Brixton/Soho Bombings False Flag?

[joyful]

Does anyone have any clues if these were inside jobs or not?

http://img125.imageshack.us/img125/422/nailbomb256x256wv1.jpg

[dondaz]

Wasn't that the twat who blew up gay bars?

[eternal_spirit]

Israel's Mossad
http://judicial-inc.biz/False_15.jpg
Black Ops and False Flags

http://judicial-inc.biz/False_Flags_summary.htm

These seem to be the ones behind many false flags, including the London fiasco.

[eternal_spirit]

http://judicial-inc.biz/False_31.jpg
2005
Mossad bombed (http://judicial-inc.biz/London_bus.htm)London buses

The general public is so suspicious, that Israel leaders have been told not to talk publicly. The news media pushes the story it was Al Quada Pakistani bombers.
.......................



This is from the same page.

[joyful]

This photo from the Guardian website called 'The Crucial Picture' and a 'videograb' looks as if the bomber has been painted in.

http://img102.imageshack.us/img102/3991/photograbam1.jpg

http://www.guardian.co.uk/documentaries/galleryguide/0,,338363,00.html

The crucial picture
This videograb from close circuit TV in Brixton shows Copeland (circled) before the first explosion. When it was published, a work colleague identified him to the police - too late to prevent Copeland planting his final bomb.

[joyful]

Considering David Copeland was a neo-nazi and member of the National Socialist Movement, who was 'obsessed with Hitler' and had Nazi flags hanging on his wall, it's very odd he bombed Black, Muslim and Gay areas but not a Jewish area, of which in London are plenty.

Copelands bedroom:
http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/7918/42633095copelandbed203ey7.jpg

[ennui]

Looks like he's been painted in how? The colour, the definition, the perpective are all spot on. The only odd thing I can see is that the railing immediately behind him is bent, but I'd have to see the railing to know if it's bend in real life and even if it weren't you have to remember that this is a still from a video tape. Could the tape be distorted?

Nice theory, but to my mind this is just some nutcase who didn't like black and gays.

I'm willing to have my mind changed if anyone has any other information on this though.

[ennui]

I know about the judical website.

Considering David Copeland was a neo-nazi and member of the National Socialist Movement, who was 'obsessed with Hitler' and had Nazi flags hanging on his wall, it's very odd he bombed Black, Muslim and Gay areas but not a Jewish area, of which in London are plenty.

Copelands bedroom:
http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/7918/42633095copelandbed203ey7.jpg

Perhaps his dislike of blacks and gays pre-dated his joining the nazis. Perhaps he joined them to somehow validate his own prejudice.

[joyful]

This article published in Green Anarchist issue 63, Summer 2001
http://website.lineone.net/~grandlaf/Cope.htm

THE DAVID COPELAND CASE

Notes From the Borderland, the para-political magazine edited by Larry O'Hara continues to fluorish. In issue 3, Autumn 2000, pp 14-38, in perhaps the best NFTB article yet, Larry looks at the Copeland fascist bag bomber case of April 1999, where Brixton (17th), Brick Lane (24th), and Soho (30th) were bombed. We should not forget that during this 79 people were injured, and three people were killed; John Light, Nick Moore and Andrea Dykes. Below is a summary of this article. For the mag itself, send £3 (Cheques to 'Larry O'Hara') to BM 4769, London WC1N 3XX.

That David Copeland is responsible for the April 1999 fascist bag bombings is not in doubt, but did he act alone, as the state and tame media claim? There are many unresolved issues, and if anything, his trial only served to raise more questions. What was the role of the state or security services in this? Three key questions about the Copeland case need to be asked and answered:

(1) Why did it take 12 days for the Brixton picture of Copeland to be released?
(2) If Copeland acted alone, how did MI5 know that gays would be the target, at Soho?
(3) Searchlight's false claim they identified Copeland by Friday lunch time confirms at best they are liars and at worst they are in collusion.

(1) WHY DID IT TAKE 12 DAYS FOR THE BRIXTON CCTV PICTURE TO BE RELEASED?

The fact there are two pictures, one taken inside the Iceland store and the other outside, clouds the issue. The police claim footage had to be sent to the USA does not account for the delay, as the picture eventually used was not image enhanced. Compare with the Harrods bombing case in 1993, where again MI5 delayed publication of pictures. Often, when pictures are released, identification quickly follows, as it did in the Harrods case, and also with Copeland. The delay is deliberate, to allow the bomber to run his course (so boosting security service interests). More bodies = more budget. There are various issues around 'missing' or not shown CCTV footage - who did Copeland meet in the pub prior to the attack, who did he telephone outside the hotel? Was he followed from Brick Lane to Soho? Also mysterious is the relationship, (if any) between Copeland and the series of 'White Wolves' communiques.

