Let us concentrate on what we agree on?

[bennett211085]

It seems like all the arguments on here are caused over te most trivial of comments. Cant we all grow up and see that there is nothing to argue about? We are all one and the same after all, are we not?

[bennett211085]

The whole mentality of argueing and name calling just goes to show the mind control that is at work on every single one of us, including me.
It is time we stopped, because it is just evidence that we have really learnt nothing.

-divide and conquer- :confused:

[Anders Lindman]

Too much consensus will only reinforce the social hive-mind, which consists of, not our own ideas but ideas implanted into us by think tanks.

Someone said: If all people agree on something you can be sure it's wrong. :D

[lilly555]

since we are part of oneness/all that is...why does it matter at all whether or not we argue or namecall?

[bennett211085]

Theres a difference between a rational debate where everyones oppinion is respected and down right fights and flame wars. If you cant say anything nice, say nothing at all?

[Anders Lindman]

A good trick to use is to ask oneself: Am I really sure about my own ideas? What if they are on partially true?

[bennett211085]

You got to look at it like this:

Any freemason or illuminati member who reads this forum will just sit back and laugh their tits off at how childish we all are and what a great job they have done of warping our minds at every turn??

[auron]

It seems like all the arguments on here are caused over te most trivial of comments. Cant we all grow up and see that there is nothing to argue about? We are all one and the same after all, are we not?
I agree mate!

We are evolving ideas. There will be squabbles amongst those ideas, because we are evolving too!

The forum as i see it is in it's infancy. Give it time, and we will see a much better place, as more and more people are waking up to what's going on in the world.

This is the place to be, when the shit hits the fan. People are going to be wanting to know what the fuck is going on.

As a group, we will be able to help them understand, and offer solutions.

:)

[strider]

This is the place to be, when the shit hits the fan. People are going to be wanting to know what the fuck is going on.

As a group, we will be able to help them understand, and offer solutions.

:)

:D

[lilly555]

You got to look at it like this:

Any freemason or illuminati member who reads this forum will just sit back and laugh their tits off at how childish we all are and what a great job they have done of warping our minds at every turn??so? i think that this "somthing else must be done..or something should change is fear based and is in itself trapped in thought.

[auron]

So lets concentrate on the job at hand:

Freedom!!

[graflok]

Cant we all grow up and see that there is nothing to argue about?

I disagree. :p

[lilly555]

I disagree. :p

Finally a rational and logical post. :D:p

[Anders Lindman]

You got to look at it like this:

Any freemason or illuminati member who reads this forum will just sit back and laugh their tits off at how childish we all are and what a great job they have done of warping our minds at every turn??

That's why it's important to be skeptical about one's own ideas, because 99% of them have probably been implanted into us.

But one has to stand firm in one's beliefs. At least until they can be replaced with a better understanding. Let's say that I say that the death penalty is wrong. Then someone may tell me: You are wrong, the death penalty is a good thing. Then when I ask why he or she can say something like: "By killing the bad guys, only the good people will be left" And then I will ask: "Isn't that eugenics?"

[bennett211085]

There will always be that which we all dissagree on, but we will never get anywhere if we just lable someone as a person who posts shit (even if they do) because once you have done that, even when they post something reasonable or even interesting you will just see the poster and read it like its a pile of shit. :confused:

[lilly555]

True I do that with Pheobe and Damagedbriann. :o

[bennett211085]

Is it not the stereotyping and lableing of others that keeps us from getting our message across to others because they can file us as paranoid or mental??

[lilly555]

Is it not the stereotyping and lableing of others that keeps us from getting our message across to others because they can file us as paranoid or mental??

hmm good point it is indeed

[Anders Lindman]

There will always be that which we all dissagree on, but we will never get anywhere if we just lable someone as a person who posts shit (even if they do) because once you have done that, even when they post something reasonable or even interesting you will just see the poster and read it like its a pile of shit. :confused:

I think it's better to attack ideas and not people, but of course that is difficult because most people, including myself in many ways, are so attached to their ideas so that an attack on those ideas is seen as an attack on the person him- or herself.

[bennett211085]

I think it's better to attack ideas and not people, but of course that is difficult because most people, including myself in many ways, are so attached to their ideas so that an attack on those ideas is seen as an attack on the person him- or herself.

