Was George Lucas whistleblowing the NWO to us?

[wwu777]

Check out this video explaining how the Star Wars Prequels show how False Flag terror attacks worked in creating a NWO dictatorship in the Star Wars Prequel Universe:

Star Wars & False Flag Terrorism HD - YouTube

Article about it here (http://intellectualexpat.blogspot.com/2010/07/star-wars-prequels-depict-false-flag.html)

So I was wondering, how does Lucas know anything about False Flag Terrorism and the NWO? Has he publicly expressed a belief in them? Or does he have inside knowledge that he is trying to whistleblow to us?

Also, when he created the Death Star, was he trying to tell us that our moon is inhabited and hollow, like David Icke claims?

Does Lucas know any government secrets regarding ET's? If so, how?

I thought he was just a nerd who got lucky? I heard he was a student of mythology. But how does he know about conspiracies?

[cathar]

George Lucas was not a nerd,,,He raced cars and almost died in a crash...he recovered & went to film school in S.cal...American Grafitti made so much money he got a blank check to make STar Wars...

[ambler1980]

from what i hear Lucas works for the NSA and is an insider. His aunt headed a section of the UN for a while.

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=123992

[wwu777]

from what i hear Lucas works for the NSA and is an insider. His aunt headed a section of the UN for a while.

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=123992

Can you cite some sources for that? I can't find any on google.

If he is an insider, does that mean he's part of a secret society or that he just knows about them?

If so, why didn't he get in trouble for whistleblowing them in Star Wars? And his anti-Bush line in the last film "You are either with us or against us"?

[shep5856]

So I was wondering, how does Lucas know anything about False Flag Terrorism and the NWO?

probably the same way you know bout them, internet, it could just be that he's been looking on the net for inspiration and used what he found.

either that or Hes a pod person here to kill us all....

[kappy0405]

whistleblowing? More like rubbing it in our faces...

[nosebleed]

Wasn't the Jedi Knights based on the - Templars , and the Masons believe their is a force in the world which can be used for good or evil , i believe also they believe in a kinda being that guides them which is called - Yoda.

I wonder who Vader is based on lol

http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/5527/masonicvader.jpg

[kappy0405]

Wasn't the Jedi Knights based on the - Templars , and the Masons believe their is a force in the world which can be used for good or evil , i believe also they believe in a kinda being that guides them which is called - Yoda.

It's Gnostic. "The Force" refers to the universal spirit/consciousness/christ. Jedi's seem to represent an egalitarian gnostic sect, while the "Dark Side" relates to the Illuminati. They essentially corrupt politicians in the Galactic Federation/parliament and use it to build their "Empire", on par with how the United Nations is being used to build a totalitarian World Government. Darth Vader is the 'antichrist', while Luke Skywalker is the messiah figure.

[edelweiss pirate]

Wasn't the Jedi Knights based on the - Templars , and the Masons believe their is a force in the world which can be used for good or evil , i believe also they believe in a kinda being that guides them which is called - Yoda.

I wonder who Vader is based on lol

http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/5527/masonicvader.jpg

Actually the Empire represents freemasonry. The Storm troopers have black and white suits. The interior of the Deathstar has furturistic 'gothic' style architecture.

The Jedi can't be masons because in episode 3 there are none left.

Also Anakin Skywalker becomes Darth Vader through a guilt and trauma based initiation, the same kind of thing I detail in my new book as Luciferian enlightenment. His mind and body destroyed, the Empreror 'His worshipful Master' is there to pick up the pieces and put him to work.

Vader is tricked into joining the dark side, just as people are tricked or blackmailed into joining the masons.

That is why the Empreror wanted Luke Skywalker to channel his hatred and feel its power, because when you use the power of hatred you inevitably make a mistake which compromises your soul and leaves you in the power of the dark forces.

[nosebleed]

I just looked through the list of Billionaires supposedly giving half their fortune to charity , and behold George Lucas is on it along with David Rockefeller and a few other globalists.

http://givingpledge.org/#enter

[ambler1980]

well that's one of the laws of the universe...keeping the flow going...to stay rich you have to give some of your money away and with confidence not fear, because that action implies you wil always have more money to give away, making you more rich. the illuminati know these laws, that's how they stay wealthy and in control.