(2) HOW DID MI5 KNOW THAT GAYS WOULD BE THE NEXT TARGET, IF COPELAND TRULY WAS ACTING ALONE?

Before the Soho blast, David Northmore of the Pink Paper revealed that gays could be next, according to an MI5 ('Home Office') alert. After the bomb, he back-pedalled, denying the Pink Paper had been tipped off, and also running a blatantly pro MI5 plug. Northmore also rang Larry O'Hara on a trawl. The Admiral Duncan pub was one of only four venues visited by the police before the attack. Supt. Phil Flower admitted the visit was a response to intelligence received. But if so, from where? Duncan Lustig-Prean (of gays in the armed forces campaign 'Rank Outsiders') admitted MI5 also tipped his group off, and Prean then went on to to warn other gay groups. Thus there is some evidence for foreknowledge.

Foreknowledge could be explained by (a) Mind Control - but there is no evidence for this. (2) Perhaps another member of Copeland's cell informed on him? - a possible explanation. (3) By the provocateur thesis, easily favourite, where Copeland was primed by a state or possibly a Searchlight asset.

The provocateur hypothesis might be shown up by plotting Copeland's BNP and NSM (National Socialist Movement, a Combat 18 splinter group) political trajectory.

In this, Searchlight pointing the finger at BNP fascists like Lecomber and Barnaby Ore, and NSM fuhrer (ex?) David Myatt can be understood as a smokescreen to obscure Copeland's real contacts with a Searchlight / or state provocateur.

(3) SEARCHLIGHT'S FALSE CLAIM THEY IDENTIFIED COPELAND BY FRIDAY LUNCHTIME

Copeland was supposedly well known to a BNP Searchlight agent 'Arthur'. Together, they attacked Politicos bookshop in Victoria. Copeland was photographed next to BNP fuhrer John Tyndall at Stratford in 1997, when Tyndall was attacked and injured by anti-fascists.

Once the Brixton picture was released to the public (Thursday), Searchlight waited a whole 24 hours before supposedly naming Copeland as the bomber to the Special Branch. If this 24 hours had not been wasted, Copeland could have been arrested at his house in Cove, near Farnborough, and the fatal Soho bomb averted.

Searchlight's supposed 'identification' came as a hand written amendment to a list of 260 other names faxed at 2 pm on the Friday. The other 260 names are then disregarded in Searchlight self-publicity. Subsequently, the list becomes 500. Curiouser and curiouser....

That the name of Copeland was written in as an afterthought, points up Searchlight's role as an information laundry for the security servies. That the state wanted Copeland highlighted five hours before Soho, but not in a way that would get him stopped, shows that the state knew who the bomber was. Why at 2 pm on the Friday and not before? The names being faxed to Special Branch rather than the SO 13 group is related to post-bombing positioning for publicity wars and inter-departmental in-fighting.

WHITE WOLVES

In so far as Copeland was linked to the NSM he would be antagonistic towards their rivals, C18. But what of the relationship between Copeland and the 'White Wolves' communiques? - These were a series of stencilled messages, claiming the bombings, sent to newspapers and Black rights groups, complete with the codeword 'Nemesis'. Is there a relationship of common authorship, organizational ties, or ideology between these and the White Wolves document circulated among fascists in Yorkshire circa 1993-94?

One possible explanation of the original White Wolves document is that it was produced by the state as a distractor ploy in the period post Derek Beackon's 1993 much opposed BNP Isle of Dogs election victory.

In Searchlight, David Myatt was blamed for the White Wolves document. Some of the features indicate this is possible but other features (eg Nationalism) contradict this. Del O' Connor is a name put in the frame by the communiques, but is understood to have been out of the country during the bombing period.

Copeland claimed he acted alone, and was careless over things like ordering bomb materials via the post, and keeping materials at home. He disregarded the advice of the 'White Wolves' booklet in key aspects, and later claimed never to have heard of the White Wolves. 'The Turner Diaries' are more likely to have been his inspiration, or another book by veteran US Nazi William Pierce, titled 'Hunter'.

