Aircraft parts left from most crashes

[ultima1]

Below is a photo of what a crash scene should look like that is being investivgated. This was not done at either the Pentagon or Shankesville site.

http://i114.photobucket.com/albums/n268/phixer6/911/concorde.jpg?t=1278310974

[throatyogurt]

Below is a photo of what a crash scene should look like that is being investivgated. This was not done at either the Pentagon or Shankesville site.
]

Hello Roger.... as usual you are clueless regarding the investigations surrounding 9/11. As usual, your spelling is atrocious. (there is only one V in investigated)

Here is a crash scene that involved a large plane that looks NOTHING like your posted picture:

http://i121.photobucket.com/albums/o233/CameronFox/flight1771.jpg

[policestate]

Hello Roger.... as usual you are clueless regarding the investigations surrounding 9/11. As usual, your spelling is atrocious. (there is only one V in investigated)

Here is a crash scene that involved a large plane that looks NOTHING like your posted picture:


That's a little harsh.. how do you know ultima1?

[apollo_gnomon]

He gets around. At some point on most forums he posts scans of his "credentials." Then he eventually gets banned for insults, trolling, making unsupported comments, repeating posts, and not responding to the posts of others.....

.... I don't expect him to get banned here, as that sort of behavior seems more the norm here than the exception.

[policestate]

ha. that sums up this 9/11 forum. :)

[truegroup]

That's a little harsh.. how do you know ultima1?

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread378018/pg1

First example I could find.

[throatyogurt]

He gets around. At some point on most forums he posts scans of his "credentials." Then he eventually gets banned for insults, trolling, making unsupported comments, repeating posts, and not responding to the posts of others.....

.... I don't expect him to get banned here, as that sort of behavior seems more the norm here than the exception.

Yes, Roger Misner has been around 9/11 Forums for years. He will follow all the above mentioned tactics. He is typically laughed at by both debunkers and truthers.

He has accused the company he allegedly works for (NSA) as being part of the massive cover-up in his 9/11 fantasy. I personally reported him to the NSA Security VIA telephone calls with several personnel at the NSA Headquarters. Roger disappeared for a brief time, only to return in his same old fashion.

[ultima1]

Yes, Roger Misner has been around 9/11 Forums for years. He will follow all the above mentioned tactics. He is typically laughed at by both debunkers and truthers. .

Yes, its just too bad no one can debate me with actual evdience, they have to resort to other things to try to get me banned.

[ultima1]

As usual, your spelling is atrocious. (there is only one V in investigated)

As usual you have to resort to goping after spelling becaue you cannot debate the facts and evidence i post.

[ultima1]

Still waiting for actual photos (with sources) of parts from the planes that supposidly crashed at Pentagon and Shankesville.

[ultima1]

He gets around. At some point on most forums he posts scans of his "credentials." Then he eventually gets banned for insults, trolling, making unsupported comments, repeating posts, and not responding to the posts of others.....
.

Funuy how people who beleive the official story can insult me and not get banned but as soon as i say something back to them i get banned.

I have been banned from forums becasue the mods could not handle that i could post facts and evidence that show reasonable doubt in the official story.

[apollo_gnomon]

I'm sorry.

A user chewed me out in another thread for being disruptive to the forum. I withdraw the comment quoted above.

[stannrodd]

Thread topic seems irrelevant .. just another venue for shit slinging.

Stann:)

[ultima1]

Thread topic seems irrelevant .. just another venue for shit slinging.

Well it is relevant for finding out the truth if their were parts left behind by planes, and what planes they were.

[throatyogurt]

Well it is relevant for finding out the truth if their were parts left behind by planes, and what planes they were.

Roger, I debated you two years ago on a CONSPIRACY THEORY website. The mods there stated that I won. That should tell you something!

[ultima1]

Roger, I debated you two years ago on a CONSPIRACY THEORY website. The mods there stated that I won. That should tell you something!

NO you did not debate me with any real evidence. I can post evdience to support what i post,, you cannot.

You did not win, i was banned by mods with a bias towards anyone seeking the truth. I have e-mailes from the mods who show that they were bias for the official story.

By the way the only conspiracy theory is the official story since it is based on a conspiracy.

[throatyogurt]

NO you did not debate me with any real evidence. I can post evdience to support what i post,, you cannot.

You did not win, i was banned by mods with a bias towards anyone seeking the truth. I have e-mailes from the mods who show that they were bias for the official story.

By the way the only conspiracy theory is the official story since it is based on a conspiracy.

Excuse me?

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread378018/pg1

You were not banned. You completed the debate and got your ass handed to you.

[ultima1]

Excuse me?

Stop being dishonest.

You cannot post any real evidence to support the official story, its been proven time and time again.

Stop being dishonest.

[throatyogurt]

Stop being dishonest.

You cannot post any real evidence to support the official story, its been proven time and time again.

Stop being dishonest.

Did we have a moderated debate 2 years ago? (yes)

Was it at Above Top Secret? (yes)

Where we both given several opportunities to state our cases with evidence? (yes)

Was I found the victor of the debate? (yes)

So, who is being dishonest here?

[ultima1]

Did we have a moderated debate 2 years ago? (yes)

So, who is being dishonest here?

Yes we did, but you did not win by posting facts and evidence.

Becasue anoyone with a basic IQ knows that most of the evidence and official reports have not been released.

So anyone stating that they know what happned is being very dishonest.

[ellis_deatrip]

I read it (linked above),the mods pretty much concluded that both of you sucked. :D

[throatyogurt]

I read it (linked above),the mods pretty much concluded that both of you sucked. :D

Agreed.... but i sucked less! :p

[ellis_deatrip]

Agreed.... but i sucked less! :p
Fair enough.... carry on.:cool:

[ultima1]

Fair enough.... carry on.:cool:

But more and more evidence has come out that shows reasonable dount in the official story.

[ellis_deatrip]

But more and more evidence has come out that shows reasonable dount in the official story.
I'm sure you mean "doubt", but "donut" would work there too. :D

I never have(since day one),and never will believe any "official story". Too many "officials" involved for any media or Alphabet agency to be reliable.

[onourway]

I'm sure you mean "doubt", but "donut" would work there too. :D

I never have(since day one),and never will believe any "official story". Too many "officials" involved for any media or Alphabet agency to be reliable.

well hadabusa just posted "the bacon of truth" in another thread so I guess a "reasonable donut" works too.

btw after all this time I finally caught on to your username ellis.

[ellis_deatrip]

....

btw, after all this time I finally caught on to your username ellis.
:D:D:DHAHAA , OnOur-NOWay, really? Guess It's called Dope for a reason, eh? JusKidd'n...
:eek: It was just "Hidden in Plain Sight" ;)

*BTW, I get confused with the multiple Onourways, I think. Isn't there also one with a '2012' at the end?and that '2012' part had me confusing it with that '2013' guy when I first started hanging out here....

[onourway]

:D:D:DHAHAA , OnOur-NOWay, really? Guess It's called Dope for a reason, eh? JusKidd'n...
:eek: It was just "Hidden in Plain Sight" ;)

*BTW, I get confused with the multiple Onourways, I think. Isn't there also one with a '2012' at the end?and that '2012' part had me confusing it with that '2013' guy when I first started hanging out here....

hahaha....I'm 2012.....my firefox died and I lost my password that I couldn't remember and blah blah blah....... but yeah.....reasonable donuts and the bacon of truth!

[ultima1]

I never have(since day one),and never will believe any "official story". Too many "officials" involved for any media or Alphabet agency to be reliable.

Too many holes in the official story.

Also the fact that we cannot get access to infomration even with FOIA requests.