[fennellal]

Then you need to read this http://www.illuminati-news.com/sith-takeover.htm It all makes sense once you understand the background of some of Lucas's Work

[scotty99]

There seems to be strains of truth in science fiction. Stargate is basically the annunaki story for instance. It may be partly a warning/ hint to us by using this material in sci fi , or people rubbing it in, taking the piss as said

[superearther]

star wars is a racist ideology due to its ethnic stereo types.

http://best.complex.com/lists/The-50-Most-Racist-Movies/star-wars-episode-1-the-phantom-menace

http://www.weirdworm.com/the-five-most-racist-star-wars-characters/

very similar to that racist garbage lord of the rings

[bluehorseman]

well that's one of the laws of the universe...keeping the flow going...to stay rich you have to give some of your money away and with confidence not fear, because that action implies you wil always have more money to give away, making you more rich. the illuminati know these laws, that's how they stay wealthy and in control.

Thats a new law to me, thinking about it though it is plausible, I just hav'nt heard of it before.

[size_of_light]

The moral of the Star Wars story is that spiritually sensitive people are ineffective burdens on their friends.

Apart from blowing up the first Death Star and saving Han and Chewie from the sarlacc, Luke did bugger-all for the rest of the original trilogy.

While out riding on the frozen planet Hoth, he gets abducted by an Ice Monster and has to be saved from freezing to death by Han Solo. Later, he abandons his Jedi training to rush off to Cloud City in order to save Han and Leia...fights Darth Vader, gets his ass handed to him by his dad and has to be rescued by his little sister and wrapped in a blanket. :rolleyes:

Even his proudest achievement in turning Darth Vader back from the Dark Side so he can destroy the Emperor at the end of Return of the Jedi was utterly irrelevant and a hollow victory for him, because they both would have still been killed a few minutes later anyway when Lando and Admiral Ackbar blew up Death Star II.

Those guys, by the way, had to take on the entire Imperial armada and fly right into the bowels of the fucking space station itself to take it out, and they didn't even have the Force or Han Solo to back them up.

It makes Luke's earlier heavily-assisted assault on the first Death Star look puny by comparison.

So he helped save Han from Jabba the Hutt and the sarlacc - big deal. If it wasn't for him, Vader wouldn't have hired all the best bounty hunters in the galaxy to catch Han and use him as bait to lure Luke out of the woodwork to begin with.

[malkor]

luke actually played an essential role by distracting the emperor long enough for everybody else to do their thing.

[size_of_light]

luke actually played an essential role by distracting the emperor long enough for everybody else to do their thing.

So Ben and Yoda spent years psychically watching over Luke and spent all that time training him up just so he could be a distraction to the Emperor when the shit went down?

The Force works in mysterious ways.

And how come you can't see Chewie's penis?

[malkor]

So Ben and Yoda spent years psychically watching over Luke and spent all that time training him up just so he could be a distraction to the Emperor when the shit went down?

The Force works in mysterious ways.

doesn't it always? :)


And how come you can't see Chewie's penis?

cover your body in fur and spread some chewie urine over yourself. that might get the desired reaction.

[wwu777]

The moral of the Star Wars story is that spiritually sensitive people are ineffective burdens on their friends.

Apart from blowing up the first Death Star and saving Han and Chewie from the sarlacc, Luke did bugger-all for the rest of the original trilogy.

While out riding on the frozen planet Hoth, he gets abducted by an Ice Monster and has to be saved from freezing to death by Han Solo. Later, he abandons his Jedi training to rush off to Cloud City in order to save Han and Leia...fights Darth Vader, gets his ass handed to him by his dad and has to be rescued by his little sister and wrapped in a blanket. :rolleyes:

Even his proudest achievement in turning Darth Vader back from the Dark Side so he can destroy the Emperor at the end of Return of the Jedi was utterly irrelevant and a hollow victory for him, because they both would have still been killed a few minutes later anyway when Lando and Admiral Ackbar blew up Death Star II.