UNANSWERED

There are many other unanswered questions. Did Copeland have links with Aldershot squaddies, eg 'Anthony', some other fascist he went stickering with? Did he go to Poland for military training? How does the previously media-hyped / subsequently 'vanished' neo-Nazi cell in Hampshire fit into the story? What about the police chase and White Wolves communique in Mansfield? What is the significance of the stopped Waterloo - Woking train and the mystery third man arrested? Who exactly were the provocateurs, and what about 'Agent Arthur'? If he did not act alone, then the 'official version' collapses. How do we account for MI5 foreknowledge? Why was Copeland allowed to run?

COMPLICIT?

What about the various state gangs operating in this murky field? Larry O' Hara makes particular comments about each of them.

Special Branch need to be criticised for being unable to stop Copeland. They have been soft on the NSM, and there is evidence they were the ones who launched the Del O'Connor = White Wolves red herring.

The anti-terrorist squad deserve criticism for occupying Brixton after the first bomb and ignoring Brick Lane. They suppressed the Brixton CCTV footage for 12 days. Despite their immediate disclaimer after his arrest, how could they know Copeland was not involved in any of the fascist groups who claimed the attacks?

CO24, the post Macpherson Report anti-racist / violent crimes unit was not at the scene. Grieve was probably warned off by MI5. Perhaps they were the 'trusted' intermediary through whom the state laundered the 260 + 1 list.

MI5 had foreknowledge. Given they knew who Copeland was the moment they received the Brixton CCTV footage, they allowed him out on a long leash to service their own agenda. Cameras, infiltrators, agent provocateurs and more alphabet soup reich agencies do not make the world safer, in fact they make things much more dangerous. Welcome to the Strategy of Tension....

[joyful]

Looks like he's been painted in how?

The fact the bottom half of his body is missing.

[eternal_spirit]

Yes like if he was a Neo Nazi why didn't he go blow up the Jewish bankers?
And if anyone believes that these Neo Nazis are everywhere. Where are all the suffering Jews? I'll brb with another interesting false flag link to prove my point.

[ennui]

The fact the bottom half of his body is missing.

Oh yes. To me that just looks like the top of a bus shelter though.

[eternal_spirit]

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=10402

[joyful]

This was reported in the Daily Express 9 weeks before the bombings:

Daily Express
London, February 8, 1999

MI5 act to smash race gangs
Secret service teams up with Yard to combat Far Right thugs

http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Congress/7727/mi5logo.gif

EXCLUSIVE BY HAL AUSTIN AND IAN GALLAGHER

SCOTLAND Yard and MI5 are planning a huge covert operation to break up violent racist organisations. The Express has learned that Intelligence officers will infiltrate Far Right groups such as the British National Party.

Other officers will tap telephones, open mail, and scrutinise bank accounts and medical records. "We plan to close down these organisations by using every administrative device available to us," said a Yard source.

"These may include tax and VAT details, local authority planning infringements and breaches of charity regulations. You must remember that Al Capone was brought down by the American Inland Revenue -- not the FBI. At the end of the day we will know everything about the people in these groups, more than they know themselves."

The operation is being masterminded by Deputy Assistant Commissioner John Grieve, head of the new Metropolitan Police race crime unit. He will work closely with the security services and the Yard's criminal intelligence unit.

Officers plan to apply the skills successfully used by the security services and the anti-terrorist squad against the IRA and Middle East bombers In London.

Mr Grieve, former head of the anti-terrorist squad, is aiming to build comprehensive computer files on the country's active racists and their relatives and associates.

"He will be using all his skills and techniques used against the IRA in the fight against the racial terrorists polluting our inner cities," said the source.

The files will detail racist groups' views and the extent to which they will use violence. It will also include a list of non-active supporters in key Government and local authority departments who are prepared to pass on vital information. The ultimate intention is to bring a series of criminal charges against the ringleaders of racist organisations and the thugs who follow them.

"If it works, and there is no reason why not, it will mark a sea change in the way subversive organisations are policed in this country," said a senior detective.

Mr Grieve will draw on the resources of the National Criminal Intelligence Service, Department of Social Security, Inland Revenue, immigration organisation and Customs. Benefits agencies, local authorities, British Telecom, credit agencies, schools and other educational institutions will also be involved. Detectives will monitor some suspects if they go abroad.

"If anyone can get to the bottom of the menace of racial violence and attacks, then John Grieve can," said a source close to the new unit.