PDA

View Full Version : Question


bigdomvegas
14-07-2010, 04:52 AM
The Powers That Be (PTB) with all their power, control, and devices...........

My question is............if they have all this power, why did they have to even create 9/11? Why not take the approach, again, with all their power, "we're the PTB and we are going to do whatever we want". Meaning, why didnt GWB just hold a press conference saying, "yeah, we think Afghanistan and Iraq are up to something and we have intelligence that says so, but we cant tell you about that, but um yeah, we're going to war". Basically say, "f you, we'll do what we want".

Why go through all that they had to plan and carry out on 9/11? It would have been easier to do what they want and not explain shit. What do they care? They have this power, right?

I thought of this question before putting on this website. Mostly because I am afraid of how many people are going to rip on me and call me an idiot. So........I guess my answers are................withouth 9/11, it would have been harder to pass the Patriot Act?? Not really though.......could have just had GWB at that press conference above say, "and to protect ourselves here, we need to pass this and that". Honestly, who the hell could and would stop him/them/PTB?

But I guess the biggest reason is........the international community, UN, or who the hell ever, wouldn't allow the above scenario. I guess we can't just storm a country for no reason, hence the fakery of 9/11. Would you agree this is the biggest reason??????
For the record, my opinion:
Doubt planes hit the building
If planes hit the buildings, they were remote controlled
The idea that some chumps with limited training did this is BEYOND STUPID

Buildings could not fall as they did without some sort of help.

No plane hit the Pentagon.

stannrodd
14-07-2010, 10:00 AM
For the record, my opinion:
Doubt planes hit the building

On the record .. OK

Have you anything you would like to contribute to The No Plane Theory Thread

Click here ..

No Plane "theory" .. ? (http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=119162)

But please expand on your other views re 9/11 HERE !!

Stann

dave52
14-07-2010, 10:41 AM
We the people are easier to control if we live in fear. Since the fall of the iron curtain and the end of communism as a "threat" to our freedom, a new bogeyman was required.

So, now we have radical islam, the big pariah threatening to ruin our western lives.

As for 9/11, nothing gets our attention more than a big action thriller.

ultima1
14-07-2010, 01:40 PM
We the people are easier to control if we live in fear. Since the fall of the iron curtain and the end of communism as a "threat" to our freedom, a new bogeyman was required.

So, now we have radical islam, the big pariah threatening to ruin our western lives.

As for 9/11, nothing gets our attention more than a big action thriller.

Take a look at this UN ad that was never aired becasue it was too graphic for Americen parents.

Stop land mines - YouTube

This would cause a lot or fear and panic if a terrorist was blamed for this.

dave52
14-07-2010, 02:07 PM
Er thanks.... pretty irrelavant but thanks.

Probably not aired because the military industrial complex makes a lot of money out of landmines.

ultima1
15-07-2010, 08:36 AM
Er thanks.... pretty irrelavant but thanks.

Probably not aired because the military industrial complex makes a lot of money out of landmines.

No, it was not aired because most TV stations would not air it. It was too graphic for American public.

But it is relavant due to the fact it would cause panic and terror if done or threatened by a terrorist.

http://theinspirationroom.com/daily/2005/landmines-clearance/
It’s an emotive ad, so emotive that some networks in the United States have chosen not to show it.

throatyogurt
15-07-2010, 10:54 AM
Take a look at this UN ad that was never aired becasue it was too graphic for Americen parents.



This would cause a lot or fear and panic if a terrorist was blamed for this.

American. Only 1 E in American, Roger.

It's wasn't the parents that thought it was too graphic, it was the networks.

ultima1
15-07-2010, 11:31 AM
It's wasn't the parents that thought it was too graphic, it was the networks.

The networks (who have people that are parents) would not show it because its too graphic.

throatyogurt
16-07-2010, 02:22 PM
The networks (who have people that are parents) would not show it because its too graphic.

You are a beacon of intellilgence, Roger. You should work for NASA!

truegroup
16-07-2010, 02:26 PM
You are a beacon of intellilgence, Roger. You should work for NASA!

It's not good form to point out a person's spelling mistakes. Particularly if you then make one yourself.

ultima1
16-07-2010, 03:09 PM
It's not good form to point out a person's spelling mistakes. Particularly if you then make one yourself.

People like him have to go after spelling because they cannot debate with facts.