Those guys, by the way, had to take on the entire Imperial armada and fly right into the bowels of the fucking space station itself to take it out, and they didn't even have the Force or Han Solo to back them up.

It makes Luke's earlier heavily-assisted assault on the first Death Star look puny by comparison.

So he helped save Han from Jabba the Hutt and the sarlacc - big deal. If it wasn't for him, Vader wouldn't have hired all the best bounty hunters in the galaxy to catch Han and use him as bait to lure Luke out of the woodwork to begin with.

But Luke liberated Vader's soul, remember? After Vader died, he became spirit and lived in the light again. So he saved his father's soul, not just delayed his death in the Death Star.

[ambler1980]

The moral of the Star Wars story is that spiritually sensitive people are ineffective burdens on their friends.

Apart from blowing up the first Death Star and saving Han and Chewie from the sarlacc, Luke did bugger-all for the rest of the original trilogy.

lol, hyperbole to the max.

While out riding on the frozen planet Hoth, he gets abducted by an Ice Monster and has to be saved from freezing to death by Han Solo.

and then leads the attack on the AT ATs, using his lightsaber and thermal detonator to down one without his snow speeder...very very impressive use of his force skills.

Later, he abandons his Jedi training to rush off to Cloud City in order to save Han and Leia...fights Darth Vader, gets his ass handed to him by his dad and has to be rescued by his little sister and wrapped in a blanket. :rolleyes:

ever heard of the hero's journey? a hero that kicks everybody's ass and never gets put in his place is pretty boring. that's not good storytelling. his brash and headstrong behavior is a mirror to his father's, which caused his downfall and transformation into Darth Vader...Luke could be going down a similar path. Plus he's not very well trained, and goes off to fight a sith Lord to try and save his friends from the imperial fleet. Impossible odds. That's good drama.

Even his proudest achievement in turning Darth Vader back from the Dark Side so he can destroy the Emperor at the end of Return of the Jedi was utterly irrelevant and a hollow victory for him, because they both would have still been killed a few minutes later anyway when Lando and Admiral Ackbar blew up Death Star II.

so what? it never happened. not only did he redeem his father, the bad ass Darth Vader, who'd been a heartless, cold, scary bastard for three movies, seemingly impossible to turn from the dark side...he rejected the same path Vader had taken, AND was willing to sacrifice himself to do all that, because he knew he was a dead man being on the death star. To top it off, Vader's victory over the Emperor was Luke's vindication. Good drama.

Those guys, by the way, had to take on the entire Imperial armada and fly right into the bowels of the fucking space station itself to take it out, and they didn't even have the Force or Han Solo to back them up. It makes Luke's earlier heavily-assisted assault on the first Death Star look puny by comparison.

i don't see your point, this has nothing to do with Luke being a pain in the ass. it's good drama, exciting space battles with visual FX that even to this day rivals the biggest budget CGI vomit fests. there was no way it was going to be as exciting as Death Star Battle One...what saves it is all the concurrent battles going on at the same time (inside Death Star, on Endor Moon)

So he helped save Han from Jabba the Hutt and the sarlacc - big deal.

big deal??? they were good friends who started out as rivals. your argument is Luke was being a pain in the ass...he saved Han's life here.

If it wasn't for him, Vader wouldn't have hired all the best bounty hunters in the galaxy to catch Han and use him as bait to lure Luke out of the woodwork to begin with.

what's the reasoning here? this is called drama. without it there is no movie.

your cynicism is amusing, the original trilogy is much better than what you're calling it...some useless distraction. wtf?

[white horse]

http://www.jonesreport.com/articles/280207_uncomfortable_death_star.html


Uncomfortable Questions: Was the Death Star Attack an Inside Job?

We’ve all heard the “official conspiracy theory” of the Death Star attack. We all know about Luke Skywalker and his ragtag bunch of rebels, how they mounted a foolhardy attack on the most powerful, well-defended battle station ever built. And we’ve all seen the video over, and over, and over, of the one-in-a-million shot that resulted in a massive chain reaction that not just damaged, but completely obliterated that massive technological wonder.

