time.
He seems like he's on a one man mission on one subject alone.There is no doubt he has the gift of the gab.

[keithm]

a caller into the george galloway show on talksport tonight,20/09/08,

brought up the current economic situation and briefly mentioned the rothchilds being advisors to the queen,

galloways reply was,bringing up or mentioning the rothchilds could be very unhealthy for you.

sounded like some sort of warning or threat to me.

maybe he does not like his masters true colours coming out on-air.

[steevo]

a caller into the george galloway show on talksport tonight,20/09/08,

brought up the current economic situation and briefly mentioned the rothchilds being advisors to the queen,

galloways reply was,bringing up or mentioning the rothchilds could be very unhealthy for you.

sounded like some sort of warning or threat to me.

maybe he does not like his masters true colours coming out on-air.

It wont be very long now before they are admitting that they will kill us if we dont "shut up". They dont care anymore, they are basically admitting that they are dictators and the sheeple still sleep.

But yeah Galloway is well dodgy.

[keithm]

i think you are right steevo,

they just don't seem to give a damn,

its like they are saying yes we did 9/11,yes you are slaves,yes we are going to put all you slaves down,

what you going to do about it.

SHUT UP SLAVES,OBEY AND SERVE US OR WE WILL KILL YOU.

all i will say, is that anyone who comes around to take me and my family,

wants to be some hard bastards, but i will take down more of them, than they take of us.

[drhemp]

Galloway's problem in my view is that because he was elected by appealing to the far left he has got locked into continuing to appease them.


Spot on!

[kweli]

It wont be very long now before they are admitting that they will kill us if we dont "shut up". They dont care anymore, they are basically admitting that they are dictators and the sheeple still sleep.

But yeah Galloway is well dodgy.

Well dodgy? Well dodgy? Galloway is a effin tramp! Scum of the earth! Ok.. I don't like him, ok! :D