Yes, that seems to be the course of the problem. Maybe people should not try to attack an idea but mearly challenge it, in a respectful way?? :confused:

[matrixcutter]

If I wanted to spread disinformation, and stop people criticising the disinformation or even disagreeing with it, I would keep saying "why can't we focus on what we agree on?" over and over and over and over again.

[bennett211085]

If I wanted to spread disinformation, and stop people criticising the disinformation or even disagreeing with it, I would keep saying "why can't we focus on what we agree on?" over and over and over and over again.

I'm just saying there is no need to single people out and side with others. :confused:

[matrixcutter]

I'm just saying there is no need to single people out and side with others. :confused:
And I'm just saying that if I wanted to suppress disagreement with disinformation that I wanted to promote, I would keep encouraging the idea that we should not express disagreement, ever, and that those who do should be ashamed of themselves, and feel guilty about it.

[bennett211085]

And I'm just saying that if I wanted to suppress disagreement with disinformation that I wanted to promote, I would keep encouraging the idea that we should not express disagreement, ever, and that those who do should be ashamed of themselves, and feel guilty about it.

Its when it becomes down right name calling and insults that its not really very productive is it dude?

[matrixcutter]

Its when it becomes down right name calling and insults that its not really very productive is it dude?
No, that's not productive.

[bennett211085]

OK OK, I'll rename the thread, "Can we agree to disagree, (without insults)"

EDIT: cant rename threads anyway. lol

[matrixcutter]

OK OK, I'll rename the thread, "Can we agree to disagree, (without insults)"
What if people are not ready to agree to disagree?

[phoebe]

To realise what you ARE
You must first realise what you ARE NOT.

[bennett211085]

To realise what you ARE
You must first realise what you ARE NOT.

Explain?. (I'm a bit dim) :D

[dondaz]

Any freemason or illuminati member who reads this forum will just sit back and laugh their tits off at how childish we all are and what a great job they have done of warping our minds at every turn??

That's it. Tiswas has joined phoebe and braindamage in my invisble ignor list!

[bennett211085]

I can admit sometimes I talk utter shite, but I least I'm aware of it.

[dondaz]

Come on Matrixcutter, with your brains you could debate anything anytime, how about some solutions, I'm sure you have a few?

[graflok]

There will always be that which we all dissagree on

I don't think that's true.

[bennett211085]

I don't think that's true.

Actually I think you could be correct there. ;)

[jim fear]

It would be agreeable to agree to disagree; if agreeing is disagreeable then agreeing to disagree is perfectly agreeable degree of the agreement made to the prior disagreement. Agree?

[bennett211085]

It would be agreeable to agree to disagree; if agreeing is disagreeable then agreeing to disagree is perfectly agreeable degree of the agreement made to the prior disagreement. Agree?

here here :D

[matrixcutter]

Come on Matrixcutter, with your brains you could debate anything anytime, how about some solutions, I'm sure you have a few?
Solutions to what?
(I already posted this but it didn't work for some reason.)

[malvern]

ref NWO attack:mad:

[auron]

It would be agreeable to agree to disagree; if agreeing is disagreeable then agreeing to disagree is perfectly agreeable degree of the agreement made to the prior disagreement. Agree?
Fantastic! :D:D:D

[lilly555]

Fantastic! :D:D:D


actually i disagree with you:p

[graflok]

It would be agreeable to agree to disagree; if agreeing is disagreeable then agreeing to disagree is perfectly agreeable degree of the agreement made to the prior disagreement. Agree?

I don't disagree but, non-disagreement isn't the same as disagreement or misagreement or, of course, mis-non-disagreement.

[punjabibeard]

i can satisfyingly and nobely announce that i agree on my poop being a healthy brown colour :)

[steevo]

I don't disagree but, non-disagreement isn't the same as disagreement or misagreement or, of couse, mis-non-disagreement.

Thanks for clarifying that :D

[auron]

actually i disagree with you:p

Yes, but by disagreeing, you are agreeing to disagree on something that is agreeable only amongst the people that agree to disagree on such issues of disagreement amongst disagreeable agreers.

[steevo]

LMAO this thread is great :D