Like many Americans, I was fed this story when I was growing up. But as I watched the video, I began to realize that all was not as it seemed. And the more I questioned the official story, the deeper into the rabbit hole I went.

Presented here are some of the results of my soul-searching regarding this painful event. Like many citizens, I have many questions that I would like answered: was the mighty Imperial government really too incompetent to prevent a handful of untrained nerf-herders from destroying one of their most prized assets? Or are they hiding something from us? Who was really behind the attack? Why did they want the Death Star destroyed? No matter what the answers, we have a problem.

Below is a summary of my book, Uncomfortable Questions: An Analysis of the Death Star Attack, which presents compelling evidence that we all may be the victims of a fraud of immense proportions.

Uncomfortable Questions about the Death Star Attack

1) Why were a handful of rebel fighters able to penetrate the defenses of a battle station that had the capability of destroying an entire planet and the defenses to ward off several fleets of battle ships?

2) Why did Grand Moff Tarkin refuse to deploy the station’s large fleet of TIE Fighters until it was too late? Was he acting on orders from somebody to not shoot down the rebel attack force? If so, who, and why?

3) Why was the rebel pilot who supposedly destroyed the Death Star reported to be on the Death Star days, maybe hours, prior to its destruction? Why was he allowed to escape, and why were several individuals dressed in Stormtrooper uniforms seen helping him?

4) Why has there not been an investigation into allegations that Darth Vader, the second-ranking member of the Imperial Government, is in fact the father of the pilot who allegedly destroyed the Death Star?

5) Why did Lord Vader decide to break all protocols and personally pilot a lightly armored TIE Fighter? Conveniently, this placed Lord Vader outside of the Death Star when it was destroyed, where he was also conveniently able to escape from a large-sized rebel fleet that had just routed the Imperial forces. Why would Lord Vader, one of the highest ranking members of the Imperial Government, suddenly decide to fly away from the Death Star in the middle of a battle? Did he know something that the rest of the Imperial Navy didn’t?


Emperor Palpatine fails to act
after being informed of the attack

6) How could any pilot shoot a missile into a 2 meter-wide exhaust port, let alone a pilot with no formal training, whose only claim to fame was his ability to “bullseye womprats” on Tatooine? This shot, according to one pilot, would be “impossible, even for a computer.” Yet, according to additional evidence, the pilot who allegedly fired the missile turned off his targeting computer when he was supposedly firing the shot that destroyed the Death Star. Why have these discrepancies never been investigated, let alone explained?

7) Why has their been no investigation into evidence that the droids who provided the rebels with the Death Star plans were once owned by none other than Lord Vader himself, and were found, conveniently, by the pilot who destroyed the Death Star, and who is also believed to be Lord Vader’s son? Evidence also shows that the droids were brought to one Ben Kenobi, who, records indicate, was Darth Vader’s teacher many years earlier! Are all these personal connections between the conspirators and a key figure in the Imperial government supposed to be coincidences?

8) How could a single missile destroy a battle station the size of a moon? No records, anywhere, show that any battle station or capital ship has ever been destroyed by a single missile. Furthermore, analysis of the tape of the last moments of the Death Star show numerous small explosions along its surface, prior to it exploding completely! Why does all evidence indicate that strategically placed explosives, not a single missile, is what destroyed the Death Star?



I think if you look into it Lucas, Spielberg and Kubrick were all initiates, who were given 'jokers' (free passes) to all life's needs, trained up to be a grade film makers so their skills could be used by the iilumes to produce seemless footage and promote the nwo agenda.

I think Spielberg has reconcilled this by giving away secrets in plain sight with ET and 3rd Encounters; Lucas is a bit half-way, but gave us Star Wars as the posters suggest, retelling a story he knew from his initiate training and insider knowledge ('long ago in a galaxy far far away' that always puzzled me; it is irrelevant to the story and adds nothing. Unless it is a 'clue'). And Kubrick seeded his films with sigils and clues from the illuminati all over the place - I believe out of the three Kubrick was the most wracked with guilt over the secret burdens, and gave us a big reveal in Eyes Wide Shut - a film in which he died at the end as it was in post prod and editing - was he bumped by illuminati and the film re-edited down to take out the really revealing truths?

[ambler1980]

I think if you look into it Lucas, Spielberg and Kubrick were all initiates, who were given 'jokers' (free passes) to all life's needs, trained up to be a grade film makers so their skills could be used by the iilumes to produce seemless footage and promote the nwo agenda.

I think Spielberg has reconcilled this by giving away secrets in plain sight with ET and 3rd Encounters; Lucas is a bit half-way, but gave us Star Wars as the posters suggest, retelling a story he knew from his initiate training and insider knowledge ('long ago in a galaxy far far away' that always puzzled me; it is irrelevant to the story and adds nothing. Unless it is a 'clue'). And Kubrick seeded his films with sigils and clues from the illuminati all over the place - I believe out of the three Kubrick was the most wracked with guilt over the secret burdens, and gave us a big reveal in Eyes Wide Shut - a film in which he died at the end as it was in post prod and editing - was he bumped by illuminati and the film re-edited down to take out the really revealing truths?

i'm very intrigued by this, as i was obsessed with filmmaking and those three were my heroes growing up, especially Spielberg. i moved to LA in 2000 to make movies and one day be like them.

knowing what i know now, it's almost impossible for me to even contemplate a hollywood filmmaking career without a surge of guilt, for what i know, i cannot ignore, that the world's problems are fueled by hollywood and only sanctioned filmmakers get to make movies.

that said, i'd very much like to know what you know regarding these filmmakers? i know spielberg's dad was in the military (many military kids end up famous entertainers), i know Lucas' aunt was head of the UN (some sub section), and i know Kubrick ran with Arthur C Clarke, who was a freemason (i heard Kubrick was a mason).

but one thing i can never seem to figure out is the whole story. how does this work? are we to believe the official biographies of these men, in that they were merely obsessed with filmmaking and lucked out on getting a hollywood career? why them and not the thousands of other hopefuls who are just as talented, if not moreso, but never get a shot? what is the protocol for an insider getting to be an insider...are filmmakers trained to be filmmakers by the illuminati? how deep does the rabbit hole go? no one can ever seem to give me a straight answer regarding this. can you?

[wwu777]

2001: A space odyssey - Ending - YouTube

Any idea of what the ending of "2001: A Space Odyssey" means? There are many interpretations. What about the monolith?

I heard Stanley Kubrick was an Illuminati insider, and that's why he knew about their Satanic rituals when he made the film "Eyes Wide Shut". If so, maybe he was trying to tell us something. I heard that Warner Brothers refused to release the director's version of Eyes Wide Shut because it contained 15 minutes of footage that Kubrick was not supposed to show, revealing things about the Illuminati elite that they don't want to be in the film.

Check out this deep comment that Kubrick told Playboy magazine about Gods and extraterrestrial intelligence, and how they aren't as different as you might think. It's very thought provoking and puts us in our place.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0062622/faq#.2.1.1

KUBRICK: I will say that the god concept is at the heart of 2001, but not any traditional, anthropomorphic image of god. I don't believe in any of Earth's monotheistic religions, but I do believe that one can construct an intriguing scientific definition of god. [Extraterrestrials] may have progressed from biological species, which are fragile shells for the mind at best, into immortal machine entities and then, over innumerable eons, they could emerge from the chrysalis of matter transformed into beings of pure energy and spirit. Their potentialities would be limitless and their intelligence ungraspable by humans. These beings would be gods to the billions of less advanced races in the universe, just as man would appear a god to an ant. They would be incomprehensible to us except as gods; and if the tendrils of their consciousness ever brushed men's minds, it is only the hand of god we could grasp as an explanation. Mere speculation on the possibility of their existence is sufficiently overwhelming, without trying to decipher their motives. The important point is that all the standard attributes assigned to god in our history could equally well be the characteristics of biological entities who, billions of years ago, were at a stage of development similar to man's own and evolved into something as remote from man as man is remote from the primordial ooze from which he first emerged. (Agel, The Making of Kubrick's 2001, 1970, excerpted from the Playboy interview, pp. 330-32)


If you want to see the whole film by the way, here is part 1:

2001 A Space Odyssey - Part 1/13 - YouTube

[wwu777]

Btw, what about the X-Files? Why did the Illuminati allow that to be made? Didn't it reveal a lot of their secrets?

[h2pogo]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c1IPrx-zC1Y

Any idea of what the ending of "2001: A Space Odyssey" means? There are many interpretations. What about the monolith?

I heard Stanley Kubrick was an Illuminati insider, and that's why he knew about their Satanic rituals when he made the film "Eyes Wide Shut". If so, maybe he was trying to tell us something. I heard that Warner Brothers refused to release the director's version of Eyes Wide Shut because it contained 15 minutes of footage that Kubrick was not supposed to show, revealing things about the Illuminati elite that they don't want to be in the film.

Check out this deep comment that Kubrick told Playboy magazine about Gods and extraterrestrial intelligence, and how they aren't as different as you might think. It's very thought provoking and puts us in our place.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0062622/faq#.2.1.1




If you want to see the whole film by the way, here is part 1:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2DXMVG8fo3g

If you read the book its all in there..especially the later published book with an added chapter at the beginning..

The monolith was an ET artefact..

I am sure i read an article about how George Lucas saw what is happening in the world as a warning he put in the last episode..

I will have a look for it..

[white horse]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c1IPrx-zC1Y

Any idea of what the ending of "2001: A Space Odyssey" means? There are many interpretations. What about the monolith?




Ha yes, you mean like this closing shot?

Don't suppose many people in 69 would have registered the symbology throughout the film, but this is a clear badge/stamp at the end of the film. Clear and blatant, unequivecal.

If you knwo anything about movie making at a high level, and especially the likes of Kubrick, you will know that NOTHING is left to chance in any shot - every shot is a carefully constructed tableau;

Check out the illuminati pyramid in the closing shots;

http://img203.imageshack.us/img203/5661/2001p.jpg

[nofuture]

Too funny that the idea of false flags is a conspiracy theory.

[wwu777]

There is a scene where HAL's eye has this thing rotating in it that looks like a pyramid too.

And the scene at the end showed the astronaut's eye as well, for a long time. What is so special about the Eye of Horus?

Also, in several scenes, you see the sun moving over the monolith.

See this video that highlights the Illuminati symbolism in that film.

2001 a space odyssey;unraveled(Kubrick.pt2))masonic movies - YouTube

[wwu777]

Check out this scene near the end of this clip from 2001: A Space Odyssey. You will see a planetary alignment. Why? Does this symbolize 2012?

2001 A Space Odyssey - Part 11/13 - YouTube

[triad]

There's some good info about this NWO movie. Even Bill Cooper stated that it is all about the New Man, New Race, New Order sort of propaganda. The fact that the masonaut-be-born-again at the end of the movie it pure propaganda.

Pitily, my parents did sent me to see this shit - If I could reverse time, I didn't go to see this utter SH*T again...

[shane]

Sorry if this has been mentioned already, I'm too lazy to read every post:

How about the blatant Darth Vader/Jesus parralell? Anakin had no father, it was an immaculate conception and strangely enough the actress who plays his mother also played the virgin Mary in the 1999 film "Mary, Mother of Jesus".

It seems an odd decision for Pernilla to have been cast as Anakin's mother, as this excerpt from her imdb biography explains:

Shmi Skywalker was her first English-speaking role, and at first she was reluctant to take it, fearing audiences would not be able to understand her English very well. George Lucas assured her that it would be fine, and joked that Shmi came from a Swedish-speaking part of the galaxy. This turned out to be strangely appropriate, as her on-screen son Hayden Christensen and grandson Mark Hamill both have Swedish ancestry as well.


Obviously the Emperor, being the most evil bastard in the Star Wars universe represents Satan/the Devil and so the story of Darth Vader is like Jesus being being tempted by Satan, turning REALLY bad for a while, before ultimately redeeming/sacrificing himself.

Clearly this is somewhat different from Christian teachings, in which Jesus doesn't stray from the path in any serious way, or does he?

[ambler1980]

This is old, but John Todd, former illuminati, talks about Star Wars and what it really means

Exposing Star Wars (The Force behind the film) - YouTube

[illuminat3d]

Check out this video explaining how the Star Wars Prequels show how False Flag terror attacks worked in creating a NWO dictatorship in the Star Wars Prequel Universe:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0fDUoudO7w

Article about it here (http://intellectualexpat.blogspot.com/2010/07/star-wars-prequels-depict-false-flag.html)

So I was wondering, how does Lucas know anything about False Flag Terrorism and the NWO? Has he publicly expressed a belief in them? Or does he have inside knowledge that he is trying to whistleblow to us?

Also, when he created the Death Star, was he trying to tell us that our moon is inhabited and hollow, like David Icke claims?

Does Lucas know any government secrets regarding ET's? If so, how?

I thought he was just a nerd who got lucky? I heard he was a student of mythology. But how does he know about conspiracies?


The same way you obtained your own knowledge :rolleyes:

[wwu777]

Check this out folks. In the 1985 Twilight Zone series, when the logo is forming at the beginning, you can see a Skull and Bones form, and then an Illuminati pyramid form, right before the logo says "Twilight Zone"! It's very easy to see. Look!

The Twilight Zone Episode: The After Hours (1986) - YouTube

[illuminat3d]

Check this out folks. In the 1985 Twilight Zone series, when the logo is forming at the beginning, you can see a Skull and Bones form, and then an Illuminati pyramid form, right before the logo says "Twilight Zone"! It's very easy to see. Look!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6u6UHJn6yWo

Yeah it's called the Twilight Zone,their main themes deal with the paranormal the what-ifs and the supernatural :rolleyes:

[ytch]

Yeah it's called the Twilight Zone,their main themes deal with the paranormal the what-ifs and the supernatural :rolleyes:

yeeeeah, suuuuure, that´s why....
Thanks for clearing this up for me little sheep..
;)

[meksar]

George Lucas is another N.W.O pawn and works for N.A.S.A and the N.S.A, also one of his aunts or something like that is the director of UNICEF. I have never even watched a Star Wars movie before and do not intend to anytime in the future, you do not become a major director in Hollywood without being Jewish(if your not Jewish then you have to suck up to them) and being in on the Masonic agenda for global mind control.

[wwu777]

Have any of you seen the Hollywood Insider video series about the Illuminati motifs in films? It's very educational. The common motifs, themes, plots, and colors it depicts across many different movies are too common to be dismissed as coincidences, even by skeptics. Check it out. Even conspiracy experts will learn something from it.

Here is part 1 of 8 of Hollywood Insider: Beneath the Surface

Illuminati Hollywood Insiders: Beneath the Surface 1 of 8 HD - YouTube

This one is more scary. It shows a lot of evidence from songs, films and testimonials that a lot of movie stars have, at some point, made pacts with evil entities to get to where they are. Do you think that's true?

Warning: I had trouble sleeping after watching this, so if you get frightened easily, you might not want to see this one.

Hollywood Insider - Dark Stars, Part 1 of 4

1 of 4 Dark Stars(Illuminati in Hollywood) - YouTube

Btw, why do so many celebrities and politicians make that horned devil sign with their hands publicly? (see part one above)

[white horse]

Have any of you seen the Hollywood Insider video series about the Illuminati motifs in films? It's very educational. The common motifs, themes, plots, and colors it depicts across many different movies are too common to be dismissed as coincidences, even by skeptics. Check it out. Even conspiracy experts will learn something from it.

Here is part 1 of 8 of Hollywood Insider: Beneath the Surface

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQaztNC6rXY

This one is more scary. It shows a lot of evidence from songs, films and testimonials that a lot of movie stars have, at some point, made pacts with evil entities to get to where they are. Do you think that's true?

Warning: I had trouble sleeping after watching this, so if you get frightened easily, you might not want to see this one.

Hollywood Insider - Dark Stars, Part 1 of 4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XIIFQfOVAUI

Btw, why do so many celebrities and politicians make that horned devil sign with their hands publicly? (see part one above)

Thanks for these vids... it's sometimes diificult to find good info these days - you have to wade thru so much crap!